• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

I know this must be bad for Joe Biden, I just don’t know how.

Meanwhile over at truth Social, the former president is busy confessing to crimes.

This blog will pay for itself.

Today’s GOP: why go just far enough when too far is right there?

Insiders who complain to politico: please report to the white house office of shut the fuck up.

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

You can’t love your country only when you win.

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

We still have time to mess this up!

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

Battle won, war still ongoing.

if you can’t see it, then you are useless in the fight to stop it.

This really is a full service blog.

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

Too often we confuse noise with substance. too often we confuse setbacks with defeat.

Within six months Twitter will be fully self-driving.

The next time the wall street journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires

Take hopelessness and turn it into resilience.

Tick tock motherfuckers!

In my day, never was longer.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Republican Stupidity / It Hurts Because He Is Right

It Hurts Because He Is Right

by John Cole|  November 25, 20042:47 pm| 20 Comments

This post is in: Republican Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

Tom Friedman is angry this Thanksgiving, and if you ask me, he has every damned right to be. You should be pissed, too, especially if you are a Republican:

In my next life, I want to be Tom DeLay, the House majority leader.

Yes, I want to get almost the entire Republican side of the House of Representatives to bend its ethics rules just for me. I want to be able to twist the arms of House Republicans to repeal a rule that automatically requires party leaders to step down if they are indicted on a felony charge – something a Texas prosecutor is considering doing to DeLay because of corruption allegations.

But most of all, I want to have the gall to sully American democracy at a time when young American soldiers are fighting in Iraq so we can enjoy a law-based society here and, maybe, extend it to others. Yes, I want to be Tom DeLay. I want to wear a little American flag on my lapel in solidarity with the troops, while I besmirch every value they are dying for.

If I can’t be Tom DeLay, then I want to be one of the gutless Republican House members who voted to twist the rules for DeLay out of fear that “the Hammer,” as they call him, might retaliate by taking away a coveted committee position or maybe a parking place.

Yes, I want to be a Republican House member. At a time when 180 of the 211 members of the 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit in Iraq who have been wounded in combat have insisted on returning to duty, I want to look my constituents and my kids in the eye and tell them that I voted to empty the House ethics rules because I was afraid of Tom DeLay.

Simply inexcusable. I understand that Ronnie Earle is a partisan hack who has a history of political prosecution, but after all of DeLay’s shenanigans with redistricting and who knows what else, it was kinda hard not to see this coming. Now, for no reason whatsoever other than arrogance, DeLay and is minions (morons??) have given the Democrats the ability to tar all Republicans as hypocrites. And you know what? They may be on to something, even though the Democrats have no such rule themselves.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Happy Thanksgiving
Next Post: Intimidation »

Reader Interactions

20Comments

  1. 1.

    platosearwax

    November 25, 2004 at 4:08 pm

    I agree with you. And that is something to give thanks for.

  2. 2.

    Random Numbers

    November 25, 2004 at 5:50 pm

    So you favor Zero-Tolerance rules?

  3. 3.

    clang

    November 25, 2004 at 5:57 pm

    Let’s say, for the sake of argument, that DeLay is actually guilty of the alleged corruption (and AFAIK, the matter is supposed to be decided by a jury, not a partisan hack behind closed doors and without recourse to legal remedies).

    What is the proper course of action to deal with such corruption?

    And if DeLay is in fact guilty and indicted for it, why should those ethics rules be relaxed for his sake?

    “And you know what? They may be on to something, even though the Democrats have no such rule themselves.”

    Fair enough. But why was that rule installed back then?

  4. 4.

    clang

    November 25, 2004 at 6:03 pm

    “So you favor Zero-Tolerance rules?”

    We’re talking about (a) congressional leadership, and (b) felonies. What do you propose, three strikes and you’re out? So by that logic, somebody with two felonies should be allowed to be House Majority Leader and representative of their party?

  5. 5.

    John Cole

    November 25, 2004 at 7:20 pm

    I am not going to deal with hypotheticals. I have said my piece.

  6. 6.

    Random Numbers

    November 25, 2004 at 7:58 pm

    Speaking as someone who has been indicted for a heinous crime, had that charge dismissed, and who still has trouble getting some jobs due to the indictment being on my public record, I think that the rule of actually examining the indictment to determine it’s veracity is a good one.

    IT IS NOT A FELONY TO BE INDICTED FOR ONE!

