• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Their freedom requires your slavery.

Somebody needs to explain to DeSantis that nobody needs to do anything to make him look bad.

We’ve had enough carrots to last a lifetime. break out the sticks.

Stop using mental illness to avoid talking about armed white supremacy.

I was promised a recession.

Biden: Oh no. We’ve upset Big Pharma again.

Something needs to be done about our bogus SCOTUS.

The gop couldn’t organize an orgy in a whorehouse with a fist full of 50s.

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

He wakes up lying, and he lies all day.

Republicans can’t even be trusted with their own money.

Conservatism: there are people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

“The defense has a certain level of trust in defendant that the government does not.”

The gop is a fucking disgrace.

We need to vote them all out and restore sane Democratic government.

If you are still in the gop, you are either an extremist yourself, or in bed with those who are.

Sadly, media malpractice has become standard practice.

Russian mouthpiece, go fuck yourself.

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

Ah, the different things are different argument.

‘Museums aren’t America’s attic for its racist shit.’

The new republican ‘Pastor’ of the House is an odious authoritarian little creep.

Teach a man to fish, and he’ll sit in a boat all day drinking beer.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Defending Abuse

Defending Abuse

by John Cole|  July 23, 200510:08 am| 12 Comments

This post is in: Politics, Republican Stupidity, The War on Your Neighbor, aka the War on Drugs

FacebookTweetEmail

There is, however, no way I can come up with any way to put a positive spin on ths administration decision:

The Bush administration in recent days has been lobbying to block legislation supported by Republican senators that would bar the U.S. military from engaging in “cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment” of detainees, from hiding prisoners from the Red Cross, and from using interrogation methods not authorized by a new Army field manual.

Vice President Cheney met Thursday evening with three senior Republican members of the Senate Armed Services Committee to press the administration’s case that legislation on these matters would usurp the president’s authority and — in the words of a White House official — interfere with his ability “to protect Americans effectively from terrorist attack.”

It was the second time that Cheney has met with Senate members to tamp down what the White House views as an incipient Republican rebellion. The lawmakers have publicly expressed frustration about what they consider to be the administration’s failure to hold any senior military officials responsible for notorious detainee abuse in Iraq and the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

This week’s session was attended by Armed Services Chairman John W. Warner (R-Va.) and committee members John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.). Warner and Graham last week chaired hearings that explored detainee abuse and interrogation tactics at Guantanamo Bay and the concerns of senior military lawyers that vague administration policies have left the door open to abuse.

Neither Cheney’s office nor the lawmakers would say exactly what was discussed at the meeting, citing a routine pledge of confidentiality. But Cheney has long been the administration’s chief defender of presidential prerogatives, and at the meeting he reiterated opposition to congressional intervention on the topic of detainee interrogations, according to a source privy to what happened.

The White House, in a further indication of its strong feelings, bluntly warned in a statement sent to Capitol Hill on Thursday that President Bush’s advisers would urge him to veto the $442 billion defense bill “if legislation is presented that would restrict the President’s authority to protect Americans effectively from terrorist attack and bring terrorists to justice.”

Unless someone can convince me otherwise (and that will take some work), I fail to see how a bill that bans “cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment” will somehow impede the “President’s authority to protect Americans effectively from terrorist attack and bring terrorists to justice.” In fact, I find it stunning that the administration could even defend this position under the guise of bringing “terrorists to justice.” Maybe justice is defined as indiscriminate beatings somewhere in the world, but it shouldn’t be in the United States.

This statement leads me to believe that this administration would like to continue their detainee policies without the scrutiny of Congress and the American people, and in effect establish a policy of, to borrow a phrase, ‘no controlling legal authority.’ That doesn’t wash.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Abu Ghraib
Next Post: No One Showed Up »

Reader Interactions

12Comments

  1. 1.

    Jeff Maier

    July 23, 2005 at 10:35 am

    John,

    It is pretty clear that the administration wants to have largely unchecked power to take any action without scrutiny: from the Congress, from the media or from the people. Clearly, it is limited on domestic matters so it will push as hard as possible in foreign policy and national security matters. It will demand, stonewall, evade and judge shop until it gets the outcome that it wants.

    At some point, you cannot blame Bush and his cohort. Their objectives have been pretty clear for awhile. You also cannot expect Democrats to be able to block these initiatives from the position of the Minority. I really wonder when some of the honorable senior Republicans are going to step in and remember that men of good conscience are required, at times, to place country before party.

    I’m specifically thinking of Lugar and Warner — both of whom I’ve voted for (even as a Democrat) when I lived in their respective states.

    Of course, now I would probably vote for nearly any Democrat who ran against them. I’ve been pretty independent throughout my life but GW Bush, Karl Rove, etc. have shown me the error of my ways. I’d like to see someone like Lugar remind me that I was right.

  2. 2.

    capelza

    July 23, 2005 at 10:57 am

    Has Pres. Bush ever vetoed anything?

    I do have to give the WH credit for not giving a flying flip about appearances, but that said, this is really bad. Refusal to release the Abu Ghraib photos coming at the same time and it honestly stinks of something that IS unAmerican. I don’t use that term very often, but something smells.

    The admin would be foolish to assume that those in the Islamic world do not read the WaPo and that this won’t fuel any backfire. Not to mention the rest of the world, and my own American soul.

    Lord I miss Mark Hatfield…

  3. 3.

