• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Let the trolls come, and then ignore them. that’s the worst thing you can do to a troll.

Washington Post Catch and Kill, not noticeably better than the Enquirer’s.

People are complicated. Love is not.

If ‘weird’ was the finish line, they ran through the tape and kept running.

Petty moves from a petty man.

The fight for our country is always worth it. ~Kamala Harris

Come on, man.

That’s my take and I am available for criticism at this time.

It’s easy to sit in safety and prescribe what other people should be doing.

They want us to be overwhelmed and exhausted. Focus. Resist. Oppose.

We’re watching the self-immolation of the leading world power on a level unprecedented in human history.

Their boy Ron is an empty plastic cup that will never know pudding.

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

In my day, never was longer.

Let’s bury these fuckers at the polls 2 years from now.

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

No one could have predicted…

He wakes up lying, and he lies all day.

if you can’t see it, then you are useless in the fight to stop it.

Not rolling over. fuck you, make me.

They are not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

The lights are all blinking red.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Republican Stupidity / My Favorite Moron

My Favorite Moron

by John Cole|  September 5, 200510:54 am| 95 Comments

This post is in: Republican Stupidity, Science & Technology

FacebookTweetEmail

It looks like my favorite moron is back in the news:

To borrow a line from Dorothy: We’re not in Kansas anymore.

Unlike the Kansas School Board, which earlier this summer approved allowing educators to teach theories in addition to evolution that explain life on Earth, the Utah Board of Education on Friday unanimously approved a position statement supporting the continued exclusive teaching of evolution in state classrooms.

Only two people out of the dozens who attended Friday’s meeting sided with Sen. Chris Buttars, R-West Jordan, and his proposal to allow teaching “intelligent design” as a theory to explain the origins of life.

Good for them. Buttars, however, remained defiant and vowed to soldier on:

The school board ignored Buttars’ complaint that board members never invited proponents of intelligent design to participate in drafting the position statement.

The board also chose to decline his request to delay voting on the document until the senator could give a two-hour presentation arguing for intelligent design.

During the public comment period, Buttars repeated his intention to either introduce legislation to require intelligent design be a school topic, or place the issue on next year’s ballot in the form of a referendum.

If you will remember, Buttars also has my favorite quote, ever, regarding intelligent design:

Buttars doesn’t disregard evolution completely, rather he believes God is the creator, but His creations have evolved within their own species.

“We get different types of dogs and different types of cats, but you have never seen a ‘dat,’ ‘’ he said.

Buttars lives up to his potential again in the hearings:

Buttars insisted that all he wants is equal time in the classroom – and it doesn’t have to be the science classroom.

“Whenever anyone challenges the evolution people, they go berserk,” he said. “[Evolution] is not a fact . . . We’re dealing with censorship here. If we only taught Shakespeare in English class, that wouldn’t be fair.”

Some of the scientists retorted that science is not a democracy.

“Legitimacy is not determined by public opinion polls, radio and TV talks shows, privately published books and, most certainly, not by legislation,” said Richard Tolman, a professor of biology and science education at Utah Valley State College.

In a summer full of crappy news, how about three cheers for the Utah Board of Education?

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « I Beg You
Next Post: Double Duty »

Reader Interactions

95Comments

  1. 1.

    over it

    September 5, 2005 at 10:58 am

    Hip-hip-Hooray! ;)

  2. 2.

    cd6

    September 5, 2005 at 11:00 am

    Buttars is awesome

    Man how many hilarious “dat” -like quotes would come out of a 2 hour presentation??

    What if he had like slides from powerpoint to go with it? Imagine a flow chart showing how dats evolve.

    I feel like we all missed out here :(

  3. 3.

    docG

    September 5, 2005 at 11:02 am

    Good for Utah! (Fourth generation Kansan now hangs head in shame.)

  4. 4.

    Davebo

    September 5, 2005 at 11:02 am

    You lead the country with the supporters you have, not the supporters you wish you had.

  5. 5.

    Demdude

    September 5, 2005 at 11:09 am

    Common sense wins out. Fabulous.

  6. 6.

    John Cole

    September 5, 2005 at 11:15 am

    Common sense wins out. Fabulous.

    And rare.

  7. 7.

    ppGaz

    September 5, 2005 at 11:19 am

    “Arf”

    — Muttonhead (one of my four cats)

  8. 8.

    SomeCallMeTim

    September 5, 2005 at 11:24 am

    I totally disagree. I hope Buttars starts winning some of these. I think we ought to be pushing for “Thar’ Be Dragons” educational programs in some of the Red States. I think it would be fun to drive across America and get to see how people lived in Ye Olden’ Times. Imagine how fun it would be to watch a trial about whether or not someone was a witch (“A Witch!”). And if we do this right, it would all be free.

