• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

With all due respect and assumptions of good faith, please fuck off into the sun.

It’s a good piece. click on over. but then come back!!

“woke” is the new caravan.

Reality always lies in wait for … Democrats.

The words do not have to be perfect.

The gop is a fucking disgrace.

I am pretty sure these ‘journalists’ were not always such a bootlicking sycophants.

Impressively dumb. Congratulations.

Books are my comfort food!

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires republicans to act in good faith.

Quote tweet friends, screenshot enemies.

Take hopelessness and turn it into resilience.

Live so that if you miss a day of work people aren’t hoping you’re dead.

This chaos was totally avoidable.

I swear, each month of 2025 will have its own history degree.

I’m starting to think Jesus may have made a mistake saving people with no questions asked.

The arc of history bends toward the same old fuckery.

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

Well, whatever it is, it’s better than being a Republican.

Republicans firmly believe having an abortion is a very personal, very private decision between a woman and J.D. Vance.

American history and black history cannot be separated.

There are consequences to being an arrogant, sullen prick.

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

When your entire life is steeped in white supremacy, equality feels like discrimination.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / What Comes Around…

What Comes Around…

by John Cole|  April 14, 20043:31 pm| 29 Comments

This post is in: Politics

FacebookTweetEmail

The Political Animal is upset because he is finally starting to catch a whiff of politics in the whole 9/11 Commission. Better late than never, I say, but what is Kevin so upset about:

You can just feel the cleverness oozing from Ashcroft’s pores as he felt “compelled” to mention that Gorelick was the author of the memo, can’t you? It’s like watching a high school student council meeting.

But there’s a serious question here. The fact that Ashcroft was so pleased with himself makes it obvious that he declassified this memo for the sole purpose of embarrassing Gorelick, an action that continues a Bush administration pattern of casually declassifying anything that helps their political cause but refusing to declassify anything that might hurt them.

You mean it is sorta like certain Democrats on the 9/11 Commission demanding that an August 6th PDB that they had read be declassified so people like you could wildly exxagerate (like in this post you wrote two hours ago)the ‘information’ contained within the document and use it as a bludgeon to beat the President with as an election year stunt?

Is it something like that? I am shocked!

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Blogads
Next Post: This Is Refreshing »

Reader Interactions

29Comments

  1. 1.

    shark

    April 14, 2004 at 4:13 pm

    They’re finding out that blowback is a real bitch, aren’t they?

  2. 2.

    epistemology

    April 14, 2004 at 4:15 pm

    Politics in the 9/11 commission?!
    Hell, the Iraq war never had anything to do with US security (no one is that stupid). This was about politics from the beginning. Too many liberals supported the Afghanistan war. Rove needed a war that would generate some of those anti-American protests he loves so much.

  3. 3.

    Rick

    April 14, 2004 at 4:28 pm

    Sheesh. Just read a bunch of the comments. I’m not sure Washington Monthly was really needing an injection of shrill statemongering like Drum has drawn.

    Cordially…

  4. 4.

    Flagwaver

    April 14, 2004 at 5:30 pm

    Jeebus, I don’t freakin’ believe my eyes!!!

    Epistemology, I think your tinfoil hat slipped a little, and let in some of those satellite-based mind control rays. I’ve heard “It’s all about the oil!,” and I’ve heard “Bush lied about WMD!” but I’ve NEVER heard that this was all about giving Rove some anti-American protests. And that benefitted Rove/Bush how, exactly??????????

    Planning to vote for Dennis Kucinich, are you??

  5. 5.

    HH

    April 14, 2004 at 6:00 pm

    Notice how everyone but Yglesias apparently sidesteps the real issue of conflict of interest…

  6. 6.

    Andrew J. Lazarus

    April 14, 2004 at 11:52 pm

    Do you think Ashcroft is being even-handed when he decides which memos to de-classify? I mean, is it possible that there’s other pertinent memos that are still secret???

