• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

“I never thought they’d lock HIM up,” sobbed a distraught member of the Lock Her Up Party.

I’d hate to be the candidate who lost to this guy.

Our job is not to persuade republicans but to defeat them.

Not all heroes wear capes.

Republican obstruction dressed up as bipartisanship. Again.

Happy indictment week to all who celebrate!

No Justins, No Peace

Following reporting rules is only for the little people, apparently.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

Let’s finish the job.

“What are Republicans afraid of?” Everything.

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

In my day, never was longer.

And we’re all out of bubblegum.

They are lying in pursuit of an agenda.

Consistently wrong since 2002

I like you, you’re my kind of trouble.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

The poor and middle-class pay taxes, the rich pay accountants, the wealthy pay politicians.

Despite his magical powers, I don’t think Trump is thinking this through, to be honest.

Russian mouthpiece, go fuck yourself.

Accountability, motherfuckers.

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

Conservatism: there are some people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Open Threads / The Hit Parade Continues On

The Hit Parade Continues On

by John Cole|  October 6, 20054:34 pm| 173 Comments

This post is in: Open Threads

FacebookTweetEmail

This is just what the country needed:

A filmmaker has sued Sen. John Kerry and a one-time campaign aide, saying they defamed him as they sought to block the broadcast of an anti-Kerry documentary during the 2004 presidential election.

The lawsuit, filed this week on behalf of producer Carlton Sherwood and a Vietnam veterans group, is the latest salvo in the battle over the documentary “Stolen Honor: Wounds That Never Heal.”

The film contends that Kerry’s anti-war activities when he returned from Vietnam caused further harm to captured U.S. soldiers.

The Sinclair Broadcast Group, which as of last year owned 62 TV stations that reached a quarter of all U.S. households, canceled plans to air the documentary during the razor-close Bush-Kerry race last fall and instead showed only portions of it as part of a broader program.

The Democratic National Committee had complained that “Stolen Honor” amounted to an illegal in-kind contribution to President Bush’s campaign, and Kerry’s campaign asked for equal time.

Sherwood’s suit alleges that Kerry directed the DNC to issue a statement that falsely said the film was produced and funded by “extreme right-wing activists.”

That is it. I am opposing a moratorium on new news. Wingnuts everywhere, just STOP. Right now. There is too much going on. Oh, and btw, that means you too, Al. No more of the digital brownshirt bit.

*** Update ***

Personally, what we really need is some Cindy Sheehan/George Galloway action. Because there is nothing going on, you know…

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Another Tragedy in the Making
Next Post: Not Dead »

Reader Interactions

173Comments

  1. 1.

    Lines

    October 6, 2005 at 4:41 pm

    Michael Moore is fat

  2. 2.

    Another Jeff

    October 6, 2005 at 4:45 pm

    Ann Coulter has a big adams apple.

  3. 3.

    Gratefulcub

    October 6, 2005 at 4:48 pm

    That is why we need tort reform. no more frivolous lawsuits.

    I heart Al.

  4. 4.

    Horshu

    October 6, 2005 at 4:52 pm

    If calling saying that an “extreme X-wing activist is funding something” is grounds for a lawsuit, then I think it spells the end of Dill Do’Reilly and Sean Hannity.

  5. 5.

    Steve

    October 6, 2005 at 4:57 pm

    Yeah, no kidding. The only thing worse than a whiny loser is a whiny winner.

    Maybe Karl Rove has a libel claim against everyone at dkos because they accuse him of being behind everything.

    This is obviously a cheap publicity stunt and, as such, unworthy of belonging to the “news overflow.”

  6. 6.

    Rick

    October 6, 2005 at 4:57 pm

    Well, if the Swift Boat Vets lied about Kerry, this would be the opening for a counter-suit to collect their pensions, incomes and law licenses.

    Welcome to the Murika made by the trial bar.

    Cordially…

  7. 7.

    Clever

    October 6, 2005 at 4:57 pm

    Pretty white girl missing. Non-stop coverage starting at 5.

  8. 8.

    Gratefulcub

    October 6, 2005 at 5:02 pm

    Clever,

    As I got ready for work today, I overheard a story on CNN, MSNBC, Today Show…..whatever Amy had on the TV. They found the remains of a very cute missing white college student this morning that had been missing for three weeks. you could almost hear the despair in the voices. They just discovered she was missing, they were sending camera crews to campus, searching for experts on missing white women (aren’t we all experts by now)….and BAM. They found a body. Oh well, what is this Rove thing I hear people talking about?

  9. 9.

    Davebo

    October 6, 2005 at 5:05 pm

    Shorter Perfessor Cole

    I’m sick and tired of these dang wingnuts!

    But I’ve got to throw in a Gore reference to maintain my fair and balanced bullshit..

    Digital brownshirt? Give me a break.

  10. 10.

    rayabacus

    October 6, 2005 at 5:09 pm

    Well, if the Swift Boat Vets lied about Kerry, this would be the opening for a counter-suit to collect their pensions, incomes and law licenses

    O’Neil is on record as saying that he would personally pay Kerry’s filing fee if Kerry would sue him and the Swift Boat Vets. He has recently said that he would also waive the Statute of Limitations. (Last month I think)

  11. 11.

