• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Republicans seem to think life begins at the candlelight dinner the night before.

President Biden is doing good where he can, and getting it done.

Republican obstruction dressed up as bipartisanship. Again.

Republican also-rans: four mules fighting over a turnip.

Consistently wrong since 2002

We’ll be taking my thoughts and prayers to the ballot box.

Everybody saw this coming.

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

It’s a new day. Light all those Biden polls of young people on fire and throw away the ashes.

Many life forms that would benefit from greater intelligence, sadly, do not have it.

So many bastards, so little time.

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

New McCarthy, same old McCarthyism.

I was promised a recession.

This has so much WTF written all over it that it is hard to comprehend.

At some point, the ability to learn is a factor of character, not IQ.

The Giant Orange Man Baby is having a bad day.

I like you, you’re my kind of trouble.

If you still can’t see these things even now, maybe politics isn’t your forte and you should stop writing about it.

Tick tock motherfuckers!

Conservatism: there are people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

It’s easier to kill a dangerous animal than a man who just happens to have different thoughts/values than one’s own.

We’ve had enough carrots to last a lifetime. break out the sticks.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / O’Connor Hysteria

O’Connor Hysteria

by John Cole|  July 2, 200510:08 am| 7 Comments

This post is in: Politics

FacebookTweetEmail

Captina Ed has a rundown of some of the more hysterical proclamations from Democratic Senators, including this from Chuck Schumer:

Sen. Charles E. Schumer, New York Democrat and a member of the committee, told reporters it would be “a shame” if Mr. Bush makes his nomination “without real face-to-face, back-and-forth consultation.” Democrats argue that this is the correct meaning of the Senate’s constitutional “advice and consent” role.

I am not sure why he believes that the President is obligated to speak with the minority party- sure, Presidents have in the past, and I would like it if Bush at least humored them so as to tamp down the rhetoric a bit and to possibly produce a consensus candidate, but he doesn’t have to. If he chooses, he can get his advice from the majority party, and then seek the consent of full body of the Senate.

Captain Ed also has this quote:

“If the president abuses his power and nominates someone who threatens to roll back the rights and freedoms of the American people, then the American people will insist that we oppose that nominee — and we intend to do so,” Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat and member of the Judiciary Committee, said.

As Ed notes, picking someone the Democrats don’t like is hardly an abuse of power. If Bush moved to install a candidate without a vote in the Senate floor, that might be considered an abuse of power.

The President is going to point a conservative. The Democrats, if they play their cards right, may be able to influence whether this is a fire-breathing conservative, or a more moderate jurist. Maybe. I would suggest that running around shrieking apocalyptic rhetoric borrowed from activist groups is not the sane path for Democrats to follow. Harry Reid has his work cut out for him, and, for everyone’s sake, lets hope he is a better leader of his caucus than Bill Frist is of his.

*** Update ***

Steve Smith notes that the Schumer statement was in reference to the agreement by the gang of 14. I thought the agreement was specifically for judicial posts other than the Supreme Court, but I am probably wrong.

Regarding Kennedy’s quip, Russ notes:

Of all the Kennedy brothers, why did this one have to be the one to live to a ripe old age?

The evidence of alcohol’s efficacy as a preservative continues to mount….

Because, as you know, I can not resist a gratuitous swipe at Teddy K. It is part of my DNA.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Hunh?
Next Post: The Plame Game »

Reader Interactions

7Comments

  1. 1.

    Steve Smith

    July 2, 2005 at 10:26 am

    Schumer’s reference to “consultation” wasn’t to any Constitutional obligation; it was to the agreement the Gang of 14 made awhile back, which specifically calls for the President to consult with Democrats. If he doesn’t consult, then the Democrats have their justification to filibuster.

  2. 2.

    eileen from OH

    July 2, 2005 at 11:54 am

    John, in negotiating you always shoot for way more than you know you’ll ultimately get. If the Dems say “We know the President will nominate a conservative, but we really hope it’s a nice one” you can bet your boots that Bush would come back with Judge Rabid E. Theocrat and say “See, it’s a conservative, just like you asked for.”

    It’s the minority’s job to be the loyal opposition, which is what Kennedy was saying. I know I’m counting on the Dems to oppose Judge Rabid. Who are all sane conservative/independent/libertarian folks counting on?

    eileen from OH

  3. 3.

    KC

    July 2, 2005 at 12:01 pm

    I really think Bush needs this judicial war. It’s something that could give him a boost. On the other hand, as Dems develop a strategy, I bet they’ll cool down a little. The only way they’re going to be able to do anything is to influence some moderate Republicans. Or, if not, open up the fissures between the Frists and the Snowes.

  4. 4.

    p.lukasiak

    July 2, 2005 at 12:32 pm

    As Ed notes, picking someone the Democrats don’t like is hardly an abuse of power.

    of course, that isn’t what Kennedy said would be an “abuse of power” — but straw men like this make it easier to criticize Kennedy. Perhaps next time you will criticize what Kennedy said, and not what you wish he had said.

  5. 5.

    Jimmy Jazz

    July 2, 2005 at 1:44 pm

    According to every opinion poll I’ve ever seen, people just want the partisanship to end (fat chance) and for Congress to focus on something other than Florida vegetables and non-burning flags (also, fat chance). To say that Democrats calling for bipartisanship and consultation is bad politics is just silly. It’s what America wants, too bad they won’t get it.

  6. 6.

    tim

    July 3, 2005 at 10:00 am

    If Bush is smart, he’ll nominate a libertarian-conservative. He’s losing that side of the party, and the Democratic hacks won’t know what to make of someone like that.

    Of course, I don’t think Bush is that smart, and will probably try to pay off the Christian Nutbag Movement again.

  7. 7.

    Mark Borok

    July 5, 2005 at 3:02 pm

    “I really think Bush needs this judicial war.”

    Like he needed the Terry Schiavo controversy, the social security fight and all the other domestic issues that he’s done so well on.

    Except for lowering taxes and the medicare bill (which was liberal) I can’t think of a thing off the top of my head that Bush has done domestically that has improved his standing.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • schrodingers_cat on Righteous Rant Open Thread (Apr 15, 2024 @ 4:58pm)
  • Chief Oshkosh on Righteous Rant Open Thread (Apr 15, 2024 @ 4:54pm)
  • Redshift on Righteous Rant Open Thread (Apr 15, 2024 @ 4:54pm)
  • RedDirtGirl on Righteous Rant Open Thread (Apr 15, 2024 @ 4:52pm)
  • lowtechcyclist on Henry Would Like His Lunch Right Now, Please (Open Thread) (Apr 15, 2024 @ 4:52pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!