• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

The GOP couldn’t organize an orgy in a whorehouse with a fist full of 50s.

I was promised a recession.

A last alliance of elves and men. also pet photos.

White supremacy is terrorism.

“woke” is the new caravan.

We still have time to mess this up!

“I never thought they’d lock HIM up,” sobbed a distraught member of the Lock Her Up Party.

Fuck the extremist election deniers. What’s money for if not for keeping them out of office?

Balloon Juice has never been a refuge for the linguistically delicate.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

Our job is not to persuade republicans but to defeat them.

Let’s finish the job.

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

When someone says they “love freedom”, rest assured they don’t mean yours.

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

We are aware of all internet traditions.

Why is it so hard for them to condemn hate?

“What are Republicans afraid of?” Everything.

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

Yeah, with this crowd one never knows.

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

This blog will pay for itself.

Republicans can’t even be trusted with their own money.

Everybody saw this coming.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Urain’tium

Urain’tium

by John Cole|  July 16, 20032:07 pm| 4 Comments

This post is in: General Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

If anyone has been found to be a liar regarding this whole uranium non-scandal, it is me, because I proclaimed I wasn’t going to talk about this anymore and then promptly posted 5 pieces on it. Here is one more to complete the package.

At any rate, Kevin Drum, in the comments section of this post regarding Ken Pollack’s pre-war predictions regarding the Iraqi WMD programs (and more specifically, the nuclear capabilities), states the following:

I don’t think Pollack is a liar. I think he truthfully reported the consensus of the intelligence community, which matches what Tenet said about the NIE in October. The CIA *did* think that Saddam had a large and active nuclear program.

Pollack blew it, but the real question is why the intelligence agencies blew it so badly. That story is just starting to come out.

Unfrotunately, the left does not seem willing to extend the same benefit to Bush. Regardless of the partisan shenanigans that the Donks are now engaging in (which appears to be having some serious blowback of its own), the real question is “What is wrong with our intelligence services?”

Let’s start from the top:

1.) I believe Saddam had and continued to possess weapons which placed him in material breech (including long-range missiles, chem and bio weapons, and perhaps part of a nuclear program).

2.) I can also list about 25 other reasons why I was an still am in favor of what we did in Iraq.

3.) Bush’s SOTU address with the infamous line is still not only technically accurate, but according to the Brits COMPLETELY accurate.

4.) The same people who are now in hysterics about Bush lying, even though he didn’t are the same people who all believed and agreed that Saddam had WMD. The only thing that differed was the approach to the issue. Most on the left wanted continued sanctions and inspections.

5.) No one in the House or Senate, and I mean no one, voted for the war because of the line in question. This, of course, is indisputable and undeniable. Pretending that war was not imminent after the Senate vote is merely additional evidence that Democrats and the anti-war crowd suffer from dementia.

All of that is pretty clear, and yet the Democrats are lauching into a full-fledged scandal mode, spinning their own webs of lies and deceit that are so obvious that the Daily Howler has now dedicated TWO days worth of posts pointing out the duplicity. What is going to happen because of all this?

Here are my predictions:

1.) Mucho partisan bickering at House and Senate hearings. Both parties will claim that they have been vindicated by the same testimony, not noticing the irony.

2.) Democrats, in their attempt to find something (“Please, Dear God, give us any issue to run on next year”) to attack Bush with will miss the really relevant issue, which is why are our intelligence services so f——d up? They probably won’t ask the question, because this is something that has taken a while to get to this point. God forbid they accept some accountability from their behavior during the Clinton years.

3.) Republicans, on the defensive, will blame it all on the Clintons.

4.) Tenet will survive, slightly bloodied, and Bush will remain unscathed. In fact, Bush’s numbers will probably increase (a la Clinton impeachment- the public recognizes witch hunts, and I am not sure why politicians have not figured out what clear BS detectors most people have.)

5.) Because the Democrats are in attack mode and the Republicans are in CYA mode (for no real reason), there will be NO FUNDAMENTAL CHANGES to the intelligence services. And that just really pisses me off.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « More On Dean’s Guest Blogging
Next Post: Walter Pincus- Go Read Spinsanity »

Reader Interactions

4Comments

  1. 1.

    Kevin Drum

    July 16, 2003 at 5:05 pm

    “I believe Saddam had and continued to possess weapons which placed him in material breech (including long-range missiles, chem and bio weapons, and perhaps part of a nuclear program).”

    In completely nonpartisan mode here, can I ask why you still believe this? To be honest, I still sort of believe it too, but at this point it seems to be based more on faith than anything else. So far, all the evidence on the ground says the WMDs never existed.

  2. 2.

    John Cole

    July 16, 2003 at 6:40 pm

    1.) The overwhelming documentation, from multiple sources, including Iraq’s own admission, that the WMD existed.

    2.) The use of chemical weapons on the Kurds.

    3.) The documentation (which is massive- NEwsmax had a story about Brokaw and a former weapons inspector) and pieces of a nuclear program (albeit part of an old program) that were recently unearthed.

    4.) The fact that they have found the banned weapons already, just not in any significant quantity (a chemical warhead here, an illegal missile there, etc.).

    5.) The nature of the man and the regime. We are going to be hearing about atrocities and shenanigans for the next 10-20 years.

    What terrifies me is the worst case scenario may have happened- these may be on the black market and in the hands of unsavories.

  3. 3.

    Greg

    July 18, 2003 at 8:28 am

    “Unfrotunately, the left does not seem willing to extend the same benefit to Bush.”

    That’s because for many on the left, it’s not really about war, uranium, or nuclear weapons. It’s about Bush. Especially now that folks have had a little while to chew on Tony Blair’s speech for a while, expect lots of “Blair doesn’t lie, but Bush does”-type rhetoric. Logically, this sort of argument holds no water whatsoever, but it’s so appealing to those on the left that they’ll find it irresistible.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. The Axis of Weasels says:
    July 16, 2003 at 9:57 pm

    Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them

    Ed Koch, the former Democratic mayor of New York, has written an article (which I found via Balloon Juice) in defense of the Bush administration: “For me, it comes down to this: If Bush actually did lie to the American…

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Cameron on Late Night Open Thread: Ron DeSaster In New Hampshire (Jun 2, 2023 @ 7:39am)
  • Geminid on Late Night Open Thread: Ron DeSaster In New Hampshire (Jun 2, 2023 @ 7:35am)
  • Suzanne on Late Night Open Thread: Ron DeSaster In New Hampshire (Jun 2, 2023 @ 7:32am)
  • Tony Jay on Late Night Open Thread: Ron DeSaster In New Hampshire (Jun 2, 2023 @ 7:31am)
  • Aussie Sheila on Late Night Open Thread: Ron DeSaster In New Hampshire (Jun 2, 2023 @ 7:25am)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup on Sat 5/13 at 5pm!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!