• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Let the trolls come, and then ignore them. that’s the worst thing you can do to a troll.

Republicans seem to think life begins at the candlelight dinner the night before.

The arc of the moral universe does not bend itself. it is up to us to bend it.

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

I’d hate to be the candidate who lost to this guy.

“Can i answer the question? No you can not!”

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

America is going up in flames. The NYTimes fawns over MAGA celebrities. No longer a real newspaper.

“What are Republicans afraid of?” Everything.

When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty. ~Thomas Jefferson

The poor and middle-class pay taxes, the rich pay accountants, the wealthy pay politicians.

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Radicalized white males who support Trump are pitching a tent in the abyss.

When your entire life is steeped in white supremacy, equality feels like discrimination.

Dear elected officials: Trump is temporary, dishonor is forever.

Conservatism: there are people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

Rupert, come get your orange boy, you petrified old dinosaur turd.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

Nothing says ‘pro-life’ like letting children go hungry.

Come on, man.

White supremacy is terrorism.

Marge, god is saying you’re stupid.

All hail the time of the bunny!

Republican speaker of the house Mike Johnson is the bland and smiling face of evil.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Here We Go Again

Here We Go Again

by John Cole|  June 7, 20041:38 pm| 13 Comments

This post is in: Democratic Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

When your partisan blinders are so snugly fit on your skull, it is easy to take anything out of context. Today’s example- Oliver looks at a Rumsfeld statement as a scathing indictment of the administration:

The Failure Of Donald Rumsfeld

I can’t believe he said this.

Rumsfeld fears U.S. losing long-term fight against terror

The troubling unknown, he said, is whether the extremists — whom he termed “zealots and despots” bent on destroying the global system of nation-states — are turning out newly trained terrorists faster than the United States can capture or kill them.

“It’s quite clear to me that we do not have a coherent approach to this,” Rumsfeld said at an international security conference.

It is quite clear to me that Rumsfeld, far from being a failure, is doing what he should be doing- asking the tough questions, questioning our policies, trying to make sure we are doing the right thing. Why do I say this? Because this is EXACTLY THE SAME DAMNED THING HE SAID 8 months ago in a memo the Democrats tried to distort and use for partisan gain then:

Today, we lack metrics to know if we are winning or losing the global war on terror. Are we capturing, killing or deterring and dissuading more terrorists every day than the madrassas and the radical clerics are recruiting, training and deploying against us?

Does the US need to fashion a broad, integrated plan to stop the next generation of terrorists? The US is putting relatively little effort into a long-range plan, but we are putting a great deal of effort into trying to stop terrorists. The cost-benefit ratio is against us! Our cost is billions against the terrorists’ costs of millions.

Do we need a new organization?

How did Oliver try to spin the rhetorical questions posed in the memo when it first came out? There was this:

This administration has not screwed up this fight completely, and the battle is long and complicated, but I honestly feel we haven’t been using our full brain on this. We do what feels like may be good, but then it fades away to bite us in the rear another day.

Then there was this post, in which he tried to use the memo as proof that we were failing in Iraq.

They sold us a war. And our kids will be paying the bills.

I will give the Democrats this much- they are not intellectually honest, but they sure are consistent.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Amusing
Next Post: Hunh? »

Reader Interactions

13Comments

  1. 1.

    DANEgerus

    June 7, 2004 at 2:45 pm

    yeah but did Oliver’s site feature appropriately objectified women with large ta-tas?

  2. 2.

    Oliver

    June 7, 2004 at 2:51 pm

    Actually, Im just surprised he said it out loud. He knows that he’s screwed the pooch, he just doesnt usually say it out loud.

  3. 3.

    Gary Farber

    June 7, 2004 at 8:22 pm

    “I will give the Democrats this much- they are not intellectually honest, but they sure are consistent.”

    I must have missed the VLWC memo; when was Oliver Willis appointed spokesperson for the Democratic party, exactly?

  4. 4.

    S.W. Anderson

    June 7, 2004 at 10:58 pm

    It’s interesting Rumsfeld offered this up in Singapore (maybe a safe enough distance from D.C.), while the boss man was in Europe and attention in this country and Europe was focused on D-Day events and high-level talks. And then, on Reagan’s passing.

    The fact that Rumsfeld’s ruminations got relatively little play and discussion in the media may augur well for him back on the reservation.

