• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Usually wrong but never in doubt

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires republicans to act in good faith.

If you are still in the GOP, you are an extremist.

They are lying in pursuit of an agenda.

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

Come on, man.

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

“What are Republicans afraid of?” Everything.

Jesus, Mary, & Joseph how is that election even close?

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires

This fight is for everything.

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

Sadly, there is no cure for stupid.

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

Too often we confuse noise with substance. too often we confuse setbacks with defeat.

Seems like a complicated subject, have you tried yelling at it?

I know this must be bad for Joe Biden, I just don’t know how.

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

Bark louder, little dog.

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

The next time the wall street journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

Putting aside our relentless self-interest because the moral imperative is crystal clear.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / A Ray of Hope

A Ray of Hope

by John Cole|  October 30, 200412:07 am| 25 Comments

This post is in: Politics

FacebookTweetEmail

Sure, they both made some jabs. Sure, Bush stated that he thinks he is better to run the war on terror. Sure, Kerry repeated the ‘outsourcing’ nonsense regarding Tora Bora. Still, I found a ray of hope in their statements regarding the new Osama video:

“Let me make this very clear,” Bush said in Toledo, Ohio, standing next to Air Force One. “Americans will not be intimidated or influenced by an enemy of our country. I’m sure Senator Kerry agrees with this.”

And agree Kerry did:

Kerry, too, said, “My reaction is that all of us … are completely united.”

Even at the height of the silly season, we will come down on these terrorist thugs with a unified hammer. And they just don’t get it.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Exposives Issue
Next Post: Classy Until The End »

Reader Interactions

25Comments

  1. 1.

    Another Round for Egor

    October 30, 2004 at 1:20 am

    If you want to see the difference between Bush and a “metrosexual” wimp like Edwards, watch this video…

    http://www.dailyrecycler.com/blog/2004/10/choice.html

    …looking at the new Bin Laden tape, after seeing the above video as well, would you really want to trust your family’s safety to a weenie like Edwards or a traitor like Kerry?

  2. 2.

    Another Round for Egor

    October 30, 2004 at 1:21 am

    If you want to see the difference between Bush and a San Franciso-style wimp like Edwards, watch this video…

    http://www.dailyrecycler.com/blog/2004/10/choice.html

    …looking at the new Bin Laden tape, after seeing the above video as well, would you really want to trust your family’s safety to a wimp like Edwards or a traitor like Kerry?

  3. 3.

    Justin Ogren

    October 30, 2004 at 3:45 am

    Yes, in purity compared to the dropping the ball every week Bush Administration.

  4. 4.

    Jaylem

    October 30, 2004 at 7:08 am

    Only problem John, is that Kerry also kept repeating the lie that Bush ‘outsourced’ the job capturing OBL when we had him ‘cornered’ in Tora Bora.

  5. 5.

    CadillaqJaq

    October 30, 2004 at 8:55 am

    Kerry blows. And having Usama “cornered” in Tora Bora sounds to me as abstract as saying we have him “cornered” in the Front Range of the Colorado Rockies.

  6. 6.

    Terry

    October 30, 2004 at 9:05 am

    I’m afraid you didn’t look further at what else Kerry said, John.

    Sure, he said we are all united in the fight against bin Laden, but as David Brooks puts it, “…he just couldn’t help himself. His first instincts were to get political.” On Milwaukee television yesterday afternoon, he used the video as an occasion to attack the president: “He didn’t choose to use American forces to hunt down Osama bin Laden. He outsourced the job.” Kerry saw a political opening, and ran with it. Back in late 2001, when bin Laden was believed to be hiding in Tora Bora, Kerry supported the strategy of using Afghans to hunt him down. As others have noted, he told Larry King at the time that our strategy “is having its impact, and it is the best way to protect our troops and sort of minimize the proximity, if you will. I think we have been doing this pretty effectively, and we should continue to do it that way.”

    As Brooks puts it, “…the political wind shifted and Kerry recalculated. Now Kerry calls the strategy he supported ‘outsourcing.’ When we rely on allies everywhere else around the world, that’s multilateral cooperation, but when Bush does it in Afghanistan, it’s ‘outsourcing.’ In Iraq, Kerry supports using local troops to chase insurgents, but in Afghanistan he is now in retroactive opposition.’

    John Kerry is indeed a hollow man with very few, if any, core values other than to marry rich and live well.

  7. 7.

    Bloggerhead

    October 30, 2004 at 1:06 pm

    Hey, Terry, you forgot “the wrong side of history,” “flip-flopper,” and “most liberal senator ever, according to this objective poll put out by Townhall.com.”

