• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

I would try pessimism, but it probably wouldn’t work.

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires republicans to act in good faith.

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

Hell hath no fury like a farmer bankrupted.

Incompetence, fear, or corruption? why not all three?

Fight for a just cause, love your fellow man, live a good life.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.

Some judge needs to shut this circus down soon.

Wake up. Grow up. Get in the fight.

It is not hopeless, and we are not helpless.

A democracy can’t function when people can’t distinguish facts from lies.

Stamping your little feets and demanding that they see how important you are? Not working anymore.

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

You cannot love your country only when you win.

Roe is not about choice. It is about freedom.

Baby steps, because the Republican Party is full of angry babies.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

Celebrate the fucking wins.

America is going up in flames. The NYTimes fawns over MAGA celebrities. No longer a real newspaper.

The revolution will be supervised.

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

Relentless negativity is not a sign that you are more realistic.

The willow is too close to the house.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / War on Terror / War on Terror aka GSAVE® / Release from Abu Ghraib

Release from Abu Ghraib

by John Cole|  August 27, 20052:53 pm| 33 Comments

This post is in: War on Terror aka GSAVE®

FacebookTweetEmail

Apparently, at the request of the Iraqi government, we let hundreds of prisoners go:

Nearly 1,000 detainees at Iraq’s Abu Ghraib prison were released this week at the request of the Iraqi government, Multi-National Forces said Saturday.

“This major release, the largest to date, marks a significant event in Iraq’s progress toward democratic governance and the rule of law, demonstrating the involvement of Iraq’s government in the effort to provide both security and justice for all Iraqis,” the forces said in a written statement.

The detainees were released from Wednesday through Saturday, with the assistance of the Iraqi government, the statement said. They represent all Iraqi communities and had been brought to Abu Ghraib from detention facilities throughout Iraq.

Those chosen for release were not convicted of violent crimes, the statement said, “and all have admitted their crimes, renounced violence and pledged to be good citizens of a democratic Iraq.”

I am sure there is much more to this than what is reported here, but I am curious- why were we holding them one day if it is just ‘ok’ to let them go the next day?

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Tierney on Marijuana
Next Post: Voter ID Laws »

Reader Interactions

33Comments

  1. 1.

    srv

    August 27, 2005 at 3:00 pm

    I don’t think we run Abu Ghraib anymore. We turned it over.

    Visualize the Dukakis revolving door commercial. MoveOn should make one with TERRORISTS in it, as George and Dick look on.

    Tinkerbell, indeed.

  2. 2.

    Mr.Ortiz

    August 27, 2005 at 3:06 pm

    Supposedly something like 25% of detainees in Iraq are completely innocent. But if we’re only releasing the ones who have admitted their crimes, well, I’m as lost as you. Maybe the offer went something like this: “We have nothing on you, but in order to save face, please sign this confession/abdication of violence before we release you. If you don’t sign, you don’t go home.”

  3. 3.

    mac Buckets

    August 27, 2005 at 3:21 pm

    Visualize the Dukakis revolving door commercial. MoveOn should make one with TERRORISTS in it, as George and Dick look on.

    Well, except that those released were non-violent criminals — looters and the like, presumably. Not that the truth need corroborate political ads.

  4. 4.

    Greenwood

    August 27, 2005 at 3:25 pm

    We usually can’t tell the the good guys from the bad guys. We don’t speak their language and we know little about their culture. It is much like our experience in another distant country that we aren’t supposed to compare to – one that starts with V, but not the one that that interests Pat Robertson.

    We think we can rule the world speaking just English, communicating only with exile leaders who speak fluent English, like Chalabi and Allawi. Unfortunately our guys don’t pick up foreign languages as quickly as the fictional characters on Mission Impossible or Alias.

  5. 5.

    DougJ

    August 27, 2005 at 3:30 pm

    Starting a new country with a new constitution is about compromise. And that’s what this is a compromise. Yes, it would be better to have detained some of them longer to keep the dangerous ones off the steets and to get more information from the ones who were not criminals. But those are the kinds of compromises that need to be made to get the Sunnis back to the negotiating table. When you look at the big picture, letting a few dangerous elements out isn’t such a big deal.

  6. 6.

    KC

    August 27, 2005 at 3:40 pm

    Maybe DougJ is right. I’m leaning that direction myself. It’s obviously tough to know for sure though. Also, if anyone’s interested, there’s a great article in Harper’s on strict constructionism, actually judicial fundamentalism. I think it puts to rest (along with Narrowing the Nation’s Power, written by a conservative 9th circuit judge, John Noonan) any notion that the real debate over the judiciary is over judicial restraint, but is really about conservative activism on the courts. I urge anybody interested to read it.