    Clever

    October 6, 2005 at 5:19 pm

    Gratefulcub,

    Disturbing on many levels. Don’t really know how to follow that…

  12. 12.

    Davebo

    October 6, 2005 at 5:26 pm

    Raybacus

    As we’ve seen in the Delay case, waiving statute of limitations is nice, but can be unwaived at any time.

    As to his offer, where did you hear of it? Someone needs to clue in the guys at Google.

  13. 13.

    Steve

    October 6, 2005 at 5:37 pm

    Well, you certainly can’t unwaive the statute of limitations after the case has already been filed.

    I don’t know how you sue someone for their law license, by the way. Is that like when you’re playing poker, and someone bets the deed to the ranch?

  14. 14.

    Rick

    October 6, 2005 at 5:40 pm

    O’Neil is on record as saying that he would personally pay Kerry’s filing fee if Kerry would sue him and the Swift Boat Vets.

    rayabacus,

    Given that Kerry and Edwards are both in need of hobby, being a 20-year seat-warmer in the first case, and unemployed in the second, I wonder why they don’t act in the name of laying out the truth.

    Seems Edwards knows a thing or a million about torts.

    Cordially…

  15. 15.

    KC

    October 6, 2005 at 5:46 pm

    Got to love the whole Sheehan action thing.

  16. 16.

    rayabacus

    October 6, 2005 at 5:50 pm

    As to his offer, where did you hear of it? Someone needs to clue in the guys at Google

    I believe it was on Fox with Hannity. I also think Beldar had a transcript of that conversation.

  17. 17.

    Stormy70

    October 6, 2005 at 5:53 pm

    I am personally glad that work is kicking my ass at this time of hyperpartisanship. I do like the Meirs pick, though. Flame away, suckers!

  18. 18.

    Tim F

    October 6, 2005 at 6:05 pm

    Flame away, suckers!

    Redundant.

  19. 19.

    bugz

    October 6, 2005 at 6:05 pm

    I think it is entirely justified. I remember the whole dustup, and how the Kerry campaign and the DNC both brought all sorts of pressure on the Sinclair network of stations to prevent the documentary from being shown.

    How is it that the left can distribute a pack of outright lies like Farenhype 911, but the right gets threatened with FCC action? (“More than 100 Democratic members of the United States Congress asked the FCC to consider the propriety of the broadcast, and Ted Kennedy, Kerry’s Senate colleague from Massachusetts, asked the Justice Department to investigate. The Democratic National Committee filed a formal complaint with the Federal Election Commission.” ref [url]http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Stolen_Honor:_Wounds_That_Never_Heal[/url]

    Seems like all of the stifling of dissent going on is coming from the left.

  20. 20.

    Tim F

    October 6, 2005 at 6:06 pm

    John,

    Speaking of redundant, the second-to-last word in your blog title renders the last word superfluous, like saying that a platoon ‘marched on foot.’

    Demimondian, I’ll take my card back.

  21. 21.

    SeesThroughIt

    October 6, 2005 at 6:08 pm

    Wow, Carlton Sherwood is a total pussy. (I hope I don’t get sued for that remark.)

  22. 22.

    Vlad

    October 6, 2005 at 7:14 pm

    “Personally, what we really need is some Cindy Sheehan/George Galloway action.”

    Least appealing in-the-news partisan porn pairing: George Galloway and Cindy Sheehan, or Karl Rove and Judith Miller?

  23. 23.

    kchiker

    October 6, 2005 at 7:15 pm

    You’d almost think that perhaps something was brewing in the news…that perhaps someone would like to distract us from. I wonder when we might get…say an elevated subway security level or something. Oh wait….

  24. 24.

    Darrell

    October 6, 2005 at 7:40 pm

    Seems like all of the stifling of dissent going on is coming from the left.

    I feel a chill wind blowing in this country

  25. 25.

    Tim F

    October 6, 2005 at 7:52 pm

    I feel a chill wind blowing in this country

    That’s the wind between your ears. The rest of us see a warm sunrise on the way. morning in America.

  26. 26.

    Andrei

    October 6, 2005 at 7:59 pm

    Chill wind?

    Yeah. Welcome to that cold day in hell so many have been promising you guys ever since the GOP made Clinton an unnessary partisan hit target back in the 90s.

    You break it, you bought it.

  27. 27.

    Sojourner

    October 6, 2005 at 8:01 pm

    O’Neil is on record as saying that he would personally pay Kerry’s filing fee if Kerry would sue him and the Swift Boat Vets. He has recently said that he would also waive the Statute of Limitations. (Last month I think)

    What’s the point of a lawsuit? It only gives O’Neil the attention he craves. What a pathetic human being.

  28. 28.

    demimondian

    October 6, 2005 at 8:19 pm

    Demimondian, I’ll take my card back

    Uh…yeah. For that display, I think you earned it.

  29. 29.

    ppGaz

    October 6, 2005 at 8:19 pm

    Keith Olbermann, the closest thing we have to an honest journalist in television today, puts on a broadcast tonight (see the rebroadcast later this evening on MSNBC) in which a pretty good case is made for an imminent Rove indictment, followed by a pretty good case for the notion that “Look – a terror threat!” is again being played by this administration in order to deflect attention from its crushing incompetance and mendacity …… leading me, at least, to wonder how in the world we ever sunk to a level lower than the one we were at when Richard Fucking Nixon was president …..

