• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Usually wrong but never in doubt

Jack be nimble, jack be quick, hurry up and indict this prick.

It’s a new day. Light all those Biden polls of young people on fire and throw away the ashes.

When someone says they “love freedom”, rest assured they don’t mean yours.

Republicans would impeach Biden if he bit into a whole Kit Kat rather than breaking the sections apart.

“Why isn’t this Snickers bar only a nickel?”

“The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.”

‘Museums aren’t America’s attic for its racist shit.’

One of our two political parties is a cult whose leader admires Vladimir Putin.

Glad to see john eastman going through some things.

No Justins, No Peace

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

Republicans got rid of McCarthy. Democrats chose not to save him.

Fight them, without becoming them!

Motto for the House: Flip 5 and lose none.

Tick tock motherfuckers!

Pessimism assures that nothing of any importance will change.

I didn’t have alien invasion on my 2023 BINGO card.

Relentless negativity is not a sign that you are more realistic.

They’re not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

“Cheese and Kraken paired together for the appetizer trial.”

Happy indictment week to all who celebrate!

An almost top 10,000 blog!

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Poll Numbers Decline

Poll Numbers Decline

by John Cole|  July 15, 200512:32 pm| 28 Comments

This post is in: Politics

FacebookTweetEmail

Bush’s numbers appear to be getting worse, according to this AP poll:

1. Generally speaking, would you say things in this country are heading in the right direction, or are they off on the wrong track?

-Right direction, 36 percent (35)

-Wrong track, 59 percent (59)

2. Overall, do you approve, disapprove or have mixed feelings about the way George W. Bush is handling his job as president?

-Approve, 42 percent (43)

-Disapprove, 56 percent (55)

6. When it comes to handling the situation in Iraq, do you approve or disapprove or have mixed feelings about the way George W. Bush is handling that issue?

-Approve, 40 percent (41)

-Disapprove, 59 percent (56)

7. When it comes to Social Security, do you approve, disapprove or have mixed feelings about the way George W. Bush is handling that issue?

-Approve, 35 percent (37)

-Disapprove, 61 percent (59)

Gutshot. If these numbers don’t turn around, the best way to know they are accurate is to watch candidates in 2006 run from Bush, fearing reverse coat-tails. I just don;t know of any event that could change these numbers, but I could, as I frequently am, be wrong.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « This Seems Plausible
Next Post: Heh »

Reader Interactions

28Comments

  1. 1.

    KC

    July 15, 2005 at 12:39 pm

    If nothing happens to Rove or anyone else in the administration, I predict something could happen along the lines of what the Bull Moose suggests.

  2. 2.

    Doug

    July 15, 2005 at 12:49 pm

    If Rove was not the leaker, the White House should identify who it was, deal with that person, apologize to the American people, and move on.

  3. 3.

    neil

    July 15, 2005 at 12:53 pm

    I can think of a few such events but they would all require a regrettable loss of innocent life.

  4. 4.

    p.lukasiak

    July 15, 2005 at 12:56 pm

    I just don;t know of any event that could change these numbers, but I could, as I frequently am, be wrong.

    Well, “another Pearl Harbor” worked for him before….

    The important numbers to watch are the ones about whether Bush shares your priorities, and the “trust/credibility” numbers. And both of those are tanking — which is a serious problem not just for Bush, but for the nation as a whole. You can “lead” people where they want to go even if they don’t trust you, and if people trust you, you can lead them where they’d rather not go. But you can’t lead them where they’d rather not go if they don’t trust you.

    The combination of low “same priority” and low “trust” numbers leaves the US vulnerable, because if there is a genuine national security crisis (i.e. not something like the Iraq War) that requires unpopular actions to be taken, appropriate action might become politically impossible.

  5. 5.

    Defense Guy

    July 15, 2005 at 1:02 pm

    Interesting. I would like to see the numbers for the Democratic party as well. It seems equally likely that they would be as low.

  6. 6.

    Lamont

    July 15, 2005 at 1:02 pm

    Away from Washington, out here in Red State America, you would not believe how the tide is turning. Almost everyone is talking about Karl Rove and wondering why Bush keeps him. Also wondering why Bush – if he is really in charge – can’t deal with the leaks and the leakers himself.

    It would be interesting to see a state-by-state breakdown of some of the most recent polls.

  7. 7.

    Steve

    July 15, 2005 at 1:05 pm

    Bush misses every opportunity. In his last speech on Iraq, he could have offered up some straight talk about the difficulties we’re facing and addressed what we’re going to change to fix it. But instead, it was more of the same, more of the National Review “we’re winning” bullshit, more determination to stay the course and never acknowledge that anyone in this Administration could make a mistake or a misjudgment.

    The public is forgiving but they’ve lost patience with this “we’re perfect” attitude, and if they keep assuming they can pull it off forever, things will just become more and more of a train wreck.

