• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

When you’re a Republican, they let you do it.

Today’s gop: why go just far enough when too far is right there?

🎶 Those boots were made for mockin’ 🎵

Disagreements are healthy; personal attacks are not.

Republicans seem to think life begins at the candlelight dinner the night before.

“In this country American means white. everybody else has to hyphenate.”

“Just close your eyes and kiss the girl and go where the tilt-a-whirl takes you.” ~OzarkHillbilly

I’m starting to think Jesus may have made a mistake saving people with no questions asked.

We will not go quietly into the night; we will not vanish without a fight.

I really should read my own blog.

Republicans firmly believe having an abortion is a very personal, very private decision between a woman and J.D. Vance.

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

Relentless negativity is not a sign that you are more realistic.

When I was faster i was always behind.

The revolution will be supervised.

Michigan is a great lesson for Dems everywhere: when you have power…use it!

The only way through is to slog through the muck one step at at time.

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires Republicans to act in good faith.

They were going to turn on one another at some point. It was inevitable.

Never give a known liar the benefit of the doubt.

Republicans are radicals, not conservatives.

Every reporter and pundit should have to declare if they ever vacationed with a billionaire.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Foreign Affairs / Military / Troop Movements

Troop Movements

by John Cole|  July 27, 200511:24 am| 30 Comments

This post is in: Military, War on Terror aka GSAVE®

FacebookTweetEmail

Rumors of a short-term draw-down in Iraq are once again popping up:

The United States hopes to sharply reduce its forces in Iraq within the next year, its top commander on the ground said on Wednesday.

“I do believe that if the political process continues to go positively, if the developments with the (Iraqi) security forces continue to go as it is going, I do believe we will still be able to make fairly substantial reductions after these elections — in the spring and summer of next year,” General George Casey said at a briefing with visiting Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.

Iraq is scheduled to hold two elections in the coming months: a referendum on a new constitution in October and an election for a new leader in December.

Casey made a similar prediction of troop cuts early this year, but U.S. officials have avoided repeating predictions that give a timetable for withdrawals since the insurgency in Iraq worsened sharply when the new government took power in April.

This annoncement appears to have coincided with statements from a top Iraqi PM:

Iraq’s transitional prime minister called Wednesday for a speedy withdrawal of U.S. troops and the top U.S. commander here said he believed a “fairly substantial” pullout could begin next spring and summer.

Prime Minister Ibrahim Jaafari said at a joint news conference with Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld that the time has arrived to plan a coordinated transition from American to Iraqi military control throughout the country.

Asked how soon a U.S. withdrawal should happen, he said no exact timetable had been set. “But we confirm and we desire speed in that regard,” he said, speaking through a translator. “And this fast pace has two aspects.”

I don’t think it is unwarranted to wonder if the announcement has anything to do with new domestic poll numbers concerning the war, and it most certainly is not unwarranted to remember that al-Jaafari has been doing some jet-setting in the region, inking deals with Iran and Syria.

In other military news, plans to permanently relocate 50,000 soldiers have been finalized:

The Army has completed plans for bringing home 50,000 soldiers living overseas, mostly in Germany and South Korea, and settling them in bases across the United States where families will move less often and troops will be closer to training centers and ports, Pentagon officials said Tuesday.

Several states with large bases – Colorado, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, New York, North Carolina and Texas – will have their Army populations grow, with the addition of at least one brigade, or about 5,000 soldiers, and their families.

The complex plans, which describe in detail where the troops will move, where new Army brigades will be located and which units will be renamed, have been approved by President Bush and Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, Pentagon officials said.

The relocation, to be completed by 2008, was described by two Pentagon officials who have worked on the project and were granted anonymity so they would describe the changes before an official announcement expected later this week.

In one of the most significant shifts of troops since the end of the cold war, the restationing program finds new homes for not only the 50,000 troops returning from abroad, but also for 30,000 new soldiers financed temporarily by Congress. Those increases are to help the Army add 10 brigades to its current 33 under a program to convert all of its combat units into more deployable modular units.

If I remember correctly, this proposal, when first floated, was met with widespread oppostion from the usual quarters. Seems to me that it is not only doable, but it makes sense and will shortly be a done deal.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « What Were They Thinking?
Next Post: Creationism Update »

Reader Interactions

30Comments

  1. 1.

    SomeCallMeTim

    July 27, 2005 at 11:50 am

    We were always going to declare victory and go home, regardless of the facts on the ground. The only question was whether we’d leave Iraq in the midst of a civil war or under the thumb of a Saddam-lite. I admit that I hadn’t considered that we make it a client state of Iran.

    But I’m guessing this doesn’t make you regret your vote in ’04 at all. Out of curiousity, how do you think that Administrations should be held accountable for foreign policy?

  2. 2.

    Steve

    July 27, 2005 at 11:55 am

    I think it would be great to have a triumphant return of a large number of troops right before the 2006 elections. Yes, let’s go with that plan.

