• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Giving in to doom is how authoritarians win.

It’s the corruption, stupid.

The Giant Orange Man Baby is having a bad day.

New McCarthy, same old McCarthyism.

Hot air and ill-informed banter

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

Conservatism: there are people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

“woke” is the new caravan.

Peak wingnut was a lie.

I’d hate to be the candidate who lost to this guy.

The willow is too close to the house.

The arc of history bends toward the same old fuckery.

This isn’t Democrats spending madly. This is government catching up.

Roe is not about choice. It is about freedom.

You know it’s bad when the Project 2025 people have to create training videos on “How To Be Normal”.

I might just take the rest of the day off and do even more nothing than usual.

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

Live so that if you miss a day of work people aren’t hoping you’re dead.

The rest of the comments were smacking Boebert like she was a piñata.

“The defense has a certain level of trust in defendant that the government does not.”

Come on, man.

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

Tide comes in. Tide goes out. You can’t explain that.

Wake up. Grow up. Get in the fight.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / The Petulant Left

The Petulant Left

by John Cole|  December 3, 20039:34 am| 16 Comments

This post is in: General Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

While Atrios might think that Tim Robbin’s newest play, ‘Embedded,’ is ‘obviously satirical,’ the value of such an effort is lost on me. In fact, I think it is pretty damn disgusting. A rundown:

But his play, “Embedded,” profiles the journalists who traveled with and reported on U.S. soldiers in Iraq and features the president’s war cabinet. It was written in Los Angeles and produced in Hollywood.

Robbins portrays journalists as Pentagon puppets, U.S. soldiers as thieves and killers of innocent women and children, and the Bush cabinet as war mongers willing to start a war to escape the negative publicity of the Enron scandal.

In production less than a month, the play received not one, but two glowing reviews from the Los Angeles Times. Robbins’ audience appears to accept his version of the war as the gospel truth.

“It is not propaganda. It is a voice of dissent, which is different than propaganda,” said audience member Kadina Dayal-Halday.

If this is dissent, color me a conformist. If this is right, I don’t mind being wrong. This play, from everything I have read about this venture, seems disrespectful, dishonest, and nothing more than agitprop for the A.N.S.W.E.R. crowd and their willing accomplices.

And to save you time in the comments, I am not saying Robbins and his friends are not patriotic- because we all know however asinine the dissent, it is patriotism! I am, however, calling Robbins an asshole. David Bloom, Michael Kelly, and the hundreds of thousands of soldiers you mock as ‘puppets’ have more character in their little fingers than exists in all of Robbins demented world. I guess the new definition of dissent includes calling everyone you disagree with stupid.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Why You Should Read Balloon Juice
Next Post: Hunh? »

Reader Interactions

16Comments

  1. 1.

    S-Train

    December 3, 2003 at 10:44 am

    I don’t have a problem with Robbins’ protraying the press as Pentagon puppets. I do have a problem with portraying U.S. soldiers as mindless killing machines (which is insanely far from the truth). If you are a mindless, killing machine in the military, you get taken down.

    Even we former gang members know that!

  2. 2.

    Guipo

    December 3, 2003 at 10:46 am

    “I guess the new definition of dissent includes calling everyone you disagree with stupid.”

    I’ve been doing this for years.

  3. 3.

    HH

    December 3, 2003 at 11:22 am

    And remember, sure, you soldiers are thieves and killers of innocent women but we support you 100%! We just don’t like Bush policy.

  4. 4.

    JC

    December 3, 2003 at 11:24 am

    Ah yes. That pesky first ammendment.

  5. 5.

    John Cole

    December 3, 2003 at 11:28 am

    I guess I missed the part where I said they “can’t” wrtie, produce, enact this bilge. I guess I missed the part where I made a call for this to be banned.

    Fortunately, the 1st amendment allows me the opportunity to call Robbins an asshole.

  6. 6.

    Gregory Litchfield

    December 3, 2003 at 12:18 pm

    Sure enough, within 4 posts someone came by to claim that criticizing Mr. Susan Sarandon for writing/producing this tripe is tantamount to censorship.

    Has everyone forgotten just what, exactly, the 1st Amendment protects against? Why are the people who know absolutely nothing of the Constitution the first to use it as a shield for all their crass behaviors?

  7. 7.

    Slartibartfast

    December 3, 2003 at 12:22 pm

    Major exemption to said behavior: full willingness to deprive others of their 2nd Amendment rights.

  8. 8.

    Mark L.

    December 3, 2003 at 1:46 pm

    Ahhh. . . .J C.

    The First Amendment states that *Congress* can make no law abridging freedom of speech or expression. The courts have interpreted that to include any government agent.

    So. . . If Clear Channel chooses not to play Dixie Chicks songs, that is not a violation of the First Amendment.