    But here, we have …. this useless thread.

    I think this is called a “hide the salami” thread.

    To see the salami, watch Olbermann at 9 pm PDT.

  30. 30.

    M. Scott Eiland

    October 6, 2005 at 8:59 pm

    Keith Olbermann, the closest thing we have to an honest journalist in television today

    Ah yes, the fellow who’s convinced the election in Ohio was stolen. Quite honest indeed. . .as are most folks who let their supply of anti-psychotic medication run out. Just don’t let them near any sharp instruments.

  31. 31.

    demimondian

    October 6, 2005 at 9:27 pm

    the fellow who’s convinced the election in Ohio was stolen. Quite honest indeed. . .as are most folks who let their supply of anti-psychotic medication run out. Just don’t let them near any sharp instruments.

    At the end, sir, have you no shame?

  32. 32.

    Kimmitt

    October 6, 2005 at 10:20 pm

    How is it that the left can distribute a pack of outright lies like Farenhype 911

    There are times when I feel like conservatism is a subset of paranoid psychosis. You know what I mean?

  33. 33.

    Pb

    October 6, 2005 at 10:22 pm

    Ah yes, the fellow who’s convinced the election in Ohio was stolen. Quite honest indeed.

    Indeed. A stark contrast to Mr. Ken “that ballot is too light for your vote to count” Blackwell.

  34. 34.

    JoeTX

    October 6, 2005 at 11:10 pm

    This administration is just plain out flat dishonest. Their company sponsors are reaping billions (and in turn themselves) from corporate friendly legislation and from that boondoggle in Iraq. What is so tinfoil hat about stealing a few votes here and there?

    Bush, Rove, Cheney, Libby, Wolfowitz, Bremer, Office of Special Plans, Plamegate, Coingate, Boatgate, Housegate, Feith, Delay, Blount, Cunningham, Abramoff, Ney, and the list goes on. We’ve trusted these crooks to watch the vault, and they’ve robbed it blind and left us with trillons of worthless IOU’s that even China will be choking on soon.

  35. 35.

    Rome Again

    October 6, 2005 at 11:29 pm

    We’ve trusted these crooks to watch the vault, and they’ve robbed it blind and left us with trillons of worthless IOU’s that even China will be choking on soon.

    Yes, and yet there are still quite a few people who think these are the good guys. Can anyone say “Cognitive Dissonance”?

  36. 36.

    jobiuspublius

    October 6, 2005 at 11:50 pm

    Swift Boat Veterans for Truth: Saving Salami Since 196SomethingOrOther

  37. 37.

    M. Scott Eiland

    October 7, 2005 at 12:20 am

    At the end, sir, have you no shame?

    I’d give that one a serious answer, but I’m too busy snickering at the sheer gall–even by moonbat standards–that it takes to expropriate that old chestnut to defend Keith Olberloon.

  38. 38.

    demimondian

    October 7, 2005 at 1:17 am

    I’d give that one a serious answer, but I’m too busy snickering at the sheer gall—even by moonbat standards—that it takes to expropriate that old chestnut to defend Keith Olberloon.

    I’ll take that as a “no”, then.

  39. 39.

    eileen from OH

    October 7, 2005 at 1:19 am

    Okayyyyy, what I don’t get is why Gore’s speech was “brownshirt?”

    Gore = Fascist?

    eileen from OH

  40. 40.

    Charlie (Colorado)

    October 7, 2005 at 1:54 am

    No, Eileen, it’s a quote from an earlier Gore speech.

    WASHINGTON – Former Vice President Al Gore yesterday unleashed another verbal assault on President Bush, comparing him to Richard Nixon and his staff to Nazi “Brown Shirts.” Boston Herald (24 June 2004)

    And John, don’t you mean “propose”?

  41. 41.

    Hokie

    October 7, 2005 at 6:25 am

    How is it that the left can distribute a pack of outright lies like Farenhype 911

    You are aware what an analogy is, right?

    Good. Then you know why this is a completely disanalogous situation. Carry on.

    Also, what’s the deal with this “moonbat” word? It doesn’t seem to make a lot of sense. It even lacks any sort of profane reference. I mean, come on, people, you can be more creative than that, can’t you?

  42. 42.

    Shygetz

    October 7, 2005 at 7:19 am

    How is it that the left can distribute a pack of outright lies like Farenhype 911, but the right gets threatened with FCC action?

    Hmm, excellent question…from someone who has no idea what the FCC is. FCC patrols broadcast media, not films shown in theaters. The Swift Boat Liars movies was going to be shown over the public airwaves right before an election; Moore’s film was shown in theaters.

  43. 43.

    Jim Allen

    October 7, 2005 at 8:17 am

    With all due (i.e., minimal) respect to the fine hacks at the Boston Herald, Gore’s full quote was:

    “The present executive branch has made it a practice to try and control and intimidate news organizations: from PBS to CBS to Newsweek. They placed a former male escort in the White House press pool to pose as a reporter – and then called upon him to give the president a hand at crucial moments. They paid actors to make make phony video press releases and paid cash to some reporters who were willing to take it in return for positive stories. And every day they unleash squadrons of digital brownshirts to harass and hector any journalist who is critical of the President.”

