• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

I like political parties that aren’t owned by foreign adversaries.

We are aware of all internet traditions.

Welcome to day five of every-bit-as-bad-as-you-thought-it-would-be.

I’ve spoken to my cat about this, but it doesn’t seem to do any good.

It’s the corruption, stupid.

’Where will you hide, Roberts, the laws all being flat?’

Conservatism: there are people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

Fundamental belief of white supremacy: white people are presumed innocent, minorities are presumed guilty.

Let there be snark.

If you’re gonna whine, it’s time to resign!

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

if you can’t see it, then you are useless in the fight to stop it.

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires Republicans to act in good faith.

Someone should tell Republicans that violence is the last refuge of the incompetent, or possibly the first.

Cancel the cowardly Times and Post and set up an equivalent monthly donation to ProPublica.

Many life forms that would benefit from greater intelligence, sadly, do not have it.

Since we are repeating ourselves, let me just say fuck that.

“A king is only a king if we bow down.” – Rev. William Barber

Hell hath no fury like a farmer bankrupted.

Hot air and ill-informed banter

Oppose, oppose, oppose. do not congratulate. this is not business as usual.

White supremacy is terrorism.

Jack Smith: “Why did you start campaigning in the middle of my investigation?!”

Sadly, there is no cure for stupid.

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Foot In Mouth Syndrome

Foot In Mouth Syndrome

by John Cole|  October 12, 20042:54 pm| 19 Comments

This post is in: Democratic Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

Prior to the 1990’s revival of the GOP, it seemed the Republican party had a bottomless pit of methods for self-destruction in campaigns, and one commentator quipped:

“Never underestimate the Repulican’s ability to shoot themselves in the foot while it is in their mouth.”

It appears there is a little bit of this going around the Kerry/Edwards camp. The first statement is the widely discussed nuisance statement:

When I asked Kerry what it would take for Americans to feel safe again, he displayed a much less apocalyptic worldview. “We have to get back to the place we were, where terrorists are not the focus of our lives, but they’re a nuisance,” Kerry said. “As a former law-enforcement person, I know we’re never going to end prostitution. We’re never going to end illegal gambling. But we’re going to reduce it, organized crime, to a level where it isn’t on the rise. It isn’t threatening people’s lives every day, and fundamentally, it’s something that you continue to fight, but it’s not threatening the fabric of your life.”

This will upset my loyal friends on the right, but I just don’t see what the problem with this statement is, and I agree with him. That is the goal- to eliminate the current overwhelming terrorist threat to that of nuisance level. It in no way implies that Kerry underestimates the nature of the threat (although I believe he does), it in no way means he will be weak on terrorism (although I think he will be not as good as Bush), but rather, it is clearly a statement in which Kerry is asked to project what the world is going to look like after our successful prosecution on the war on terror.

We will never eradicate all terrorism, and the goal is to get it to the level that life is tolerable. There is always going to be some idiot with some C4 or a fertilizer bomb- hell, go read Orcinus and you will find out all aboutour own homegrown nuts who are walting around the US with their own half-baked ideas.

Why, then, am I calling this a foot in mouth gaffe? Because you would think the jackass who totally demagogued Bush’s statement that we can never ‘win’ the war on terror would know better than to say the same damn thing. Of course, Kerry contradicts himself hourly and no one seems to care, so perhaps he just said to hell with it and didn’t give it any thought. At any rate, even though I agree with him, it is funny watching him get hit around hte head and shoulders with this statement.

The next gaffe from the Dynamic Duo is John Edward’s hideous statement implying that if Kerry is elected, the handicapped will walk again. Not only did he not wait until Reee’s corpse was even cold, it is a disgusting lie. There is simply no evidenmce that embryonic stem cell research will help spinal injury victims atall, and saying otherwise is worthy of condemnation.