  8. 8.

    Anderson

    July 15, 2005 at 1:13 pm

    What Lukasiak said.

    At what point will Rove et al. actually permit/fake an attack to boost Bush’s numbers? Not a 9/11 size attack, more Londonesque …

    (I *think* I’m wearing tinfoil on that, but damn, I just don’t know any more ….)

  9. 9.

    arkabee

    July 15, 2005 at 1:20 pm

    DefenseGuy
    “Interesting. I would like to see the numbers for the Democratic party as well. It seems equally likely that they would be as low.”

    my gut level reaction is to agree.

  10. 10.

    Compuglobalhypermeganet

    July 15, 2005 at 1:24 pm

    The attitude from America is “everything in Washington sucks.” America sees politics as too partisan, too mean, too self-concerned. The Democrats don’t poll any better, Congress’s numbers are tanking, and the ’06 election polls show the same old “My Guy’s Great, But Throw the Other Bastards Out” syndrome that we see every election. So what’s the effect of these poll numbers? Not much. People admittedly aren’t paying much attention to Social Security and other issues, but their general negative attitudes towards DC come through in their answers (which often contradict each other, which goes to how little the public cares/knows about the issues).

  11. 11.

    Marcus Wellby

    July 15, 2005 at 1:25 pm

    Interesting. I would like to see the numbers for the Democratic party as well. It seems equally likely that they would be as low

    Might even be lower. Say what you will about Bush, he plays to his base, and he plays hard. Thats the only reason his numbers are even as high as they are. Shit, his approval should be in single digits.

    The Dems for the most part ingore their base.

  12. 12.

    Kimmitt

    July 15, 2005 at 1:37 pm

    appropriate action might become politically impossible.

    That’s reassuring, actually, given that Bush’s vision of “appropriate action” is often much worse than doing nothing.

  13. 13.

    p.lukasiak

    July 15, 2005 at 1:53 pm

    At what point will Rove et al. actually permit/fake an attack to boost Bush’s numbers? Not a 9/11 size attack, more Londonesque …

    ARggghhh…

    The Bush administration neither permitted nor arranged 9-11, and it really is a blood libel to suggest that they would allow (let alone fake) another attack. 9-11 doubtless happened because terrorism was not a priority for Bush, but to suggest that it was “permitted” to happen goes to far.

    Indeed, I don’t think that the deliberate outing of Valerie Plame by the White House was done with the full understanding of its National Security implications. Reportedly, Plame had transitioned to State Department cover as a covert agent prior to the Novak column — and its not much of a secret that lots of people with “diplomatic” passports are working for the CIA.

    Its still a crime, and still wrong, to identify someone with State Department cover as a CIA operative — but the damage of such a disclosure is minimal.

    Rove, Libby, etc were careless in disclosing classified information in the malicious attempt to damage Joe Wilson. It probably never entered their minds how much damage outing Valerie Plame could do.

    That doesn’t excuse their actions but any means; “I didn’t know” doesn’t count for shit when the disclosure of National Security secrets is involved. But I think it does present a more plausible explanation of what happened.

  14. 14.

    Jimmy Jazz

    July 15, 2005 at 2:09 pm

    Does this mean the Mission to Mars is off?

  15. 15.

    sidereal

    July 15, 2005 at 2:47 pm

    Mars, bitches!

    I would like to see the numbers for the Democratic party as well. It seems equally likely that they would be as low.

    Apples to oranges. You could compare the Republican Party numbers to the Democratic Party numbers, but comparing the President’s to the opposition Party’s doesn’t make a lot of sense. He is, after all, the freaking President.

  16. 16.

    Rick

    July 15, 2005 at 2:53 pm

    Oh, no! Another death spiral? Nothing can save Dubya now!

    Forget this summer’s similarities to the pre-9/11 period. The ranting is like that surrounding the Starr investigation in ’98. All kinds of positive declarations; bupkis as a result.

    Cordially…

  17. 17.

    capelza

    July 15, 2005 at 2:57 pm

    Oh, no! Another death spiral? Nothing can save Dubya now!

    Forget this summer’s similarities to the pre-9/11 period

    For some reason, that statement is loaded with some very sad irony. Will some other wonderful 9/11 period rescue W’s numbers?

  18. 18.

    Defense Guy

    July 15, 2005 at 3:22 pm

    Apples to oranges. You could compare the Republican Party numbers to the Democratic Party numbers, but comparing the President’s to the opposition Party’s doesn’t make a lot of sense. He is, after all, the freaking President.

    I don’t want to compare, just laugh.

  19. 19.

    Lee

    July 15, 2005 at 3:45 pm

    Personal observation here as well. I live in Texas; I work around a bunch of Bush Zealots (this is really not too far from the truth). Lately they have been wondering what the hell Bush has been thinking. It started with the Social Security fiasco. Every one of them wondered why he was working on that and not changing the tax code.

