• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Anyone who bans teaching American history has no right to shape America’s future.

Their freedom requires your slavery.

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

Incompetence, fear, or corruption? why not all three?

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

Shallow, uninformed, and lacking identity

It’s the corruption, stupid.

Infrastructure week. at last.

The words do not have to be perfect.

Consistently wrong since 2002

Schmidt just says fuck it, opens a tea shop.

Balloon Juice has never been a refuge for the linguistically delicate.

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

This blog will pay for itself.

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

This really is a full service blog.

They’re not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires

Some judge needs to shut this circus down soon.

T R E 4 5 O N

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

Presidents are not kings, and Plaintiff is not President.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Nancy to the Rescue

Nancy to the Rescue

by John Cole|  October 26, 200310:49 am| 33 Comments

This post is in: Democratic Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

Don’t worry, illegal aliens- Nancy Pelosi has your back:

U.S. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said on Friday police raids on dozens of U.S. Wal-Mart stores in the search for illegal immigrants this week amounted to “terrorizing” workers.

“It instills a great deal of fear in people who are only trying to earn a living and put food on the table for their family,” Pelosi, a California Democrat, told reporters on a Congressional visit to Mexico.

Hundreds of workers at Wal-Mart Stores Inc. locations across the United States were arrested on immigration charges on Thursday in an investigation into contractor cleaning crews.

Pecisely what does the word illegal mean anymore?

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « test
Next Post: Lack Of Poss »

Reader Interactions

33Comments

  1. 1.

    Andrew Lazarus

    October 26, 2003 at 10:57 am

    I’m very disappointed in Pelosi, because the real meat of this story is Wal-Mart hiring contractors for $2 a day.

  2. 2.

    Dana

    October 26, 2003 at 11:21 am

    I’m disappointed in the cheapening of the term “terror[ism]”, too.

  3. 3.

    Brandon

    October 26, 2003 at 5:45 pm

    “Precisely what does the word illegal mean anymore?”

    To Pelosi? Ooh, ooh, let me guess: anything the Bush adminstration does?

  4. 4.

    Harry

    October 26, 2003 at 7:17 pm

    Hell John, those are potential Democratic votes being arrested and deported. Geez, they’ll let anyone be a freakin’ congressman.

  5. 5.

    Andrew Lazarus

    October 26, 2003 at 7:31 pm

    Actually, Brandon, Pelosi followed Gephardt down the “We can’t let Bush outflank us on defense so we’ll pretend Bush knows what he’s doing in Iraq” road. I guess they like minority status, what can I say?

  6. 6.

    Aspasia

    October 26, 2003 at 7:40 pm

    I’m no Pelosi fan, but the real crime here is Walmart’s exploitative behavior, not the few hundred bread winners that were trying to mail some cash home.

    Cracking down on the immigrants – and not the companies – sends one unmistakeable message to the illegals: Work here at your peril, but under no circumstances come forward.

    In other words something like this only makes it that much harder to prosecute businesses that capitalize on the cheap labor.

  7. 7.

    Dean

    October 26, 2003 at 10:02 pm

    Aspasia:

    The “real” crime? Sorry.

    There were two sets of crimes here. The immigrants are here illegally. Therefore, they’ve violated the law, and should be found and deported.

    And SEPARATELY, every bit as real, Wal-Mart was employing known illegals. They should be fined to the full extent of the law as well.

    But BOTH are real crimes.

  8. 8.

    Andrew Lazarus

    October 27, 2003 at 12:35 am

    Dean is right. Having said that, I’ve heard of cases where the former was done to the detriment of the latter (no witnesses left). In some cases Sometimes it would be prudent to cut a deal.

  9. 9.

    tom scott

    October 27, 2003 at 3:21 am

    I have heard that Wal-mart contracts out for janitorial services. The company they contract with is responsible for interviewing and hiring the janitorial crew.

  10. 10.

    Kimmitt

    October 27, 2003 at 7:15 am

    I totally agree; the US should not take any responsibility whatsoever for the fact that its endess search for cheap, easily-exploited labor has, over the past decades, led us to engender a culture of non-enforcement of immigration laws, leading to the inevitable result of millions of immigrants living here illegally.