Dan Quayle should be breathing a sigh of relief, because he seems downright Presidential compared to Edwards.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Shocking Death
Next Post: How Does The Kool-Aid Taste Today? »

Reader Interactions

19Comments

  1. 1.

    shark

    October 12, 2004 at 3:49 pm

    “We have to get back to the place we were, where terrorists are not the focus of our lives, but they’re a nuisance

    I have bolded the part of the sentance that is the problem.

    “Back to where we were”- I have to assume that he means prior to 9/11 and the war on terror.

    Well, people died during that period. They died because we viewed terrorism as a “nuisance” instead of something to eradicate.

    This indicates a 9/10 mindset.

  2. 2.

    CadillaqJaq

    October 12, 2004 at 3:57 pm

    None of Kerry’s verbal flubs compare with the one real reason why he shouldn’t be elected president; John Edwards.

  3. 3.

    Director Mitch

    October 12, 2004 at 4:35 pm

    Terrorism is a “nuisance” when? Only when it is only happening to Jews overseas and not Americans?

  4. 4.

    jeff

    October 12, 2004 at 5:31 pm

    Edwards makes Kerry sound like one of those preachers you see on TV who smacks some people on the forehead and all of a sudden they’re “healed”.

  5. 5.

    JohnO

    October 12, 2004 at 5:35 pm

    The sad part is that Edwards would be hovering over the doctors in the event that the perfect result wasn’t achieved, ready and waiting to issue the Summons & Complaint. For him to say ANYTHING about medical progress is just astounding.

  6. 6.

    Bloggerhead

    October 12, 2004 at 6:01 pm

    John,

    I disagree with only a little of what you’ve written here. It just seems to me that the quite benign political point you’re scoring–Kerry’s a flip-flopper or hypocrite, ho hum–isn’t worth sullying your much more important point, that the war on terror likely won’t end in it’s complete eradication, and that, it follows, this is a different sort of conflict, to which the current crude dichotomy, military v. criminal (decide, damnit!), does little justice. Of course, it has been primarily war-supporters who have exploited this crudeness, crudely, and with crude on top.

    Plus, Kerry was not being a complete hypocrite for attacking Bush for something that, I agree, Kerry believes. It is the President who, in the process of wrapping himself in a manly banner, has embraced the muscular military solution to the denigration of the police. So when he says something which shows he recognizes that this is not a war to end in treaties and a cessation of hostilities, it shows his hypocrisy in exploiting the military v. criminal dichotomy as well.

    So both sides can be lying cocksuckers at times, manipulative and, well, political, big surprise. What’s important is who can lead us to stamp down terror and, it again follows, to clean up Iraq. So far, Bush has shown only the faintest understanding, as you appear ruefully to admit, and he back-tracks like the devil when called on anything, too. (Remember how he and his campaign had, on the very next day, to “exlain his remarks” about not be able to win the war on terror?) Kerry at least grasps the problem, and no amount of dis-contectualizing his Senate record and shrieking about his being the most liberal Senator can shake the growing impression, I sense, that he is better equipped to confront terror. You see, Bush has a record, too, and it’s really, really fresh in people’s minds.

  7. 7.

    Bloggerhead

    October 12, 2004 at 6:29 pm

    Oh, and nice additional cheap shot attempt, linking the dubious notion that embryonic stem cells offer no hope (yeah, that’s why researchers are clamoring for them) with the relative merits of Edwards and Quayle. Admittedly, Edwards can appear to be at boy amongst men, at times, but Quayle remains a simpleton in any setting, except in one-on-one meetings with current President.

  8. 8.

    W. K.

    October 12, 2004 at 6:51 pm

    I know that a moron like Bloggerhead will never be convinced, but I find it inconceivable that the American people could ever turn to a piece of excrement like John Kerry given his horrible record on national security matters. Consider some of the distinctive national security choices Kerry has made over the years.

    April 22, 1971: The American people have never elected president someone who, while serving in the military, chose to testify (in uniform) against a war his country was then waging.

    January 12, 1991: The American people have never elected president a senator who voted against an authorization for
    the use of military force, in this case in pursuance of a United Nations-approved policy to eject Saddam Hussein from Kuwait.

