• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Marge, god is saying you’re stupid.

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

Wake up. Grow up. Get in the fight.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires.

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

Giving in to doom is how authoritarians win.

Nothing says ‘pro-life’ like letting children go hungry.

It’s all just conspiracy shit beamed down from the mothership.

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

This fight is for everything.

We need to vote them all out and restore sane Democratic government.

Perhaps you mistook them for somebody who gives a damn.

Not all heroes wear capes.

We are builders in a constant struggle with destroyers. keep building.

They traffic in fear. it is their only currency. if we are fearful, they are winning.

People are complicated. Love is not.

If America since Jan 2025 hasn’t broken your heart, you haven’t loved her enough.

“Everybody’s entitled to be an idiot.”

There are consequences to being an arrogant, sullen prick.

“What are Republicans afraid of?” Everything.

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

It’s pointless to bring up problems that can only be solved with a time machine.

You cannot shame the shameless.

There is no right way to do the wrong thing.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Gimme A Break

Gimme A Break

by John Cole|  March 2, 20043:15 pm| 55 Comments

This post is in: General Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

I can’t even call this Democratic Stupidity, because it is so irresponsible:

The Bush administration Monday denied allegations by Jean-Bertrand Aristide and his supporters that U.S. agents and diplomats coerced him into resigning as Haiti’s president and spirited him out of the country at gunpoint.

“He went onto the airplane willingly,” Secretary of State Colin Powell said. “And that’s the truth.”

Powell also admonished two members of Congress for suggesting U.S. diplomats and troops strong-armed the Haitian into exile.

“It would have been better for members of Congress who have heard these stories to ask us about the stories before going public with them so that we don’t make a difficult situation that much more difficult,” Powell said, calling the charges “absurd.”

Powell made the remarks after Reps. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) and Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) said Aristide or his wife told them by telephone that American soldiers had forced him onto a plane eventually bound for the Central African Republic.

Aristide told The Associated Press and CNN he was “forced to leave” by Americans who warned that his life was threatened by rebels besieging the capital.

Powell said Aristide decided to resign and that U.S. forces helped protect him and his family as they boarded a private jet chartered by the State Department.

Rangel said Aristide told him on the telephone “he felt like he was being kidnapped.” Rangel said Aristide also claimed U.S. Embassy officials dictated the text of his resignation letter.

“They needed that resignation. Why? Because [without it] we would have been part of a coup, because it was a coup,” Rangel said.

Waters told CNN Aristide’s wife, Mildred, told her the exiled Haitian leader was “forced to leave his home,” after a U.S. Embassy official told him he “had to go now

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Hate Speech
Next Post: Isn’t That Something »

Reader Interactions

55Comments

  1. 1.

    keith edge

    March 2, 2004 at 4:11 pm

    treason?

  2. 2.

    mark

    March 2, 2004 at 4:25 pm

    Wasn’t Rangel the one who also hosted Fidel Castro at a church in Harlem years ago when he was in the U.S. for some U.N. meeting? Quite telling who some people see as true leaders, eh?

  3. 3.

    Kimmitt

    March 2, 2004 at 5:09 pm

    I’m so far into the land of WTF that I haven’t even the faintest notion of where to start.

  4. 4.

    shark

    March 2, 2004 at 5:21 pm

    Wow. Just wow. How. Fricking. Sad.

  5. 5.

    Jack Sparks (burn rate)

    March 2, 2004 at 5:38 pm

    This is going to become a fairly large story over the next week. As Edwards is going to drop out tonight, there’s no horserace left, and what better story for the media than “Questions remain over what role the Bush Administration played in the overthrow of democraticaly elected President Aristide.”
    WTF land today, “legitimate” news story tomorrow.

  6. 6.

    Charlie (Colorado)

    March 2, 2004 at 7:15 pm

    What is it called when you are actively working to the dtriment of your government?

    “Election year politics.”

    Goddamnit.

  7. 7.

    trump

    March 2, 2004 at 9:02 pm

    What is it called when you are actively working to the dtriment of your government?

