• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Tick tock motherfuckers!

The media handbook says “controversial” is the most negative description that can be used for a Republican.

Oppose, oppose, oppose. do not congratulate. this is not business as usual.

The gop is a fucking disgrace.

It’s the corruption, stupid.

Republicans want to make it harder to vote and easier for them to cheat.

Black Jesus loves a paper trail.

When we show up, we win.

Text STOP to opt out of updates on war plans.

Disagreements are healthy; personal attacks are not.

We’re watching the self-immolation of the leading world power on a level unprecedented in human history.

The press swings at every pitch, we don’t have to.

The line between political reporting and fan fiction continues to blur.

We will not go back.

“In this country American means white. everybody else has to hyphenate.”

My right to basic bodily autonomy is not on the table. that’s the new deal.

Giving up is unforgivable.

Our job is not to persuade republicans but to defeat them.

White supremacy is terrorism.

There is no compromise when it comes to body autonomy. You either have it or you do not.

The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.

Everything is totally normal and fine!!!

I might just take the rest of the day off and do even more nothing than usual.

Sometimes the world just tells you your cat is here.

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / O’Connor Hysteria

O’Connor Hysteria

by John Cole|  July 2, 200510:08 am| 7 Comments

This post is in: Politics

FacebookTweetEmail

Captina Ed has a rundown of some of the more hysterical proclamations from Democratic Senators, including this from Chuck Schumer:

Sen. Charles E. Schumer, New York Democrat and a member of the committee, told reporters it would be “a shame” if Mr. Bush makes his nomination “without real face-to-face, back-and-forth consultation.” Democrats argue that this is the correct meaning of the Senate’s constitutional “advice and consent” role.

I am not sure why he believes that the President is obligated to speak with the minority party- sure, Presidents have in the past, and I would like it if Bush at least humored them so as to tamp down the rhetoric a bit and to possibly produce a consensus candidate, but he doesn’t have to. If he chooses, he can get his advice from the majority party, and then seek the consent of full body of the Senate.

Captain Ed also has this quote:

“If the president abuses his power and nominates someone who threatens to roll back the rights and freedoms of the American people, then the American people will insist that we oppose that nominee — and we intend to do so,” Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat and member of the Judiciary Committee, said.

As Ed notes, picking someone the Democrats don’t like is hardly an abuse of power. If Bush moved to install a candidate without a vote in the Senate floor, that might be considered an abuse of power.

The President is going to point a conservative. The Democrats, if they play their cards right, may be able to influence whether this is a fire-breathing conservative, or a more moderate jurist. Maybe. I would suggest that running around shrieking apocalyptic rhetoric borrowed from activist groups is not the sane path for Democrats to follow. Harry Reid has his work cut out for him, and, for everyone’s sake, lets hope he is a better leader of his caucus than Bill Frist is of his.

*** Update ***

Steve Smith notes that the Schumer statement was in reference to the agreement by the gang of 14. I thought the agreement was specifically for judicial posts other than the Supreme Court, but I am probably wrong.

Regarding Kennedy’s quip, Russ notes:

Of all the Kennedy brothers, why did this one have to be the one to live to a ripe old age?

The evidence of alcohol’s efficacy as a preservative continues to mount….

Because, as you know, I can not resist a gratuitous swipe at Teddy K. It is part of my DNA.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Hunh?
Next Post: The Plame Game »

Reader Interactions

7Comments

  1. 1.

    Steve Smith

    July 2, 2005 at 10:26 am

    Schumer’s reference to “consultation” wasn’t to any Constitutional obligation; it was to the agreement the Gang of 14 made awhile back, which specifically calls for the President to consult with Democrats. If he doesn’t consult, then the Democrats have their justification to filibuster.

  2. 2.

    eileen from OH

    July 2, 2005 at 11:54 am

    John, in negotiating you always shoot for way more than you know you’ll ultimately get. If the Dems say “We know the President will nominate a conservative, but we really hope it’s a nice one” you can bet your boots that Bush would come back with Judge Rabid E. Theocrat and say “See, it’s a conservative, just like you asked for.”

    It’s the minority’s job to be the loyal opposition, which is what Kennedy was saying. I know I’m counting on the Dems to oppose Judge Rabid. Who are all sane conservative/independent/libertarian folks counting on?

    eileen from OH

  3. 3.

    KC

    July 2, 2005 at 12:01 pm

    I really think Bush needs this judicial war. It’s something that could give him a boost. On the other hand, as Dems develop a strategy, I bet they’ll cool down a little. The only way they’re going to be able to do anything is to influence some moderate Republicans. Or, if not, open up the fissures between the Frists and the Snowes.

  4. 4.

    p.lukasiak

    July 2, 2005 at 12:32 pm

    As Ed notes, picking someone the Democrats don’t like is hardly an abuse of power.

    of course, that isn’t what Kennedy said would be an “abuse of power” — but straw men like this make it easier to criticize Kennedy. Perhaps next time you will criticize what Kennedy said, and not what you wish he had said.

  5. 5.

    Jimmy Jazz

    July 2, 2005 at 1:44 pm

    According to every opinion poll I’ve ever seen, people just want the partisanship to end (fat chance) and for Congress to focus on something other than Florida vegetables and non-burning flags (also, fat chance). To say that Democrats calling for bipartisanship and consultation is bad politics is just silly. It’s what America wants, too bad they won’t get it.

  6. 6.

    tim

    July 3, 2005 at 10:00 am

    If Bush is smart, he’ll nominate a libertarian-conservative. He’s losing that side of the party, and the Democratic hacks won’t know what to make of someone like that.

    Of course, I don’t think Bush is that smart, and will probably try to pay off the Christian Nutbag Movement again.

  7. 7.

    Mark Borok

    July 5, 2005 at 3:02 pm

    “I really think Bush needs this judicial war.”

    Like he needed the Terry Schiavo controversy, the social security fight and all the other domestic issues that he’s done so well on.

    Except for lowering taxes and the medicare bill (which was liberal) I can’t think of a thing off the top of my head that Bush has done domestically that has improved his standing.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - way2blue - SINALEI, SAMOA—RESPITE EDITION—FEBRUARY 2025.  (second of five) 8
Image by way2blue (7/16/25)
Donate

Recent Comments

  • H.E.Wolf on Excellent Read: The Past Isn’t Dead… (Jul 16, 2025 @ 4:03pm)
  • schrodingers_cat on Open Thread: PEPFAR No Longer on the GOP Chopping Block (Jul 16, 2025 @ 3:50pm)
  • zhena gogolia on Excellent Read: The Past Isn’t Dead… (Jul 16, 2025 @ 3:47pm)
  • Trollhattan on Excellent Read: The Past Isn’t Dead… (Jul 16, 2025 @ 3:46pm)
  • prostratedragon on Excellent Read: The Past Isn’t Dead… (Jul 16, 2025 @ 3:44pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Feeling Defeated?  If We Give Up, It's Game Over

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!