  7. 7.

    Random Numbers

    November 25, 2004 at 8:04 pm

    I will, however, go so far as to say that this is entirely the wrong time to make this rule change. It would be better to wait until DeLay is aquitted or the charges dismissed to make this change, but it is still a better rule than the “zero-tolerance” crap in place now.

  8. 8.

    Terry Ott

    November 26, 2004 at 12:34 am

    It’s a bad rule, because these things should be decided case-by-case. If not that, then the alleged offender should step aside, not step down, and let someone else do the job until the matter is resolved.

    So the first mistake was made when the rule was written as it was (why was that done? I can’t recall). And the second mistake, as noted by another, was in repealing it when this particular matter is pending.

    Two wrongs do not make a right … they just make for embarrassment.

  9. 9.

    platosearwax

    November 26, 2004 at 1:58 am

    IIRC the Republicans put the rule in place in 1993 to get rid of Rostenkowski.

    I agree that indictments are not felonies or proof of wrongdoing. However, the party that decries the democrats lack of attention to the rule of law is showing themselves to be pretty hypocritical in changing the “rule of law” when they might be subject to it.

    I think the rule should be that a conviction triggers the punishment. But changing it now, for this reason, is really sleazy.

  10. 10.

    slickvguy

    November 26, 2004 at 2:01 am

    I disagree.

    That rule should never have been there in the first place. Good riddance.

    And what would be hypocritical of the Republicans. You didn’t say. The Dems don’t need a similar rule to charge hypocrisy, but what is the GOP being hypocritical of?

  11. 11.

    Ramrod

    November 26, 2004 at 2:06 am

    I’m not a fan of DeLay but I think you should correct your record. The report I have heard is that the rule that was changed in his favor was not a House rule but a Republican rule. I am further informed that the Democrat Party has no similar rule.

    I also argee that we ought to hold our judgement until the facts are in. We have just been through a campaign that was rife with lies about another parties members. [For example, the Rather forgery issue.] It seems to be a fact that the person bringing the charges is a partisan Democrat. Let’s see how it plays out.

  12. 12.

    Kimmitt

    November 26, 2004 at 5:09 am

    Sounds about right — the Republicans adopt a rule to try to make the Dems look bad, then rescind it when it might affect them. That pretty much sums up the Republican attitude toward laws in general; use them against your opponents, then change them when they get inconvenient.

  13. 13.

    Jason

    November 26, 2004 at 10:48 am

    Sounds about right — the Republicans adopt a rule to try to make the Dems look bad, then rescind it when it might affect them. That pretty much sums up the Republican attitude toward laws in general; use them against your opponents, then change them when they get inconvenient.

    Yeah… that pretty much sums up the Democratic attitude towards the law, as well. Remember the Office of Independent Counsel?

    This kind of partisan gamesmanship cuts both ways.

  14. 14.

    Rick

    November 26, 2004 at 11:58 am

    DeLay and is minions (morons??) have given the Democrats the ability to tar all Republicans as hypocrites.

    John,

    Oh, the Dems would never think of doing that otherwise? Where have you been the last 35 years?

    Cordially…

  15. 15.

    Al Maviva

    November 26, 2004 at 12:44 pm

    I say we fucking shoot Delay right now. Castrate his dead body then hang him from a street lamp at 2nd and East Capitol, and then set the body alight. And we’ll do the same thing to any Republicans indicted (or under an attempted but failed indictment). That will show the Marines we take ethical violations seriously. Hopefully, Ronnie Earle doesn’t indict the President since we’ll have to do that to Dubya, too.

    On the other side of the coin, I’d have preferred if Delay stepped aside for a while until Earle’s stupid attempt to indict him was quashed. Delay is a low-rent partisan game player, who happens to be of ideoligically conservative leanings. Somehow, I have trouble summoning outrage over what Ronnie Earle is trying to do to him, and I have equal trouble summoning outrage over the Republican caucus easing the rules for him. Maybe it’s because I’m corrupt and immoral myself, or maybe it’s because I remember the ethics wars of the 80’s and 90’s, and how house ethics rules and proceedings were played for partisan advantage by both parties, along with the independent prosecutor law. Lawrence Walsh, anybody?

  16. 16.

