• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Republicans do not pay their debts.

Not so fun when the rabbit gets the gun, is it?

Putting aside our relentless self-interest because the moral imperative is crystal clear.

Some judge needs to shut this circus down soon.

Let me file that under fuck it.

Israel is using food as a weapon of war. Unforgivable.

He imagines himself as The Big Bad, Who Is Universally Feared… instead of The Big Jagoff, Who Is Universally Mocked.

He seems like a smart guy, but JFC, what a dick!

Boeing: repeatedly making the case for high speed rail.

There is one struggling party in US right now, and it’s not the Democrats.

If you still can’t see these things even now, maybe politics isn’t your forte and you should stop writing about it.

Republicans are radicals, not conservatives.

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

You’re just a puppy masquerading as an old coot.

Sadly, there is no cure for stupid.

The Supreme Court cannot be allowed to become the ultimate, unaccountable arbiter of everything.

Their boy Ron is an empty plastic cup that will never know pudding.

Nikki Haley, who can’t acknowledge ‘slavery’, is a pathetic shill.

Everybody saw this coming.

The lights are all blinking red.

I’m more Christian than these people and I’m an atheist.

Accountability, motherfuckers.

Hi god, it’s us. Thanks a heap, you’re having a great week and it’s only Thursday!

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Bwahaha

Bwahaha

by John Cole|  June 14, 200510:44 pm| 15 Comments

This post is in: General Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

Baldilocks has a wingnut attacking her for supporting the Iraq War but not enlisting.

Two problems:

1.) Baldi is an Air Force veteran.

2.) The nutjob passing the ‘chickenhawk meme’ gets nailed for having numerous sock puppets.

Too funny. It is probably JadeGold.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « New Book Thread
Next Post: The Conservative Movement ‘Grows’ »

Reader Interactions

15Comments

  1. 1.

    p.lukasiak

    June 15, 2005 at 3:10 am

    Being an Air Force Veteran does not prevent one from re-enlisting in the US Army and requesting assignment to Iraq.

    So if Baldilocks is so supportive of the Iraq war, there is nothing preventing her from joining up, and “putting her money where her mouth is.” Indeed, with her years of military training, she’d be a great asset to the Army.

    But, like most war supporters, its all about other people fighting the wars they support….

  2. 2.

    Mustang 23

    June 15, 2005 at 3:44 am

    P. whatever your last name is,

    she is a RETIRED Vet. big differance. she did over 20 honerable years already.

    before you write a diatribe get the facts correct.

  3. 3.

    RW

    June 15, 2005 at 7:54 am

    Great idea, p.lukasiak.

    Let’s institute this philosophy across the board: all those against the Bush tax cuts pay the Clinton tax rates.

    Did you send your Bush tax cut back? You’re not supporting others’ pay for what you support, are you?

  4. 4.

    Nash

    June 15, 2005 at 9:59 am

    RW Proudly Presents: Facile Logic on Ice

    Let’s institute this philosophy across the board: all those against the Bush tax cuts pay the Clinton tax rates.

    Did you send your Bush tax cut back?

    For the myriad number of people returning those vaunted Bush tax cuts, a majority would be in the, what, low-to-mid-3 figures?

    I know I fell gratefully on my knees at the Gates of Walmart with my fat check in fevered hand.

    You? Let’s have all the Cordial Ricks out there who say that Soc. Sec. is just a wee smidge bitty bit out of balance and needs just a tad nudgy nudge in the form of diminished liabilities (approaching zero, you know, just like is rightfully happening to ill-bargained corporate giveaways in the form of evil pension benefits) to get back on a sound fiscal track–let’s have these Cherry Cordials follow your facile logic by ripping that Soc. Sec. check out of Mama’s grasping greedy hands, because it’s so much fun to play this game.

  5. 5.

    timekeeper

    June 15, 2005 at 10:31 am

    Being an Air Force Veteran does not prevent one from re-enlisting in the US Army and requesting assignment to Iraq.

    You’re right. However, the fact that she served 20 years makes her at least 37, which DOES disqualify her, since the entrance age is capped at 35 for all services. It doesn’t take a degree in accounting to do the basic math required to figure this out, BTW.

    Of course, getting the facts straight isn’t on YOUR agenda, since you had to get in your two cents without reading the relevant data. The first comment on the link that John provided to Baldilocks notes that she retired, which means that you didn’t bother to click through before shooting off.

    But, like most war supporters, its all about other people fighting the wars they support….

    She supported the war while she was still on active duty. Does this mean that now that she is out, she must withdraw her support? Think before you answer, because I don’t think you’ll like the ramifications of THAT line of logic. It can be applied to a whole slew of situations, some of which you would hate to have to defend against.