    Gore didn’t compare Bush’s staff to the brownshirts, but said Bush’s staff unleashed the brownshirts. Bush’s staff are much higher up in the Reichstag than mere brownshirts.

    Carry on.

    And I, too, heart Al.

  44. 44.

    Com Con

    October 7, 2005 at 8:37 am

    The Swift Boat Liars movies was going to be shown over the public airwaves right before an election; Moore’s film was shown in theaters

    What’s the difference? Theaters are public places so the same basic rules should apply.

    And did any of you see clips of Al Gore’s speech? He was practically foaming at the mouth. I guess he’s angry about all the heat he’s taking for that pathetic little “rescue” stunt he pulled in New Orleans. He should stop giving speeches and go back to inventing internets.

  45. 45.

    Another Jeff

    October 7, 2005 at 8:45 am

    The best part of the Gore speech was where he said that he turned on a newsprogram expecting to get some hard news about important issues of the day (which was probably mistake number one) and what got instead was a story about a kid that’s had the hiccups for three years.

  46. 46.

    Jim Allen

    October 7, 2005 at 9:17 am

    Com Con —

    “What’s the difference?”? Since when does the FCC have any authority over what is shown in a movie theater?

  47. 47.

    Com Con

    October 7, 2005 at 9:52 am

    Since when does the FCC have any authority over what is shown in a movie theater?

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t one of the C’s for COMMUNICATION. Aren’t movies a form of communication? The FCC could easily have put a stop to Michael Moore’s lying, extreme left propaganda if it wanted to. They’re cowed by the fear of a left-wing backlash. That’s why they won’t do their job.

  48. 48.

    Defense Guy

    October 7, 2005 at 9:53 am

    No, Eileen, it’s a quote from an earlier Gore speech.

    Charlie, he resurrected that claim for this last speech as well, a small greatest hits moment, for the folks.

  49. 49.

    Tim F

    October 7, 2005 at 9:57 am

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t one of the C’s for COMMUNICATION. Aren’t movies a form of communication? The FCC could easily have put a stop to Michael Moore’s lying, extreme left propaganda if it wanted to. They’re cowed by the fear of a left-wing backlash. That’s why they won’t do their job.

    Morning, DougJ.

  50. 50.

    Defense Guy

    October 7, 2005 at 10:01 am

    Com Con (or whoever you really are)

    It’s not even a good job of parody. If you try to be a little more reasonable you might pull it off.

  51. 51.

    CadillaqJaq

    October 7, 2005 at 10:46 am

    “Andrei Says:

    Chill wind?

    Yeah. Welcome to that cold day in hell so many have been promising you guys ever since the GOP made Clinton an unnessary partisan hit target back in the 90s.”

    IMO what ever “target” Clinton was back in the 90s was the product of his own behavior; no “you guys” made him into anything he wasn’t already. Let him take the responsibility.

  52. 52.

    danelectro

    October 7, 2005 at 10:59 am

    clinton chronicles, cadillaqjaq.

  53. 53.

    Andrei

    October 7, 2005 at 11:11 am

    IMO what ever “target” Clinton was back in the 90s was the product of his own behavior;

    Oh please… That’s such utter bullshit. How do you explain a 4 year or so independent investingation into Whitewater, a real estate case, that converts into a the President lying about an affair and getting impeached under oath for an ENTIRELY different matter that to a large degree was created by the investigation itself. (The lying about the affair, not the fact he was having one.)

    No one I think ever defended the President for his bevahior, but the zeal and fervor the GOP went after him is what I was talking about. The GOP has created the atmosphere of attack politics and are now wallowing in their own cesspool for it.

  54. 54.

    Andrei

    October 7, 2005 at 11:14 am

    The FCC could easily have put a stop to Michael Moore’s lying, extreme left propaganda if it wanted to.

    Wow. An openly fascst remark from a right-winger. Who woulda thunk John would not repsond to that one on his own boards?

  55. 55.

    Lines

    October 7, 2005 at 11:15 am

    So despite the active world of politics and war, what do I see on the Today Show this morning? Oh, sea lions are irritating the rich people in southern California and they are pissed off because they can’t chase them away. Those damn environmentalists have made it impossible.

    Ah, that damn liberal media again. They must be ignoring the indictment story because its going to ultimately be embarrasing to the lefties, starting with the arrest of Joe Wilson and Valerie Plame and then extending into most of the Clinton Administration. I’m betting Sandy Berger shoved the hastily torn page of Who’s Who in his socks and ran out, laughing like a hyenia.

  56. 56.

    Defense Guy

    October 7, 2005 at 11:22 am

    Wow. An openly fascst remark from a right-winger. Who woulda thunk John would not repsond to that one on his own boards?

    First, its a ‘left winger’ doing a parody of a ‘right winger’ and second, it’s not a board, it’s John’s blog. You are entirely welcome to fuck off whenever you get sick of it.

  57. 57.

    Jim Allen

    October 7, 2005 at 11:23 am

    Thanks, Tim F — that it might be the Resident Chain-yanker Extraordinaire never occured to me.