  7. 7.

    Slartibartfast

    April 15, 2004 at 7:15 am

    I don’t understand why those who were screaming for the PDB declassification aren’t overjoyed that the declassification of this memo was accomplished with such alacrity.

  8. 8.

    TM Lutas

    April 15, 2004 at 9:00 am

    I think we should all take a moment to cheer the Democrat party operatives for their self-sacrifice. They’re furthering the cause of declassification reform, don’t you know.

  9. 9.

    br

    April 15, 2004 at 9:07 am

    So what Andrew is proposing is that we ignore the memo and its author simply because we just, really just, don’t know if there are more memos…what a way to change the subject…magicians you all are

  10. 10.

    Ron

    April 15, 2004 at 10:26 am

    Slarti asks

    I don’t understand why those who were screaming for the PDB declassification aren’t overjoyed that the declassification of this memo was accomplished with such alacrity.

    You were joking, right? Allow me to quote from a couple of Calpundit’s previous posts:

    The White House is “actively” working to declassify the August 6 Presidential Daily Briefing

  11. 11.

    Slartibartfast

    April 15, 2004 at 12:10 pm

    No, I wasn’t joking. But it’s possible that you misunderstood me.

  12. 12.

    Rick

    April 15, 2004 at 1:22 pm

    “I mean, is it possible that there’s other pertinent memos that are still secret???”

    AJL,

    This is one of those historic moments when it’s appropriate to adapt a quotation from Jacques ChIrak: You missed a good opportunity to keep quiet.

    Cordially…

  13. 13.

    Robin Roberts

    April 15, 2004 at 3:56 pm

    It should be rather obvious that Gorelick’s memo doesn’t have any potential to reveal intelligence capabilities to the extent that the PDB memo did. Accordingly, Ashcroft’s declassification of it did not do as much damage as the 9/11 Commission did by setting up the pressure for the declassification of the PDB. And as for game playing, there is a good case for the idea that the Democrat commission members were trying to play a game that dared the White House to declassify the PDB while hoping that the WH wouldn’t.

    And as pointed out, still Gorelick sits on the Commission while fatally conflicted.

  14. 14.

    The Bobs

    April 15, 2004 at 4:19 pm

    You mean it is sorta like certain Democrats on the 9/11 Commission demanding that an August 6th PDB that they had read be declassified

    Which democratic commission members were making this demand John? I have been unable to confirm this assertion.

  15. 15.

    frontinus

    April 15, 2004 at 7:50 pm

    I’d seen mentions of FISA changes during 1995 in several articles predating Ashcroft’s theatrics so I seriously doubt this was entirely unknown in the beltway. Much like the Ressam/Millenium story which was allowed to fester for weeks.

  16. 16.

    Andrew J. Lazarus

    April 16, 2004 at 10:36 am

    Salon says that Ashcroft’s deputy AG “Larry Thompson, endorsed precisely the same 1995 guidelines on Aug. 6, 2001.” I wonder why Ashcroft didn’t mention that?

    Salon also notes that Ashcroft apparently lied under oath when he stated that Clinton had not approved an assassination of Osama. And that both Democratic and Republican members of the Commission were trying to interrogate him about this, within the constraints that the assassination order remains classified. I guess Ashcroft didn’t realize that the Administration had (most reluctantly) turned over that memo along with other Clinton-era material they had withheld. Perhaps that’s because unlike the hastily-declassified Gorelick memo, it didn’t tend to exculpate them. (Don’t you find the Administration’s willingness to declassify memos seems based more on politicial opportunity that any visible security interests?)

    Clarke, Zinni, Wilson, so many career civil servants end up at loggerheads with the Bush Administration. Some of them have no record as Democrats.

  17. 17.

    Ricky

    April 16, 2004 at 2:13 pm

    Joe f-ing Conason?

    What, you couldn’t find a string from Sid Blumenthal to grasp ahold of?

