• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Their freedom requires your slavery.

The most dangerous place for a black man in America is in a white man’s imagination.

Everyone is in a bubble, but some bubbles model reality far better than others!

Just because you believe it, that doesn’t make it true.

Let’s finish the job.

…and a burning sense of injustice to juice the soul.

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

There is no right way to do the wrong thing.

FFS people, this was a good thing. take the win.

Republicans would impeach Biden if he bit into a whole Kit Kat rather than breaking the sections apart.

Boeing: repeatedly making the case for high speed rail.

Let’s not be the monsters we hate.

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.

Nancy smash is sick of your bullshit.

I was promised a recession.

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

There are a lot more evil idiots than evil geniuses.

Quote tweet friends, screenshot enemies.

The arc of the moral universe doesn’t bend itself. it’s up to us.

“In the future, this lab will be a museum. don’t touch it.”

It’s a doggy dog world.

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

Republican obstruction dressed up as bipartisanship. Again.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Republican Stupidity / So Much for Internal Consistency

So Much for Internal Consistency

by John Cole|  June 9, 20055:42 pm| 11 Comments

This post is in: Republican Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

The President’s nominees deserve an up or down vote, and we must vote on them for the sake of the Constitution. Otherwise, we are destroying the Republic and violating the principles our forefathers laid out for us. Except in this case:

While Republican senators insist on prompt votes for every judicial nominee, Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.) has placed a “hold” on President Bush’s nomination of Julie Finley as ambassador to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. Mrs. Finley is well qualified. Like many ambassadorial appointees, she has been a major Republican fundraiser, but she has also been a strong and active advocate in Washington for the expansion of NATO, the integration of Turkey into the European Union and the spread of democracy to countries of the former Soviet Union. These are issues that would be central in her new post — and issues that Mr. Brownback also has highlighted. Nevertheless, Mr. Brownback, a possible presidential candidate in 2008, as of last night was employing a parliamentary maneuver to block any Senate vote — on the grounds that Mrs. Finley is pro-choice on abortion.

The move may please Republican anti abortion activists, who have launched a campaign against Mrs. Finley, demanding that the president withdraw her nomination. But the hold is repugnant, on both procedural and substantive grounds. If a filibuster is at best a controversial way of deciding policy, allowing a single senator to have effective say over whether to hold a vote on a particular presidential appointment would seem completely unacceptable.

Personally, I think she should just tell Sen. Brownback that she is pro-choice because of religious convictions. After all, when someone says they have firm religious beliefs, we all have to just back off and go along with whatever they believe in or be tarred as anti-religous, right?

I really hope that the Democrats nominate some Wiccans or Buddhists when they next win the Presidency. That will be just too much damned fun.

And, for the pure sake of intellectual honesty- I have no problem with Brownback placing a hold on this woman. I think they should be able to do things like this, and we should go back to the blue slip rule and the other tools we had used for years in regards to judicial nominations.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Post of The Day
Next Post: Mr. And Mrs. Smith »

Reader Interactions

11Comments

  1. 1.

    Jon H

    June 9, 2005 at 8:13 pm

    That’s just bizarre. Abortion isn’t even remotely *relevant* to that job, unless they think she’s going to propose the development of fetus-based weapons systems.

  2. 2.

    Rick

    June 9, 2005 at 8:47 pm

    Well, bugger blue slips and holds in all circumstances.

    Cordially…

  3. 3.

    caleb

    June 9, 2005 at 9:29 pm

    Don’t worry john….soon as the republicans lose control of congress (not saying this will happen any time soon…though it just might), those republicans will be screaming about how unfair the blue slip rule is no longer and that it should be reinstated and how they can fillibuster anyone they want, at any time, no matter how many times.

    As sure as the sun rises in the east……

    __________

    “Fetus-based weapons system”?!?!?!

    Do I smell a classic South Park episode, or is someone just baking brownies?

  4. 4.

    Simon

    June 10, 2005 at 12:38 am

    Is that in any way, shape or form a legitimate grounds for placing a hold on someone’s career? That just seems ludicrous. Let me get this straight. The law of the land says that abortions are legal. You agree with the law of the land. Your superior can then halt your advancement because he doesn’t agree with the law of the land. So basically, one has to renounce the law of the land in order to move ahead in Brownback’s government? I can’t wait for this joker to run.