  7. 7.

    mac Buckets

    August 27, 2005 at 3:41 pm

    Odd day in Iraq news…

    Apparently, discussions about letting these prisoners go have been ongoing for awhile between Sunnis and President Talibani. It’s no doubt just a “good-faith buyoff” to get Sunni agreement on the Constitution procedings.

    Reuters also reports hot Sunni-on-Sunni action:

    “In one example of Iraq’s complex violence, hospital officials said 20 members of two rival tribes were killed near the western town of Qaim. Both tribes are Sunni but one supports the militant group al Qaeda in Iraq, clerics in the town said.”

    These Sunnis still remind me of Life of Brian:

    REG: The only people we hate more than the Romans are the fucking Judean People’s Front.
    P.F.J.: Yeah!
    JUDITH: Splitters!
    P.F.J.: Splitters!
    FRANCIS: And the Judean Popular People’s Front.
    P.F.J.: Yeah. Oh, yeah. Splitters. Splitters!
    LORETTA: And the People’s Front of Judea.
    P.F.J.: Yeah. Splitters. Splitters!
    REG: What?
    LORETTA: The People’s Front of Judea. Splitters.
    REG: We’re the People’s Front of Judea!
    LORETTA: Oh. I thought we were the Popular Front.
    REG: People’s Front! C-huh.
    FRANCIS: Whatever happened to the Popular Front, Reg?
    REG: He’s over there.
    P.F.J.: Splitter

  8. 8.

    Joeseph Ramone

    August 27, 2005 at 3:44 pm

    BREAKING….MILITARY RECRUITERS SHOW UP AT CAMP QUALLS….DOZENS FLEE!!

  9. 9.

    ppGaz

    August 27, 2005 at 4:00 pm

    Starting a new country with a new constitution is about compromise.

    Bwaaaaaaaaaaahahaha! Is that right, Dougie?

    You sound like you are watching a tv show about building a new carport.

    Tell us more about nation-building, Doug. Here, let me help you:

    “If we don’t stop extending our troops all around the world in nation-building missions, then we’re going to have a serious problem coming down the road.”

    “I’m worried about an opponent who uses nation-building and the military in the same sentence. See, our view of the military is for our military to be properly prepared to fight and win war and, therefore, prevent war from happening in the first place.”
    GWB 6 Nov 2000

  10. 10.

    DougJ

    August 27, 2005 at 4:02 pm

    “If we don’t stop extending our troops all around the world in nation-building missions, then we’re going to have a serious problem coming down the road.”

    “I’m worried about an opponent who uses nation-building and the military in the same sentence. See, our view of the military is for our military to be properly prepared to fight and win war and, therefore, prevent war from happening in the first place.”
    GWB 6 Nov 2000

    9/11 changed everything. If you don’t understand that, you don’t understand anything.

  11. 11.

    ppGaz

    August 27, 2005 at 4:10 pm

    9/11 changed everything.

    Really? How’s that, Doug? 9-11 meant that we are now going to try to nation-build our way to a world of perfect safety?

    How’s that going to work, Doug? Can you map it out for me? Timetable? Goals? Measurables? Costs? Benefits?

    Most Americans don’t think this war has made them safer from terrorism, Doug? Are the people too stupid to figure this all out?

    Maybe you should explain it better for them?

  12. 12.

    jobiuspublius

    August 27, 2005 at 4:14 pm

    9/11 did change everything. It was the switch part of bait and switch.

  13. 13.

    Davebo

    August 27, 2005 at 8:14 pm

    9/11 did indeed change everything.

    Today people eat their corn on the cob in a vertical versus horizontal position, causing many buttery noses.

  14. 14.

    Boronx

    August 27, 2005 at 9:09 pm

    9/11 changed everything.

    If you don’t see through that, you don’t see through anything.

  15. 15.

    Aakash

    August 28, 2005 at 2:55 am

    Regarding Mr. Cole’s question in this entry… I actually had thoughts along this line, after those prisoners were released, in the wake of the prison contoversy. This doesn’t seem to make that much sense.

    And, reading the comments above, I am sick of seeing people who say…
    (Well, considering the time, this is another issue, that will have to wait for later.) Goodnight.

  16. 16.

    baronelmo

    August 28, 2005 at 7:26 am

    Since it has been well established that the Bush White House and the neocons in general were desperate to invade Iraq long before the WTC attack, it’s hard to see how 9/11 “changed” anything in regard to their attitude towards nation building. Made lots of Americans very eager to kick some Muslim ass, though – and Bush and company were overjoyed to oblige. The fact that Iraq wasn’t actually involved in the attack? A mere technicality. Those damn Ay-rabs all hate America anyhow…

  17. 17.

    mac Buckets

    August 28, 2005 at 10:20 am

    Iraq wasn’t ever an exercise in nation-building, so this whole argument is kind of stupid. “Nation-building” is strictly for humanitarian reasons, and Iraq was never presented as that — there were UN Resolutions, a ceasefire, and a terrorist-supporting government also at play.