    It should have, though — one should only be that stupid with tongue planted firmly in cheek.

  58. 58.

    Sojourner

    October 7, 2005 at 11:38 am

    The FCC is responsible for monitoring the public airwaves – which we the people supposedly own – in spite of Repub attempts to take this ownership away from us.

    We do not own the movie theaters nor do we own cable.

    That’s the difference.

  59. 59.

    jobiuspublius

    October 7, 2005 at 11:42 am

    Defense Guy Says:
    First, its a ‘left winger’ doing a parody of a ‘right winger’

    Maybe it’s a parody of a parody. DamN that DougJ is clever, which would explain everything, suckers. Look, can’t you clowns find anything better to yammer about? Hey, this just in, there is war and reCONstruction going on “run” by crooks and cronies. And to top it all off, nobody can find the salami!!

  60. 60.

    jobiuspublius

    October 7, 2005 at 12:06 pm

    BTW, from Luntz’s play book:

    3) There was no national theme. Local politics dominated the election. There was no umbrella effort to unite voters across the country to keep Republicans in office. It was assumed that Reagan himself would be the unifying force and “stay the course” would be the message. Instead, an incredible 30% of those who voted for Reagan in 1984 actually voted for a Democrat Senate candidate in 1986 – and roughly 25% voted Democrat in House races.

    Similarly, there was no presidential “bounce.” President Reagan campaigned hard to help keep Republican control of the U.S. Senate about as aggressively as George W. Bush did in 2002. However, by the sixth year of his term, Reagan was only able to achieve a 3-point bounce when he visited a state and it dissipated within a week.

    Page 5 —

    Strategy: Do not depend on a popular president to bring home the votes. House and Senate Republicans must establish their own identity in advance. People have different reasons for casting votes in Congressional elections than in a presidential contest. “Getting things done for America” is exactly what they want from the next Congress. and that’s why it should be at least a sub-theme of your efforts.

    Show and tell. That’s why Meirs is all things to all people. How many times do I have to tell you naive geriatrics? We The People are being played, like salamis, or whatever it’s called.

    The sneaky thing, for the dominant party, to do would be to craft a national theme, being that it’s expected there will not be one. He does that with

    “Getting things done for America”

    What a sneaky little phrase. It means whatever the listener wants it to mean. Hehe, what a “uniter”.

  61. 61.

    Tim F

    October 7, 2005 at 1:58 pm

    The blog’s gone awfully quiet. Too quiet.

  62. 62.

    DougJ

    October 7, 2005 at 2:00 pm

    The blog’s gone awfully quiet. Too quiet.

    The aspens are turning, Tim.

  63. 63.

    Defense Guy

    October 7, 2005 at 2:30 pm

    The blog’s gone awfully quiet. Too quiet.

    I question the timing.

  64. 64.

    Krista

    October 7, 2005 at 2:46 pm

    It IS quiet right now, isn’t it? The Canadian contingent of posters has a long weekend and might already be en route to their weekend destinations, but we don’t make up that sizeable a percentage, do we?

  65. 65.

    jobiuspublius

    October 7, 2005 at 2:48 pm

    How very suspicious of Friday to arrive just as we were discussing the hiding of salami.

  66. 66.

    Krista

    October 7, 2005 at 2:55 pm

    Well, salami IS the traditional Thanksgiving dish in Canada…

  67. 67.

    Lines

    October 7, 2005 at 2:58 pm

    The best time to hide the salami is on a slow newsday, as then it will be overlooked and under commented. Statistically, less people pay attention the salami on Friday’s through the weekend and there is a great rush to find the salami on Mondays.

    Given all of that, where would be the best place to hide the salami?

  68. 68.

    jobiuspublius

    October 7, 2005 at 3:04 pm

    Lines Says:
    Given all of that, where would be the best place to hide the salami?

    Where a dog can’t sniff and dig it out. Mark my words. When all is said and done, the legacy of this WH will be all the hidden salami that Barney, the First Dog, had squireled away. A dog is way more effective than a thousand 911-commissions or grand juries.

  69. 69.

    Krista

    October 7, 2005 at 3:06 pm

    No terrier that I’ve ever known has squirrelled away food. Unless squirreling it away in his stomach counts.

  70. 70.

    jobiuspublius

    October 7, 2005 at 3:08 pm

    Krista Says:

    No terrier that I’ve ever known has squirrelled away food. Unless squirreling it away in his stomach counts.

    That goes to show you how much salami there is and what a deep throat the little guy is.

  71. 71.

    Krista

    October 7, 2005 at 3:09 pm

    Okay, this is getting disturbing.

  72. 72.

    Andrei

    October 7, 2005 at 3:10 pm

    First, its a ‘left winger’ doing a parody of a ‘right winger’ and second, it’s not a board, it’s John’s blog. You are entirely welcome to fuck off whenever you get sick of it.

    Wow… you’re starting to sound like one of them pussy wingers these days Defense Guy. Touchy subject for you?

  73. 73.

    jobiuspublius

    October 7, 2005 at 3:11 pm

    That’s the nature of salami and the reason it is hidden.

  74. 74.

    Krista

    October 7, 2005 at 3:15 pm

    You are a strange, sick little man, aren’t you?

  75. 75.

