• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

A consequence of cucumbers

… pundit janitors mopping up after the GOP

Let’s finish the job.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

Why is it so hard for them to condemn hate?

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

In short, I come down firmly on all sides of the issue.

Jack Smith: “Why did you start campaigning in the middle of my investigation?!”

🎶 Those boots were made for mockin’ 🎵

Some judge needs to shut this circus down soon.

New McCarthy, same old McCarthyism.

Innocent people don’t delay justice.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

The GOP is a fucking disgrace.

Putin dreamed of ending NATO, and now it’s Finnish-ed.

Motto for the House: Flip 5 and lose none.

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

Today’s GOP: why go just far enough when too far is right there?

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

Insiders who complain to politico: please report to the white house office of shut the fuck up.

Bark louder, little dog.

I’m pretty sure there’s only one Jack Smith.

Since when do we limit our critiques to things we could do better ourselves?

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Science & Technology / Someone Call the Censors

Someone Call the Censors

by John Cole|  August 14, 20051:07 pm| 7 Comments

This post is in: Science & Technology

FacebookTweetEmail

And Nanny Nation takes another blow:

Results from the first long-term study of online videogame playing may be surprising.

Contrary to popular opinion and most previous research, the new study found that players’ “robust exposure” to a highly violent online game did not cause any substantial real-world aggression.

After an average playtime of 56 hours over the course of a month with “Asheron’s Call 2,” a popular MMRPG, or “massively multi-layer online role-playing game,” researchers found “no strong effects associated with aggression caused by this violent game,” said Dmitri Williams, the lead author of the study.

Players were not statistically different from the non-playing control group in their beliefs on aggression after playing the game than they were before playing, Williams said.

Nor was game play a predictor of aggressive behaviors. Compared with the control group, the players neither increased their argumentative behaviors after game play nor were significantly more likely to argue with their friends and partners.

“I’m not saying some games don’t lead to aggression, but I am saying the data are not there yet,” Williams said. “Until we have more long-term studies, I don’t think we should make strong predictions about long-term effects, especially given this finding.”

Williams, a professor of speech communication at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, is an expert on the effects of online video-game play. He conducted the study with Marko Skoric, a lecturer at the School of Communication and Information at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore.

Their findings appear in the June issue of Communication Monographs in an article titled “Internet Fantasy Violence: A Test of Aggression in an Online Game.”

According to Williams, researchers have suspected a strong linkage between games and aggression “but, with the exception of relatively short-term effects on young adults and children, they have yet to demonstrate this link.”

Interesting. I know some people who are currently conducting similar research, so this will be a fun issue to follow.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Why Are We in Iraq, Cindy Sheehan, and Other Things
Next Post: The War on Pain Relief Goes Digital »

Reader Interactions

7Comments

  1. 1.

    Steve

    August 14, 2005 at 1:28 pm

    When I think of violent video games, I don’t think at all about games from AC2’s genre.

  2. 2.

    mac Buckets

    August 14, 2005 at 1:39 pm

    Contrary to popular opinion and most previous research, the new study found that players’ “robust exposure” to a highly violent online game did not cause any substantial real-world aggression.

    My old roomie and his mates are huge gamers, and they’re the calmest people you’ll ever meet. I mean, it’s hard to be aggressive when you are that high.

  3. 3.

    James Richardson

    August 14, 2005 at 1:48 pm

    John, John John.

    Didn’t you ge the memo? Scientific studies are just another tool by the liberal elite who control this country used to try to convince mainstream Americans that their belief structure is wrong. We won’t stand for it I say! If your precious “science” goes againsts my ideology then your “science” must be wrong, because no sissy liberal is going to force me question myself. That’s Commie talk.

    –end parody.

  4. 4.

    Craig

    August 14, 2005 at 3:27 pm

    I am not a publication elitist, but

    Their findings appear in the June issue of Communication Monographs

    Communication Monographs? I can’t even find it listed on a list of journal’s impact factors.

    Just because something got published doesn’t mean it is well done science.

    I am not saying I disagree with the report, just that it is important to see where something got published.

  5. 5.

    John Cole

    August 14, 2005 at 3:32 pm

    Comm Monographs is the premiere journal from the National Communication Association, and the best research done in the field. That doesn’t mean this study will stand on its own, but it is akin to the New England Journal of Medicine for Communication Studies.

  6. 6.

    Zifnab

    August 14, 2005 at 5:02 pm

    I’m a gamer and a big proponent of the belief that violent video games do not a violent child make.

    That said, AC2? Seriously, if you want to tramautize your kid, try something like Doom III, Half Life II, or Soldier of Fortune. Once he’s done blowing up demons from hell, aliens from beyond, and crazied drug lord terrorists from Uzbekioslovikastan we’ll see how sociable he is.

  7. 7.

    Boronx

    August 14, 2005 at 5:21 pm

    I’ve been a gamer and been around gamers for a long time now, and I have three unscientific observations:

    Games are an outlet for the overly agressive. Some people have, shall we say, well developed predatory instincts. Games give those instincts constant satisfaction. I don’t know if this a good thing in the long run, but it does seem to help them avoid preying on those around them.

    Games violent games can make you more sympathetic to bad actors. While playing GTA may not make you think carjacking is wonderful, it will make you sympathize somewhat with carjackers and perhaps look down a little on the victims.

    However, and perhaps most importantly, as gamers grow older, they begin to reflect upon violence games at least two conclusions are reached, one obvious, that the violence, if transported into real life would be a horror.

    The other hardly mentioned at all in today’s culture, that men in particular are very easily seduced by the thrill of killing their enemy, of crushing other men, and that, the stupid stories that drive video games being the proof, no real justification is needed for it.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Steeplejack on Friday Night Open Thread: Guilty, Guilty, TACKY! (Jun 9, 2023 @ 11:51pm)
  • James E Powell on Friday Night Open Thread: Guilty, Guilty, TACKY! (Jun 9, 2023 @ 11:47pm)
  • Jim, Foolish Literalist on Friday Night Open Thread: Guilty, Guilty, TACKY! (Jun 9, 2023 @ 11:47pm)
  • Chetan Murthy on Friday Night Open Thread: Guilty, Guilty, TACKY! (Jun 9, 2023 @ 11:45pm)
  • Ramona Rosario on Friday Night Open Thread: Guilty, Guilty, TACKY! (Jun 9, 2023 @ 11:43pm)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup on Sat 5/13 at 5pm!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!