    Democrat politics as usual.

    Listening to shit like this makes me pray very hard for a loony gunman to to come give these asshats the bullet to the brain they so richly deserve.

  8. 8.

    Terry

    March 2, 2004 at 9:34 pm

    The US government ought to take Maxine, Charlie, and the other members of the Black Caucus up on their concern and offer to fly them over to the Central African Republic where they could pick up Aristide and fly him back to Haiti We should then drop the whole fucking lot of them in the middle of Port Au Prince and let the people of Haiti give them a good old fashioned Haitian welcome, perhaps along the lines of the “tire-necklacing” that Aristide himself made popular a decade ago.

  9. 9.

    M. Scott Eiland

    March 2, 2004 at 10:16 pm

    Maxine is just mad because there were fatal riots going on that she had no part in aggravating.

  10. 10.

    Bloggerhead

    March 2, 2004 at 10:52 pm

    Um, John, don’t you mean “to the detriment of our country?” Otherwise, you’d be advocating that no one should ever be able to point out what lying sacks we have in charge. And how is further pointing out that we may well have sided with murderous thugs to overthrow yet another of our hemisphere’s elected leaders, albeit a bit of a thug himself, a detriment to our country, as opposed to this particular government?

    Seems to have gotten a few of the mouthbreathers to relieve themselves on your board, though.

  11. 11.

    JayR

    March 3, 2004 at 2:43 am

    Just curious, John: Do you think that Rangel and Waters are lying about this or do you believe that they are obligated not to mention that we might have had a role in toppling a democratically elected government. And if it is the second, why? Also, if the second then did you also have the same issue with Dick Armey and Tom DeLay and Trent Lott speaking out when the US participated in the NATO campaign against Serbia?

    Also, if you believe that people are obligated to shut up about this, what do you think are the correct means of expressing distaste for these actions?

  12. 12.

    Syl

    March 3, 2004 at 5:13 am

    It’s very simple. Do you believe Powell is lying or is it Aristide who is lying?

    Looks to me as though Rangel and Waters are showing extremely poor judgement.

  13. 13.

    SDN

    March 3, 2004 at 7:12 am

    No worse than Bagdad Jim McDermott and his compatriot who went to Iraq and said they trusted Saddam more than Bush. I still remember vividly the abuse that came my way for suggesting that this met the definition of treason as “aid and comfort” to the enemy. I’m sure I’ll get some more. Ah well.

  14. 14.

    M. Scott Eiland

    March 3, 2004 at 9:02 am

    “No worse than Bagdad Jim McDermott and his compatriot who went to Iraq and said they trusted Saddam more than Bush. I still remember vividly the abuse that came my way for suggesting that this met the definition of treason as “aid and comfort” to the enemy. I’m sure I’ll get some more. Ah well.”

    Hey, if Maxine and Charlie want to go to Haiti and make these accusations in the middle of the biggest, most homicidal crowd they can find–I think a few tax dollars can be found to pay their way. Just remember to make them one-way tickets: more efficient.

  15. 15.

    Andrew J. Lazarus

    March 3, 2004 at 9:38 am

    I think Powell is mistaken (possibly lying). That’s a problem with the boy-crying-wolf dishonesty of this Administration. As a matter of fact, I can’t think of any reason except blind lobotomized loyalty why one would believe the Administration’s story over Aristide’s, which was reported by foreign news services even before Aristide himself, and CERTAINLY no reason why one should go off the deep end assailing persons who don’t agree.

    There were unfortunate times 35 years ago that Radio Hanoi was more truthful than the American government, and I don’t think anyone who followed the news then will ever quite get over the cynicism this caused.

  16. 16.

    Ripper

    March 3, 2004 at 10:06 am

    And no one considers the possibility that Aristide is simply trying to save face? “No, I didn’t run away like a little girl – the evil Americans kidnapped me. Be strong, brave Haitians, I shall return!” This murderous thug pulled the same sort of scam before when the left was desperate to portray him as the “people’s priest” who only wanted to save his country, so why not do it now?

