Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

Thanks to your bullshit, we are now under siege.

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

Why is it so hard for them to condemn hate?

Consistently wrong since 2002

Second rate reporter says what?

Our job is not to persuade republicans but to defeat them.

It’s the corruption, stupid.

if you can’t see it, then you are useless in the fight to stop it.

Infrastructure week. at last.

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

Usually wrong but never in doubt

We are aware of all internet traditions.

I didn’t have alien invasion on my 2023 BINGO card.

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

American History and Black History Cannot Be Separated

Just because you believe it, that doesn’t make it true.

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.

So it was an October Surprise A Day, like an Advent calendar but for crime.

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires republicans to act in good faith.

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

You are here: Home / Sports / Tough Choices

Tough Choices

by | 5 Comments

This post is in: 

I dunno:

Friends and family of an Appleton woman convicted of theft can pack away their Cheeseheads for the year.

By shedding the green and gold, Sharon E. Rosenthal will avoid donning an orange jumpsuit.

Rosenthal, 49, made a decision that might make many Green Bay Packers fans shiver after Judge Scott Woldt gave her the choice Friday between donating a year of her family

Reader Interactions

5Comments

  1. 1.

    Halffasthero

    Glad to be the first to post on this. As a Vikings fan, I would have taken a perverse delight being that judge and making it a condition of her sentence. : )

    I guess it would be a very real and painful punishment for her. Packer fans are very dedicated (rabid). My Packer-fan friends that would consider a 1-15 Vikings season a near-perfect season would certainly have a hard time with this judgement. That could either be considered a very fair sentence in Minnesota but cruel and unusual in Wisconsin. Their Supreme Court would probably ovcerturn it for that reason!

  2. 2.

    Half Canadian

    To be fair, she only gave up her husband’s tickets, and it was for only one year. If they get them back the following season, it’s a punishment, but not an eternal punishment.

  3. 3.

    Halffasthero

    Perhaps the fact that her husband will now be with her at home Sundays during the football season and not at the game is the punishment. : )

  4. 4.

    Dr. Weevil

    I’m trying to figure out how this can be constitutional. Everyone worries about whether the death penalty violates the first half of “cruel and unusual”, but no one seems to worry about the second half. Tailoring the punishment to fit the particular criminal seems obviously wrong to me.

  5. 5.

    SilverRook2000

    Hmmmm..in Chicago foregoing a season watchint the Bears would be considered therapy not punishment..in fact making someone watch them would be much more painful…

Comments are closed.