    You people have no vision.

  9. 9.

    washerdreyer

    September 5, 2005 at 11:40 am

    Does anyone know if the LDS church have a position on this? Having just finished Under the Banner of Heaven, I’m under the impression that they have a great deal of sway in all areas of Utah politics.

  10. 10.

    capnmike

    September 5, 2005 at 11:40 am

    CAN WE HAVE EQUAL TIME (gotta be politically correct here!) for STUPID DESIGN???

  11. 11.

    Airmon

    September 5, 2005 at 11:43 am

    He should stop by and meet Chester, my “Cog”. He looks like a cat, but acts like a dog. Even hates all other cats and comes when he’s called.

  12. 12.

    Kitty

    September 5, 2005 at 11:44 am

    Isn’t there a dat in the Book of Revelations?

  13. 13.

    Female and Technical

    September 5, 2005 at 11:52 am

    The Left should not be gleeful about this. It is the direct result of dumbing down and relativizing science – the worst elements of what their advocates think of as post-modernism.

    When you have “women’s science” alleging that quantitative analysis is “sexist”, don’t be surprised if the other side of the spectrum takes up your successful strategy to dismantle objective science, history and other disciplines.

  14. 14.

    dlnevins

    September 5, 2005 at 11:53 am

    Hurrah for Utah!

    And Professor Tolman’s comment nails it. You can add ID to science classrooms, but that does not make ID science. Anyone who really wants to learn the science of biology eventually has to toss ID on the heap of useless ideas, just as anyone who’s truly interested in astronomy has to give up on heliocentrism and astrology.

  15. 15.

    Geoduck

    September 5, 2005 at 11:55 am

    Washerdreyer- I wondered about that myself. It’s an unqualified good thing that they gave ID the boot, but how is the state’s quasi-official religion handled in the school cirriculum?

  16. 16.

    Narvy

    September 5, 2005 at 12:04 pm

    washerdreyer Says:

    I’m under the impression that they have a great deal of sway in all areas of Utah politics.

    This is sarcasm, right?

    Geoduck Says:

    cirriculum

    Could we move this over to the spelling thread?

  17. 17.

    Narvy

    September 5, 2005 at 12:05 pm

    Female and Technical Says:

    When you have “women’s science” alleging that quantitative analysis is “sexist”

    Wow. This is a new one for me. Can you provide a reference?

  18. 18.

    Narvy

    September 5, 2005 at 12:08 pm

    John, are you sure his name isn’t spelled “Butt arse”?
    Haven’t we seen him on television in “Beavis and Buttarse”?

  19. 19.

    JTS

    September 5, 2005 at 12:18 pm

    From now on, Buttars will be arguing against the theory of gravity.

    Instead, he will be demanding that science classes begin teaching Intelligent Falling.

  20. 20.

    jobiuspublius

    September 5, 2005 at 12:19 pm

    capnmike Says:

    CAN WE HAVE EQUAL TIME (gotta be politically correct here!) for STUPID DESIGN???

    ROFLMAO State funded sunday school. Pick your sunday course, intelligent design(NOT!), stupid design, or a sunday school voucher for the rest of us.

  21. 21.

    SoCalJustice

    September 5, 2005 at 12:23 pm

    I’ve seen a dat.

  22. 22.

    ol cranky

    September 5, 2005 at 12:27 pm

    “Whenever anyone challenges the evolution people, they go berserk,” he said. “[Evolution] is not a fact . . . We’re dealing with censorship here. If we only taught Shakespeare in English class, that wouldn’t be fair.”

    Where else is he teaching Shakespeare . . . Math? (or does drama now count as core curriculum?)

  23. 23.

    Toothless in Kansas

    September 5, 2005 at 12:28 pm

    Shazamm! Ya mean there’s folks don’t know that Jesus made the world and all its critters?!

  24. 24.

    David W

    September 5, 2005 at 12:30 pm

    The Onion did a great parody of ID a couple of weeks ago, proposing that, since gravity has never been fully explained, that ‘Intelligent Falling’ be taught–the money quote at the end was something like, ‘when you fall, it is the hand of the Almighty that is pushing you down!’

  25. 25.

    Narvy

    September 5, 2005 at 12:40 pm

    If we only taught Shakespeare in English class, that wouldn’t be fair …
    Where else is he teaching Shakespeare . . . Math?

    I think that’s a misreading, what he meant was ‘If we taught only Shakespeare in English class, that wouldn’t be fair’.
    But I guess that’s a taughtology. (Dives under desk.)