  5. 5.

    Far North

    June 10, 2005 at 4:02 am

    “…President’s nominees deserve an up or down vote….”

    “…Democrats are denying the President’s choices an up or down vote and…………”

    “..why can’t these very qualified poeple get a simple up or down vote…..?”

    “..Liberals are blocking the president’s superb judicial selections by opposing an up or down vote…..”

    blah, blah, blah….up or down vote…, blah, blah.

    Here’s what the GOP really mean:

    “We believe that every one of the president’s nominees deserves an up or down vote. Eh, um, that’s President Bush, not President Clinton. See, Bill Clinton, well he was just dissasembling and he didn’t deserve up or down votes for, um, let’s see, 60+ of his judicial nominees. That’s because American is different now. See, 9/11 changed everything. Some choose to live in a pre 9/11 world. That’s why President Clinton didn’t deserve up or down votes for more than 60 of his nominees to the bench. He was in a pre-9/11 world. 9/11 changed everything. President Bush knows that.

    In a pre-9/11 world, Republicans would just block judicial nominees in committee, and see, well it’s all real complicated politics and stuff and we won’t bore you with it but let’s just say we Republicans are tired of the Liberal tricks and we believe the American people want congress to do their job. And that job is to give the president an up or down vote on his judicial nominees.

    Up or down votes are the cornerstone of American democracy and those Liberals hate America. It’s as simple as that.

    Nothing is more stunning in politics than the hypocrisy of the new century conservative. Nothing!

  6. 6.

    Hokie

    June 10, 2005 at 9:14 am

    John: I don’t know if it’d be “fun” for Wiccans or Buddhists to be nominated. The outcry would be tremendous. I don’t know if I can take the kind of fundie in the street outpouring we saw over Schiavo for as long as it would be there.

    But, lord, this is just unbelievable.

  7. 7.

    Rick

    June 10, 2005 at 10:46 am

    Far North,

    Playing politics and stalling and bottling up nominations in committee wasn’t invented when the GOP took over Congress in 1995.

    The elephant is my party’s mascot, and we *do* have long memories.

    Cordially…

  8. 8.

    Far North

    June 10, 2005 at 1:47 pm

    Rick,
    I never claimed that the GOP started bottling up nominations in 1995. Fillibusters have been used in the Senate by each party when they were the the minority party My point was that all this up or down vote bullshit we’ve just heard from republicans is the height of hypocrisy.

  9. 9.

    RW

    June 10, 2005 at 2:37 pm

    I’m all for internal consistency.

    Filed under: “the rhetoric from the people my new kossack audience, that I’m bending over to appease, disapproves of causes violence (cuz I said so…if it hasn’t happened yet, it will. And if it doesn’t, I won’t apologize for being wrong, I’ll just wait until it does or point to other things and say I’m right. Did I mention my new appeasement policy?) while the rhetoric of something else doesn’t cause violence, it’s caused by people”, where internal consistency depends on which way the wind is blowing.

  10. 10.

    John Cole

    June 10, 2005 at 2:49 pm

    Ricky,

    I have no idea what that meant, but I know what you are trying to say.

    Just out of curiosity- why is it ok for one Republican to block this nominee but not ok for Democrats to do the same because they are anti-abortion?

    I think Brownback should be able to, if he is within Senate rules, block whoever he wants for whatever he wants. Same with the Democrats.

    That is kissing ass?

  11. 11.

    Rick

    June 10, 2005 at 4:31 pm

    John,

    Is RW the “Ricky” one Tim F suspects me to be?

    Or were you responding to me?

    Cordially…

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • WaterGirl on Righteous Rant Open Thread (Apr 15, 2024 @ 4:27pm)
  • Brachiator on Henry Would Like His Lunch Right Now, Please (Open Thread) (Apr 15, 2024 @ 4:27pm)
  • gvg on Take the Fucking Win (Apr 15, 2024 @ 4:26pm)
  • Dorothy A. Winsor on Henry Would Like His Lunch Right Now, Please (Open Thread) (Apr 15, 2024 @ 4:26pm)
  • WaterGirl on Henry Would Like His Lunch Right Now, Please (Open Thread) (Apr 15, 2024 @ 4:24pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!