    And as Rangel and Waters prove, when a Republican is in charge you can always get support – no matter how vile a piece of human sewage you may be – from the left. Is there any murderous dictator the Democrat party DOESN’T support?

  17. 17.

    trump

    March 3, 2004 at 11:19 am

    There were unfortunate times 35 years ago that Radio Hanoi was more truthful than the American government, and I don’t think anyone who followed the news then will ever quite get over the cynicism this caused

    GET. OVER. IT. Vietnam happened a long time ago. Please move on or shuffle off so the rest of us in this country can finally move beyond some fricking godforsaken idiocy from the 1960’s and 70’s…

  18. 18.

    Jack Sparks (burn rate)

    March 3, 2004 at 12:42 pm

    Andrew,
    I can’t think of any reason save pathological Bush-hatret to think it’s reasonable that Bush ordered the kidnapping of JBA. What possible good could it do, particularly if JBA would respond by telling the world we forced him out at gunpoint?
    Application of a little common sense might help you out here.

  19. 19.

    jack

    March 3, 2004 at 12:57 pm

    What does the US have to gain by getting Aristide out of the counrty? He was leaving anyway.

    Of course, our way, he’s still breathing.

    And so are a lot of Haitians who wouldn’t be otherwise.

  20. 20.

    Rick

    March 3, 2004 at 12:58 pm

    “I can’t think of any reason save pathological Bush-hatret to think it’s reasonable that Bush ordered the kidnapping of JBA.”

    Given the fringers contortions over the “AWOL” non-issue, no reason is necessary.

    Cordially…

  21. 21.

    Ken Hahn

    March 3, 2004 at 2:48 pm

    I’m so angry, I’ve had to start this entry three times. Radio Hanoi? Radio f* Hanoi? Just when where they accurate Mr. Lazarus? When they reported that Senator McCain and others were enjoying the resort like treatment at the Hanoi Hilton? When they said they never killed and maimed villagers loyal to the South? When they reported that Jane Fonda was representative of the American people? When? Or maybe now when they report there no genocide in Vietnam against ethnic nonVietnamese? Perhaps we can listen to Radio DPRK for the truth?

    Believing a con man like Aristide is about on par with citing Jesse Jackson. There is no truth there.

    I don’t think we should have rescued Aristide. I don’t think we should be in Haiti at all. This is a real quagmire that the other professional liar, Mr. Clinton, got us into. For once I think this is a job for the UN. Let them handle this and let the Europeans handle the Balkans. Haiti, like Kosovo, is unfixable.

    There are no good guys in Haiti. Aristide is a socialist thug. His opponents aren’t much different. I’m not much of a fan of Mr. Powell but compared to Rangel and Waters, he’s a saint.

  22. 22.

    Andrew J. Lazarus

    March 3, 2004 at 3:47 pm

    Why Bush wanted Aristide out? Perhaps because Otto Reich and his deputy Roger Noriega have wanted him out for a very long time. They saw him as another Castro in the making. Perhaps they wanted him out for humanitarian reasons. Perhaps they wanted him out because they thought it would lessen the number of refugees trying to get to Florida. I agree, it is also *possible* that Aristide has invented (or grossly exaggerated) the extent of American pressure on him, to look less cowardly or to rally his own forces for the next grisly phase, but I see little reason to dismiss his claims out of hand, as you do.
    I see a major newspaper has the same take I do on the Administration’s credibility.

    The Guardian’s report does not look encouraging.

    The deposed dictator Jean-Claude “Baby Doc” Duvalier has announced that he intends to return as soon as possible, although he added that seeking the presidency was “not on my agenda”.

    Louis-Jodel Chamblain, a convicted killer who led army death squads and is accused of ordering hundreds of executions, has demanded a voice in the new political settlement. “What’s mine is mine,” he said.

