Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

They think we are photo bombing their nice little lives.

“woke” is the new caravan.

Every reporter and pundit should have to declare if they ever vacationed with a billionaire.

Give the craziest people you know everything they want and hope they don’t ask for more? Great plan.

Come on, man.

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

Republican obstruction dressed up as bipartisanship. Again.

We are aware of all internet traditions.

When someone says they “love freedom”, rest assured they don’t mean yours.

If you are in line to indict donald trump, stay in line.

Jesus, Mary, & Joseph how is that election even close?

This isn’t Democrats spending madly. This is government catching up.

You miss 100% of the shots you don’t take. Go Senator Whitehouse!

In after Baud. Damn.

“The defense has a certain level of trust in defendant that the government does not.”

The worst democrat is better than the best republican.

This year has been the longest three days of putin’s life.

In short, I come down firmly on all sides of the issue.

The cruelty is the point; the law be damned.

As long as McCarthy is Speaker, the House will never be in order.

I did not have this on my fuck 2022 bingo card.

Stamping your little feets and demanding that they see how important you are? Not working anymore.

A lot of Dems talk about what the media tells them to talk about. Not helpful.

Despite his magical powers, I don’t think Trump is thinking this through, to be honest.

You are here: Home / The End of The Road

Reader Interactions

6Comments

  1. 1.

    jri

    Only a Republican could be this clear eyed. I swells my breast that these two loyal Republicans have finally come forward and resovled this troubling issue. The Bush Administration official who outed Plame can now rest easy and tell his side of the story. Who is he, anyway?

    –

  2. 2.

    Thomas

    Well, you’re right that it didn’t quite take down the administration like we planned. But the op-ed just says what’s been said before: the leak wasn’t criminal. Which may be true, but that doesn’t explain the on-going investigation.

  4. 4.

    Dave

    Firstly, why is ‘scandal’ in ‘inverted commas’? I take it you’re okey-dokey with undercover agents being exposed? Did you know that this might have killed people as a result, besides rendering one fully trained operative useless? (He could have made his petty allegation without naming Plame.) And that’s in return for an unprovable allegation of nepotism. What a deal!

    (Neopotism? Gosh No! Somebody tell president Bush! No, the other president Bush.)

    Secondly, ‘careless spilling of the beans about an undercover identity’? No, sorry. Explain how one could ‘accidentally’ expose an undercover agent. Even if the source ‘accidentally’ let her name slip, Novak didn’t ‘accidentally;’ publish it.

    Lastly, why would anybody criticise his qualifications, when he got it right? He came back with the correct answer, remember? Hell, I’ve always known there were no WMD in Iraq, and I didn’t need any qualifications for that. I just know bullshit when I hear it.

  5. 5.

    SDN

    Dave, there are several thousands of Iraqi Kurds who would just LOVE to educate you on how wrong you are. Of course, you might not survive the process, but….

  6. 6.

    Nate

    Dave, your frankly idiotic comments mark you as one of the latest new strain of Democrats: the “retrospective genius.” You always know what shouldn’t have been done just a couple months after it happens. It’s like being psychic in reverse, only with more whining!

    You knew there were no WMD in Iraq all along? Then why didn’t you tell Kerry, Clinton, Kennedy, and all the Democrats who said they knew there WERE WMD there? Don’t just leave them out to dry!

Comments are closed.