    The question for debate is: is it better or worse for us to publicly advertise our timetables? Obviously, no one is advocating for a date we must abide by no matter what happens, but we can certainly set dates contingent on things going according to plan. I tend to be less convinced by the idea that “the terrorists will know to wait us out!” and more convinced by the idea that some of the less fanatical elements of the insurgency may be persuadable if they start to get the sense we actually intend to leave.

  3. 3.

    Sojourner

    July 27, 2005 at 12:02 pm

    Cut and run. What a great plan.

  4. 4.

    Cassidy

    July 27, 2005 at 12:26 pm

    Not to be a party crasher, but this has been the military’s intent for a while now. I’ve been hearing things of this nature since I got here in Feb.

  5. 5.

    Sojourner

    July 27, 2005 at 12:48 pm

    Did Bush really say this?

    WASHINGTON, DC—President Bush officially responded to the latest round of London transit bombings Monday, challenging terrorists to “do their worst.” Said Bush, in a televised statement from the Oval Office: “The proud and resilient people of London can take anything the forces of evil and cowardice can throw at them. They will never live in fear of you. Bring it on. Prime Minister Tony Blair thanked Bush for his comments, inviting him to visit London and ride the Underground in a show of solidarity.

  6. 6.

    Steve

    July 27, 2005 at 1:22 pm

    I’m going with “no.” Howard Dean might have said it though.

  7. 7.

    sean

    July 27, 2005 at 1:25 pm

    that’s from the Onion, Sojourner

  8. 8.

    Jeff Maier

    July 27, 2005 at 1:31 pm

    The Onion is clearly doing a parody of Bush’s first “bring it on” speech. A thousand, or more, military deaths and untold civilian lives later it is STILL being brought on.

  9. 9.

    jg

    July 27, 2005 at 1:34 pm

    Cut and run. get the boys home in time for the 06 elections. And when Iraq falls into civil war blame the liberals who demnaded a pullout. Sound about right? BTW I’ve yet to hear or read a liberal demand immediate pullout. I have seen and read lots of wingnuts who say liberals demand pullout however.

  10. 10.

    kl

    July 27, 2005 at 1:44 pm

    Did Bush really say this?

    Yes! Don’t listen to these guys. Please forward that quote to Kos and MoveOn immediately.

  11. 11.

    Steve

    July 27, 2005 at 1:46 pm

    You can find individuals at dkos who demand an immediate pullout, just like you can find individuals at dkos who think Bush is a space alien, but I’m not aware of any elected Democrats who have taken that position.

  12. 12.

    jg

    July 27, 2005 at 2:01 pm

    Steve, thanks for catching that. I did mean democrats or liberals that have a voice. Not the noise of far left moonbats.

  13. 13.

    yet another jeff

    July 27, 2005 at 2:05 pm

    Sojourner…

    No. You know you got that from The Onion…

    You wouldn’t be trying to see if you can get them quoted in the Chinese press again, would you?

  14. 14.

    Sojourner

    July 27, 2005 at 2:15 pm

    That’s a relief. I thought Bush was doing his macho thing again since it worked so well the first time.

  15. 15.

    StupidityRules

    July 27, 2005 at 2:54 pm

    A bit OT, but a great piece from the Onion that isn’t there anymore.

  16. 16.

    Rick

    July 27, 2005 at 3:48 pm

    Glad to learn we’re starting to extricate ourselves from the German and SoKo quagmires. I just hope civil wars don’t break out upon our withdrawls.

    Man, some exit plan for those occupations: 60 and 50+ years. FDR, Truman and Eisenhower really botched those wars.

    Cordially…

  17. 17.

    rilkefan

    July 27, 2005 at 4:08 pm

    apropos, a headline via Kleiman:

    Bush Awaits Orders From Rove On Handling Of Rove Scandal

  18. 18.

    Stormy70

    July 27, 2005 at 4:09 pm

    that’s from the Onion, Sojourner

    Reality-based commentary for those who inhabit the reality-based world.

  19. 19.

    Sojourner

    July 27, 2005 at 4:47 pm

    Reality-based commentary for those who inhabit the reality-based world.

    Note that I asked if it was true. I didn’t take anything on blind faith as is done on Planet Stormy.

  20. 20.

    Mike

    July 27, 2005 at 5:15 pm

    “jg Says:

    Steve, thanks for catching that. I did mean democrats or liberals that have a voice. Not the noise of far left moonbats.”

    Haven’t you heard?
    They are the ONLY Voice that matters, just ask them…
    Boy are they gonna show Hillary, yessiree, sure are gonna show her.

  21. 21.

    Jimmy Jazz

    July 27, 2005 at 5:23 pm

    Rumors of a short-term draw-down in Iraq are once again popping up:

    John, when the top general in Iraq stands next to the SecDef and states to the assembled press corps in an on-the-record briefing that he’s hoping for a big drawdown next summer, I’d rank that somewhere above a “rumor”. I’d call that a “stated timetable”, like the one Bush said last month we’d never set. Wasn’t this exactly what conservatives said Kerry would do? Oh well, at least we’re spared the mock outrage.

  22. 22.

    Bob

    July 27, 2005 at 6:54 pm

    Plan B.