    October 17, 2003: The American people have never elected president someone who voted against an appropriation to support troops fighting in a war he had approved

    September 23, 2004: The American people have never elected president someone who gratuitously attacked a visiting leader, in this case Iraqi prime minister Ayad Allawi, after a speech to a joint session of Congress, when that leader’s government was fighting terrorists on a day-to-day basis alongside American troops.

    Will the American people choose as president someone with John Kerry’s national security record? They never have before.

  9. 9.

    TM Lutas

    October 12, 2004 at 9:12 pm

    So, how long has it been since the bey of Tripoli sponsored a pirate expedition in the Mediterranean?

    From the halls of Montezuma to the shores of Tripoli!

    Is terrorism any more difficult than piracy to eliminate? Why?

  10. 10.

    Mark

    October 12, 2004 at 9:26 pm

    First: I more or less loathe John Kerry.

    Second: I absolutely loathe the Bush-Is-The-Devil Crowd.

    But I don’t think there’s any point to pouncing on Kerry for his “nuisance” comment. In isolation, it can be understood as expressed desire to dampen, not ignore, the threat of terrorism. Moreover, when held up next to Bush’s remark about the impossibility of “winning” the war against terrorism, it seems to be of the same ilk. Let’s not play the same “gotcha” game that Kerry’s moronic supporters (actually, Bush’s addled enemies) played when Bush made his remark.

    Kerry’s remark, really, means next to nothing. However, Kerry’s history on defense and foreign policy issues — his relentless antipathy toward American power & his sympathy for dubious leftist foreign regimes and “summitry” — is the truly telling factor that should be hammered home by all those worried that the man with “a plan” might soon be running our foreign policy.

  11. 11.

    Toren

    October 12, 2004 at 10:12 pm

    Yeah, Kerry’s so serious about terrorism that he failed to show up last week for arguably the most critical legislation on intelligence reform ever, the National Intelligence Reform Act of 2004. What the hell, he’s missed 92% of all Senate votes this year, anyway…what’s one more? Not to mention the fact official records show Kerry not present for at least 76% of public hearings held during his eight years on the Senate Intelligence Committee, and possibly 78% (the record of one hearing is ambiguous).
    Now there’s a man serious about terrorism!
    And Bloggerhead…here’s some facts on stem cell research from that right wing tool, CNN:

    The president and his supporters note that his administration is the first to offer any federal funding for embryonic stem cell research, accusing Democrats of trying to create the impression that Bush has banned the practice.
    Criticizing Edwards’ comment linking the lifting of Bush’s policy to medical breakthroughs, Frist said research related to spinal cord injuries does not involve embryonic stem cells but rather adult stem cells, “where the president has absolutely no restrictions, no limitations and there are about 140 treatments.”

  12. 12.

    SDN

    October 13, 2004 at 6:04 am

    Actually, TM, terrorism is more difficult to eliminate than piracy: it requires less infrastructure.

    Consider: to be a pirate, you must obtain a reasonably sized ship, equipped with weapons and ammunition (all of which have to be built somewhere); you have to obtain a fairly large crew (to run your own ship and have extras for casualties, prize crew, etc.); and you must have a place to return to between forays to repair, reprovision, and fence the loot. All of these things can be traced.

    Terrorism requires much less: Timothy McVeigh represents a fairly large scale effort, and all he needed was himself and one other person, a truck he rented at a corner gas station, and a few hundred pounds of a common substnce that he could have bought in small quantities over months from a dozen Wal-Marts.

    Clear on the difference now? I can spot Port Royale on a spy satellite; Tim’s garage is a little more difficult.

  13. 13.

    Steve Malynn

    October 13, 2004 at 9:13 am

    A couple of historic and current facts. Piracy does not require pre-existing assets, just theft. It does not require heavy weapons, just knives. Only when the merchant ship was heavily armed, did the Pirate need more arms, usually acquired from the ship taken, because unsuccessful pirates died. Unfortunately, there is always someone willing to buy stolen goods, to reduce the incidence of piracy (like terrorism) this support needs to be reduced.

