• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

A democracy can’t function when people can’t distinguish facts from lies.

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

The fight for our country is always worth it. ~Kamala Harris

I like political parties that aren’t owned by foreign adversaries.

Fear or fury? The choice is ours.

A sufficient plurality of insane, greedy people can tank any democratic system ever devised, apparently.

When they say they are pro-life, they do not mean yours.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires.

This isn’t Democrats spending madly. This is government catching up.

Let’s not be the monsters we hate.

75% of people clapping liked the show!

Giving up is unforgivable.

The real work of an opposition party is to hold the people in power accountable.

Republican speaker of the house Mike Johnson is the bland and smiling face of evil.

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

Just because you believe it, that does not make it true.

The gop is a fucking disgrace.

They don’t have outfits that big. nor codpieces that small.

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

Hey Washington Post, “Democracy Dies in Darkness” was supposed to be a warning, not a mission statement.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

Shallow, uninformed, and lacking identity

SCOTUS: It’s not “bribery” unless it comes from the Bribery region of France. Otherwise, it’s merely “sparkling malfeasance”.

An almost top 10,000 blog!

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / The Name Game

The Name Game

by John Cole|  August 20, 20039:04 am| 2 Comments

This post is in: Politics

FacebookTweetEmail

I have noticed lately that in all discussions of Arnold’s race in California, someone pops up and claims Arnold is not fiscally conservative. I am not going to debate the merits of whether he is or isn’t (I have no earthly idea- criticisms about his not outlining his positions are entirely legitimate and accurate). What is curious is that there appears to be a new definition of ‘fiscally conservative’ that some people are peddling, and that is worthy of a discussion.

At least in my mind, ‘fiscally conservative’ does not mean ‘against all taxes.’ Fiscal conservatism, in my understanding, is not spending more than needs to be spent, avoiding deficits, and keeping tax rates as low as possible while not wasting taxpayer money.

Simply cutting taxes and spending boatloads (as the current administration is doing), is not fiscally conservative, but it is fiscally irresponsible, as I have stated over and over and over and over and over and over again. You do not need to engage in a debate of the relative merits of the spending to understand that spending 500 billion a year more than you take in to the treasury is fiscally irresponsible- and there is absolutely nothing conservative about it.

Fiscal conservatives believe, generally, that the idea is to keep government spending down- eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse. Fiscal conservatives believe tax cuts are good when the public is paying too much in taxes. Fiscal conservatives believe in balanced budgets.

Fiscal conservatives do not, IMHO, simply believe that all taxes should be repealed and the government should have no role in society- only absolutist, Big L, libertarians believe in that, and they should receive the teasing they richly deserve. In other words, while fiscal conservatism may incorporate certain attitudes about the level of taxation, it also includes a number of other beliefs, as well.

That’s about all I have to say about that.

*** Update ***

I guess I have more to say- this Scrappleface post about Arnold is genius (as always):

2003-08-18) — California gubernatorial candidate Arnold Schwarzenegger today announced plans for a televised debate in which he will match wits and words against members of his own campaign team.

“My staff and advisors are all over the map politically and ideologically,” said Mr. Schwarzenegger. “We want to use this TV debate to develop some major ideas that I can stand for. Because whatever those ideas are, I’m going to lead people to accept them. Because I am a leader with leadership qualities, and a destiny to lead and of course a leaders’ vision.”

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Virus
Next Post: Virus, Part 2 »

Reader Interactions

2Comments

  1. 1.

    Peter Peaslee

    August 20, 2003 at 12:11 pm

    John,

    Well stated and agree wholeheartedly. I cannot understand how GW can submit a budget that does not cut at least some wasteful, redundant and obselete federal programs. The best I can come up with in accepting his leadership, insofar as federal expenditures are concerned, is the alternatives we are faced with (Al Gore, Howard Dean, Dick Gebheart) and the likelyhood that the deficit would be any better onder their hands.

  2. 2.

    JKC

    August 20, 2003 at 2:57 pm

    Pete-

    Dean kept the Vermont budget balanced, despite the lack of a constitutional prohibition in that state.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - lashonharangue - Along the Zambezi River [2 of 2] 8
Image by lashonharangue (7/8/25)

World Central Kitchen

Donate

Recent Comments

  • Ruckus on Sharing Is Caring Open Thread: Calls to Action (Jul 9, 2025 @ 1:54am)
  • Sister Inspired Revolver of Freedom on War for Ukraine Day 1,230: Another Early Morning Under Ukraine Wide Air Raid Alerts (Jul 9, 2025 @ 1:47am)
  • prostratedragon on Wisconsin Is A Reminder of Why We Should Never Give up (Jul 9, 2025 @ 1:45am)
  • prostratedragon on Wisconsin Is A Reminder of Why We Should Never Give up (Jul 9, 2025 @ 1:33am)
  • Msb on We Should All Be So Lucky (Jul 9, 2025 @ 1:31am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Feeling Defeated?  If We Give Up, It's Game Over

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!