    If John McCain threatens to take away Clear Channel’s licence because they choose not to play the Dixie Chicks that probably *is* a violation of the First Amendment.

    If John Cole calls Robbins an asshole that is *not* a violation of the First Amendment.

    If Robbins uses a friendly Congresscritter to get the hosting IP to kick John Cole’s blog off *becase* John Cole called Robbins an asshole, then that probably *is* a violation of the First Amendment.

    I have a First Amendment right to call unpatriotic losers unpatriotic losers. I have a First Amendment right to turn off the set when I see their faces or hear their voices. I have a First Amendment right to tell advertisers that run ads on their shows that I turn the set off whenever I see them. They have the right to advertise on those shows or not.

    Because none of that involves the government.

    The First Amendment guarantees you the right to speak or write. It does not guarantee a right to be read or listened to. And it most definately does not protect you from the consequences of speaking or writing, so long as those consequences come from the private sector.

    Got it? (I doubt it.)

  9. 9.

    Moe Lane

    December 3, 2003 at 2:08 pm

    “And it most definately does not protect you from the consequences of speaking or writing, so long as those consequences come from the private sector.”

    With the caveat that such consequences are themselves legal, of course; I do not believe that Mark L is saying that it’s permissible to commit felonies against people you disagree with, but best to spell that out. :)

  10. 10.

    Kimmitt

    December 3, 2003 at 2:42 pm

    I’ll wait to actually see a script or performance before having an opinion, thanks.

  11. 11.

    Harry

    December 3, 2003 at 2:54 pm

    The only thing Tim Robbbins knows about being Embedded is when his huge head is embedded up his ass. Which seems to be always.

  12. 12.

    DANEgerus

    December 3, 2003 at 8:02 pm

    No one remembers the Edinburgh Scotland production of the Fireman’s eye view of 911 dramatized by Sarandumb and her boy-toy? That of course involved no interviews with actual firemen… but rather ‘dramatized’ what they ‘must have thought’…

    Though frankly I’d rather see the French POS ‘dramatizing’ all the fornicating the 911 victims ‘must have’ done as the planes came in…

    Pornogra-Fry the victims… how French!

    Robbins/Sarandumb and the French… Same same…

  13. 13.

    Mark L.

    December 3, 2003 at 8:32 pm

    Moe — you are right. I should have spelled out that I meant consequences such as loss of sales, being called out for the idjit they are, being criticized, etc. After all the Tom Robbins and A.N.S.W.E.R types are too dim to differentiate between legal and illegal consequences. That’s why you always have to clean up after them when they stage a protest.

  14. 14.

    David

    January 5, 2004 at 4:19 am

    A couple of comments. First of all, I am a registered Republican and completely disagree with Tim Robbins and his politics: HOWEVER, I have seen several plays at his theater now (my wife is an avid fan-go figure), and I want to correct a couple of factual errors about the actual content. First of all, “The Guys,” which we saw Mr. Robbins perform in LA with Helen Hunt, was in fact all taken from real interviews with a fireman who was indeed at Ground Zero. It was performed as a staged reading, and was practically a transcript of the interviews. And quite moving, and patriotic, I should add.

    Now as for Embedded, Fox News (which I usually trust)is not reporting the play I saw accurately. It was definetely coming from a point of view I disagree with, but I have to say I was shocked at how fair it really was, even for a liberal like Robbins. He really pays tribute to the soldiers out there, and the play itself was humorous and entertaining…not at all like Fox News described it. Kind of makes me question them now. I recommend anyone to see it for themselves. Even though I still totally disagree with his politics it’s actually a patriotic play in its own way.

  15. 15.

    David Burton

    March 1, 2004 at 10:02 am

    Can someone explain to me how “dissent” can even exist as a concept, let alone a rationale, in a country with a First Amendment ?
    Thanks.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. DANEgerus Weblog says:
    December 3, 2003 at 8:06 pm

    Pornogra-Fry

    No one remembers the Edinburgh Scotland production of the Fireman’s eye view of 911 dramatized by Sarandumb and her boy-toy? That of course involved no interviews with actual firemen… but rather ‘dramatized’ what they ‘must have thought’…

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - Mike in Oly - Woodard Bay Natural Resources Conservation Area
Image by Mike in Oly (5/24/25)

Recent Comments

  • zhena gogolia on Saturday Afternoon Open Thread (May 24, 2025 @ 9:27pm)
  • eclare on Saturday Afternoon Open Thread (May 24, 2025 @ 9:24pm)
  • sab on Saturday Afternoon Open Thread (May 24, 2025 @ 9:21pm)
  • Trivia Man on Saturday Afternoon Open Thread (May 24, 2025 @ 9:20pm)
  • Ruckus on Saturday Afternoon Open Thread (May 24, 2025 @ 9:16pm)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!