    As far as Radio Hanoi, Mr. Hahn. I did not say that everything Radio Hanoi said was more truthful than the US’s official position. That would be ridiculous. It is incontrovertible, however, that we conducted a “secret” (to whom?) bombing campaign of Laos and Cambodia that you could hear about on Radio Hanoi, but our government denied. That’s only the first example that comes to mind. Whatever it does to your blood pressure, you’ll just have to deal with it.

    Excuse me if I find you guys pitifully credulous. Where are those WMD Rumsfeld said we knew all about? Why exactly should we believe a single word these guys say??

  23. 23.

    joe schmo

    March 3, 2004 at 3:57 pm

    Andy, before you go spinning abother story about the Bushilter administration, you should review what Joh Kerry had to say about this. He is on record saying that the Us should not have waited so long to go in. He also said he would not have waited for UN approval.

    Now consider thatn this was a US-French operation with UN approval.

    http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/169039p-147637c.html

    Yep, evil bushilter, bad dog.

  24. 24.

    Jack Sparks (burn rate)

    March 3, 2004 at 4:29 pm

    Well, Radio Hanoi is reporting that Bush ordered the kidnapping of JBA as part of a Haliburton plan to take control of Haiti’s substantial litter and burning tire reserves. So I guess it makes sense.

  25. 25.

    Ricky

    March 3, 2004 at 4:51 pm

    Andrew, do you believe – as Waters alleged – that the influx of crack cocaine was infiltrated by our US government in order to keep down the black community?

    And you have the temerity to assume that we should believe her over Colin Powell?

  26. 26.

    Jack Sparks (burn rate)

    March 3, 2004 at 5:10 pm

    Radio Hanoi is reporting that crack cocaine was invented accidentially by then Lt. George W. Bush after driving then-girlfriend Condi Rice to get an abortion and while AWOL from his TANG unit. He sold the recipe to his dad in exchange for an unspecified amount of Haliburton stock.

  27. 27.

    Steverino

    March 3, 2004 at 5:16 pm

    And how is further pointing out that we may well have sided with murderous thugs to overthrow yet another of our hemisphere’s elected leaders,

    Oh, please. Aristede was elected like Saddam Hussein was elected. If you’re going to insist that Aristede was elected, then you have lost any right to grouse about the 2000 election.

  28. 28.

    trump

    March 3, 2004 at 5:33 pm

    Andrew J Lazarus: GET OVER VIETNAM.

    Either learn to move on or please just shut the f*ck up with it already.

    It’s 35+ years ago. IT’S OVER. IT’S DONE. Everybody on all sides of the issue should have learned their lessons by now (because the protestors deserve a lot of shit for their actions as well). SO please end our misery. YOU may be one of the pathetic group who frames their worldview in the vietnam looking glass, but the rest of us are TIRED of this shit. What is this presidential election about so far? Vietnam! What is the Iraq debate framed in? Vietnam! BLAH BLAH BLAH. There is nothing more your kind can teach us, as we’ve been made to marinate in this vile brew for decades. VIETNAM IS OVER. YOU’RE OVER. I can’t wait for you and those like you to die off so some of us who live in a different time can FINALLY move on and end this interminable drag on our souls.

  29. 29.

    Andrew J. Lazarus

    March 3, 2004 at 5:49 pm

    Hey, Schmoe, did you actually READ what Kerry said?

    Kerry (D-Mass.) said he would have sent troops to Haiti even without international support to QUELL the revolt against President Jean-Bertrand Aristide.

    If you can’t see a profound difference between that and what we have done, I added capital letters to help. Geez.

    Ricky: No, I don’t believe Waters on crack’s origins. I try to keep a skeptical mind about all sorts of extraordinary claims.

    You guys have yet to make any AFFIRMATIVE argument why Powell and Bush’s statements are credible. I wonder why??

    Steverino: On the thuggery scale, Aristide’s successors look much worse. Frying pan, fire.

    Trump: Young and foolish comes to mind. Let me give you a hint: we STILL deal with the legacy of the Civil War, although not so much as when I was born. Post-Vietnam, only the lobotomized have an excuse for “If Uncle Sam says it, it must be true.” (Other countries have recognized the falsity of this statement for a long time.)