  26. 26.

    SeesThroughIt

    September 5, 2005 at 1:06 pm

    Common sense wins out. Fabulous.

    And rare.

    No kidding–and in Utah, no less! I figured they’d buckle to religious creationism in record time. But man, how ’bout a hand for the good folks in Utah!

  27. 27.

    Hannibal

    September 5, 2005 at 1:21 pm

    One thing to keep in mind, a lot of Creationists don’t buy into Intelligent Design either, as it contradicts the bible. Really, ID doesn’t have very many proponents, just a few very loud ones.

  28. 28.

    franc tireur

    September 5, 2005 at 1:21 pm

    If all they taught in ‘English’ class was Shakespeare, we would talketh a bit odd, thinks you?

    I demand equal-time too!

    http://www.churchofthesubgenius.com

    rick

  29. 29.

    Bekkieann

    September 5, 2005 at 1:39 pm

    Lifetime Utahn here. Buttars apparently hasn’t visited our own Hogle Zoo where we have a stuffed Liger, also a lifetime Utah resident. Granted mommy tiger and daddy lion were both cats.

    I just heard on the news that Katrina survivors, upon learning they are being sent to Utah, are getting off the plane. Ouch!

  30. 30.

    ppGaz

    September 5, 2005 at 1:48 pm

    “Meowwrrrgrowf!”

    — Dweezil The Poopy Doopy (another of my four cats)

  31. 31.

    bob

    September 5, 2005 at 1:50 pm

    I despise them

    But my brothers and sisters, they are winning

    What judges has bush installed already?
    What SCOTUS nominee will be confirmed as chief justice?
    What elections did they steal?
    What kind of laws are they passing?
    Whose money are they giving to Halliburton?
    What corp. got billions in tax cuts?
    What liberties have the eliminated?
    Who is making bank with oil profits?
    What city is under water because of budget cuts?
    What ethics charges are going unaccounted for?
    Whose kids are dying in Iraq?
    What science are they keeping from us?
    What god do they worship?

    They are winning

    2006 is closer than we think…please get active

    .

  32. 32.

    Ima Pauled

    September 5, 2005 at 1:58 pm

    Evolution is a religion of faith with no provable case and is the faith of the ignorant. Thousands of billions of amoeba generations have been produced over thousands of years and not one has evolved into anything other then an amoeba. Teaching evolution serves only to dumb down the proponents of evolution even further were it possible. The beginning of wisdom is the acknowledgement of God.

  33. 33.

    aimee

    September 5, 2005 at 2:06 pm

    but, of course, the intelligent design to be taught will be one of the christian faith, correct?

    what, i say, about flying spaghetti monsterism? why can’t we be represented?

  34. 34.

    Scott

    September 5, 2005 at 2:12 pm

    Oh, fear not. The ID thing in Utah isn’t finished. And fwiw, this really isn’t about ID or getting religion in schools at all. Utah public schools all over the state offer LDS religion classes, and to my knowledge, all of the public universities have an “Institute of Religion” near them where students take classes as part of their regular schedule (the courses don’t count for credit, but the relationship is designed to be seamless).

    This is about undoing the Enlightenment.

  35. 35.

    Sirkowski

    September 5, 2005 at 2:31 pm

    Booya!

  36. 36.

    franc tireur

    September 5, 2005 at 2:32 pm

    ramen…

    http://www.subgenius.com

  37. 37.

    Gary Farber

    September 5, 2005 at 2:36 pm

    “It looks like my favorite moron is back in the news”

    Sounds like, but did I miss where you provided a link to where you’re quoting from?

  38. 38.

    Andrew

    September 5, 2005 at 2:39 pm

    For those who’ve asked about the LDS Church’s position on evolution and its place in the curriculum…here ya go:
    Since the 1910’s, the Mormon Church leadership has occassionally issued statement’s reaffirming their belief that God did create the earth and its inhabitants. However, these statements have allowed room for many to believe that evolution could be God’s method.
    At BYU, the LDS Church’s flagship institution, evolution is taught as fact by Mormon biology professors.
    As far as making a statement on Buttars’ proposal, the LDS Church has not officially commented on it, and I don’t expect it to anytime soon. The LDS Church leadership is very aware of the perception (and indeed, reality) of their political influence in the state and are careful not to seem overbearing, at least politically.
    As to questions of the state curriculum, Utah History is a required course for every seventh or eighth grader, which of course, is heavy on the whole Brigham Young leading the Mormon pioneers across the Great Plains to Utah. While it is not overtly religious, there is certainly a sense of milleniarianism in the curriculum. But that is as close as Mormonism is to being taught in the classrooms.
    Mormon high school students are allowed the option of taking religious instruction courses off-campus during the school day. These Church buildings are generally located across the street from the high school. However, no student, even Mormon students, is compelled by the state (family and societal pressures, of course, are an entirely different matter) to take these religious courses.
    Even a lapsed Mormon like myself can safely say that the Mormon Church is careful, in most cases, not to overstep its bounds by dictating what should or should not be taught in Utah schools.