  20. 20.

    Compuglobalhypermeganet

    July 15, 2005 at 3:49 pm

    At this rate, Bush won’t get re-elected in 2008!

  21. 21.

    Don

    July 15, 2005 at 4:53 pm

    I think the big 2004 failure was in not going after competency over decisions. Kerry et all could have stood up and said that no matter what we wanted before or now, what we do we should do WELL. For our soldiers, for our jobs, for our dollars and for our deficits. Not this nebulous (to many people) yellowcake he said she said, but rather “why did you say it would cost this much and now it costs 3x as much?” and “why did we let all those explosives go for a walk?” etc.

    But of course the democratic party doesn’t trust their members to look at the big picture the way the republicans do. ‘pubs will throw the Jeebus warriors some bones that the moderates don’t like knowing they’ll hang onto them if they do enough. In their terror that Nader might take too many patcholie-stinking granolla eaters the demos failed to capture any middle road folk like our generous host.

  22. 22.

    Stormy70

    July 15, 2005 at 5:42 pm

    Every single summer, there is some overblown “scandal’ du jour, and all the polls show Bush is really in trouble this time. Whatever. Last summer, it was all “no incumbent President with such low approval numbers has ever been reelected.” Look how that turned out. I’m the only person I know following this. Everyone else appparently has a life, or something.

    PS I encounter new people everyday, not sit at my terminal like a geekette. Well, mostly anyway.

  23. 23.

    Doug

    July 15, 2005 at 5:51 pm

    Poll numbers are meaningless now. But, Dems can probably make some hay in ’06 running against Bush instead of the opponent in their district. I don’t see it happening, but it’d be interesting to see how Bush dealt with Democrats with subpoena power.

  24. 24.

    Bob

    July 15, 2005 at 6:31 pm

    I’ve lived through the sixties, where leaders of the left were dropping like flies. Lone gunemen roamed the land, bumping off a generation of leaders, just like Germany in the 20s. Somehow the lone nuts all fixated on those left of center (unless you were running to the right of Nixon).

    Gulf of Tonkin? How many of the 53,000 Americans died after that lie? Remember the Maine? We’re still paying for that one. Why should 9/11 be so different? Hey, all that has been proven so far for the 9/11 attacks is the “whoopsy daisy” theory of governance, a convenient excuse for a war that Big Oil wanted. Did Bush et al permit the attacks on 9/11? Was BushCo in on it? The whole thing smells. I certainly don’t have the proof, but please don’t be so shocked, shocked that people in power do nasty shit to increase their power and wealth. Ooo-weee! People died so someone could make a buck? That’s what the fuck history is all about.

  25. 25.

    Kimmitt

    July 15, 2005 at 6:58 pm

    it really is a blood libel to suggest that they would allow (let alone fake) another attack.

    Well, that explains the Administration’s laser-like focus on port security, nonproliferation, and capture of the man responsible for 9/11.

    C’mon, we know — and the Administration knows — that what they have to do is look like they’re doing a good job and hope that something gets through. There are absolutely no downsides to a terrorist attack on US soil for this Administration, especially given that such an attack would almost certainly hit in a “blue” state.

    That said, I don’t think they’re actively looking for one, just being extremely comfortable with doing a poor job on preventing one.

  26. 26.

    Veeshir

    July 16, 2005 at 8:48 am

    There is one problem with those polls, there’s no context.
    Each of the questions just asks if you approve or disapprove of Bush’s actions without follow-up.

    Of those who disaprove, what percentage think he should be killing more jihadis in Iraq and what percentage think he should be killing fewer jihadis in Iraq?

    Those two camps won’t agree on who they should vote for. Bill Quick,Spoons, Kos and Atrios would probably be in the ‘disapprove’ category but do you think it’s for the same reason and do you think they would vote the same way?

    I see a push-poll that gets the desired result.

  27. 27.

    Kimmitt

    July 16, 2005 at 12:35 pm

    I see a push-poll that gets the desired result.

    Er . . . no. This is not even vaguely a push-poll. You bring up a good point about the poll’s likely limitations, but words, you know, mean things.

  28. 28.

    PaulB

    July 18, 2005 at 10:57 am

    A new Iraq constitution and election will give him a temporary boost. Unless the security situation there improves, though, the boost will truly be temporary.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • schrodingers_cat on Righteous Rant Open Thread (Apr 15, 2024 @ 5:29pm)
  • Msb on Righteous Rant Open Thread (Apr 15, 2024 @ 5:29pm)
  • Geminid on Take the Fucking Win (Apr 15, 2024 @ 5:27pm)
  • lowtechcyclist on Righteous Rant Open Thread (Apr 15, 2024 @ 5:27pm)
  • HumboldtBlue on Righteous Rant Open Thread (Apr 15, 2024 @ 5:26pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!