  30. 30.

    Dean

    March 3, 2004 at 5:59 pm

    Actually, I hate to say this Andrew, but your response brings Bluto from Animal House to mind.

    “Over? OVER? It’s not over ’til WE say it’s over! Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!”

  31. 31.

    trump

    March 3, 2004 at 11:18 pm

    Andrew J Lazarus- we may still have to deal with post-vietnam effects, fine. But there is no excuse for you people who define every single thing by it. Dealing with the effects and aftermath of Gulf War I is more important to our lives than rehashing a 35 year old war. FUCK VIETNAM, we have other things to deal with. Vietnam is old news, and Vietnam era throwbacks are also old news. Time to modernize

  32. 32.

    Chowderhead

    March 3, 2004 at 11:28 pm

    I heard that Andrew J. Lazarus likes to bugger little children, a story which I will believe until Andrew J. Lazarus makes an AFFIRMATIVE argument as to why it is false.

  33. 33.

    Toren

    March 4, 2004 at 2:08 am

    Attention, lefties:
    Here is some information on the elections that gave Haiti their “democratically elected leader.” And please note the source…your pals at Human Rights Watch.
    Haiti Elections 2000

  34. 34.

    Andrew J. Lazarus

    March 4, 2004 at 3:26 am

    Chowderhead: we already know Rumsfeld and Powell were very badly mistaken in a matter of national security (or that they dissembled). That’s a good reason to be extra-skeptical of their latest pronouncements. You guys are STILL perfectly willing to take their uncorroborated word, even though WE ALREADY KNOW that it’s no good. Only because they’re saying what you want to believe, not because they’re reliable. (What’s more, David Kay has started COMPLAINING that the Administration isn’t even interested in why they were so wrong on WMD, which detracts from their credibility EVEN FURTHER.)

    A better analogy, Chowderbrain, if you must pick something so lurid, is that if I had already been convicted of child molestation AND THEN YOU WERE SO STUPID AS TO LEAVE A KID WITH ME AGAIN. I mean, I’m not Michael Jackson.

  35. 35.

    Andrew J. Lazarus

    March 4, 2004 at 3:30 am

    (Toren: far be it from me to defend Aristide qua Aristide, like Mugabe, he’s lost it, but what did Human Rights Watch have to say about the Duvalierist butchers who seem to be behind the rebellion? Much, much worse, I’d guess. Leaving aside whether it’s a good thing in general to go around the world removing less-than-democratic governments, we can say with confidence that it’s a bad thing when the replacement is Duvalierist.)

  36. 36.

    Slartibartfast

    March 4, 2004 at 9:43 am

    Andrew in a nutshell: being wrong once is the same as being a pathological liar; hence Rumsfeld and Powell should be assumed to be lying unless conclusive proof of their veracity can be produced.

    Accurate representation?

  37. 37.

    Terry

    March 4, 2004 at 10:07 am

    I’m curious why some of you folks are bothering to respond to an obvious fool like Andrew. It’s clear that a preponderance of his views on the world are filtered through the prism of his anal-retentive memories of listening/reading to leftish crapola most of his life.

  38. 38.

    Jack Sparks (burn rate)

    March 4, 2004 at 10:08 am

    Chowderhead, Radio Hanoi is confirming your story re Andrew’s amorous assignations.

    And Andrew, by your “logic”, we are fully justified in refusing to believe anything said by the entire Clinton administration, Blair’s gov’t, and the gov’ts of every other country who made affirmative statements re Iraq’s WMDs, as well as Kerry, H.R.C., and a myriad of other Democrats.

    I eagerly await your vehement renunciations of Kerry’s entire platform, as it is per se false, or at least presumed false until proven true.

  39. 39.

    Ricky

    March 4, 2004 at 10:42 am

    Ricky: No, I don’t believe Waters on crack’s origins. I try to keep a skeptical mind about all sorts of extraordinary claims.

