• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Thanks to your bullshit, we are now under siege.

Jesus, Mary, & Joseph how is that election even close?

Do not shrug your shoulders and accept the normalization of untruths.

Conservatism: there are people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

It’s all just conspiracy shit beamed down from the mothership.

I am pretty sure these ‘journalists’ were not always such a bootlicking sycophants.

The real work of an opposition party is to oppose.

There are a lot more evil idiots than evil geniuses.

if you can’t see it, then you are useless in the fight to stop it.

People are complicated. Love is not.

Roe is not about choice. It is about freedom.

When they say they are pro-life, they do not mean yours.

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

Cancel the cowardly Times and Post and set up an equivalent monthly donation to ProPublica.

This really is a full service blog.

Something needs to be done about our bogus SCOTUS.

Since when do we limit our critiques to things we could do better ourselves?

We are aware of all internet traditions.

She burned that motherfucker down, and I am so here for it. Thank you, Caroline Kennedy.

Republicans are radicals, not conservatives.

Shut up, hissy kitty!

Give the craziest people you know everything they want and hope they don’t ask for more? Great plan.

“In this country American means white. everybody else has to hyphenate.”

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / David Corn, Liar

David Corn, Liar

by John Cole|  September 16, 200311:21 pm| 23 Comments

This post is in: Democratic Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

In the Nation (the left wing political rag whose editor does not know who represents her in Congress), David Corn writes:

September is back-to-school time, and Bush hit the road to promote his education policies. During a speech at a Nashville elementary school, he hailed his education record by noting that “the budget for next year boosts funding for elementary and secondary education to $53.1 billion. That’s a 26-percent increase since I took office. In other words, we understand that resources need to flow to help solve the problems.” A few things were untrue in these remarks. Bush’s proposed elementary and secondary education budget for next year is $34.9 billion, not $53.1 billion, according to his own Department of Education. It’s his total proposed education budget that is $53.1 billion. More importantly, there is no next-year “boost” in this budget. Elementary and secondary education received $35.8 billion in 2003. Bush’s 2004 budget cuts that back nearly a billion dollars, and the overall education spending in his budget is the same as the 2003 level.

Sounds damning, and some on the left rushed to link approvingly to this newest bit of evidence to add to the “Bush is a Liar” meme.

The problem is that Justin Katz and Steve Verdon have run the numbers- and Bush wasn’t lying. Corn was:

In summary, it is only through a combination of selective data and careful parsing of words that David Corn is able to exploit the habitual budgetary tricks of the federal government to call the President of the United States a liar. And his faulty conclusion has probably already caught on sufficiently that careful analysis of boring numbers will not prevent it from becoming “common knowledge.”

This is the Democrat strategery, and it started with the fabricated yellowcake ‘scandal.’ Simply make charge after charge about Bush being a liar, and don’t waste a second checking the facts. The idea is to just throw things up and hope they stick. When you are corrected, merely ignore the corrections, and wait a couple of weeks to re-surface the charge. By then it will be, as Justin pointed out, ‘common knowledge.’ The Democrats will know it is a lie, but they will keep saying it over and over again, because it might lead them to the only thing they care about- winning the White House.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Batteryless Flashlight
Next Post: Great Advice For Everyone »

Reader Interactions

23Comments

  1. 1.

    Steve

    September 16, 2003 at 11:46 pm

    Oh this one is really penny-ante stuff too. The 26% increase is true when you look at total discretionary education spending by the feds.

    If you look at just elementary spending by the feds, spending increased 24.7% since 2001.

    Only by looking at what was appropriated this year vs. what Bush proposed for 2004 do you get the decrease. It is not uncommmon for the appropriations process to add anywhere from 1 to 3 billion bucks. Also, the two numbers are from two different sources.

    Further, Corn is obviously a lying partisan hack when you look at 1998 and 1999. In 1998 Clinton proposed over $23 billion and in ’99 he proposed over $20 billion. Yet, it would have been quite valid for Clinton to argue that educational spending had increased dramaticall since he became President. Hell, the increase was almost 50%. Bush is over half way there in only his first term. If we look at the first 4 years of Clinton’s tenure the increase is a meager 10.3%.

    Corn is a jackass.

  2. 2.

    Gary Farber

    September 17, 2003 at 12:06 am

    Accepting for argument’s sake that your indictment is 100% accurate, the problem with it is that it merely suggests that, since what you outline is the 2000 successful Republican campaign against Al Gore, the Democrats will succeed.

    Of course, they won’t have the Supreme Court on their side, so perhaps not.

  3. 3.

    Gary Farber

    September 17, 2003 at 12:09 am

    Actually, let me make one additional point: “…because it might lead them to the only thing they care about- winning the White House.”