    Piracy still exists, over 370 instances each year, many cargo ships are hijacked and ransacked without the use of firearms today.

    A massive bibliography: http://www.nwc.navy.mil/library/3Publications/NWCLibraryPublications/LibNotes/libModernMaritimePiracy.htm

  14. 14.

    Ken

    October 13, 2004 at 12:47 pm

    “The American people have never elected president a senator who voted against an authorization for
    the use of military force”

    Didn’t Lincoln oppose the Mexican War while in Congress?

    It’s true that terrorism will, at best, be reduced to a “nuisance” – there will never be any shortage of idiots with a grudge. But that doesn’t mean we should let them get their hands on nukes, which is what will end up happening sooner rather than later if terror-sympathetic states (*cough*Iran*cough*) are left to develop nukes in peace.

    Will Kerry stop them? Not a chance in Hell. So terror will be much more than a nuisance in the near future, and for all time.

    It’s interesting that he considers prostitution and illegal gambling as something that could ever conceivably threaten people’s lives every day, but terror-sympathetic states working on WMD’s is compatible with a “nuisance” level of terrorism.

    By the way, embryonic stem cells from a clone could end up blowing adult stem cells out of the water. Of course embryonic stem cells from a non-clone will be less useful than your own adult stem cells. Which major party is more in favor of a complete ban on cloning for any purpose whatsoever?

  15. 15.

    van

    October 13, 2004 at 1:48 pm

    I, also, thought the Kerry statement was alot about nothing (as was Bush’s). When fighting a war of ideas, it is long, painful and the end result in unknowable. We fought communism. Everyone understands it is a failure, yet many here still do not get it. Jahidists are similar to communists. Both fanatical. Both prey on people’s fears. I think both will be marginalized into ineffectiveness.

    I understand the Kerry comment, when seen in his voting record light, seems to be going back to Clinton-era ideas on fighting terrorism. If I take him for what he said, he means to make terrorism as important as sea pirates. A nuisance in the scheme of things.

  16. 16.

    Liberal Larry

    October 13, 2004 at 2:59 pm

    Yes, can’t we please get back to the good ol’ days when only the Jews had to worry about terrorism?

  17. 17.

    Scott

    October 13, 2004 at 3:03 pm

    Kerry’s ‘nuisance’ comment misses the point on the dangers of modern terrorism just as those who say there are no ‘stockpiles’ of WMDs in Iraq.

    Just one vial of biological WMD can wipe out the United States. One chemical shell, like the one found in Iraq, can wipe out New York City. I.E. a stockpile of WMDs could be two vials or 4 shells. Thus one Terrorism ‘nuisance’ could destroy our nation or make a city into a mass grave site.

    Kerry statements prove that he still thinks as if he is in Vietnam and living in the 70s. He hasn’t a clue about WMDs. His plan is to hire Janet Reno to re-erect the wall that Jamie Gorelick erected under Clinton. Smart Huh?

  18. 18.

    wild bird

    October 14, 2004 at 8:22 am

    Hey the demacrats suffer from this only they have the liberal left-wing media to cover for them and to help them take their foot out of their mouth which is no easy feat especialy when its in there pretty good

  19. 19.

    homegrown

    November 10, 2004 at 4:39 pm

    Cool cool

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - twbrandt - Belle Isle, Detroit, Michigan 7
Image by twbrandt (7/18/25)
Donate

Recent Comments

  • u on Friday Night Open Thread – How About a Little Music? (Jul 19, 2025 @ 7:19am)
  • Suzanne on Friday Night Open Thread – How About a Little Music? (Jul 19, 2025 @ 7:19am)
  • u on Friday Night Open Thread – How About a Little Music? (Jul 19, 2025 @ 7:19am)
  • Nancy on Friday Night Open Thread (Jul 19, 2025 @ 7:18am)
  • u on Friday Night Open Thread – How About a Little Music? (Jul 19, 2025 @ 7:17am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!