    Veeshir

    July 23, 2005 at 11:03 am

    There’s not a lot of meat in there. There are no quotes from the Administration on exactly why they oppose this. We only know that they want to stop it and the Post gives us only some examples of provisions. The sub-head on the front page says, White House says legislation regulating detainee treatment would usurp presidential authority.
    Perhaps they’re against it for other reasons than that they want to torture every random Muslim they pick up? You know, the way they did at abu Ghraib. Notice they manage to get that in there again.
    I’m not defending Bush on this, I’m saying we don’t know what’s going on. The Washington Post leaves a lot out of the article and I don’t trust them to be impartial.
    They’ve shown themselves to be far too biased to be trusted.
    I have to admit, I trust Bush far more than the Washington Post.

  4. 4.

    Sojourner

    July 23, 2005 at 11:44 am

    Those of you, like Stormy and DougJ, who argue that the detainees were treated no worse than fraternity pledges should step forward and demand that these materials be released. Otherwise it’s safe to conclude that you don’t really believe that.

  5. 5.

    Norden

    July 23, 2005 at 12:00 pm

    Are you really against degrading treatment? On what grounds?

  6. 6.

    Bob

    July 23, 2005 at 12:26 pm

    Yeah, what’s wrong with releasing photos of detainees eating chicken dinners and adjusting their air conditioning?

    Doug and Stormy know why.

  7. 7.

    Jcricket

    July 23, 2005 at 12:33 pm

    John: Someone with a similar world-view (I believe) to your own put it very well on his blog

    While I have zero desire to look at any more images from the disgraceful episodes at Abu Ghraib, I believe that the Pentagon should comply with the judge’s ruling. Abu Ghraib is a horrifying and shameful episode that Americans should face and learn from, not try to shove under the rug.

    And

    There is no excuse for abuses like this, and there can be no excuses made for not uncovering the full truth and holding to account those who are responsible. It is the right thing to do.”

    The fact that LGF, Rush, Powerline (blog of the year!) and others have continued to be torture apologists shows that it really hasn’t sunk in. Some of them so strongly believe that admitting the truth is aiding the enemy that they’ve lost sight of the fact that we be acting in ways that make us proud to show off our behavior. Therefore I support the release of the evidence of what really happened at Abu Ghraib.

    Simply hiding behind “we’ve seen it already” isn’t going to help anyone. Actively working to stifle the flow of information is only going to make the American public ignorant (don’t forget, the rest of the world is getting their news from sources not bound by what Cheney and Bush dictate). Most importantly, it’s not going to prevent this kind of abuse from happening again.

  8. 8.

    Kimmitt

    July 23, 2005 at 12:44 pm

    Enh, the American people have spoken. This liberty and democracy stuff is hard work.

  9. 9.

    CaseyL

    July 23, 2005 at 12:49 pm

    The photos should be released.

    The photos should be released because too many people continue to peddle the lie that “it wasn’t that bad” and “there were only a few bad apples.”

    The liars know they’re lying. They’re sadists, pure and simple. But the photos would take away the last shreds of obfuscation they’re hiding behind.

    The photos should be released because too many people are still willing to give the Bush Admin the benefit of the doubt. Releasing the photos would take away the last shreds of doubt.

    The Bush Admin is a gang of thugs that has shat on everything America stands for. Their supporters enable them, either by lying or by hiding from the truth.

    This country needs to have its collective nose rubbed in the shit that the Bush Admin has created.

  10. 10.

    KC

    July 23, 2005 at 1:42 pm

    Jesus John, it’s no secret these guys have a Nixonite idea about the expansion of presidential powers (and I’m not using the term “Nixonite” in the pejorrative sense either). It’s clear they do not want any judicial or legislative intrusion into the powers of the Executive Branch, no matter how reasonable in some cases. Cheney has made a great deal, and many on the right have, about the powers of the presidency being too circumspect. Given the executive order on presidential records, the administration’s fight against FOIA, its lack of cooperation on oversight issues, and its willingness to challenge the judiciary on pretty much everything that might require it to be modestly forthcoming, their decision block the release of the torture photos seems typical to me.

  11. 11.

    jg

    July 23, 2005 at 2:19 pm

    Has Pres. Bush ever vetoed anything?

    I know he threatened to veto his own bill to fund the Iraq war because it revoked the rich people’s tax cuts which led to the neo-cons favorite Kerry soundbite ‘I voted for it before I voted against it’. I still find it so amazing that half the country never asked how a senator got 2 votes.

  12. 12.

    Gary Farber

    July 23, 2005 at 5:34 pm

    I don’t know how much to attribute to the writer versus the source, but note the weasel wording here: “….that President Bush’s advisers would urge him to veto the $442 billion defense bill….”

    Not “that the President would veto” but that his “advisers would urge.”

    That’s a great way to phrase it if you want to intimidate, but not have to follow through and still not have made a false threat.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • cain on Righteous Rant Open Thread (Apr 15, 2024 @ 4:29pm)
  • WaterGirl on Righteous Rant Open Thread (Apr 15, 2024 @ 4:27pm)
  • Brachiator on Henry Would Like His Lunch Right Now, Please (Open Thread) (Apr 15, 2024 @ 4:27pm)
  • gvg on Take the Fucking Win (Apr 15, 2024 @ 4:26pm)
  • Dorothy A. Winsor on Henry Would Like His Lunch Right Now, Please (Open Thread) (Apr 15, 2024 @ 4:26pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!