  39. 39.

    Adrian Cook

    September 5, 2005 at 2:40 pm

    Officially, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Mormon Church) has not taken a stand on evolution.

    Evolution is unabashedly and rigorously taught by faculty members of Brigham Young University.

    There are documents on reserve at the Harold B. Lee Library at BYU that allow students to read statements of former presidents (prophets) of the Church who have sanctioned (in the positive sense) the instruction of evolution. Perhaps, the former president who most strongly and specifically defended the teaching of evolution was David O. McKay who was president of the Church from 1951-1970. Official endorsement of instruction about evolution is the case even though Joseph Fielding Smith (a descendent of Joseph Smith, the person who was most instrumental in founding the Church) wrote a book on the origin of life which assailed the concept of evolution. For a relatively short time, Joseph Fielding Smith was president of the Church, and in that capacity, he never condemned the teaching of evolution.

    Incidentally, “Dinosaur Jim”, a former faculty member of BYU described and named the two largest dinosaurs ever discovered (Supersaurus and Ultrasaurus) with the exception of a large dinosaur recently discovered in Argentina.

  40. 40.

    Andrew

    September 5, 2005 at 2:42 pm

    By the way, if you think the “dat” comment was as idiotic as it comes, you should see Buttars when the Legislature is actually in session!
    He’s like a mix of Santorum-insensitivity, Bush-cluelessnessand ignorance, and Pat Robertson-sense of being on a mission.
    He is a Utah state treasure.

  41. 41.

    goonie bird

    September 5, 2005 at 2:45 pm

    All these evolution crack-pots can come up with is a few bone fragments and few meselly fossels and some rediclous theory that has yet to be proven i mean even darwin said the fossels show no proof and the leakies are the sorryist bunch of crack-pots ever

  42. 42.

    ppGaz

    September 5, 2005 at 2:53 pm

    “squeak”

    — Squeaker Doodle, Who Always Uses Her Noodle
    (third of my four cats to speak on this topic)

  43. 43.

    ppGaz

    September 5, 2005 at 2:58 pm

    “goonie bird is the most bizarre troll I’ve ever seen. Can I kill him and eat him?”

    — FrankLee MyDear (fourth of my four cats to speak today)

    “In all the fair city, there is no finer kitty, than sweet sweet FrankLee MyDear.”

  44. 44.

    Andrew

    September 5, 2005 at 3:13 pm

    For those interested in reading a reliable source on the story: http://sltrib.com/search/ci_2864394

  45. 45.

    Gray

    September 5, 2005 at 3:18 pm

    “you have never seen a ‘dat’”
    I’m not so sure about dat…

  46. 46.

    Andrew

    September 5, 2005 at 3:18 pm

    Another gem from Buttars, as found in the Salt Lake Tribune story: “In my constituency,” he said, “the vast majority believe God created man and we are his spirit children, not his spirit apes.”

  47. 47.

    tzs

    September 5, 2005 at 3:21 pm

    Someone above mentioned about “woman’s science.” As a woman with a doctorate in physics, let me tell you that “woman’s science” == fruitcake. These theories seem to be generated by the nuttier of the feminist groups who seem to have overdosed on idiocy and have never done any science in their lives. I’ve never run into any woman in any science or engineering department who thinks that way. My gut reaction is this was originally dreamed up by some bitchy undergrad who got an F on a physics test and didn’t want to admit she didn’t know anything.

    My roommate from college had a law professor (female) who ranted this way. My roommate’s response was that since she had graduated from MIT she bloody well knew what science was and the professor was talking crap.

  48. 48.

    Marq

    September 5, 2005 at 3:35 pm

    Evolution is a religion of faith with no provable case and is the faith of the ignorant. Thousands of billions of amoeba generations have been produced over thousands of years and not one has evolved into anything other then an amoeba. Teaching evolution serves only to dumb down the proponents of evolution even further were it possible. The beginning of wisdom is the acknowledgement of God.
    Ima Pauled

    Are you implying that every instance of a single-celled organism dividing has been observed?! By a microbiologist who was qualified to determine if the original amoeba was, indeed, still a pair of amoebas after it had divided? Enjoy the antibiotic-resistant bacterial infection you’ll doubtlessly one day contract.

