• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

There’s always a light at the end of the frog.

Not all heroes wear capes.

The words do not have to be perfect.

You are so fucked. Still, I wish you the best of luck.

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

We’ve had enough carrots to last a lifetime. break out the sticks.

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

Stop using mental illness to avoid talking about armed white supremacy.

It’s easier to kill a dangerous animal than a man who just happens to have different thoughts/values than one’s own.

“That’s what the insurrection act is for!”

He really is that stupid.

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

Republicans got rid of McCarthy. Democrats chose not to save him.

You don’t get rid of your umbrella while it’s still raining.

The cruelty is the point; the law be damned.

I did not have this on my fuck 2022 bingo card.

Despite his magical powers, I don’t think Trump is thinking this through, to be honest.

This has so much WTF written all over it that it is hard to comprehend.

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

if you can’t see it, then you are useless in the fight to stop it.

Never forget that he train is barreling down on Trump, even as he dances on the tracks.

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

Ah, the different things are different argument.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Republican Stupidity / More on Filibusters and the Senate

More on Filibusters and the Senate

by John Cole|  May 24, 200511:27 am| 12 Comments

This post is in: Republican Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

It seems that Professor Bainbridge and I have pretty similar takes on the issue:

Will somebody please get these folks some cheese to go with their whine? I find these reactions not only short-sighted but also surprisingly unconservative. They reflect a willingness to put possible short-term partisan gain (and I emphasize the word possible) over both principle and long-term advantage…

They aren’t conservative. They aren’t even the same reactionary extremists that used to be the fringe of the Republican party ( I like reactionaries- they aren’t running around proposing bullshit, they are trying to stop it). The extrem right in Congress is a group of radicals with a big government, and decidedly unconservative, agenda.

The filibuster is a profoundly conservative tool. It slows change by allowing a resolute minority to delay – to stand athwart history shouting stop. It ensures that change is driven not “merely by temporary advantage or popularity” but by a substantial majority. Is it any wonder that it has usually been liberals who want to change or abolish the filibuster rule?

Proponents of the “nuclear option” claim to believe that abolishing the filibuster could be limited to judicial nominations. It’s a coin flip as to whether this is naive or disingenuous. It’s a slippery slope to abolishing the filibuster as to Presidential nominations or even legislation. Would the GOP be tempted to abolish the filibuster if necessary to put John Bolton at the UN? Or to ram through social security reform? Even if the GOP resisted that temptation, what happens the next time the Democrats control the Senate? A GOP-established legislative and institutional precedent for abolishing the filibuster as to judicial nominations would make it all that much easier for the Democrats to do the same as to nominations or legislation.

They don’t care, and they are being disingenuous. No need to flip a coin. At any rate, read the whole thing.

*** Update ***

One more time for the slow. I find the notion that Republicans are pursuing the ‘nuclear option’ out of deference to the Constitution to be completely laughable. Period.

This group of phonies on both sides of the aisle have shown time and time again that they are willing to not only shit all over the Constitution, but to wipe with it when they are done. The idea that they are now pursuing this option for the sanctity of the Constitution is utter nonsene. They are doing it because they want their judges confirmed.

If Republicans were so damned concerned with the Constitution, they may have been able to make a persuasive argument when they were in the minority all those years. Instead, they were quite content to use the rules in place to blue-slip and kill legions of Clinton appointees, all without a whit of concern for the Constitution or any mention of a President having a right to have his nominees voted on.

That they have managed to convince some in the wingnut base to adopt this language and attitude may be one thing, so when you see them huffing and puffing in the blogosphere about the Constitution, you know why. But it doesn’t make them right, and it doesn’t mean the Senators pushing this really give two hoots in hell about the Constitution, either.

This was about power, pure and simple. Not, as some would have you believe, the Constitution.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « More Signs of Religious Tolerance
Next Post: Bill Maher, Slow Learner »

Reader Interactions

12Comments

  1. 1.

    TJ Jackson

    May 24, 2005 at 11:53 am

    The radicals are the ones who would ignore the Constitution in the persuit of political power and disregard the foundations of the nation’s rule of law. The Democrats and those who attempt to usurp the Constitution are to be dispised only less than the RINOs who trampled on the Constitution. But what is to be expected of McCain and his ilk who brought us McCain Feingold which was the greatest assualt on the 1st amendment this country has ever seen.

    Such tactics are perfectly legal within the context of the Constituion. Even th casual observer will realize that any presidential appointee does not require a 60 vote approval, only a majority as specified.

  2. 2.

    bg

    May 24, 2005 at 12:37 pm

    slow indeed.

  3. 3.

    Halffasthero

    May 24, 2005 at 12:51 pm

    Wthi respect T.J., do you understand that, as imperfect as the process of the passage of laws ans the approval of judges is, it has worked for a very long time. The consequences of killing the filibuster are a complete unknown and once done, would have been a nightmare to repair. Who would ever agree to it first?