    Plan A was “We’re staying there forever!” That one wasn’t going over too well.

  23. 23.

    CaseyL

    July 27, 2005 at 7:57 pm

    Well, I really don’t care that Bush is bringing the troops home in time for the ’06 elections. Considering how the war’s been a political ploy from the start, it’s a given that GOP election strategy will continue to take priority over military strategy for as long as the GOP can get away with it. The important thing is that our soldiers will be coming home.

    This quote caught my eye, though:

    ““I do believe that if the political process continues to go positively, if the developments with the (Iraqi) security forces continue to go as it is going…”

    Last I heard, the Iraqi security forces were, at best, half of what they needed to be by now; and there was still a problem with desertion.

    What’s the political situation? Other than the agreement with Iran, the half-finished Constitution that’s supposed to be voted on next month, and rumors that the civil war has already started, I haven’t heard much about it.

  24. 24.

    SamAm

    July 27, 2005 at 9:01 pm

    These plans are basically meaningless until Iraq gets a permanent government. And there are 3 hurdles to that right now. Will they all be cleared on schedule? Perhaps. But the constitutional ratification step looks quite dicey indeed. Say the Sunni provinces reject the constiution. Such a public failing on the part of the Iraqi political process would make US withdrawl much, much more difficult. It would expose as un-truth the idea that we’ve accomplished our mission there and are returning on our terms. Reality; the US military can’t sustain the tempo of current operations and the public has grown unhappy with the war. You and I know that’s a large part of Bush’s desicion making, but he and his administration will never admit it. I hope a liberal and democratic constitution is enshrined on schedule, but the chances of that happening seem slim indeed. The TAL really goofed when it allowed a 3 province veto. But on the other hand, you can’t legislate inter-ethnic political harmony. So, we’ll see how it works out and hope for the best.

  25. 25.

    Jimmy Jazz

    July 27, 2005 at 10:03 pm

    These plans are basically meaningless until Iraq gets a permanent government.

    You think so, huh?

    My guess: unless there is major riot-level unrest, we’re pushing the bird out of the nest come Summer. Operation Cut and Run will have the same Joementum as the invasion.

  26. 26.

    SamAm

    July 27, 2005 at 11:27 pm

    Well, until a permanent government is seated the mission remains more un-accomplished than all but the most dead-end of Bush supporters would admit. The fact that the US is planning reductions either way, and irrespective of the ISF’s abilities shows, once again what a contemptable lot we have running our government.

    So actually, I’m of two minds about this. I don’t think the Bush administration has the ability (or even cares that much) to resolve details on the ground to anything resembling the outcome of how the war was sold post facto. At the same time, seeing as how PR is such a huge part of their decision making process, even they would be hard pressed to draw down our force levels without the political process being finished.

  27. 27.

    Barry

    July 28, 2005 at 2:01 pm

    Rick Says:

    “Glad to learn we’re starting to extricate ourselves from the German and SoKo quagmires. I just hope civil wars don’t break out upon our withdrawls.”

    I was stationed in Germany in the early 80’s. I had had to learn lots of Army acronyms, but ‘IED’ wasn’t one of them.

  28. 28.

    Defense Guy

    July 28, 2005 at 3:05 pm

    I was stationed in Germany in the early 80’s. I had had to learn lots of Army acronyms, but ‘IED’ wasn’t one of them.

    First, thanks for your service, it is as always appreciated. Second, how many years after the end of WW2 were you there? Trying to compare it is apples to oranges at best.

  29. 29.

    W.B. Reeves

    July 28, 2005 at 8:05 pm

    First, thanks for your service, it is as always appreciated. Second, how many years after the end of WW2 were you there? Trying to compare it is apples to oranges at best.

    Actually it was Rick who was comparing apples to oranges.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. Balloon Juice says:
    July 29, 2005 at 10:21 am

    […] In a response to a post that supports the decision on moderate blog Balloon Juice, commenter SomeCallMeTim snarks: “We were always going to declare victory and go home, regardless of the facts on the ground. The only question was whether we’d leave Iraq in the midst of a civil war or under the thumb of a Saddam-lite. I admit that I hadn’t considered that we make it a client state of Iran.” […]

Primary Sidebar

Image by WaterGirl (6/21/25)

Recent Comments

  • Matt McIrvin on TGIFriday Morning Open Thread: Waiting for the Doc Dump(s) (Jun 20, 2025 @ 9:29am)
  • Dorothy A. Winsor on TGIFriday Morning Open Thread: Waiting for the Doc Dump(s) (Jun 20, 2025 @ 9:29am)
  • terraformer on Late Night Open Thread: Another Musk Rocket Goes Boom (Jun 20, 2025 @ 9:28am)
  • Geminid on Late Night Open Thread: Another Musk Rocket Goes Boom (Jun 20, 2025 @ 9:28am)
  • comrade scotts agenda of rage on TGIFriday Morning Open Thread: Waiting for the Doc Dump(s) (Jun 20, 2025 @ 9:27am)

Personality Crisis Podcast (Cole, DougJ, mistermix)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!