    Yes, quite true. No ethics, no morals, no brains. That’s one half of the country for you. Fortunately, the other half is moral, just, and wise. Thank goodness for the good guys! Down with the stupid bad guys!

    John, this sort of rhetoric is useless for anything accept pointless venting, and making people who agree with it feel comfortably superior to Those Stupid Other Bad People.

    You can, and often do, do better. Much better.

  4. 4.

    John Cole

    September 17, 2003 at 12:15 am

    Gary- I dont think that sums up all Democrats at all- but it most certainly does some up my estimation of the people who have done nothing but contort every word Bush utters and try to distort it into some sort of lie.

    If I thought the only thing ALL Democrats cared about was winning the White House, I would pay no attention to them and make no effort to even argue with them- what is the point. Clearly (well- maybe not clearly at all, as it appears), I was talking about the people who are engaging in the game I discussed- throw up a charge, any charge, and hope it sticks.

  5. 5.

    Gary Farber

    September 17, 2003 at 12:30 am

    There are such people, of course. And I spend plenty of time and energy condemning them. (And, for my thanks, I am, of course, considered by many of my lefty friends to be a vile traitor and Republican dupe. In Avedon Carol’s words of a couple of days ago I’ve “not yet come to my senses.”)

    But you specifically said “this is the Democrat strategery.” Not “this is the strategy of some particularly unscrupulous Democrats” or some such variant. And your category is “Democrat stupidity” not “stupidity of some Democrats.” If you don’t want to use such generalizations, and have some people find them irritating and overly strong, the cure is simple: don’t.

    (Also, you engage in that traditionally weird Republican usage of refusing to use the proper adjective of “Democratic,” but instead use the ungrammatical — and I’ve never, ever, understood the logic of this, or what it’s supposed to mean, except that — somehow — it seems to be derogatorily intended in some inexplicable way — usage of “Democrat” as an adjective, rather than the noun that it is. Why do Republicans — should that be “Republics”? — use this bizarre usage?)

    Incidentally, I’ve only just gotten back from checking your link to Virginia Postrel, and I’m quite puzzled. I’m no fan of van Heuvel’s, mind — I disagree with her more than I agree with her, and hold her in little respect, and thus don’t at all identify as a defender of hers, but while her statement in the transcript is on the incoherent side — as most people’s statements on debate tv shows, full of interruptions, tend to be — she seems, as Virginia, and James Taranto, said, to have said that her Representative is, correctly, Jerrold Nadler.

    So, um: what?

    Did you not read the clarification Virginia and James Taranto wrote, two years ago, or what? I is confuzzled.

  6. 6.

    John Cole

    September 17, 2003 at 10:15 am

    Gary- This is the Democrat strategy from the DNC. That does not mean every Democrat across the country is engaging in this sort of attack- but every prominent elected Democrat sure is- with the exception of Lieberman. It does not take much to read the Sunday transcripts and interviews, starting with the yellowcake, and figure out what McAuliffe’s talking points for the week are.

    I admit, my use of the word Democrat rather than Democratic started recently- when the Democrats started with this ‘Republicans don’t believe in democracy’ crap. It is petulant and childish on my part, but at least I admit it.

    Finally, I saw Katrina on that Hardball episode- in fact, I watched it twice. I saw it at 7, and I was so amused at her performance that I watched again at 11 or 12 or 1 (the re-run times have changed so much in the lastyear). If you saw the actual interview, and not the transcript, it is clear she had no idea who her Rep. was- and she couple her ignorance with an arrogant sneer- “How dare you ask me a question like that,” as if knowing your representative was something the little people should do.

  7. 7.

    Kimmitt

    September 17, 2003 at 2:08 pm

    It’s so strange to me that someone would take a fib like this out of proportion when there are so very many outright lies coming out of the Administration to seize upon, such as the non-fabricated decision by the President to include information believed to be false by the CIA in the State of the Union address, then use a carefully parsed set of words to create plausible deniability.

    That said, the President said the Dept. of Education budget for elementary and secondary schools was bigger than it was. If he doesn’t say it again, it was a simple error (which the White House Press Office should take some pains to correct, for the record). If he does, it was a deliberate distortion of the type for which the President has become so famous.

  8. 8.

    John Cole

    September 17, 2003 at 2:21 pm

    This education nonsense is about as stupid as the Clinton Hair Cut non-story, the Gore Internet story, and the Bush 1 grocery scanner story.

  9. 9.

    Stentor

    September 17, 2003 at 2:55 pm

    And your category is “Democrat stupidity” not “stupidity of some Democrats.”

    That’s an awful little nitpick, for a category name that seems to simply indicate “stupidity that is Democrat[ic].”

    John: You’d better watch it with the ungrammatical “Democrat,” or frequent usage will make it standard (it’s already working in my brain — I wouldn’t have even noticed if Gary hadn’t pointed it out, despite my being a Dem voter). Then you’d have to resort to something like “Democratical” when you wanted to mock that party.