  18. 18.

    p.lukasiak

    August 28, 2005 at 10:20 am

    John, I think the answer to your question is fairly simple.

    There is no functioning “justice” system in Iraq at the moment, and thus no way to process people accused of a crime through a justice system. So you have lots of people being “detained” on suspicion of criminal acts who find themselves in a legal “limbo” — not only is there no effective means of contesting the charges against them, there is no functioning system that can determine guilt and mete out appropriate punishment.

    The “solution” — let the ones “detained” on suspicion of non-violent crimes go free — is the only practical one.

  19. 19.

    james richardson

    August 28, 2005 at 10:25 am

    it doesn’t make much sense. either a) they couldn’t keep the manpower utilized in the prison (then why not use iraqis?) or b) they researched these people and found them to be innocent (beat that with a stick oreilly). any more? it can’t be for a “good” reason because they dumped it in the friday news dump.

  20. 20.

    mac Buckets

    August 28, 2005 at 10:52 am

    There is no functioning “justice” system in Iraq at the moment,

    Is that a joke, or just woefully uninformed opinion?

  21. 21.

    Tim F

    August 28, 2005 at 12:01 pm

    why were we holding them one day if it is just ‘ok’ to let them go the next day?

    Looks like we hade more or less the same reaction.

  22. 22.

    Tim F

    August 28, 2005 at 12:02 pm

    a terrorist-supporting government

    Speaking of woefully uninformed.

  23. 23.

    kl

    August 28, 2005 at 12:03 pm

    Is that a joke, or just woefully uninformed opinion?

    It’s Paul “Kinko’s” Lukasiak, so the two are not mutually exclusive.

  24. 24.

    kl

    August 28, 2005 at 12:08 pm

    Speaking of woefully uninformed.

    I’m with Tim F. Iraq never supported a single terrorist, and I will ignore all evidence to the contrary. Don’t even try, wingnuts.

  25. 25.

    mac Buckets

    August 28, 2005 at 12:25 pm

    Iraq never supported a single terrorist, and I will ignore all evidence to the contrary. Don’t even try, wingnuts.

    LOL! That IS much easier that actually reading, innit?

  26. 26.

    Tim F

    August 28, 2005 at 12:56 pm

    Show me an anti-American terrorist who was supported by Iraq. Saddam gave grudging support to groups that threatened Israel, to the same degree as every single other leader in the Arab world, but the last time I checked Israel is not America.

    So either you intend ‘terrorist-supporting’ to mean that Saddam was in fact an arab leader in the middle east, or else you intend something more in which case you are a mealy-mouthed bullshit artist. Your choice.

  27. 27.

    Tim F

    August 28, 2005 at 12:58 pm

    My magic rightwing eight-ball just came up ‘Zarqawi.’ Don’t bother.

  28. 28.

    kl

    August 28, 2005 at 1:03 pm

    That IS much easier that actually reading, innit?

    Don’t even try it! [puts fingers in ears] LA LA LA LA LA LA

    So either you intend ‘terrorist-supporting’ to mean that Saddam was in fact an arab leader in the middle east, or else you intend something more in which case you are a mealy-mouthed bullshit artist. Your choice.

    Dude, I’m on your side! Don’t let these wingnuts tear us apart.

  29. 29.

    Tim F

    August 28, 2005 at 2:58 pm

    I’ll take that as choice ‘b.’ Thanks for playing.

  30. 30.

    kl

    August 28, 2005 at 3:21 pm

    I know you don’t mean that. Don’t let these chickenhawks get to you, man. IMPEACH BUSH!!!

  31. 31.

    p.lukasiak

    August 28, 2005 at 10:08 pm

    Is that a joke, or just woefully uninformed opinion?

    neither. do some research.

  32. 32.

    kl

    August 28, 2005 at 11:14 pm

    Like Mary Mapes did.

  33. 33.

    sigi

    September 12, 2005 at 2:44 pm

    BREAKING….MILITARY RECRUITERS SHOW UP AT CAMP QUALLS….DOZENS FLEE!!

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - Winter Wren - North of Quebec City (part 2 of 3) - Cap Tourmente and on the way to Tadoussac 2
Image by Winter Wren (5/13/25)

Recent Comments

  • The Audacity of Krope on Tuesday Morning Open Thread: Circuses Everywhere (May 13, 2025 @ 8:54am)
  • WaterGirl on As Settled as a Fat Wombat in Its Burrow (May 13, 2025 @ 8:54am)
  • Spanky on Tuesday Morning Open Thread: Circuses Everywhere (May 13, 2025 @ 8:51am)
  • WaterGirl on On The Road – 🐾BillinGlendaleCA – Dark Places (May 13, 2025 @ 8:51am)
  • RevRick on Tuesday Morning Open Thread: Circuses Everywhere (May 13, 2025 @ 8:48am)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!