Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Thanks to your bullshit, we are now under siege.

People are complicated. Love is not.

Make the republican party small enough to drown in a bathtub.

Impressively dumb. Congratulations.

We are builders in a constant struggle with destroyers. let’s win this.

A sufficient plurality of insane, greedy people can tank any democratic system ever devised, apparently.

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

The party of Reagan has become the party of Putin.

Good lord, these people are nuts.

The worst democrat is better than the best republican.

Republicans seem to think life begins at the candlelight dinner the night before.

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

Nancy smash is sick of your bullshit.

Just because you believe it, that doesn’t make it true.

The revolution will be supervised.

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

Too often we hand the biggest microphones to the cynics and the critics who delight in declaring failure.

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

Do not shrug your shoulders and accept the normalization of untruths.

Accountability, motherfuckers.

Bark louder, little dog.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

You are here: Home / Yeah- That’s Really Newsworthy

Reader Interactions

6Comments

  2. 2.

    Sandi

    Yeah, about Kerry the NYT said: “He strikes us, above all, as a man with a strong moral core.”

    What? Umm. Men with strong moral cores don’t exploit the children of candidates to make political hay. Men with strong moral core are not afraid to talk about their 20 year record. Men with strong moral core don’t flip flop.

    NYT said about Bush: “Nearly four years ago, after the Supreme Court awarded him the presidency,…”

    How about that the court realized Gore had yet to win a single count.

    NYT said: “Men captured in the Afghan war were held incommunicado with no right to challenge their confinement.”

    Exactly. Combatants never get to challenge confinement. They never have been able to. The NYT is ignorant of the legal conventions covering prisoners of war.

    The NYT omits facts, are out of touch and ill informed? (Or just outright lying.)

  3. 3.

    Justin O.

    Bush already exploited the child of Cheney candidate by imposing a ban on gay marriage and thinking that being gay is a choice.

    Marinate in Texas for a little while longer Bushie, maybe everyone will go back to hating on the black folks.

  4. 4.

    wild bird

    Yeah and i,ll bet that the NYT came out for th relection of jimmy carter hey do you expect anything else from the New York Pravda? its americas most far left paper

  5. 5.

    Justin Ogren

    You wanna know about endorsements? Turn on Fox News for 10 seconds, turn it off. Think. You didn’t even need to ponder did you?

  6. 6.

    Guitar Picks Guy

    I think it was in the 1st debate where Kerry said “It’s the wrong war, in the wrong PLACE”? He (later in the same debate) then said: there was no evidence of any terrorist groups or support in Iraq that made it the wrong PLACE.

    Very funny that his answer to the next set of questions led to a statement (about the Iraq borders being unsecured) reflecting something to the effect of: the terrorists are now pouring across the Iraqi borders, and something needs to be done to better secure them.

    Too bad Bush didn’t jump on that during the debate. A great question arises:

    Which is it?
    – There were NO terrorists in Iraq and now they are RUNNING there to fight for there cause?
    – They really WERE there ALL ALONG and sent for reinforcements?
    – Bush is a war strategy genius and has them running to a country (where they weren’t) right at the US troops?

    -Hmmm, wonder which it really is? Very confusing. Guess we may never know!

Comments are closed.