    Good. This is an extraordinary claim & it’s not up to Powell to prove that Waters is being the fool AGAIN in this case.

    Next.

  40. 40.

    Slartibartfast

    March 4, 2004 at 2:28 pm

    Heh. Well, I was going to stay away from Bush/Clinton comparisons, but I wonder how many in the Clinton administration lost any credibility with Andrew after the aspirin factory turned out to be demonstrably nothing more threatening than an aspirin factory?

  41. 41.

    Jack Sparks (burn rate)

    March 4, 2004 at 2:50 pm

    According to the latest dispatch from Radio Hanoi, it was a BABY asprin factory.

    Ok, I’ll stop now.

  42. 42.

    Dean

    March 4, 2004 at 3:18 pm

    You know what’s funny? Neither Radio Hanoi nor Andrew ever mention one of the key REASONS for that “secret bombing” of Cambodia and the like—the Ho Chi Minh trail.

    You don’t remember that? The trail (more like an unpaved highway in many places) where the North Vietnamese violated sovereignty and ran their supply lines through southern Laos and eastern Cambodia, in order to supply their southern forces?

    To hear Radio Hanoi (or Andrew) talk about it, you’d think that this route didn’t exist, that the bombing was simply in order to bomb a buncha yellow people—as opposed to trying to cut a major supply route that the Laotians and Cambodians were either unwilling (or more likely, unable) to cut themselves.

    Funny….

  43. 43.

    Andrew J. Lazarus

    March 4, 2004 at 5:34 pm

    Dean, I didn’t say the bombings of Laos and Cambodia were unjustified. I said that Radio Hanoi’s account of them was more truthful than our own, which denied they occurred. Does the word “Hanoi” discombobulate you so much, that this elementary distinction escapes you?

    Slart, did Clinton ever insist up and down he was so sure of the aspirin factory, even to the extent of ignoring UN Inspectors in the factory? Of course not. There’s a strong case to be made that Clinton was mistaken, while Powell and Rumsfeld were either eager to deceive themselves, or simply dissembling. OTOH, I wouldn’t believe the first thing Clinton said about an affair; indeed, I didn’t at the time.

    Ricky, how about the teensiest corroboration of Powell’s version of events? Too much to ask for?

  44. 44.

    Dean

    March 4, 2004 at 6:01 pm

    Andrew:

    No, it discombobulates me when somebody says that Radio Hanoi was somehow more honest while leaving aside a gaping hole of facts and reality.

    This would be like arguing that Radio Berlin was more accurate in discussing Stalin’s invasion of Germany while utterly ignoring the events of June 22, 1941. Or arguing that Tokyo Rose was more accurate in reporting the deaths of thousands of civilians in Hiroshima while studiously ignoring Pearl Harbor.

    Similarly, that Radio Hanoi would find it useful to report on the bombing of Cambodia and elsewhere doesn’t surprise me. Neither does your sarcastic reference to it, as though, as I noted above, it occurred out of whole cloth, w/o reference to the Ho Chi Minh trail, etc.

    And if Aristide is going to accuse the US of kidnapping him, why is it up to Powell to prove his word?

  45. 45.

    Harry

    March 4, 2004 at 6:11 pm

    If Aristide had not left Haiti he would be dead now. That’s a fairly reasonable assumption. How would propping up a corrupt murderous regime like Aristide’s with American power be in America’s interests?

    Saddam Hussein won his last election with 100% of the vote and a great many Europeans along with European news organizations took this as a true mandate of the Iraqi people. According to Andy’s logic the Iraqi people craved Saddam Hussein to lord over them and who are we to say different, even if it was detrimental to American interest?

    Haiti is a toilet. It has always been a toilet. It will probably always be a toilet. Clinton and other leftists were and are all to ready to have us swim or drowm in that toilet. Leave Haiti to the Haitians good or bad. Even if Haiti goes Marxist, let it. The only thing Haiti exports is poor people, so I rather doubt it can export Marxism.