  18. 18.

    the talking dog

    April 16, 2004 at 4:11 pm

    HH-

    Good catch on conflicts of interest involving Gorelick.

    (1) Mr. Ashcroft somehow raised Ms. Gorelick as an impediment to his own freedom of action, failing to note that he outranks her as the AG (she was Deputy) and more importantly, she was out of power– and he was in, yet whatever her policy was he didn’t like, he didn’t change it to his liking.

    (2) Why is no one talking about Ms. Gorelick being on the 9-11 commission AT ALL when her Wlimer Cutler & Pickering law firm represents SAUDI DEFENDANTS in civil suits being brought by families of 9-11 victims? Just– why is that? I realize Ms. G. is a Democrat (as am I)– and of late, its fashionable to call Republicans for this kind of conflict– but this one is bad.

    As to that– I think you’re all kind of missing the point of the 9-11 commission, which is good theatre– OF COURSE its partisan– the press eats that shit up. Its mission is to divert the attention of the American people from some fairly OBVIOUS questions that DO NOT involve the commission’s limited mandate on so-called intelligence failures. I refer specifically to operational failures– and why no one is investigating a series of fiascos ranging from delays in notifying NORAD to delays in scrambling fighters to delays in TELLING fighters IN THE AIR just how critical the situation was to the DOD situation room well aware of 2 planes crashing into WTC and 2 more in the air, and tracking them, while not telling the SecDef who remained in his office (with 20,000 other people) while a plane hurtled to the Pentagon, and finally and most intriguingly, why the President of the United States– the one man with the authority if necessary to shoot down airliners over the United States, took himself out of commission to read a goat story to 3rd graders, instead of excusing himself to get his ass to a situation room.

    THOSE are things I want to see investigated– and they are ALL beyond this commission’s mandate.
    Funny that.

  19. 19.

    Tongue Boy

    April 16, 2004 at 4:28 pm

    Andrew Lazarus states: “Salon says that Ashcroft’s deputy AG “Larry Thompson, endorsed precisely the same 1995 guidelines on Aug. 6, 2001.” I wonder why Ashcroft didn’t mention that?”

    It does seem ridiculous for his own AG to endorse guidelines that were in the author’s own words “which go beyond what is legally required.” And both Gorelick and Thompson look foolish after this decision by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review.

    But is your implication that the final consequences stemming from Gorelick’s memo were the same as Thompson’memo and therefore deserved equal billing? If so, that conclusion does not square with the timelines; Thompson’s memo could have had no conceivable impact on the events of 9/11 coming as it did less than five weeks beforehand, whereas Gorelick’s memo immensely weakened intelligence sharing capabilities during the precise period that Al Qaeda, the perpetrators of 9/11, was gathering strength.

    Since certain members of the committee seemed immensely worried about the time constraints of questioning during Ms. Rice’s testimony, perhaps Ashcroft was cutting to the chase and addressing those decisions having a direct effect on the course of potential intelligence failures leading to 9/11.

  20. 20.

    Andrew J. Lazarus

    April 16, 2004 at 9:02 pm

    Tongue Boy, indeed if Ashcroft’s DoJ had changed the policy as of August 2001, ut would not have stopped the hijackers. But the conspicuous failure to change the policy (indeed, the decision to reiterate it) suggests that Ashcroft should have been much, much less smug.

  21. 21.

    jean

    April 16, 2004 at 11:39 pm

    Was just running through the comments here and someone said,
    In Salon they wrote and I burst out
    laughing. You believe what you
    read on that site?

    Oh, dear.

  22. 22.

    Andrew J. Lazarus

    April 17, 2004 at 5:36 pm

    You can take editorializing at Salon at whatever discount you please. Generally I assume that statements of fact from the mid-left to the mid-right are truthful: I’m not disputing the right-wing reports of Gorelick’s memo (that of course soon spread to the major media), even though I didn’t read it with my own eyes.