    Uncle Mikey

    November 26, 2004 at 12:53 pm

    What Delay and company recently did with respect to redistricting was first done in 1991 by Democrats, led by Martin Frost. Don’t remember Democrats having a problem with it then, nor do I remember Texas Republicans running off to Oklahoma or New Mexico to avoid it. It’s a non-issue regardless of your opinion of Delay.

  17. 17.

    CadillaqJaq

    November 26, 2004 at 3:18 pm

    I think it’s a dumb rule, regardless who it benefited initially.

    Somewhere around here, one is still considered innocent until proven guilty except in the eyes of former House Speaker Tom Foley, D-WA, who considered the “seriousness of the charge” paramount regardless of it’s provity.

    I don’t like either Ron Earle or Tom DeLay. DeLay reminds me of a greasy snake-oil salesman or an Elmer Gantry. IMO he’s making an attempt to follow in the steps of several other crafty Texas politicians: former Speakers Jim Claud Wright and Sam Rayburn to name a couple. Above all, don’t forget the craftiest of them all, LBJ.

    Maybe it’s something in the water down there.

  18. 18.

    Mark L

    November 27, 2004 at 3:17 pm

    It is said that hard cases make bad law. Ronnie Earle has a history of filing indictments against those with whom he has political differences, both Democrats and Republicans. He has done this irrespective of the evidence against the individual, if he felt an indictment would yield political gain. In at least one case (a corruption charge against Kay Bailey Hutchinson), when a case came to trial, Earle then stated that he was not ready to proceed with the prosecution, and the case was dismissed at that point, with the defendent getting an acquittal.

    Given a prosecutor with a history of filing bogus indictments, and seeing that man has an opportunity to deny one of most powerful Republicans in Texas from serving as Majority Leader — just by filing an indictment that will never get prosecuted — what would YOU do, John? Give the little weasel his pound of flesh?

    There is not a rats chance that Delay will get convicted of anything. There is a strong likelihood that if Earle does file charges he will again plead that he is unready to proceed when the case comes to trial. The bipartisan House Ethics Committee rebuked the loser that filed the complaints that led to Earle’s empaneling a grand jury, because they felt his charges were baseless. This is just another example of the Democrats using the law to mug someone.

  19. 19.

    Noel

    November 28, 2004 at 6:01 pm

    Tom DeLay has not been indicted of anything, yet is spoken of as if he’d already been indicted, tried, convicted and sentenced.

    Ronnie Earle doesn’t get a veto over the House majority. So far, the only crime I’ve seen any evidence of at all is malicious prosecution.

    That rule put a big, fat target on his back so it had to be changed. Now, the House Republicans would review any charges to see if they pass the stink test. If so, he’d be gone. That’s sounds reasonable to me.

    Based on his track record of seeking in court what he cannot win at the ballot box, Earle is just another Travis County Democrat, cooking things up down in Texas like Dan Rather and his Gang of Forgers.

    The rule had to be changed because yet another Democrat, yet again, has proven he can’t be trusted with power.

  20. 20.

    Andrew | BB

    November 29, 2004 at 12:03 pm

    Noel, that’s your view. No one is speaking as if he is already indicted – that’s the [email protected]#$% point.

    Uncle Mikey, This also isn’t only about the redestricting; it’s about Indian gaming and about lobbying groups playing both sides.

    John Cole is the only Republican / conservative I’ve read / seen to see the sleeze for what it is from the Republicans on this. And that is shameful.

    PS it’s not a Republican rule. You can’t get rid of Democrat Dan Rostenkowski, with a Republican party rule. ?????

    It is a House rule. The final “DeLay rule” was slightly altered from what it was – to allow that “stink” review

    A lot of half-assed opinion here and very few facts. It’s why I will never consider 99.99999999999 percent of blogs as a news source. That and having to address someone as “Uncle Mikey” on a serious point.

    “I’m a grown-ass man” – Cedric the Entertainer

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • CaseyL on Saturday Night Maxwell Update (Mar 26, 2023 @ 12:53am)
  • James E Powell on Saturday Music & Postcard Thread (Mar 26, 2023 @ 12:28am)
  • Bill Arnold on War for Ukraine Day 395: Russia Continues To Pound Away (Mar 26, 2023 @ 12:19am)
  • BruceFromOhio on Saturday Evening Open Thread (Mar 26, 2023 @ 12:18am)
  • Jay on War for Ukraine Day 395: Russia Continues To Pound Away (Mar 26, 2023 @ 12:18am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!