From the “You Can’t Make This Shit Up” files:
Two fired caretakers for Koko, the world-famous sign-language-speaking gorilla, have sued their former bosses, claiming they were pressured to expose their breasts as a way of bonding with the 300-pound simian.
Nancy Alperin and Kendra Keller, both of San Francisco, claim they were subjected to sexual discrimination and then wrongfully terminated after reporting health and safety violations at Koko’s home in Woodside, an upscale town in the south San Francisco Bay area.
Cuddly Ape or Hairy Pervert?
JohnO
“Cuddly Ape or Hairy Pervert?”
Depends on if he’s sniffing that finger or putting it to his lips in a thoughtful gesture, wondering whether he should use magenta or sienna for that all important finishing touch on his masterpiece.
Abigail
Making women expose their breasts in order to keep a job, that’s sexual harrassment.
The Lonewacko Blog
Doesn’t Larry “Lawrence” Ellison live in Woodside? Coincidence?
Veeshir
Cuddly Ape or Hairy Pervert?
I don’t think they’re mutually exclusive. I usually go for a mix.
Alan Kellogg
Looks to me more like certain people are hung up about their bodies. Koko is a lowland gorilla. Has the mind of a ten year old. She’s curious, that’s all.
Maybe we should start treating the prissy for Obsessive/Compulsive Disorder.
wild bird
Wasnt this the gorilla that cudled the kitten? well it looks like the gorilla is picking its nose eeuuww
Kung Fu
If you expose your breasts to a gorilla in order to keep your (probable) minimum wage job, then being unemployed is the least of your worries. You might want to focus on the self-esteem issue first.