• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

I’d hate to be the candidate who lost to this guy.

If you’re pissed about Biden’s speech, he was talking about you.

The arc of history bends toward the same old fuckery.

You cannot shame the shameless.

This has so much WTF written all over it that it is hard to comprehend.

Let’s finish the job.

Pessimism assures that nothing of any importance will change.

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

Accountability, motherfuckers.

Damn right I heard that as a threat.

The next time the wall street journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

People are complicated. Love is not.

A last alliance of elves and men. also pet photos.

Battle won, war still ongoing.

I’ve spoken to my cat about this, but it doesn’t seem to do any good.

Nancy smash is sick of your bullshit.

This blog will pay for itself.

Not all heroes wear capes.

Everybody saw this coming.

Give the craziest people you know everything they want and hope they don’t ask for more? Great plan.

This really is a full service blog.

Black Jesus loves a paper trail.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Domestic Politics / It’s The Economy, Stupid

It’s The Economy, Stupid

by John Cole|  July 21, 20034:56 pm| 8 Comments

This post is in: Domestic Politics

FacebookTweetEmail

Take this with the usual grain of salt:

A key measure of future economic activity increased slightly in June for the third month in a row, in line with analysts’ expectations.

The report lent support to the view among economists that the worst was over, although it did not alter their opinion that consumers and businesses still are on shaky ground.

The Conference Board reported Monday that its Index of Leading Economic Indicators rose by 0.1 percent in June to 111.8, after a 1.1 percent rise in May and a 0.1 percent rise in April. However, the board said it was too soon to declare the start of a period of steady economic growth.

“I still think we need to be a little cautious,” said Ken Goldstein, an economist for the board.

“But,” he added, “we may finally, after a year and a half delay, be moving into a real recovery.”

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « This Has to Be Killing the French
Next Post: Kobe Bryant »

Reader Interactions

8Comments

  1. 1.

    PG

    July 21, 2003 at 5:16 pm

    Cool. Does this mean that my friend with a double degree in English and physics from an excellent liberal arts college can find a decent job now? Monster.com keeps telling him that he could be making $40k, but they don’t say where, and so far only 7/11 has been interested.
    And to be really selfish, does this mean that the number of people applying to grad school because the job market is so unappealing will decrease before the admissions round for fall ’04?

  2. 2.

    John Cole

    July 21, 2003 at 5:22 pm

    PG- wow- what a nugget of whining liberalism. I guess I missed the memo where it said your friend DESERVED a job making 40k a year, and where it said it was the government’s responsibilty to be in charge of his job placement.

    BTW- go look up lagging indicators.

  3. 3.

    Andrew Lazarus

    July 21, 2003 at 5:28 pm

    Ah, but John, it’s the government’s huge deficits that will drive businesses out of the capital market when they want to expand. (The received view is that it is good to run deficits during the economic slowdown, but not, as Bush intends, as far as the eye can see.)

  4. 4.

    Dean

    July 21, 2003 at 5:34 pm

    Uh, where did businesses get their capital during the record deficits of the Reagan era? Or doesn’t that period of economic expansion count?

  5. 5.

    Jonas

    July 21, 2003 at 5:54 pm

    Dean

    There was much higher unemployment in the ’80s than there is now. In 1984, the unemployment rate broke 10%. With less people employed, businesses didn’t need as much capital (well maybe they needed, but it wasn’t available).

  6. 6.

    Andrew Lazarus

    July 22, 2003 at 1:19 am

    The (sad) truth is, Dean, that GDP grew less (as an annual average) under Reagan than under Jimmy Carter.

  7. 7.

    Art

    July 28, 2003 at 10:06 am

    Andrew,

    Using geometric averages and adjusting (imperfectly) for the effects of inflation, your claim is not supported.

    The high nominal GDP rate under Carter was due to multiple bouts of dollar devaluation from 1965-1977, and the high rate of inflation they caused.

    In the data you cite, the figures in the second column are ‘deflated’ using 1996 dollar prices as a benchmark. The results, when averaged geometrically, reveal that annualized GDP was virtually indistinguishable between the Carter and Reagan Admins (see below), and probably within the std of error for measurement and inflation adjustment methods.

    However, to anyone who lived through both periods, the qualitative differences were like night and day (day following night, that is).

    1977-1980: 3.252%
    1981-1984: 2.969%
    1985-1988: 3.699%
    1981-1988: 3.334%

  8. 8.

    Art

    July 28, 2003 at 10:37 am

    (Con’t) Quarterly numbers adjusted and annualized in the same way show greater disparity between the two:

    1978-1980: 2.814%
    1981-1984: 3.129%
    1985-1988: 3.74 %
    1981-1988: 3.434%

    If the 2Q78-4Q78 figures that resulted from Carter’s reluctant agreement to a cut in the capital gains rate are stripped out (as this policy originated with Congressional GOP), the quarterly average becomes 1.997%; and if you strip out 4Q80 as a reflection of positive toward Reagan policies, it falls to 1.567%.

    These are a bit indulgent, but I suspect they offset the distortion caused by complex lags in inflation measures. If dollar inflation had been measured in real time, I suspect that the Reagan years would beat the Carter years even more emphatically.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • WaterGirl on Open Thread: Too Good Not to Share (Mar 20, 2023 @ 7:14pm)
  • feebog on Open Thread: Too Good Not to Share (Mar 20, 2023 @ 7:13pm)
  • WaterGirl on Open Thread: Too Good Not to Share (Mar 20, 2023 @ 7:12pm)
  • Baud on Twenty Years Gone (Mar 20, 2023 @ 7:11pm)
  • Commenting at Balloon Juice since 1937 on Twenty Years Gone (Mar 20, 2023 @ 7:11pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!