  49. 49.

    Ivy

    September 5, 2005 at 3:47 pm

    I’ve seen a cog or two.

  50. 50.

    Adrian Cook

    September 5, 2005 at 3:50 pm

    Evolution is not a theory. It’s a fact.

    More than 4000 yr ago, broccoli, cauliflower, cabbage, brussels sprouts, kale and kohlrabbi did not exist. Since then, via crossing by man, they have all descended from Charlock (Wild Mustard) [Sinapis arvensis]. To some of you: You have really eaten broccoli. That you did is not a figment of your imagination.

    I make one more point.

    What does it mean that a bacterium become resistant to antibiotics or pesticides? It means that the bacterium experienced a mutation that allowed it to survive the effects of an antibiotic or pesticide, and hence to have an increased chance of reproducing and passing on its genetic resistance to offspring. After a number of generations, this resistant trait becomes predominant in a population of the bacterium. The circumstance that I just described can be measured, and it is an inconvertible manifestation of evolution.

    Biologists don’t talk of “Darwin’s theory of evolution”. It has been accepted by biologists whose articles are published in journals since the 1800s. Sometimes, biologists speak of theories that may explain some aspect of evolution, but not about “the theory of evolution.” Lay people talk about that. Evolution is a biological principle.

  51. 51.

    Adrian Cook

    September 5, 2005 at 3:53 pm

    Sorry. “inconvertible” should read “incontrovertible”.

  52. 52.

    Barb

    September 5, 2005 at 3:54 pm

    Witch trials aren’t really that amusing; although I am sure you were being funny. What is this women’s science thing?
    I have always seen Utah (and Idaho) as one of the most backward states in the country. I was wrong. Utah, for right now, I am proud of you. Thank you for giving me a chance to say that!

  53. 53.

    Narvy

    September 5, 2005 at 4:02 pm

    Evolution is a religion of faith with no provable case

    Ignoring the fact that this is incorrect, are we to conclude that ID and Creationism are not religions of faith? That they have provable cases?

    Thousands of billions of amoeba generations have been produced over thousands of years and not one has evolved into anything other then an amoeba.

    The fact that examples of an organism that might have evolved to produce a different organism continue to exist shows that no previous generations ever evolved? There’s no such thing as evolutionary branching?

    Teaching evolution serves only to dumb down the proponents of evolution even further were it possible.

    Teaching ID or creationism serves only to smarten up the opponents of evolution were it possible.

    The beginning of wisdom is the acknowledgement of God.

    Any God in particular? Or just a god in general? This must explain the wisdom of Pat Roberts, Jerry Falwell, James Dobson, and all the other politically active acknowledgers of God.

    I’m appalled.

  54. 54.

    tzs

    September 5, 2005 at 4:14 pm

    Well, the concept of “woman’s science” I’ve run into runs the gamut all the way from belief that if women had been the majority of people developing science the theories developed would have been different (This one I call “Relativity as Indication of Priapism”) to the scientific method as being sexist in itself (huh?) to the less loony idea that areas such as medicine have been unconsciously biased through the assumption male==standard and female==deviation from standard. Dunno how true it is but did hear that for quite a few medical trials that were not specifically sex-linked (i.e.,prostate cancer, breast cancer) they had concentrated on using men only and had extended the results to cover women as well (reason for not including women is the extra complication in analysis due to the monthly hormone fluctuations.)

    Then you get the real wackos, who gone so far to the left (doing math and science is against one’s feminist nature) that they reach the nuts on the right (doing math and science is against one’s feminine nature.)

  55. 55.

    bill darbyshire

    September 5, 2005 at 4:17 pm

    Well this is all hogwash. There’s no such thing as ID…. and we don’t teach anything else in the Schools that requires us to “have faith” that it’s true, do we (except early American History, heh, heh)?

    So to end the discussion, I sent a message to many sites including the Christian Coalition, saying: “Jesus is a Liberal, and God Created Evolution”….. no response from any of them, but I’m now on hundreds of new spam mailing lists for “Christian Mortgage” or “Christian Singles”, etc… follow the money….

  56. 56.

    ppGaz

    September 5, 2005 at 4:36 pm

    The beginning of wisdom is the acknowledgement of God.

    DougJ? Is that you?

  57. 57.

    Narvy

    September 5, 2005 at 4:50 pm

    … broccoli, cauliflower, cabbage, brussels sprouts, kale and kohlrabbi … have all descended from Charlock

    And that’s a good thing?

    BTW, kohlrabi has only one L. I don’t think it’s Jewish.

