Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

If West Virginia and San Francisco had a love child.

Something needs to be done about our bogus SCOTUS.

It’s easy to sit in safety and prescribe what other people should be doing.

Bogus polls are all they’ve got left. Let’s bury these fuckers at the polls a year from now.

Why is it so hard for them to condemn hate?

There are consequences to being an arrogant, sullen prick.

ha ha ha! Nice try weird people.

A consequence of cucumbers

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

You don’t get rid of your umbrella while it’s still raining.

Usually wrong but never in doubt

You cannot shame the shameless.

People are complicated. Love is not.

Never forget that he train is barreling down on Trump, even as he dances on the tracks.

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

Republicans seem to think life begins at the candlelight dinner the night before.

It’s a good piece. click on over. but then come back!!

Republicans want to make it harder to vote and easier for them to cheat.

They love authoritarianism, but only when they get to be the authoritarians.

Fuck the extremist election deniers. What’s money for if not for keeping them out of office?

You are here: Home / No Kidding

No Kidding

by | 4 Comments

This post is in: 

Gee- almost the entire staff of Slate is voting for Kerry. Who would have guessed?

Now, if I could just figure out who the staff writers for the Village Voice, the Nation, the American Prospect, the Media Matters Staff, George Soros, and Theresa Heinz-Kerry intend to vote for, and I might be able to make up my mind.

I mean really- how ever am I supposed to figure out who David Brock, Atrios, and Oliver Willis are going to vote for?

Reader Interactions

4Comments

  2. 2.

    Bloggerhead

    One word, John: Hitch. That’s just too damn funny. Look’s to me like the Limeys don’t believe in the Bogeyman, and know a Bonehead when they see him. Hey, maybe you could blame it on Hitchens’ drinking. Surely, the conservative base fantasizes about a return to Prohibition. Maybe a future intention along these lines was revealed to Hitch recently, and like Sully, was enough to make him cross over from the right side of history.

  4. 4.

    Bloggerhead

    I see your point, John. Hitch is a contrarian, but he’s our contrarian, so there’s no real surprise that he’d come home.

    Still, he was apparently touting Bush in the Nation but a few days ago. What a schlosh, huh?

Comments are closed.