    Under no circumstances should the unintended consequences of a law and its enforcement be discussed. This applies across the board, from Federal antidrug policy to tax policies; if people don’t want to get in trouble, they shouldn’t break the law, and the logical response to lawbreaking on a massive scale should not be to reexamine the law, but rather to mete draconian punishments to the few we do capture, so as to make them an example to others.

  11. 11.

    Aspasia

    October 27, 2003 at 8:27 am

    Absolutely. And may I say that “I’m shocked, absolutely shocked, to find there is gambling here.”

    Your winnings, sir.

  12. 12.

    russ

    October 27, 2003 at 10:28 am

    Pelosi pandering for votes among the illegals is hardly a suprise…

    Consider the nonsense when the dim-witted Dems tried to steal the electoral votes in FloriDUH! in 2000…

    For more on why the dim-witted Dems are doing this consider reading the contents at the following:”Immigration Remakes Political Landscape
    Study Examines Impact on Congressional Apportionment”

    http://www.cis.org/circle.html

  13. 13.

    RW

    October 27, 2003 at 10:29 am

    Um, do I really have to remind everyone that this woman is the LEADER OF THE DEMOCRATS in the house of representatives? Surely the rest of the party apparatus doesn’t feel this way & is on record condemning those comments, right?

    BTW, Kimmitt, it’s okay to drop the “wait, how can I spin this so that America is in the wrong, since Bush is in charge” facade for a few minutes to discuss an actual news story.

  14. 14.

    M. Scott Eiland

    October 27, 2003 at 12:10 pm

    “Um, do I really have to remind everyone that this woman is the LEADER OF THE DEMOCRATS in the house of representatives? Surely the rest of the party apparatus doesn’t feel this way & is on record condemning those comments, right?”

    As I’ve said before, Harold Ford Jr. must have a lot of laughs at the expense of his fellow House Democrats, who chose this mediocre ideologue over him as Minority Leader last year. If they’re smart, they’ll boot her out soon and stick him in the post–he might actually be able to do the job effectively.

  15. 15.

    Aspasia

    October 27, 2003 at 1:10 pm

    The fact that she’s a dim-witted ideologue hardly changes the fact that the same people complaining bitterly about illegal immigrants are benefitting enormously from their cheap labor.

    A bit of integrity and intellectual honesty here, please folks. How is it that a country so intimately involved in the formation of labor rights has become so casually exploitative?

    Now it’s one thing to admit the obvious and say we’re benefitting from these practices, in which case we should take the next logical step and legalize their status.

    Alternatively we could say we don’t like this at all and attempt a serious effort at cracking down on systemic abuses.

    But to make a buck off it, and then to whip up the xenophobic fervor by making it all about the immigrants who are doing the jobs we don’t bother with is, well, shameful to say the least.

  16. 16.

    David Perron

    October 27, 2003 at 2:31 pm

    I wish I had some idea what you’re talking about. I’m against the use of illegals. And I’m damned if I can see how I’m employing any.

    The flipside of this argument hold up just as well: If you’re going to have a minimum wage at all, you can’t endorse illegals, because they’re effectively undercutting the minimum wage. Yet it seems that the same people who have a stake in minimum wage laws…you see where this is going, don’t you?

  17. 17.

    Aspasia

    October 27, 2003 at 2:54 pm

    Honestly I don’t. You may not employ illegals in your garden, but that doesn’t mean you’re not employing them each time you enjoy the benefits of discount shopping. Or would you rather scrub the toilets yourself for a ridiculously low wage?

    My position is not inconsistent because I don’t “endorse illegals.” I endore legalizing their status to reflect the reality and to at least partially mitigate the discrepancies.

    Alternatively, if we’re to follow your view, than we should crack down on this hugely profitable industry and have the integrity to forever abandon the dream of discount underwear.

    But let’s not blame Pedro for mailing a hundred bucks a month home, ok?