    George W. may have near endless patience with sources of bad ideas, questionable and wrong information, and terrible results. However, he draws a sharp line when it comes to people making statements based on thinking outside the administration box — especially when some pretty obvious good sense shines through. Can’t have that, no sir.

    Wouldn’t it be something if, after getting everything but a kiss on the mouth from W after the Abu Ghraib debacle, Rumsfeld were to be escorted to the same plank used for Shinseki and O’Neill’s departures?

  5. 5.

    Rick

    June 8, 2004 at 11:24 am

    Nawwww…in spite of all their lip service, the Democrats don’t know nuance when it bites them on the ass.

    Cordially…

  6. 6.

    sheesh

    June 8, 2004 at 1:27 pm

    Hey, Farber: Oliver is SELF-appointed.

  7. 7.

    Gary Farber

    June 8, 2004 at 10:18 pm

    “Hey, Farber: Oliver is SELF-appointed.”

    I doubt that, Mr. Sheesh, but let’s stipulate it for the moment. Why is John Cole acting as if it is an official appointment, and denouncing “Democrats” based upon what Oliver Willis says?

    Would it be equally valid to denounce “Republicans” because of what some Republican blogger we choose to pick out says? If not, why not?

  8. 8.

    double effin'sheesh

    June 9, 2004 at 5:59 am

    Uh, I dunno — I suppose if they were saying it over at the Corner, you could (and WOULD) say it represents GOP thinking. I don’t think there’s a bigger shill for the DNC on the web than old Ollie. He fancies himself a real Party strategist, and every chance he gets, he charges to the Party’s defense. Why don’t you TAKE A LOOK at the ads, etc. on his site? I guess if you want to keep playing blind & dumb, that’s your thing. Christ! The more I think about it, the more annoyed I am with your willful blarney.

  9. 9.

    Gary Farber

    June 9, 2004 at 6:21 am

    So, John, do you agree with this brave anonymous poster?

  10. 10.

    John Cole

    June 9, 2004 at 6:50 am

    Gary-

    A.) Although I only linked to Oliver, there were numerous Democrats ranging from Matt Yglesias to Pandagon to Oliver making statements.

    B.) I am not really sure what he is saying, to be quite honest, but his anonymity doesn’t bother me nearly as much as Atrios.

  11. 11.

    Gary Farber

    June 9, 2004 at 1:47 pm

    “A.) Although I only linked to Oliver, there were numerous Democrats ranging from Matt Yglesias to Pandagon to Oliver making statements.”

    It would have been helpful to say so when making your assertion.

    In general, when accusing a mass of people, such as “Republicans,” or “Democrats,” of being guilty of some charge, it is useful to provide more than one example; it is most useful, and convincing, if the examples are official examples, and not, say, bloggers. So I suggest, at least.

  12. 12.

    John Cole

    June 9, 2004 at 1:54 pm

    They are not only bloggers, they are part of the Democratic apparatchik.

    Oliver Willis- Media Matters
    Jesse Taylor- Jerry Springers Advocacy Group
    Matthew Yglesias- The American Prospect
    KEvin Drum- Washington Monthly

    IN addition, Atrios also commented on the matter, and he has been a huge fundraiser for numerous candidates and numerous left-wing causes. All of the above also have advertisements on their web sites for official Democratic candidates.

    When I quote them, I am quoting the mainstream of Democratic thought.

  13. 13.

    Sheesh

    June 10, 2004 at 1:37 pm

    Farber seems to be some sort of goofball Foucault. When it’s convenient for him, he claims to have problems with even the most narrowly drawn generalizations. Because he’s my new hero, and in the interest of consistency, I forbid Mr Farber from using the terms “Republican,” “Democrat,” “Liberal,” “Conservative,” “People,” “Dog,” etc. etc.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road -  ?BillinGlendaleCA - Gold! 1
Image by BillinGlendaleCA (5/10/25)

Recent Comments

  • Jackie on The Gifts That Keep on Giving (May 14, 2025 @ 1:56pm)
  • Betty Cracker on Wednesday Morning Open Thread: Summer Travel Season (May 14, 2025 @ 1:55pm)
  • lou on Wednesday Morning Open Thread: Summer Travel Season (May 14, 2025 @ 1:54pm)
  • prostratedragon on The Gifts That Keep on Giving (May 14, 2025 @ 1:52pm)
  • Redshift on The Gifts That Keep on Giving (May 14, 2025 @ 1:52pm)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!