  58. 58.

    mmmbeer

    September 5, 2005 at 4:53 pm

    You, they should just teach intelligent design when they teach fables & fiction in literature and/or politics. That’d be an interesting way to “get it into the curriculum” but in the correct context.

  59. 59.

    Jeff Maier

    September 5, 2005 at 4:53 pm

    Adrian

    After a number of generations, this resistant trait becomes predominant in a population of the bacterium.

    Unfortunately, these examples look like they support Buttars’ “dat” intra-species evolution postulate. You don’t show evidence of Charlock evolving into a mollusk.

    :-)

  60. 60.

    Narvy

    September 5, 2005 at 4:54 pm

    Wait, wait! That should have been “has only one B“.

  61. 61.

    Adrian Cook

    September 5, 2005 at 5:09 pm

    The descendents of Charlock [Sinapsis arvensis] belong to two species and several subspecies. Those two species are completely distinct from their ancestor Sinapsis arvensis.

    Broccoli is Brassica oleracea italica; Cauliflower is Brassica oleracea botrytis; Kale is Brassica oleracea acephala; Kohlrabi is Brassica oleracea gongylodes; Brussels Sprouts is Brassica oleracea gemmifera]; Cabbage is Brassica pekinensis. These species arose within a period of

  62. 62.

    Adrian Cook

    September 5, 2005 at 5:14 pm

    Sorry, some of my text was deleted.

    The descendents of Charlock arose within a period of less than 4000 years. Imagine the changes that could occur witin 4 million years (1000 times as long) or 4 billion years (1,0000,000 times as long). Earth is about 3.9 billion years old (almost 4 billion years old).

  63. 63.

    Narvy

    September 5, 2005 at 5:15 pm

    These species arose within a period of

    Adrian, please finish the sentence. I can’t stand the suspense.

  64. 64.

    Adrian Cook

    September 5, 2005 at 5:15 pm

    I mean to say life has existed on Earth for 3.9 billion years.

  65. 65.

    Narvy

    September 5, 2005 at 5:16 pm

    Earth is about 3.9 billion years old

    I have it on good authority that the earth is actually 6000 years old. And it’s flat.

  66. 66.

    Adrian Cook

    September 5, 2005 at 5:22 pm

    Earth is approximately 4.5 billion years old.

  67. 67.

    Ima Pauled

    September 5, 2005 at 5:52 pm

    Which God? There are hundreds of Gods–Some peoples god is Money, Some worship sports figures, some worship rock stars. You have to figure out for yourself what God you will worship or if you will worship one at all. Those that choose to believe they evolved from gooey green slime will have no spiritual God. Only when you are under fire in war or caught in the midst of a disaster like Hurricane Katrina will you look for the true God. Their are no athiests in a crisis.

  68. 68.

    tBone

    September 5, 2005 at 6:15 pm

    The descendents of Charlock arose within a period of less than 4000 years. Imagine the changes that could occur witin 4 million years (1000 times as long) or 4 billion years (1,0000,000 times as long).

    Super-intelligent broccoli will take over the planet. They will rustle their brain-fronds with pleasure as they dip their human prisoners into scalding cheese and then consume them.

    Take your stinking leaves off me, you damn dirty vegetable!

  69. 69.

    ppGaz

    September 5, 2005 at 6:45 pm

    I have it on good authority that the earth is actually 6000 years old. And it’s flat.

    That’s Kansas.

  70. 70.

    Narvy

    September 5, 2005 at 7:08 pm

    Earth is approximately 4.5 billion years old.

    Oh, in that case, I take back the 6000 years old statement. But it’s still flat.

  71. 71.

    Narvy

    September 5, 2005 at 7:12 pm

    Their are no athiests in a crisis.

    I believe that was originally “in foxholes”, coined during World War II. Oh, wait, no, that was “atheists in foxholes”. A completely different cliche.

  72. 72.

    db

    September 5, 2005 at 8:00 pm

    “The beginning of wisdom is the acknowledgement of God.”

    By definition, wouldn’t that actually be the end of wisdom, since you are no longer so concerned with thinking for yourself?

    Or were you just trying to be cleverly profound?

  73. 73.

    CessnaDriver

    September 5, 2005 at 8:32 pm

    Horsecrap! There are plenty of athiests in a crisis/foxhole

  74. 74.

    CessnaDriver

    September 5, 2005 at 8:36 pm

    Saying, “There is no way a true God would let this crap happen!”

    While others might go to church after being attacked in the name of religion, ala 9/11, I wonder about the number of athiests created by any of these large disasters.

    How about the believers of the FSM? Why would the FSM let this happen to NOLA?

    -30-

  75. 75.