  18. 18.

    Andrew Lazarus

    October 27, 2003 at 5:01 pm

    David, for your position to be consistent, you would have to oppose not just minimum wage but every worker protection law imaginable. Like: “So you require elementary safety equipment, and since desperate illegals are willing to work without it, you see where this is going, don’t you.”

    Tom, as far as Wal-Mart using contractors, that’s as clever and original a way of avoiding responsibility as saying Tony Soprano uses contractors when he orders a hit. Wal-mart execs knew darn well why they could get such good deals from their contractors.

  19. 19.

    David Perron

    October 27, 2003 at 5:12 pm

    Andrew:

    I would have to oppose minimum wage? Hmmm…I don’t recall ever having said that. Nor did I take a position. I merely showed how the broad-brush approach fails. Worked, didn’t it? I wasn’t denigrating minimum wage, just a particular argument that says something to the effect of: “How inconsistent! They don’t want illegals and yet use them!”. “They” don’t exist.

    Nor am I here to defend Wal-Mart, just to preempt that line of argument.

    Aspasia:

    You know, some manufacturers of underwear doubtless employ a pedophile or two. Does wearing of their brand name constitute moral support of pedophiles?

    And, you have no idea where I shop. You’re free to jump to conclusions, and you seem rather talented in that regard. Have at it.

    I don’t blame the workers for anything other than violation of immigration law. If you disagree with the law strongly enough to argue against it, maybe you should look into taking steps to get it changed.

  20. 20.

    Kimmitt

    October 27, 2003 at 5:31 pm

    That said, Pelosi’s comments were goofy. One can raise the ongoing economic and social issues associated with exploitation of illegal labor without sounding like a damn fool.

  21. 21.

    Aspasia

    October 27, 2003 at 5:41 pm

    David, don’t mean to be too testy with my responses, or my speculations, so I’m sorry if that was overbearing.

    I’m merely pointing out that our economy as a whole is rather dependent on this cheap labor for tasks most of us have no interest in. This is a part of the business plan nowadays for many profitable companies (see recent Times or Post articles on the matter, particularly as it relates to the sanitation industry).

    This is far more systemic, and integral to the business model of companies like wal-mart, than say, hiring a pedophile or two.

    So yeah, I think some kind of legal recognition for these people would be a humane gesture, and certainly not at all at odds with our self-interest.

    Certainly we shouldn’t be demonizing them.

  22. 22.

    M. Scott Eiland

    October 27, 2003 at 6:40 pm

    “That said, Pelosi’s comments were goofy. One can raise the ongoing economic and social issues associated with exploitation of illegal labor without sounding like a damn fool.”

    Yes, clearly “one” can. Just as clearly, she can’t.

  23. 23.

    Aspasia

    October 27, 2003 at 7:09 pm

    Aside from the disingenious use of the word “terrorizing,” which I agree is a degradation of language, what exactly is so horrible about them?

    “It instills a great deal of fear in people who are only trying to earn a living and put food on the table for their family.”

    That’s an expression of fact.

  24. 24.

    Dean

    October 27, 2003 at 7:42 pm

    Yes, Aspasia, it makes these people worry. Just as every organized crime investigation presumably instills fear in members of the Mafia, who also view themselves as “only trying to earn a living and put food on the table for their family.”

    These people have violated the law, you DO see that, right?

  25. 25.

    Aspasia

    October 27, 2003 at 7:57 pm

    You just equated sub-minimal wage workers with mafia criminals.

    You DO see that, right?

  26. 26.

    John Cole

    October 27, 2003 at 8:17 pm

    What part of illegal alien and illegal worker are you failing to grasp, Aspasia?

    If it does put fear into them, perhaps it might scare them into trying to become legal citizens. Legal immigration is a long proud tradition here in the United States, and I am in favor of it.

  27. 27.

    Kimmitt

    October 27, 2003 at 9:13 pm

    Er, the reason people immigrate illegally is because it is impossible for them to immigrate legally — the quotas for their countries have been filled.

  28. 28.