    Indeed, indeed, in contrast to Kerry, Bush is a man just full of it, principle, resoluteness, purity, fortitude, so much so, in fact, that he’s left with little room for a brain. And it is clear for all to see that Bush’s core values have enabled him to live a life of wide accomplishment, nose forever to the grindstone, with little concern for his own well-being.

    Would that this election weren’t at least a little bit about competence, then President Selfless W. Scarecrow would most assuredly win it in a landslide.

    And John, I agree that both sides handled this with some class initially, but it was undoubtedly calibrated. This is a tightrope for both candidates, and both–which Brooks’ “analysis” failed to point out, by the way–used it for stump purposes last night, but carefully.

    If nothing else, we live in interesting times, my man.

  8. 8.

    Charles K.

    October 30, 2004 at 2:56 pm

    Blockerhead:

    This election comes down to a choice between one man’s evolution (to borrow The New York Times delicate term for Kerry’s numerous about-faces) and the other man’s resolution. With his endlessly repeated Tora Bora charges, Kerry has made Afghanistan a major campaign issue. So be it. Who do Americans likely want as president? The man who conceived the Afghan campaign, carried it through without flinching when it was being called a “quagmire” during its second week, and has seen it through to Afghanistan’s transition to elections and democracy? Or the retroactive genius, who always knows what needs to be done after it has already happened — who would have done “everything” differently in Iraq, yet in Afghanistan would have replicated Bush’s every correct, courageous, radical and risky decision — except one. Which, of course, he would have done differently. He says. Now.

  9. 9.

    Ramrod

    October 30, 2004 at 3:52 pm

    I hope you guys out there in blogoland are getting on top of the B.S. being proposed by Walter Cronkite. This sounds like Dean, ” I don’t know if it’s true but I heard . . .. These guys will say absolutely ANYTHING!.

    Ramrod

  10. 10.

    Sandi

    October 30, 2004 at 4:06 pm

    I guess even when there is something we all can/should come to gether and agree on, y’all have to fight each other.

  11. 11.

    Craig

    October 30, 2004 at 5:09 pm

    So now we know: The Bush campaign accuses the Kerry campaign of politicizing the latest bin Laden tape, all the while thinking of it as a “gift.” I realize that politics is politics, but the Bush camp has brought us to a new low. In a recent interview with the New York Daily News, a senior GOP strategist is quoted as saying, “Anything that makes people nervous about their personal safety helps Bush.” He also called it “a little gift,” saying it helps the President but doesn’t guarantee his reelection. Meanwhile, the President continues to harangue Senator Kerry for being weak on defense and the war on terror. Who is really weak here? We gave Mr. Bush his chance to catch bin Laden – three years, in fact – though he stated he wasn’t really worried about him, didn’t think about him too much. If Mr. Bush had spent at least some time worrying about Osama bin Laden, maybe he wouldn’t be taunting us on our TV screens to this day.

  12. 12.

    SDN

    October 30, 2004 at 9:46 pm

    Didn’t sound like a taunt; sounded more like saying Uncle. “Please don’t beat me no more! I’ll be good!” Sorry, Osama, that’s over.

  13. 13.

    jpe

    October 30, 2004 at 11:17 pm

    If you want to see the difference between Bush and a San Franciso-style wimp like Edwards

    A “San Francisco-style wimp”? Paging Another round for Egor: it’s time to come out of the closet. You have some issues to deal with.

    Serious issues.

  14. 14.

    jpe

    October 30, 2004 at 11:20 pm

    Who do Americans likely want as president?

    See, that’s why we do these whole ‘election’ things: to figure this question out, numbskull. That way we don’t have to rely on the collected wisdom of Townhall to select a president.

  15. 15.

    HH

    October 31, 2004 at 12:48 am

    John, don’t forget – Kerry is for the war now…

  16. 16.

    S.W. Anderson

    October 31, 2004 at 6:19 pm

    Indeed, John, you express an admirable sentiment. So did Bush in the statement you cited.

    Unfortunately, earlier in the day and fully knowledgeable about the bin Laden tape, Bush held at least two speaking engagements where he bashed away at Kerry as being weak, indecisive and unsuited to the lead the war against terrorism.

    That, unfortunately, left Bush looking and sounding like a two-faced, two-bit pol when he got all “we’re united in opposing” for the photo op.

    FWIW, any president is going to do his best against the terrorists. The problem for Bush is that too many of us have seen his best and come to the conclusion it’s a long way from being good enough.