    Haitian culture is ingrained with tryanny and poverty and we are not going to change their behavior. Best to leave them to their own fate. The only interest we have in Haiti is to try to stem the number of boat peole trying to reach Florida. So what was in America’s interest was that this crisis end quickly with or without Aristide. It has never mattered and it will never matter which leftist thug whether duly elected or not is charge of Haiti it will remain a sewer. But it is fascinating how much American leftists dig left wing thugs, however. Birds of a feather I guess.

  46. 46.

    Al Maviva

    March 4, 2004 at 10:18 pm

    The rebels start tearing up the country, the Black Congressional Caucus – the self-proclaimed “conscience of the Congress” hollers it’s racist to not intervene.

    Corrine Brown says it’s racist to not take in every Haitian fleeing the country.

    The rebels get into the city, the BCC and John Kerry say it’s racist if Bush does nothing.

    Bush’s ambassador makes a phone call and offers security to drive Aristide to the airport, a couple hundred Marines show up and order the rebels to drop the guns and go home, many Haitians start begging America to stay for 50 or so years, the food relief starts to flow… and it’s… wait for it….

    Why it was the racist overthrow of a democratically elected government of course.

    So there you have it. It’s racist to let the black bodies pile up in a failed state, it’s racist to do something about it.

    Pretty soon, the term racist will have lost its meaning. As will “democratic election” – especially in light of the Organization of American States accusations that Aristide rigged the 2000 election. I mean honest to God, if Bush isn’t democratically elected according to the Dems, how can a real banana republic dictator who really actually stole the last election be democratically elected?

  47. 47.

    Andrew J. Lazarus

    March 4, 2004 at 10:31 pm

    This would be like arguing that Radio Berlin was more accurate in discussing Stalin’s invasion of Germany while utterly ignoring the events of June 22, 1941

    Perhaps it would be. Except Radio Berlin did no such thing, we may well prove my point. I didn’t claim that Radio Hanoi was generally honest, I claimed that on some issues, it was accurate, and our position was false. Would you care to attack that on its merits? Are you claiming that because on many other issues Hanoi was dishonest, then it’s not an embarrassment when the reverse is true? Or are you claiming that North Vietnam was so evil that it doesn’t matter if Radio Hanoi was more accurate? Neither of these strikes me as very cogent, but I’d like to be sure it’s what you intend to argue.

  48. 48.

    Dean

    March 5, 2004 at 9:17 am

    Andrew,

    YOU wrote, “There were times that Radio Hanoi was more truthful than the US Government.”

    Ken Hahn asked for examples.

    YOU cited Radio Hanoi’s reporting on the bombing of Cambodia and Laos as somehow being “more truthful.” This, when they left out the subject of WHAT WAS BEING BOMBED.

    Now you claim that all you are saying is that they were accurate and our statements were false.

    WRONG.

    Their statements were inaccurate, and so were our own government’s. They were inaccurate on different lines. YOU, OTOH, accept their sins of omission, while condemning our (larger, in this case) sins of commission.

    The fact that, for a real-life example, Radio Berlin and the Nazi news structure WAS CORRECT in reporting that it was the Soviets who executed the Polish officers in Katyn Forest allows you to make the claim, I suppose, that it is unfortunate that there were times that the Nazi propaganda machine was more accurate than news from American allies. (An extremely narrowly true statement.) But to use that as support of your larger theme that therefore the US has no credibility, or to justify your cynicism about the American government viz. Aristide (who now seems to be claiming that he left “to avoid further bloodshed”), I leave to the rest of this forum to conclude appropriateness.

  49. 49.

    Slartibartfast

    March 5, 2004 at 10:12 am

    “Slart, did Clinton ever insist up and down he was so sure of the aspirin factory, even to the extent of ignoring UN Inspectors in the factory?”

    Good thing that wasn’t my point, or else my conclusion sure would be in trouble. Luckily for me, the idea that you can call Bush and staff a bunch of pathological liars for the crime of being wrong once without returning the favor to Clinton and staff lives on.