    Free Thinker

    September 5, 2005 at 8:42 pm

    I hate to break it to you folks, but when they talk about teaching Evolution in schools they’re talking about the “big bang” theory, not the idea that things evolve (which is clearly documented). The big bang is no more a scientific fact than intelligent design, neither one has a place in education, unless it’s being taught as a widely accepted theory, which applies to both theories equally.

  76. 76.

    Narvy

    September 5, 2005 at 8:48 pm

    If we’re not going to spell atheist correctly, we ought to move this to John’s spelling thread.

  77. 77.

    Narvy

    September 5, 2005 at 9:26 pm

    but when they talk about teaching Evolution in schools they’re talking about the “big bang” theory

    Really! I thought when they talk about teaching Evolution in schools they were talking about teaching Evolution. I would expect the Big Bang to be talked about in the context of teaching the Big Bang.

    I also was under the impression that, while not universally accepted, Big Bang theory was supported by some evidence, which is why some credentialed astronomers thought it might explain observable physical phenomena. Just like Intelligent Design.

  78. 78.

    Accountability is a dirty word

    September 5, 2005 at 9:27 pm

    Giving the fundie right a issue to place on referenda is not really a good thing. Just like the phoney gay marriage issue of 2004, this may be Rove’s way of getting out the base in 2006.

    The majority of Americans support teaching this bogus science in the science classroom. Maybe it would be better for the school curriculum committees to control how this gets brought in because it’s coming in via referenda.

  79. 79.

    kevin

    September 5, 2005 at 9:47 pm

    I agree. If you only taught Shakespeare in an English class you should be fired. However, if you tried to teach comic books in an English class claiming they deserved equal time, you should be committed to an asylum.

  80. 80.

    tBone

    September 5, 2005 at 10:04 pm

    I hate to break it to you folks, but when they talk about teaching Evolution in schools they’re talking about the “big bang” theory

    Huh? Methinks you have your scientific disciplines confused here.

  81. 81.

    Free Thinker

    September 5, 2005 at 10:23 pm

    [quote]Huh? Methinks you have your scientific disciplines confused here[/quote]

    It hasn’t been that many years since I was in school (in the bible thumping south no less) and in the science classes I had, big bang and Evolution was a package deal. The term “Evolution” is often used (especially by fundies) to describe the big bang and everything after that. I realise that it is incorrect terminology, but the fact remains that no matter what you call it, the big bang is being taught as fact in atleast some schools across the country, and it falls under the banner of Evolution. Any human being with a mind capable of thought can look around at this big complex world and see that things evolve, thats not the teaching most of the fundies that I run into are so rabidly against. If a little common sense is applied it becomes easy to see that comparing the full idea of intelligent design to only evolution (without the big bang included) is comparing apples and golfballs. On the other hand, if you compare the whole idea of big bang Evolution against the idea of intelligent design, you end up with 2 “theories” (and I use that in the most loose possible way) that explain the same events in vastly different ways.

  82. 82.

    tzs

    September 5, 2005 at 10:41 pm

    If they don’t like the Big Bang, then how do they explain the background cosmic radiation (3 degrees Kelvin)? I thought that was a perfect case of a theory predicting something, then they went out and looked for it and found it.

  83. 83.

    dantewyrmfoe

    September 5, 2005 at 11:27 pm

    As a long time resident of Utah it’s nice to see the occasional nugget of common sense leak out from behind the Zion Curtain.

    I’ve noticed a few people asking how the LDS church deals with the concept of ID in the classroom.

    To be perfectly honest it never really comes up. The LDS faith in Utah seems to be very “members only” when it comes to their core beliefs, so it’s rare that they introduce any of it into the public education system.

    At least that’s how it was when I was in school, not having children of my own I couldn’t tell you for certain how it is now.

  84. 84.

    tBone

    September 6, 2005 at 12:14 am

    in the science classes I had, big bang and Evolution was a package deal.

    Just to be clear here – when you say Big Bang, you’re referring to the beginning of the universe, matter spewing out of nowhere, etc? I’m having trouble wrapping my head around how you get a “package deal” out of that – it’s a big leap from cosmology to biology. You must have had an interesting science teacher.

  85. 85.

    The Witch

    September 6, 2005 at 9:02 am

    “If we only taught Shakespeare in English class, that wouldn’t be fair.”

    Where else are you gonna teach Shakespeare? History?

    (Incidentally, I’m all about teaching intelligent design in English class. Along with all the other works of fiction…)

  86. 86.

    Narvy

    September 6, 2005 at 11:41 am

    Intelligent Design doesn’t always work, witness the proponents of Intelligent Design.