    Defense Guy

    October 7, 2005 at 3:16 pm

    Touchy subject for you?

    Indeed. Heh.

  76. 76.

    pmm

    October 7, 2005 at 3:18 pm

    There’s a Gannon joke waiting to be told in this thread, somewhere.

  77. 77.

    demimondian

    October 7, 2005 at 3:18 pm

    The aspens are turning, Tim.

    No, no, no! DougJ, get it right, will you? The talking point is “The aspens are turning a corner. The summer is in its last throes, leading to an inevitable Fall.”

    (With apologies to those from Canada, who are unable to defend themselves, seeing as it’s already Winter up there.)

  78. 78.

    jobiuspublius

    October 7, 2005 at 3:19 pm

    Krista Says:

    You are a strange, sick little man, aren’t you?

    I owe it all to 5 years worth of Luntz and Rove’s platitudes.

  79. 79.

    jobiuspublius

    October 7, 2005 at 3:20 pm

    *vicious platitudes.

  80. 80.

    jobiuspublius

    October 7, 2005 at 3:21 pm

    I wonder where Gannon’s, or whatever he’s called, been hiding.

  81. 81.

    Krista

    October 7, 2005 at 3:25 pm

    demimondian – only in Winnipeg.

  82. 82.

    Krista

    October 7, 2005 at 3:25 pm

    It’s still Autumn for most of the country. The leaves are quite lovely, actually.

  83. 83.

    Lines

    October 7, 2005 at 3:26 pm

    Ever seen Pulp Fiction? Remember the Gimp? If he can live in a trunk in the basement, so can Gannon.

    Its always fun to see a thread like this transform into a chat room when teacher is away.

  84. 84.

    jobiuspublius

    October 7, 2005 at 3:30 pm

    When the cats away, the mice will play – another foolish game.

  85. 85.

    demimondian

    October 7, 2005 at 3:32 pm

    Krista — I like to remind my friends from further south that Madison is due west of Toronto and has a far more severe winter climate.

    But, hey, c’mon — a day without useless Canada-bashing is like a day without moonshine.

  86. 86.

    Lines

    October 7, 2005 at 3:35 pm

    Do mice play hide the salami, though?

    Reminds me of a joke I heard at a Republican Luncheon (Lunch would be too lowbrow):

    An elephant is walking through the jungle when it gets a thorn stuck in its foot. As its trying with all it’s brute strength to remove the rock, a small mouse comes up and says “I can get that thorn out of your foot for one free favor.”

    The elephant thinks for a minute, figures that a small mouse can’t ask for more than an elephant can give and says “sure, do your best”

    POP, out comes the thorn. The elephant looks at the mouse and asks him what she can do for him.

    “Well, I’ve never screwed an elephant, I’d really like to do that”

    The elephant, after laughing mightily, grants the mouse his wish. As the mouse climbs up on her back and starts going at it, the elephant steps on another thorn.

    “Ouch!” she exclaimes.

    And the mouse, in all his glory yells, “yeah, bitch, take it all!”

  87. 87.

    Defense Guy

    October 7, 2005 at 3:36 pm

    A leader we all can agree on. Bow down insolent knaves.

  88. 88.

    DougJ

    October 7, 2005 at 3:42 pm

    If he can live in a trunk in the basement, so can Gannon.

    Do you that Gannon, like the Gimp, is kept as a sex slave by two sadistic rednecks?

  89. 89.

    Krista

    October 7, 2005 at 3:45 pm

    But, hey, c’mon—a day without useless Canada-bashing is like a day without moonshine.

    …or salami.

  90. 90.

    Lines

    October 7, 2005 at 3:47 pm

    A way to make your moonshine more palatable is to add plums to it. Let the plums soak up much of the diesel fuel taste, then remove the plums and drink!

    Just don’t eat the plums. I guess thats only for serious rednecks.

    Now plums in salami, thats just wrong.

  91. 91.

    Steven D

    October 7, 2005 at 3:55 pm

    Actually, what the country really needs is the Anne Coulter updated book being hawked in your blog ads. I can feel the level of discourse elevating as I type.

  92. 92.

    Krista

    October 7, 2005 at 3:55 pm

    What about salami in moonshine?

    John must look over some of these dead threads sometime and just shake his head at the shenanigans that occur.

  93. 93.

    Krista

    October 7, 2005 at 3:58 pm

    Actually, what the country really needs is the Anne Coulter updated book being hawked in your blog ads.

    You know, looking at that picture…Christ, she DOES look manly, doesn’t she?

    Now we know where the salami is.

  94. 94.

    Lines

    October 7, 2005 at 4:00 pm

    well shoot, might as well put mice in the moonshine.

    Course, they might like it, get brain damage, and then get a superiority complex and want to be president.

  95. 95.

    Krista

    October 7, 2005 at 4:05 pm

    Ba-DUM-dum.

    Anyhoo, lads…it’s been a lark, but I’m off to the mother’s house for a long Thanksgiving weekend of turkey, too much wine, and a heaping helping of French-Canadian melodrama. Wish me luck, and go easy on the salami jokes.

  96. 96.

    demimondian

    October 7, 2005 at 4:15 pm

    A way to make your moonshine more palatable is to add plums to it.

