Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

You come for women, you’re gonna get your ass kicked.

He seems like a smart guy, but JFC, what a dick!

I’m pretty sure there’s only one Jack Smith.

The frogs are rarely mistaken.

Polls are now a reliable indicator of what corporate Republicans want us to think.

Thanks to your bullshit, we are now under siege.

FFS people, this was a good thing. take the win.

I’m just a talker, trying to find a channel!

Putting aside our relentless self-interest because the moral imperative is crystal clear.

“Cheese and Kraken paired together for the appetizer trial.”

Let the trolls come, and then ignore them. that’s the worst thing you can do to a troll.

No one could have predicted…

The media handbook says “controversial” is the most negative description that can be used for a Republican.

Republican obstruction dressed up as bipartisanship. Again.

The gop couldn’t organize an orgy in a whorehouse with a fist full of 50s.

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

The line between political reporting and fan fiction continues to blur.

Compromise? There is no middle ground between a firefighter and an arsonist.

…and a burning sense of injustice to juice the soul.

The problem people have with Biden’s age is the color of the VPs skin.

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

Never give a known liar the benefit of the doubt.

Republicans firmly believe having an abortion is a very personal, very private decision between a woman and J.D. Vance.

They’re not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

You are here: Home / The End of The Road

Reader Interactions

6Comments

  1. 1.

    jri

    Only a Republican could be this clear eyed. I swells my breast that these two loyal Republicans have finally come forward and resovled this troubling issue. The Bush Administration official who outed Plame can now rest easy and tell his side of the story. Who is he, anyway?

    –

  2. 2.

    Thomas

    Well, you’re right that it didn’t quite take down the administration like we planned. But the op-ed just says what’s been said before: the leak wasn’t criminal. Which may be true, but that doesn’t explain the on-going investigation.

  4. 4.

    Dave

    Firstly, why is ‘scandal’ in ‘inverted commas’? I take it you’re okey-dokey with undercover agents being exposed? Did you know that this might have killed people as a result, besides rendering one fully trained operative useless? (He could have made his petty allegation without naming Plame.) And that’s in return for an unprovable allegation of nepotism. What a deal!

    (Neopotism? Gosh No! Somebody tell president Bush! No, the other president Bush.)

    Secondly, ‘careless spilling of the beans about an undercover identity’? No, sorry. Explain how one could ‘accidentally’ expose an undercover agent. Even if the source ‘accidentally’ let her name slip, Novak didn’t ‘accidentally;’ publish it.

    Lastly, why would anybody criticise his qualifications, when he got it right? He came back with the correct answer, remember? Hell, I’ve always known there were no WMD in Iraq, and I didn’t need any qualifications for that. I just know bullshit when I hear it.

  5. 5.

    SDN

    Dave, there are several thousands of Iraqi Kurds who would just LOVE to educate you on how wrong you are. Of course, you might not survive the process, but….

  6. 6.

    Nate

    Dave, your frankly idiotic comments mark you as one of the latest new strain of Democrats: the “retrospective genius.” You always know what shouldn’t have been done just a couple months after it happens. It’s like being psychic in reverse, only with more whining!

    You knew there were no WMD in Iraq all along? Then why didn’t you tell Kerry, Clinton, Kennedy, and all the Democrats who said they knew there WERE WMD there? Don’t just leave them out to dry!

Comments are closed.