  4. 4.

    over it

    May 24, 2005 at 12:53 pm

    Molasses, anyone?

  5. 5.

    sidereal

    May 24, 2005 at 1:05 pm

    “only a majority as specified”

    Specified where, TJ?

  6. 6.

    Rick

    May 24, 2005 at 1:38 pm

    I find the notion that Republicans are pursuing the ‘nuclear option’ out of deference to the Constitution to be completely laughable.

    Well, I’m grateful John Cole shares his “finding” with us, which only demonstrates a certain slowness on his part, as well.
    Because he shows a shocking insoucience about the Democrats will to rule, and what that will entail when the pendulum does swing.

    The Pubbies may find a President H. Clinton, or Barak Obama, proposing an “extraordinary” extremist to the bench (say, another Ginsburg). Watch how long the GOP fillibuster will last.
    ]
    Gone in the blink of an eye, and 108year-old Senator Byrd will again claim to have rescued the Constitution, and Senate Tradition.

    And increasingly starkers John Cole will–again–believe him. Sad.

    Cordially…

  7. 7.

    John Cole

    May 24, 2005 at 1:53 pm

    The only reason Republicans would have to filibuster is because they themselves got rid of the blue-slip rules and all the other protections.

    Any mud you fling in this invariably comes back to a Republican source, unfortunately.

  8. 8.

    Rick

    May 24, 2005 at 2:07 pm

    John,

    Bullcrap. Do you even remember Robert Bork? Let alone Nixon’s nominees Haynesworth & Carswell? (Only one of those two was a serious nominee; the other was nominated by Nixon as an F.U. to the Democratic senate).

    For the record, blue slips suck, and an earlier, and I feel much superior, compromise would’ve eliminated the practice. It’s a point of principle with me that any nominee–by Clinton or by Bush– should get a vote. “Extremists,” or the unqualified/underqualified and the corrupt wouldn’t pass, it should go without saying.

    No, the Democrats can always, with confidence, expect pubbie craveness. And should they return to a majority, and encounter some shocking GOP spine, well, the KKKonscience of the Senate will just change the rules again. In the Great Tradition. Praise from the usual suspects will surely follow.

    Cordially…

  9. 9.

    TJ Jackson

    May 24, 2005 at 2:30 pm

    Sidereal:
    Both you and Mr. Cole need to examine Article 2, section 2 clause 2 of the Constitution. If you aren’t aware of what the Constitution requires then you might bother to read it.

    As for the argument of ending the filibuster exactly what is to be gained from it? It is unconstitutional in this specific event. So are you advocating we thrash the Constitution to advance partisan agenda. By all means alter the Constitution if this benefits the nation but what we see today demonstrates that we are not a nation of laws but dwarfs.

    What has been solved?

  10. 10.

    Mr Furious

    May 24, 2005 at 2:32 pm

    “”Extremists,” or the unqualified/underqualified and the corrupt wouldn’t pass, it should go without saying.

    Oh, I wish it were so… In these days of Republican majority (by a healthy enough margin) and lockstep loyalty/obedience, I have no faith in true votes of conscience…there is no quality filter in place at the front end (Bush), the committee level or the final vote.

  11. 11.

    TJ Jackson

    May 24, 2005 at 5:22 pm

    Furious:
    Right you are. Seems the Supreme Court just overturned a convicted murder’s sentence because the convicted criminal appeared in court, gasp, shackled! When the seven idiots who voted to overturn the murderer of two elderly individuals guess who they were.

    Yes indeed when idiots like Breyer can make it onto the supreme court one realizes that indeed a significant portion of the senate goose steps uin perfect lock step. We saw it again yesterday as they trampled the Constitution. Its too bad Mr. Cole finds that document too insignificant to follow. It is indeed about power pure and simple.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. smijer & Buck says:
    May 26, 2005 at 6:26 am

    Lotta Catching Up To Do & Links With Your Eye Boogers

    I didn’t take the free kick penalty that everyone else in the blogosphere got when the Koran Flushing church sign went up. John Cole did. Speaking of John Cole… I disagree strongly with him on the justification and need for…

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • RedDirtGirl on Righteous Rant Open Thread (Apr 15, 2024 @ 4:49pm)
  • OzarkHillbilly on On The Road – Albatrossity – Spring migration begins (Apr 15, 2024 @ 4:48pm)
  • rikyrah on Henry Would Like His Lunch Right Now, Please (Open Thread) (Apr 15, 2024 @ 4:47pm)
  • schrodingers_cat on Righteous Rant Open Thread (Apr 15, 2024 @ 4:42pm)
  • lowtechcyclist on Henry Would Like His Lunch Right Now, Please (Open Thread) (Apr 15, 2024 @ 4:42pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!