  6. 6.

    RW

    June 15, 2005 at 10:47 am

    Think before you answer, because I don’t think you’ll like the ramifications of THAT line of logic.

    They’re not using logic. It’s hate. You can almost feel it between the bytes.

  7. 7.

    p.lukasiak

    June 15, 2005 at 11:15 am

    LOL! The army is so desperate for recruits that they’d be perfectly willing to “fix” Baldilocks DoB if it means another warm body….

    oh, and BTW, what YOUR excuse for not enlisting…..?

  8. 8.

    p.lukasiak

    June 15, 2005 at 11:17 am

    Of course, getting the facts straight isn’t on YOUR agenda, since you had to get in your two cents without reading the relevant data.

    well, perhaps our host should provide the “relevant data”, rather than just say she’s an Air Force Vet.

  9. 9.

    RheGirl

    June 15, 2005 at 11:19 am

    You’re extremely funny when you’re unrealistic, p.lukasiak.

  10. 10.

    RheGirl

    June 15, 2005 at 11:21 am

    well, perhaps our host should provide the “relevant data”, rather than just say she’s an Air Force Vet.

    Are you next going to get on John Cole’s case about being an Army vet? How come you haven’t ragged on him yet for reenlisting, either?

  11. 11.

    a

    June 15, 2005 at 1:28 pm

    “How come you haven’t ragged on him yet for reenlisting, either?”

    John Cole’s white.

  12. 12.

    timekeeper

    June 15, 2005 at 2:34 pm

    I can’t enlist because a) I am 37, and b) I am currently on active duty in the U. S. Navy.

    Fish, Barrel, Gun.

    Do you wish to embarrass yourself anymore, Mr. Lukasiak?

  13. 13.

    timekeeper

    June 15, 2005 at 2:53 pm

    That should be “any more” (two words) in my previous post.

    Oh, for the record, the military cannot accept someone who has served for 20 years (regardless of the age restrictions) due to retirement pay issues, not to mention high-year tenure (HYT) restrictions. I do not know Juliette’s final paygrade, but in my case, I will be forced to retire at the 20-year mark, unless I am selected for the next higher paygrade (which is highly unlikely due to my weight problem.) I would not be allowed to continue even if I wanted to, and that is not something that is going to be relaxed anytime soon. (If you were in the military, you’d understand how that is an understatement in the extreme.)

    This is rebuttal, of course, to all of you screaming lunatics who bleat “chickenhawk” without a bloody clue about how the military works. (See: Kevin Drum and his idiotic posting on Bush’s military records, which demonstrate his complete and throrough lack of knowledge of military documentation.)

    In any case, it’s an asisine line of argument straight out of the “what if” school. What if we reinstate the draft, but restrict it only to those who oppose the war? What if the president issues an executive order to dissolve congress and hold new elections? What if Howard Dean and Harry Reid were to give a press conference during which they wore matching pink tutus and toe shoes?

  14. 14.

    John Cole

    June 15, 2005 at 3:05 pm

    This is rebuttal, of course, to all of you screaming lunatics who bleat “chickenhawk” without a bloody clue about how the military works.

    Or the idiotic meme that ‘none of the swift vets served on the same boat’ as Kerry.

    That doesn’t make what the Swift Vets true, but it sure does make that idiotic attack on them false.

    It is just based on a total ignorance of how the military works. I still remember the social security number of my roommate (we were required to learn it and other vitals) who I served with almost 20 years ago.

  15. 15.

    Nash

    June 15, 2005 at 3:48 pm

    I agree the meme was idiotic, then and now, and I’ve been idiot enough to catch myself thinking that way at times.

    At the same time, wouldn’t you agree that this meme was also idiotic, at least in hindsight?

    But then again, Kerry is aware that the press is in bed with him…

    Just like there were many honorable men who didn’t like Kerry who served on Swift Boats and observed him, it is equally silly to maintain that because one reporter from the Globe favored Kerry that it meant that the majority of our press was stumping for him. Ask Bob Somerby whether he thinks Kerry got a fair shake from the press. Yes, I know, you don’t care what he has to say.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • schrodingers_cat on Righteous Rant Open Thread (Apr 15, 2024 @ 5:29pm)
  • Msb on Righteous Rant Open Thread (Apr 15, 2024 @ 5:29pm)
  • Geminid on Take the Fucking Win (Apr 15, 2024 @ 5:27pm)
  • lowtechcyclist on Righteous Rant Open Thread (Apr 15, 2024 @ 5:27pm)
  • HumboldtBlue on Righteous Rant Open Thread (Apr 15, 2024 @ 5:26pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!