    Those who think Kerry wouldn’t be tough enough should think again. If he wins, the more likely danger is the he might go overboard trying to prove how resolute and tough he is.

  17. 17.

    willyb

    October 31, 2004 at 8:46 pm

    “Those who think Kerry wouldn’t be tough enough should think again. If he wins, the more likely danger is the he might go overboard trying to prove how resolute and tough he is.”

    I doubt seriously if we would have to worry about a President Kerry being too tough on terror. He voted against the first Gulf war, a war that had the blessing of the U.N. I think it more likely he would adopt Mr. Clinton’s approach and send meaningless signals with missles and posture like a tough guy. Or use bribes to eliminate potential problems, as was done in North Korea. Indeed, I think the core constituencies of the Democrat party would expect tough rhetoric, but a complete moratorium on the use of U.S. power.

  18. 18.

    op4

    November 1, 2004 at 4:41 am

    I’m not sure why the outsourcing thing is “nonsense.” The US has had a lot of opportunities to focus more effort on bin Laden. The problem is that Bush has made Iraq, which had nothing to do with 9/11, his priority.

    “Even at the height of the silly season, we will come down on these terrorist thugs with a unified hammer. And they just don’t get it…”

    Respectfully, however, I don’t know that this is what we are doing. Bin Laden looks well-rested and relatively comfortable. The other guy in charge of al-Qaeda, Ayman al-Zawahiri, is also still free. Why are they free? A lot of it is because Bush chose this moment to focus on Iraq (a nation with a secular government that al-Qaeda called “infidels”). Was it the best choice?

    I think this may help to put some of this in perspective for a few people. There’s more behind the war than most Americans realize.

    http://bushiraq.r8.org/
    (or http://freewebtown.com/bushiraq/ )

  19. 19.

    Terry

    November 1, 2004 at 10:19 am

    “op4”

    Since you were good enough to provide a list for my perusal, you might find this one from Slate of some interest relative to your candidate:

    http://slate.msn.com/id/2096540/

  20. 20.

    willyb

    November 1, 2004 at 1:11 pm

    As a threat, bin Laden has been reduced to producing videos to persuade people of his “righteousness.” He has primitive command and control capabilities and no secure base of operations. HE IS HIDING OUT. While I would still like to see him drawn and quartered, time is on our side.

    As for the Tora Bora issue, Michael Delong, the No. 2 general at CentCom in charge of the Afghanistan War, has debunked Mr. Kerry’s claims that we outsourced this operation. WST; November 1, 2004; Page A15. Tommy Franks has also indicated that Mr. Kerry is wrong on his view of Tora Bora.

  21. 21.

    Another Round for Egor

    November 1, 2004 at 10:59 pm

    Jpe, did you watch the video? I challenge everyone to watch that video and then come back and tell me that John Edwards should be a heartbeat away from the presidency! Watching him primp and fuss his hair while holding a makeup compact is about the most unmanly thing I’ve ever seen. Give the boy some lipstick and haircurlers and he’s ready for a Friday night on the town in San Francisco.

  22. 22.

    Kimmitt

    November 2, 2004 at 3:34 am

    You know, if a Democratic President had allowed bin Laden to get away for three years, I doubt you’d all be making excuses for him.

  23. 23.

    Dean

    November 2, 2004 at 2:17 pm

    Kimmitt:

    What party was Bill Clinton?

    Or does WTC ’93, Khobar Towers, two US embassies and the USS Cole not count as terrorism?

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. The Moderate Voice says:
    October 30, 2004 at 12:35 am

    On Osama bin Laden’s Newest Tape

    Terrorist Osama bin Laden resurfaced in a new video, looking healthier and rested as he issued more cryptic threats against the United States and taunted President George Bush — all carefully timed right before Americans go to the polls in

  2. The Antiprotester Journal says:
    October 30, 2004 at 11:49 am

    Kerry’s latest ploy

    Second, if we took Kerry’s charge seriously, then we would be forced to take as seriously the possibility that the WMD which the US, Europeans, and several leaders in the Middle East all thought had been in Iraq could have fallen into the hands…

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • Omnes Omnibus on What the Hell Is Happening In Israel? (Mar 27, 2023 @ 10:19am)
  • WaterGirl on What the Hell Is Happening In Israel? (Mar 27, 2023 @ 10:18am)
  • Omnes Omnibus on What the Hell Is Happening In Israel? (Mar 27, 2023 @ 10:18am)
  • David Anderson on Within metal domination (Mar 27, 2023 @ 10:18am)
  • lowtechcyclist on What the Hell Is Happening In Israel? (Mar 27, 2023 @ 10:18am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!