    “There’s a strong case to be made that Clinton was mistaken, while Powell and Rumsfeld were either eager to deceive themselves, or simply dissembling.”

    Feel free to make that point. Better make it a strong one, because this accusation of lying is pretty serious. Serious enough to impeach.

    On the other hand, if you don’t have a strong case, you’re going to look pretty stupid for even mentioning it.

  50. 50.

    CadillaqJaq

    March 5, 2004 at 11:08 am

    Leaving Hanoi aside for a minute, let’s take up a collection and send Andrew off to Africa to “rescue” the kidnapped Aristide and return him to Haiti… like that’s where he’d like to be? LMAO!

    While Andrew is flying the Atlantic with Aristide, perhaps he’d demand to see whatever proof exists that Powell etal lied, or is it just more wishful thinking on your part Andrew?

  51. 51.

    Slartibartfast

    March 5, 2004 at 3:45 pm

    “Slart, did Clinton ever insist up and down he was so sure of the aspirin factory, even to the extent of ignoring UN Inspectors in the factory?”

    Dang, I hate leaving out something. Tell me, does it indicate good judgement on Mr. Clinton’s part that he launched a cruise missile attack on an installation in a country we didn’t currently have any quarrel with, given the lack of total certainty you insist was there?

    Interesting.

  52. 52.

    Andrew J. Lazarus

    March 6, 2004 at 4:14 pm

    Well, Slart, if you want to impeach members of the Administration for being so terribly wrong, far be it from me to stop you. I would at least have expected the credulous officials who believed Ahmad Chalabi and his well-orchestrated network of phony defectors over our own spy agencies and the UN’s on-the-spot inspectors to have been fired. But no. It was all just a teeny accidental mistake, not terrible judgment.

  53. 53.

    Dean

    March 6, 2004 at 6:50 pm

    Back to Aristide, isn’t it odd that the (American) press is still reporting that Aristide wasn’t kidnapped? Instead, they’re reporting that his own bodyguards don’t believe he was kidnapped.

    But I guess expecting Andrew to perhaps recognize that the US Government hasn’t committed EVERY crime it’s accused of is a bit much.

    http://www.jdnews.com/SiteProcessor.cfm?Template=/GlobalTemplates/Details.cfm&StoryID=20776&Section=News

  54. 54.

    Slartibartfast

    March 6, 2004 at 10:53 pm

    “Well, Slart, if you want to impeach members of the Administration for being so terribly wrong…”

    WRONG? I thought they were liars. Warp 8 on the goalposts, you canna push em much faster.

  55. 55.

    M. Scott Eiland

    March 6, 2004 at 11:14 pm

    “Back to Aristide, isn’t it odd that the (American) press is still reporting that Aristide wasn’t kidnapped? Instead, they’re reporting that his own bodyguards don’t believe he was kidnapped.

    But I guess expecting Andrew to perhaps recognize that the US Government hasn’t committed EVERY crime it’s accused of is a bit much.”

    *snicker*

    *Scott hauls out The World’s Smallest Violin and starts playing “Nearer By God To Thee” in honor of Andrew’s riding the good ship “Maxine May *Not* Be An Insane Racist Liar, ‘cuz Bush–he’s *bad*” straight into Davy’s Jones’ Locker*

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - PaulB - Olympic National Park: Lake Quinault 1
Image by PaulB (5/17/25)

Recent Comments

  • Omnes Omnibus on Repubs in Disarray Open Thread (May 18, 2025 @ 12:04am)
  • RaflW on War for Ukraine Day 1,178: Russia Commits Another War Crime in Sumy (May 17, 2025 @ 11:59pm)
  • Adam L Silverman on War for Ukraine Day 1,178: Russia Commits Another War Crime in Sumy (May 17, 2025 @ 11:48pm)
  • Jay on War for Ukraine Day 1,178: Russia Commits Another War Crime in Sumy (May 17, 2025 @ 11:42pm)
  • NotMax on Repubs in Disarray Open Thread (May 17, 2025 @ 11:39pm)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!