Campaign Finance Reform is intended to take away the stacked deck.
Mr. Krapmasky made no real argument, he made no concrete foundations for anything, he just tries out random words and they happened to form something akin to a paragraph and he posted it.
I don’t know why I even follow your RedState links, they rarely make much sense.
2.
John S.
Red State…
That sort of smacks of Communism. I don’t think Mr. McCarthy would be pleased at all with good Americans identifying themselves as thus.
Umm. The point was to follow the link Krempasky provided to the words from the Democrat.
Canpaign Finance Reform took away no stacked deck- it stacked the deck in favor of incumbents. I am beginning to wonder why I read your comments, they rarely make such sense.
BinkyBoy
Campaign Finance Reform is intended to take away the stacked deck.
Mr. Krapmasky made no real argument, he made no concrete foundations for anything, he just tries out random words and they happened to form something akin to a paragraph and he posted it.
I don’t know why I even follow your RedState links, they rarely make much sense.
John S.
Red State…
That sort of smacks of Communism. I don’t think Mr. McCarthy would be pleased at all with good Americans identifying themselves as thus.
Sarcsam off.
John Cole
Umm. The point was to follow the link Krempasky provided to the words from the Democrat.
Canpaign Finance Reform took away no stacked deck- it stacked the deck in favor of incumbents. I am beginning to wonder why I read your comments, they rarely make such sense.
John S.
Get a sense of humor, John.
John Cole
Umm. I was talking to Binky, John S.
John S.
Oh, well that explains a lot then.
Sorry for the misunderstanding…it’s been a long day.
Jim Dandy
Krempasky’s right. The question is, how do we get rules that don’t stack the deck in favor of incumbents when it’s incumbents writing the laws?
Krempasky
Binky, for someone who can’t seem to spell a name I can’t really give your criticism too much credit.