• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Only Democrats have agency, apparently.

Let’s finish the job.

Black Jesus loves a paper trail.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

After roe, women are no longer free.

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

Something needs to be done about our bogus SCOTUS.

The GOP couldn’t organize an orgy in a whorehouse with a fist full of 50s.

“Can i answer the question? No you can not!”

Schmidt just says fuck it, opens a tea shop.

It’s easy to sit in safety and prescribe what other people should be doing.

The worst democrat is better than the best republican.

Is it negotiation when the other party actually wants to shoot the hostage?

Usually wrong but never in doubt

“Everybody’s entitled to be an idiot.”

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

Damn right I heard that as a threat.

They traffic in fear. it is their only currency. if we are fearful, they are winning.

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

If you are still in the GOP, you are an extremist.

You can’t love your country only when you win.

A lot of Dems talk about what the media tells them to talk about. Not helpful.

Second rate reporter says what?

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Open Threads / Excellent Links / Quick Hits

Quick Hits

by John Cole|  September 23, 200510:24 am| 11 Comments

This post is in: Excellent Links, Blogospheric Navel-Gazing

FacebookTweetEmail

Projetc Nothing has an on the ground report from the traffic jam in Houston. With pictures.

Jeremy Dibbell has a post on the impact slowing down has on fuel efficiency.

Andrew Sullivan and Armando at dKos have a cage match.

The Carpetbagger has more on Abramoff/DeLay/Rove.

And don;t forget to check out the Dawn Patrol, a round-up of links about Iraq, Afghanistan, and Politics.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « No Defense
Next Post: Math, Global Warming, and Hurricanes »

Reader Interactions

11Comments

  1. 1.

    TallDave

    September 23, 2005 at 10:32 am

    If you like Greyhawk’s Dawn Patrol, you might also enjoy Bill Roggio’s flash presentation today. Interesting stuff.

  2. 2.

    Steve

    September 23, 2005 at 11:12 am

    Sullivan was right in his disagreement with Armando, but his notion that “let’s use this as a test of whether the lefty blogosphere can self-correct!” is overflowing with pompous self-importance, even for Sullivan. Yes, even though 100 dkos commenters had already called Armando out on his misstatement, the world must stop because Andrew Sullivan has cried foul.

  3. 3.

    John Cole

    September 23, 2005 at 11:19 am

    Anyone want to run-down the corrections I am still waiting for from Sullivan? They number in the dozens, I bet.

  4. 4.

    Dave Ruddell

    September 23, 2005 at 11:39 am

    What’s funny though is that Armando is actively refusing to admit he’s in the wrong. It’s one thing to just ignore the topic, but to insist that you’re right in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, well that’s just [INSERT NAME OF YOUR MOST HATED POLITICAL FIGURE HERE]-esque.

  5. 5.

    Steve

    September 23, 2005 at 12:19 pm

    But Sullivan gets it wrong when he says Armando is stupid, which he definitely is not. He is just world-class stubborn.

  6. 6.

    Retief

    September 23, 2005 at 12:40 pm

    Sullivan is the one who is wrong. Larry is smoking crack if he thinks that a few point difference in Standard Deviation is more important than a 100 point the difference in means. I’m looking at the GRE data. On the quantitative scores, the Male mean was 651 and SD was 138. The female mean was 557 and SD was 149. Please note, 149 is greater than 138. The man is repeating rightwing dogma, not based in realityland, when he spouts this Standard Deviation line. He is also demonstating basic innumeracy when he claims that the 11 point difference in SD has more impact on the top tail than a 94 point difference in means even if the direction of the SD gap were reversed the way he claims. So yes, his abuse of the statistical concept of standard deviation to cloak his reformating of the hoary “men are just smarter” foolishness in pseudoscientific legitimacy is nonsensical. Of course none of the slicing of scores will make much difference as long as the disparity in number of boys and of girls taking the test and aiming at math & science remains. Any fair observer will have to note that Larry Summers address conveniently concentrated on factors beyond the control of University Presidents in his explanations.

  7. 7.

    Retief

    September 23, 2005 at 1:06 pm

    Dawn Patrol is not terrible. But people who get their Afghanistan news there must have been puzzled by the US General defending US airstrikes against criticism from the President of Afghanistan today, as they never got to hear about how Karzai Wants End to U.S.-Led Operations three days ago. Like I said, I don’t want to jump down Dawn Patrol’s throat, but this seems a little more newsworthy that the latest outrageuous translation from outrageous translation specialists, MEMRI.

  8. 8.

    Dave Ruddell

    September 23, 2005 at 1:49 pm

    You’re using the quantutative portion of the GRE as a surrogate for mathematical ability in the general population? You do realize that the GRE is only taken by those going to grad school, don’t you? Whichis to say people who are already at the far end of one of the tails

    Or how about this? The SAT math scores for females are higher every year than for males. Given that far more people take the SAT than the GRE, clearly it’s a better indicator, no? Therefore, women are clearly better than men at math, right?

    Of course, that’s BS as well. Only college-bound students take the SAT, so you’re still not capturing the general population.

  9. 9.

    Dave Ruddell

    September 23, 2005 at 1:59 pm

    Alright, I just found a different link here (which is actually from the College Board) that has men ahead of women on the SAT math in all years reported. Nevertheless, this result still does not invalidate Summers’ remarks, since the SAT still is only capturing the top end of the distribution.

  10. 10.

    Retief

    September 23, 2005 at 5:40 pm

    The very tippy top of the tail is all Summers, or anybody who is talking about the composition of tenured professors at top universities, cares about. Why does he assume the means are the same? How could he abstract the supposed standard deviations of the males and females knowing only that his guess based on a bunch of estimates that were “all over the map” was that two thirds of the top 5% of 12th graders were male without making a bunch of baseless assumptions? When you start a sentence with “Whatever the difference in means…” don’t expect anybody familiar with staistics to take the rest of what you say seriously. But anyway, the people at the .01% level that Summers says is required to win a to 25 university job are aberations. They’re freaks, and boatloads of data about the 99.99% of people within four standard deviations of the mean tells us very little about them. Summers can’t tell us just what it is that we could measure that determines ability to win tenure at a top university, and yet he want’s to tell us that he’s pretty sure males have 20% greater variablity in that mysterious characteristic than females do?

  11. 11.

    TallDave

    September 26, 2005 at 2:45 pm

    The whole Summers thing is so stupid. No one is discussing the fact that more women go to college than men.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • Major Major Major Major on Late Night Open Thread: Taxing Prep (Mar 28, 2023 @ 1:46am)
  • Alison Rose on Late Night Open Thread: Taxing Prep (Mar 28, 2023 @ 1:26am)
  • Chetan Murthy on War for Ukraine Day 397: A New Week Begins (Mar 28, 2023 @ 1:10am)
  • Jay on War for Ukraine Day 397: A New Week Begins (Mar 28, 2023 @ 1:05am)
  • Chetan Murthy on War for Ukraine Day 397: A New Week Begins (Mar 28, 2023 @ 12:59am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!