    Oh, wait a minute, I thought we were talking about De Sign of Intellignce.

    Oh, wait another minute, maybe that should be “witless, the proponents of Intelligent Design”.

    I have to go now, my bucket o’ puns is empty.

  87. 87.

    Richard Gardner

    September 6, 2005 at 12:12 pm

    You’ve got different kinds of cactus and you’ve got different kinds of dogs.

    But you never see a cog.

  88. 88.

    Jrod

    September 6, 2005 at 1:48 pm

    Big Bang Theory being taught along with Evolution? Are you serious? You went to a crappy school man. Those are two completely different subjects in two entirely different disciplines. Big Bang Theory is part of astrophysics while Evolution is clearly biology.

    I suppose in a generic “science” classroom setting a teacher might also mention Big Bang theory. Teaching it simultaneously with Evolution however, is just plain confusing. Some people might want to draw parallels between the “evolution” of the universe and biological Evolution, but they are completely different. The only similarity is in the basic meaning of evolution — change in a particular direction over time.

  89. 89.

    Charles

    September 6, 2005 at 2:14 pm

    Is Karl Rove a Mormon? I know he dropped out of the University of Utah, but like Bush, he fails upwardly.

  90. 90.

    Brendan

    September 6, 2005 at 3:21 pm

    These “intelligent design” people are the morons. And Mr. Cole, you are aiding and abbetting the moron-ity by EQUIVOCATING. The issue is NOT whether so-called “Intelligent Design” can be taught. The issue is whether it can be taught IN SCIENCE CLASS, AS IF IT WERE SCIENCE. It is not. It is Religion masquerading as science.

    If we’re going to have discussions of a creator god in schools, can we discuss whether this god is also misogynistic, or even downright evil. I mean, If God could have spared the millions slaughtered by tyrants in the twentieth century the pain and terror and horror, shouldn’t he have? Perhaps we should discuss whether God is a sadist who enjoys watching humans suffering?

    The REASON we keep god out of public education is because issues like this, issues that COULD be discussed reasonably would be utter;y offensive to many and could make school a VERY hostile environment. If they want to push this god down our throats, don’t be surprised if some would give him the Karl-Rove Treatment.

  91. 91.

    Victor

    September 6, 2005 at 3:30 pm

    Buttars doesn’t disregard evolution completely, rather he believes God is the creator, but His creations have evolved within their own species.
    “We get different types of dogs and different types of cats, but you have never seen a ‘dat,’ ‘’ he said.

    Doesn’t Buttars know the “dogcow”? Moof! is the sound a dogcow makes and Clarus is its name.

    If you have used an Apple computer you know what it means. For more you can read:

    http://www.macsimumnews.com/index.php/archive/5439/

    “To stupid statements stupid quotes.”

  92. 92.

    shadowpoodle

    September 6, 2005 at 10:20 pm

    I’m sure it’s just because Noah couldn’t find a couple of dats for the ark.

    Oh, nuts. Sorry about the flood reference.

    …and by the way. I don’t see how an intelligent design cirriculum could be created by stupid people. Kinda oxymoronic if you think about it.

  93. 93.

    Virginia Progressive

    September 8, 2005 at 1:01 am

    I, for one, applaud Buttar’s efforts. Equal time for alternatives to the heresy of Evilution! Thus, the ignorant masses finally will be made privy to the all encompassing truth that is the Flying Spaghetti Monster (say Rahmen!)

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. UNCoRRELATED says:
    September 5, 2005 at 8:12 pm

    A victory for common sense

    In a move of surprising wisdom, the Utah Board of Education unanimously passed a resolution supporting the teaching of science in science classes.

  2. Balloon Juice says:
    October 6, 2005 at 2:39 pm

    […] We got a live one here, I think, and I hope Patricia Miller turns out to be as endlessly entertaining as Utah’s Chris Buttars. […]

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - Albatrossity - Flyover Country Spring 2
Image by Albatrossity (5/18/25)

Recent Comments

  • Jackie on Sunday Diversion: ‘A Dumb New Way To Think About The Dismantling Of The Federal Government’ (May 18, 2025 @ 7:22pm)
  • Nukular Biskits on Medium Cool – Best Album Covers! (May 18, 2025 @ 7:21pm)
  • Spanky on Medium Cool – Best Album Covers! (May 18, 2025 @ 7:21pm)
  • Gin & Tonic on Medium Cool – Best Album Covers! (May 18, 2025 @ 7:20pm)
  • Elizabelle on Sunday Diversion: ‘A Dumb New Way To Think About The Dismantling Of The Federal Government’ (May 18, 2025 @ 7:20pm)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!