    Dean

    October 28, 2003 at 9:12 am

    And the only reason people commit crimes is because they can’t make a living legally, eh?

    Yes, Aspasia, I just equated illegal immigrants with other criminals. They may not be as well organized as the Mafia, but they are criminals. You can argue, as Kimmitt does, that they have wonderful extenuating circumstances, but they are still breaking the law.

  29. 29.

    Steve Woods

    October 28, 2003 at 9:26 am

    Wrote this to Nancy:

    I am shocked and outraged that an elected official can make a statement in regards to our U S Customs and Border Protection agent who conducted raids on Wal-Mart stores this past week. You state that this is terrorism. How can this be?

    I work at the Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson Itnl’ Airport, and see these fine agents working everyday. I see them protecting our borders. I see them doing what they are paid to do. KEEP OUT THE INDIVIDUALS WHO DO NOT BELONG.

    Fine, the employer was wrong in hiring these people, but these people are just as wrong as the employer by not entering this country LEGALLY! I think the illegal workers are terrorizing me, with thier continued use of MediCal and other state/federal program that I, am individual who was born in California, legally, under parents who where also born here in the US legally, whose grandparents were also born here legally,etc. I do not goto Mexico or Chile, or Peru and ask those governments for hand out. Why do the illegals get hand outs? I need health care too. But I pay for it!

    How dare you say the fine people in U S Customs and Border Protection terrorized these illegals. They were doing their job. Go get em all I say. Come here legally. You were born in another country other than the USA, and you want to come in to the USA? DO IT LEGALLY! Get a VISA.

  30. 30.

    Andrew Lazarus

    October 28, 2003 at 5:34 pm

    I don’t believe an illegal immigrant is technically a “criminal”, even though his entry into the country was unlawful. That’s why we can expel them without a full-blown trial. If an illegal alien gets busted for jaywalking, he has the same rights to a trial as a citizen.

    I still hope Walmart gets what they deserve. Once the ADAs talk jail time to the contractors, they’ll be turning over the tapes they made.

  31. 31.

    Kimmitt

    October 28, 2003 at 6:13 pm

    I am merely making clear that cracking down on illegal immigration will not have the result of producing more legal immigration, as the latter is already fully enabled.

  32. 32.

    David Perron

    October 29, 2003 at 12:44 am

    I don’t know enough to even make a suggestion as to what the right course is. However, it’s a given that these people are unauthorized visitors. Either the law needs to change or they need to leave. I don’t see how anyone can make an argument that they should stay in violation of the law.

    Now, should the law change? How? Once they are here legally, do we now have to crack down on minimum-wage laws? Collection of payroll taxes?

    I can see how reaping payroll taxes off of newly legal aliens might be a good thing. But I see a transfer of pain from immigration to…who, Labor? in the matter of minimum-wage enforcement.

    Or are our labor laws too good for non-citizens?

  33. 33.

    Andrew Lazarus

    October 29, 2003 at 7:20 pm

    Many illegal immigrants, although not Wal-mart’s, are paying taxes. They often use a legal relative’s SSN. I’ve often thought that companies who violated obvious tax and safety laws (which is to me prima facie proof they knew their employees were illegals who wouldn’t complain) should have their fines trebled.

    Either the law needs to change or they need to leave. I don’t see how anyone can make an argument that they should stay in violation of the law.

    ABSOLUTELY!!

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • WhatsMyNym on TGIFriday Morning Open Thread: Busy, Busy, Busy (Jan 27, 2023 @ 1:35pm)
  • mrmoshpotato on TGIFriday Morning Open Thread: Busy, Busy, Busy (Jan 27, 2023 @ 1:34pm)
  • eclare on TGIFriday Morning Open Thread: Busy, Busy, Busy (Jan 27, 2023 @ 1:34pm)
  • MisterDancer on TGIFriday Morning Open Thread: Busy, Busy, Busy (Jan 27, 2023 @ 1:32pm)
  • eclare on TGIFriday Morning Open Thread: Busy, Busy, Busy (Jan 27, 2023 @ 1:31pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!