  10. 10.

    Andrew Lazarus

    September 17, 2003 at 3:52 pm

    The Republicans got a lot of mileage from the Clinton Haircut (not to mention the Clinton Vince Foster Love Triangle Murder) and from the Gore Internet story.

    I hope our exaggerations do so well! Tit for tat, as the game theorists know, is a very effective strategy.

  11. 11.

    John Cole

    September 17, 2003 at 5:50 pm

    Andrew- I think the Democrats got some pretty good m9leage out of the grocery incident- they used it as the center piece of their “It’s the Economy, Stupid” campaign to show, GASP!, Bush is show out of touch with the middle class and the economy that he doesn’t know how a grocery scanner works, let alone how much a gallon of milk imight cost.

  12. 12.

    Robin Roberts

    September 17, 2003 at 10:27 pm

    Hmmm, Kimmit fabricates a “non-fabricated” decision. Oh, the irony.

  13. 13.

    David Perron

    September 18, 2003 at 9:23 am

    Hmmm…I’m not sure if I could tell you within 15% how much a gallon of milk costs. Can I run for President? Wonder if I’m destined to figurehead an elitist fundamentalist oligarchy?

  14. 14.

    Stentor

    September 18, 2003 at 1:12 pm

    A gallon of milk costs $2.99 (at Oliver’s Corner Store in Worcester, MA). Let’s all memorize that fact, just in case.

  15. 15.

    David Perron

    September 18, 2003 at 1:56 pm

    See, I woulda guessed $2.50. I’m definitely Presidential material! And if I’d only known I was this wealthy, I’d have bought that new Ferrari quite a while back.

  16. 16.

    Kimmit

    September 18, 2003 at 4:36 pm

    Same gallon costs six bucks here in Hawai’i. Stupid price supports.

  17. 17.

    Dean

    September 18, 2003 at 8:26 pm

    Kimmitt:

    Please, please, please tell me that you’re joking.

    That you DO know that prices in Hawai’i are quite a bit higher than elsewhere in the US, since just about all the food is imported.

    That you DO know that US government salaries include a 25% adjustment for cost-of-living, for the Hawai’i area.

    That the $6/gal. for milk there is NOT the result of price supports.

  18. 18.

    Kimmitt

    September 19, 2003 at 5:36 pm

    link

    Not. Fricking. Kidding. Milk price controls; it’s like it’s 1934 or something out here.

  19. 19.

    David Perron

    September 22, 2003 at 2:14 pm

    Oh, gawd. You poor frick’n Islanders.

    Can I conclude that you don’t subscribe to Ag subsidies? I’m wondering if there’s anyone who does. I certainly don’t know anyone, but I don’t know many farmers.

  20. 20.

    Kimmitt

    September 22, 2003 at 5:06 pm

    Heh. I had more patience for agricultural subsidies when my grandfather was receiving them. :)

    More seriously, I’m more of a “require corporate farmers to follow the same kinds of environmental standards which family farmers follow as a matter of course” guy than a subsidies guy. I kind of like the ethanol subsidy on national security grounds (and because the technology may well improve in the near future).

  21. 21.

    David Perron

    September 23, 2003 at 8:21 am

    I don’t care for the ethanol subsidy because it actually takes more energy to make the ethanol than you get out of it. So in effect it’s causing us to consume more petroleum in the name of national security, which I think is just silly. We’d be better off just stockpiling oil.

    Sounds as if we have some overlap, but not total agreement.

    My personal views on ag subsidies is we shouldn’t be in the business of propping up large agribusinesses while pretending to be helping out the family farmer. I don’t know if propping up the family farmer is needed, but propping up the large combines is definitely not needed.

  22. 22.

    Kimmitt

    September 23, 2003 at 4:24 pm

    My understanding is that we use locally-produced coal to produce ethanol, by and large.

    But yeah, we’re pretty damn close.

  23. 23.

    Grub

    December 21, 2003 at 11:32 pm

    David Corn looks like a monkey.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - Deputinize America - Moorea 2024 2
Image by Deputinize America (7/14/25)
Donate

Recent Comments

  • stinger on Late Night Open Thread: Obama Speaks (Jul 15, 2025 @ 8:35am)
  • u on War for Ukraine Day 1,236: Release the Tariffs!!!! (Jul 15, 2025 @ 8:35am)
  • Soprano2 on Late Night Open Thread: Obama Speaks (Jul 15, 2025 @ 8:35am)
  • mrmoshpotato on Monday Night Open Thread (Jul 15, 2025 @ 8:34am)
  • moonbat on Late Night Open Thread: Obama Speaks (Jul 15, 2025 @ 8:34am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Feeling Defeated?  If We Give Up, It's Game Over

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!