    I’ve heard that the best way to improve the “flavor” of moonshine is to run it through a brita water filter (another fine Canadian thing, btw). After four or five runs through, most of the fusel alcohols have bound to the carbon filter, leaving a fine, smooth, and utterly intoxicating brew…with less capacity for methanol poisoning.

    However, kids…don’t try that at home. Methanol is nothing to play with.

  97. 97.

    Lines

    October 7, 2005 at 4:26 pm

    How long does the filter last? How many runs can you get through one little filter?

    Can you use any activated charcoal filter? What about dropping a fish filter packet into a jug?

    Wow, this sounds like I have a still out on the back 40 somewhere.

  98. 98.

    demimondian

    October 7, 2005 at 4:29 pm

    How long does the filter last? How many runs can you get through one little filter?

    Hmm. Why don’t you run some experiments, and report back? You could start with samples of vodka and cheap red wine, in order to have a proper control scenario.

    You’ll be guaranteed a very long weekend that way…

  99. 99.

    Horshu

    October 7, 2005 at 5:19 pm

    You can do the same thing with vodka. These folks say it tastes better than Ketel One after a few runs: http://www.ohmygoditburns.com

  100. 100.

    Tim F

    October 7, 2005 at 6:20 pm

    Another nice use for vodka – you can put a cheap liter in a mason jar along with a few pears (or other fruit of your choice) and let it steep in the basement for a year or so. It makes spectacular shots as-is, or you can serve it hot like the Swedes do, drink it like tea in the winter and call it glogg.

  101. 101.

    Mac Buckets

    October 7, 2005 at 6:48 pm

    Quite honest indeed. . .as are most folks who let their supply of anti-psychotic medication run out. Just don’t let them near any sharp instruments.

    Being “honest” doesn’t preclude wacKO from being wrong all the time. He honestly believes all his lefty kook rhetoric, even the lamest bits of it. Like, for instance, last night, when he subtly mentioned, ohhh, 15 times that it couldn’t POSSIBLY be a coincidence that a “supposed” NY terror alert happens on the same day that rumours of Rove being indicted (yes, rumours are now top-flight news in Keith’s “honest journalist” world) come out. He even mentioned that the Rove tactic wouldn’t work because “we caught them” — arrogance from a man whose greatest contribution to journalism was making fun every week of NASCAR driver Dick Trickle’s name.

    Keith was running full whack on this one until his third guest (I guess this point had eluded the first two and wacKO) mentioned that the terror alert sources were the New York regional guys, and that the feds were the ones throwing cold water on the hype. OOOPS! Another conspiracy fairy tale bites the dust! Have no fear, though, tomorrow’s another show, and that third guest won’t be on to douse the next wacKO theory.

  102. 102.

    h0mi

    October 7, 2005 at 7:00 pm

    15 times that it couldn’t POSSIBLY be a coincidence that a “supposed” NY terror alert happens on the same day that rumours of Rove being indicted

    I’m quite certain that there was a PDB saying “Osama bin Laden determined to strike the US” the last couple of days.

  103. 103.

    jg

    October 7, 2005 at 7:09 pm

    mentioned that the terror alert sources were the New York regional guys, and that the feds were the ones throwing cold water on the hype.

    Bush said that the New York people reacted to the information washington gave them. New York may have overreacted but how could this come from New York regional guys when conspirators are being arrested in Iraq? All it took was one guy to say something that made you comfortable and its all swept under the rug for you now huh?

    The way you describe Olbelmans show is exactly like how liberals describe anything on Fox or Limbaugh’s show (or CNN lately). If you’re right, are libs right?

  104. 104.

    SF

    October 7, 2005 at 7:27 pm

    Politics as usual:
    The vote, which was supposed to be taken in five minutes, lasted more than 40 minutes as GOP leaders searched for the last two votes they needed to get the bill approved. They buttonholed lawmakers for last-minute lobbying as Democrats complained loudly that the vote should be closed. Finally two GOP lawmakers switched from “no” to “yes,” giving the bill’s supporters the margin of victory.

    “Is this the House of a Banana Republic?” Rep. Henry Waxman, D-California, shouted at one point, expressing his frustration about the GOP holdup of the final tally.

  105. 105.

    Mac Buckets

    October 7, 2005 at 9:46 pm

    Bush said that the New York people reacted to the information washington gave them. New York may have overreacted

    …which is my (and that guest’s) entire point. Notwithstanding arrests, notwithstanding where the original intel originated, the fact is that NY was far hotter on this situation than the feds were. The feds were minimizing, if not outright dismissing, the threat, which doesn’t fit with a Rovian “distraction” scenario very well, does it?

    All it took was one guy to say something that made you comfortable and its all swept under the rug for you now huh?

    Huh? Dude was not dropping any science on me. I already knew wacKO’s theory was nuts based on the “not credible” statements out of the DHS. I’m just stunned that Keith had one guest out of three on his show with enough brains to explain it to him in small words.

    The way you describe Olbelmans show is exactly like how liberals describe anything on Fox or Limbaugh’s show (or CNN lately). If you’re right, are libs right?

    Case by case basis. The person who I find to be as consistantly silly as Keith, ironically, is his arch-nemesis, Loofah O’Reilly. So make of it what you will.

