The NY Times has a pretty interesting piece on the types of flood control employed all over the world.
An even better story can be found here.
by John Cole| 5 Comments
This post is in: Science & Technology
The NY Times has a pretty interesting piece on the types of flood control employed all over the world.
An even better story can be found here.
Comments are closed.
Don Surber
Oddly enough, NYT editorial board says flood control is spendthrift and hurts the environment!
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles_print.php?article_id=4796
AMC
I am not an expert on the subject, but isn’t there a slight difference between the Gulf of Mexico and the North Sea? I think that there us a marked difference between the balmy waters of the Gulf and those of the North Sea. And as we have heard from all of the global warming alarmists, warmer water fuels hurricanes.
Though one could probably say that spending money to protect New Orleans would be less of a waste than London and Amsterdam have made, the fact remains that when Katrina hit New Orleans, it was a Category 4 storm. I don’t recall any sort of quantification of strength from the article as a basis for comparison.
Tony Dismukes
I’ve been saying for days now that when it comes time to rebuild New Orleans, we should get some top Dutch civil engineers and give them the money to do things right. They’ve got to be the world’s leading experts on living below sea level.
AMC
Yeah, but the point is that I think that the nature of their storms is much different. They don’t call the Carribean (sic.) “Hurricane Alley” for nothing.
goonie bird
Build better leavees and screw the eco-jerks and their dumb leavee bugs