The NY Times weighs in

by John Cole| February 18, 20021:40 am| Leave a Comment

The NY Times weighs in on the two versions of the farm bill:

The House and the Senate have now passed differing farm bills that preserve many of the worst features of the old subsidies. Yet for a host of reasons the Senate bill is far superior.

Any wild guesses which bill spends more money?

« It seems American companies are

Th NY Times is chock »

Comments are closed.

They’re not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

Republicans are radicals, not conservatives.

Let’s finish the job.

I did not have this on my fuck 2022 bingo card.

I’d hate to be the candidate who lost to this guy.

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

Perhaps you mistook them for somebody who gives a damn.

Not so fun when the rabbit gets the gun, is it?

The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.

This fight is for everything.

I’m pretty sure there’s only one Jack Smith.

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

Today’s GOP: why go just far enough when too far is right there?

A sufficient plurality of insane, greedy people can tank any democratic system ever devised, apparently.

Nothing worth doing is easy.

A democracy can’t function when people can’t distinguish facts from lies.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

This year has been the longest three days of putin’s life.

I was promised a recession.

If you are still in the GOP, you are an extremist.

A last alliance of elves and men. also pet photos.

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

Fuck these fucking interesting times.

The NY Times weighs in