• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Today’s GOP: why go just far enough when too far is right there?

Americans barely caring about Afghanistan is so last month.

Conservatism: there are some people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

Battle won, war still ongoing.

This really is a full service blog.

Schmidt just says fuck it, opens a tea shop.

Sadly, there is no cure for stupid.

Do not shrug your shoulders and accept the normalization of untruths.

“More of this”, i said to the dog.

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

T R E 4 5 O N

Only Democrats have agency, apparently.

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

You cannot shame the shameless.

I like you, you’re my kind of trouble.

Shallow, uninformed, and lacking identity

The GOP couldn’t organize an orgy in a whorehouse with a fist full of 50s.

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

We are aware of all internet traditions.

We are builders in a constant struggle with destroyers. let’s win this.

Yeah, with this crowd one never knows.

We’ve had enough carrots to last a lifetime. break out the sticks.

Everybody saw this coming.

People are complicated. Love is not.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / The Name Game

The Name Game

by John Cole|  August 20, 20039:04 am| 2 Comments

This post is in: Politics

FacebookTweetEmail

I have noticed lately that in all discussions of Arnold’s race in California, someone pops up and claims Arnold is not fiscally conservative. I am not going to debate the merits of whether he is or isn’t (I have no earthly idea- criticisms about his not outlining his positions are entirely legitimate and accurate). What is curious is that there appears to be a new definition of ‘fiscally conservative’ that some people are peddling, and that is worthy of a discussion.

At least in my mind, ‘fiscally conservative’ does not mean ‘against all taxes.’ Fiscal conservatism, in my understanding, is not spending more than needs to be spent, avoiding deficits, and keeping tax rates as low as possible while not wasting taxpayer money.

Simply cutting taxes and spending boatloads (as the current administration is doing), is not fiscally conservative, but it is fiscally irresponsible, as I have stated over and over and over and over and over and over again. You do not need to engage in a debate of the relative merits of the spending to understand that spending 500 billion a year more than you take in to the treasury is fiscally irresponsible- and there is absolutely nothing conservative about it.

Fiscal conservatives believe, generally, that the idea is to keep government spending down- eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse. Fiscal conservatives believe tax cuts are good when the public is paying too much in taxes. Fiscal conservatives believe in balanced budgets.

Fiscal conservatives do not, IMHO, simply believe that all taxes should be repealed and the government should have no role in society- only absolutist, Big L, libertarians believe in that, and they should receive the teasing they richly deserve. In other words, while fiscal conservatism may incorporate certain attitudes about the level of taxation, it also includes a number of other beliefs, as well.

That’s about all I have to say about that.

*** Update ***

I guess I have more to say- this Scrappleface post about Arnold is genius (as always):

2003-08-18) — California gubernatorial candidate Arnold Schwarzenegger today announced plans for a televised debate in which he will match wits and words against members of his own campaign team.

“My staff and advisors are all over the map politically and ideologically,” said Mr. Schwarzenegger. “We want to use this TV debate to develop some major ideas that I can stand for. Because whatever those ideas are, I’m going to lead people to accept them. Because I am a leader with leadership qualities, and a destiny to lead and of course a leaders’ vision.”

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Virus
Next Post: Virus, Part 2 »

Reader Interactions

2Comments

  1. 1.

    Peter Peaslee

    August 20, 2003 at 12:11 pm

    John,

    Well stated and agree wholeheartedly. I cannot understand how GW can submit a budget that does not cut at least some wasteful, redundant and obselete federal programs. The best I can come up with in accepting his leadership, insofar as federal expenditures are concerned, is the alternatives we are faced with (Al Gore, Howard Dean, Dick Gebheart) and the likelyhood that the deficit would be any better onder their hands.

  2. 2.

    JKC

    August 20, 2003 at 2:57 pm

    Pete-

    Dean kept the Vermont budget balanced, despite the lack of a constitutional prohibition in that state.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • NotMax on Entertainment Open Thread: Happy Birthday, Mr. Hackman! (Jan 31, 2023 @ 2:33am)
  • Chetan Murthy on War for Ukraine Day 340: Just a Brief Update Tonight (Jan 31, 2023 @ 2:29am)
  • YY_Sima Qian on War for Ukraine Day 340: Just a Brief Update Tonight (Jan 31, 2023 @ 2:19am)
  • Fall in queue on War for Ukraine Day 340: Just a Brief Update Tonight (Jan 31, 2023 @ 2:19am)
  • prostratedragon on Entertainment Open Thread: Happy Birthday, Mr. Hackman! (Jan 31, 2023 @ 2:16am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!