    Of course, there are exceptions. Where’s the WMD? (Bush still talks about them the way a developmentally-disabled adult might speak of Santa Claus, that he just can’t let go of the chance they exist).

    Tell you what, jean. Let’s make a cash bet on whether Salon is correct that Larry Thomson reaffirmed the pre-existing policy.

  23. 23.

    GrantR

    April 17, 2004 at 7:19 pm

    Andrew wrote:
    “…Ashcroft should have been much, much less smug.”

    Exactly how smug is Ashcroft allowed to be?

    Slightly smuggy with a chance of glowers?

  24. 24.

    Kimmitt

    April 18, 2004 at 12:57 pm

    Since he was in office during the worst attack in US history, not even a little smug.

    Of course, since he’s a goddamn fascist, smug comes with the territory.

  25. 25.

    Andrew J. Lazarus

    April 18, 2004 at 6:09 pm

    Gorelick in the Washington Post: “The Truth About the ‘Wall'”

    Very obvious that the idea the wall arose from some volitional act of hers is absurd. And that until it was convenient as part of the Slime and Defend campaign, AG Ashcroft never had any problem with it.

  26. 26.

    Tongue Boy

    April 19, 2004 at 9:18 am

    I didn’t see is testimony so am unable to gauge his “smugness” for myself. Having observed him through two terms as attorney general, two terms as governor and one term as U.S. senator from my home state, I would never use the term “smug” to characterize Ashcroft’s public appearances. Boring, maybe. Sleep-inducing, almost certainly. Smug, naaahh.

  27. 27.

    Tongue Boy

    April 19, 2004 at 9:27 am

    Kimmitt excretes, referring to John Ashcroft:

    “Of course, since he’s a goddamn fascist, smug comes with the territory.”

    Golllly! Us Ozark hillbillies sure got schlickered by that big-city fascist John Ashcroft, bein’ all fascist and not even tellin’ us.

    Even after we elected him twice as attorney general.

    And twice as governor.

    And once as U.S. senator.

    And he *really* schlickered us ’cause bein’ a fascist and whatnot, he twern’t suppos’d to hold no more ‘lections after the first one. Maybe he was just pretendin’ to be a fascist so as to gets all the fascist votes. Well, durn tootin’ he did it and then got all gooey democrat on us and when he was gov’nor he didn’t even disband the Missouri State Assembly like a good fascist!

    Well, I know one ol’ hillbilly who ain’t never gonna vote for that lyin’ bastard ever, ever again.

  28. 28.

    Ricky

    April 19, 2004 at 2:00 pm

    Andrew, Gorelick’s spin convinces no one but the diehard Bush haters (like Kimmitt, who just destroyed any and all credibility whatsoever).

    Very obvious that the idea the wall arose from some volitional act of hers is absurd.

    Well, yeah, if you want to forget those pesky facts.
    Please.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. The S-Train Canvass says:
    April 15, 2004 at 2:08 am

    Politicians need to walk THE LINE!

    John Cole hits it well about the 9/11 Commission becoming more and more political. Once again politics gets in the…

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - Winter Wren - North of Quebec City (part 2 of 3) - Cap Tourmente and on the way to Tadoussac 2
Image by Winter Wren (5/13/25)

Recent Comments

  • Jay on MAHA Slap Fight! (Open Thread) (May 13, 2025 @ 2:47pm)
  • Geminid on MAHA Slap Fight! (Open Thread) (May 13, 2025 @ 2:45pm)
  • Trivia Man on MAHA Slap Fight! (Open Thread) (May 13, 2025 @ 2:45pm)
  • Trivia Man on MAHA Slap Fight! (Open Thread) (May 13, 2025 @ 2:44pm)
  • 🐾BillinGlendaleCA on On The Road – 🐾BillinGlendaleCA – Dark Places (May 13, 2025 @ 2:42pm)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!