Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

The poor and middle-class pay taxes, the rich pay accountants, the wealthy pay politicians.

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Not so fun when the rabbit gets the gun, is it?

White supremacy is terrorism.

The cruelty is the point; the law be damned.

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

“A king is only a king if we bow down.” – Rev. William Barber

“I was told there would be no fact checking.”

These days, even the boring Republicans are nuts.

Every decision we make has lots of baggage with it, known or unknown.

If you can’t control your emotions, someone else will.

He seems like a smart guy, but JFC, what a dick!

There are more Russians standing up to Putin than Republicans.

Conservatism: there are people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

The rest of the comments were smacking Boebert like she was a piñata.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires.

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

Books are my comfort food!

This isn’t Democrats spending madly. This is government catching up.

Consistently wrong since 2002

Quote tweet friends, screenshot enemies.

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

🎶 Those boots were made for mockin’ 🎵

Come on, media. you have one job. start doing it.

You are here: Home / Politics / Media / In Case you Missed It

In Case you Missed It

by | 2 Comments

This post is in: 

The Guardian has retracted the Wolfowitz story and issued a correction. Unhinged liberals can return to the usual rhetoric about Republicans starving poor people and children:

Paul Wolfowitz

A report which was posted on our website on June 4 under the heading “Wolfowitz: Iraq war was about oil” misconstrued remarks made by the US deputy defence secretary, Paul Wolfowitz, making it appear that he had said that oil was the main reason for going to war in Iraq. He did not say that. He said, according to the department of defence website, “The … difference between North Korea and Iraq is that we had virtually no economic options with Iraq because the country floats on a sea of oil. In the case of North Korea, the country is teetering on the edge of economic collapse and that I believe is a major point of leverage whereas the military picture with North Korea is very different from that with Iraq.” The sense was clearly that the US had no economic options by means of which to achieve its objectives, not that the economic value of the oil motivated the war. The report appeared only on the website and has now been removed.

Reader Interactions

2Comments

  1. 1.

    Cautionary Tale

    Can there be any doubt that our diligent bloggers are compelling the “mainstream” media types to start governing their tendencies to suborn fact to ideology? Hurrah! I only hope that more of the mass of middling voters, whose political opinions and actions rest not on reflection but inertia, will be moved to question the leftist dogmas they receive in print and on television–and to turn away from these passive media and to become more active citizens on the internet. DeTocqueville would approve.

  2. 2.

    Sal

    Thankfully they carrected the error, now if we can the Moonie Times to start doing that, we will have something. Maybe Moon’s propaganda rag could start by correcting the lie they printed about AF1 being trashed. Did anyone see that? It sure had the puppets jumping up and down hating Clinton a little extra. They all knew it HAD to be true because they are trained not to question but act. Pavlov would be proud of conservatives.

Comments are closed.