  106. 106.

    Mac Buckets

    October 7, 2005 at 9:54 pm

    I’m quite certain that there was a PDB saying “Osama bin Laden determined to strike the US” the last couple of days.

    Really? He’s “determined?” Why hasn’t anyone alerted me to this news?! “Determined to strike the US” sounds serious — Bush had better declare nationwide martial law immediately, for as long as it takes, until Al Qaeda is totally destroyed!

  107. 107.

    Com Con

    October 7, 2005 at 10:12 pm

    Determined to strike the US” sounds serious—Bush had better declare nationwide martial law immediately, for as long as it takes, until Al Qaeda is totally destroyed!

    ROFLSHIAC. The way the lefties talk about that Michael Moore movie you’d think that was what they wanted him to do.

  108. 108.

    ppGaz

    October 7, 2005 at 10:14 pm

    No point is too obvious for the Bushmonkeys not to miss it.

    The point is not whether a “terror threat alert” is actually a pimped news diversion. The point is that more and more people believe that it is. The point is that people talk rather casually these days about the fact that DHS is a joke.

    Why should the news media focus on the true nature of the recent NYC “threat”? The government won’t reveal enough about these things to make that possible. They just act as though citizens should blindly and dumbly be persuaded by stupid color charts and endless strings of “Number Two Terrorist” sightings and other nonsense, that the government knows what it is doing. I think the Bushco Iraq job approval rating right now is running around 32%, which includes the snake handlers, the abortion clinic bombers and the people in the White House itself. The only way Bush could get those numbers lower would be to nominate Saddam Hussein to the Supreme Court.

    Credibility In the Toilet

    It’s sad when the monkeys can only show the world their butts and laugh about Keith Olbermann to deflect attention from the fact that the world is laughing at their dumbass president.

  109. 109.

    Com Con

    October 7, 2005 at 10:27 pm

    I think the Bushco Iraq job approval rating right now is running around 32%, which includes the snake handlers, the abortion clinic bombers and the people in the White House itself.

    Oh, really? It includes the people in the White House itself? And how, Mr. Smarty Pants Libera, do the pollsters get through to the people in the White House? Have you ever heard of something called a *restricted line*?

  110. 110.

    ppGaz

    October 7, 2005 at 10:32 pm

    The pollsters just hang around outside the gate and draw in the staffers by offering them cigarettes.

  111. 111.

    Com Con

    October 7, 2005 at 10:38 pm

    the fact that the world is laughing at their dumbass president.

    Have you ever considered that the reason they laugh at your president is because the media here spends so much time making fun of him?

    And you think that weren’t laughing at Clinton? I know everyone will be laughing at him after Freeh’s interview on Sunday. It’s too bad they can’t impeach him a second time.

  112. 112.

    ppGaz

    October 7, 2005 at 10:42 pm

    I know everyone will be laughing at him after Freeh’s interview

    Maybe, until they read the book on Freeh, Dougster. The guy is a walking, talking disaster. He probably set the FBI back 25 years.

    That makes them about on a par with Rasputin, I think.

  113. 113.

    DougJ

    October 7, 2005 at 10:45 pm

    Do you think that this Freeh interview, the subway scare, the Miers nomination is all to distract from indictments coming in the Plame investigation? I’ve got to think people are going down next week. If not Rove, then Libby at least. I think it’s become the 800 lb. gorilla in the White House. Which isn’t to be confused with the 190 lb gorilla who runs the White House.

  114. 114.

    jobiuspublius

    October 7, 2005 at 10:59 pm

    ppGaz Says:

    The pollsters just hang around outside the gate and draw in the staffers by offering them cigarettes.

    What if they were offered salami?

  115. 115.

    Sojourner

    October 7, 2005 at 11:06 pm

    And you think that weren’t laughing at Clinton?

    No, they weren’t laughing at Clinton. They were laughing at all the idiots who got so hysterical over a blow job.

  116. 116.

    demimondian

    October 7, 2005 at 11:14 pm

    What if they were offered salami?

    Oh, my God! The staffers have been let out of the White House! Hide the salami!

  117. 117.

    ppGaz

    October 7, 2005 at 11:28 pm

    What if they were offered salami?

    Well, as Karl Rove said, “I don’t want to get cotto.”

  118. 118.

    Mac Buckets

    October 7, 2005 at 11:40 pm

    The point is not whether a “terror threat alert” is actually a pimped news diversion. The point is that more and more people believe that it is.

    Even accepting your faith-based premise (which I don’t)…So your point is that more and more people are becoming as thick as Keith Olbermann? Or is it that the left is just getting better at duping the gullible into following their line of, for lack of a better word, “thinking?”

    It’s sad when the monkeys can only show the world their butts and laugh about Keith Olbermann to deflect attention from the fact that the world is laughing at their dumbass president.

    Laughing at Olbermann is no fun — he’s an entertainer, just like Rush, and he says shocking things, just like Rush, and he makes a lot of money for doing it, just like Rush. So good for him. I’m laughing at those who take him even the least bit seriously. And Dick Trickle finished 24th.

  119. 119.

    jobiuspublius

    October 7, 2005 at 11:52 pm

    Sojourner Says:

    And you think that weren’t laughing at Clinton?

    No, they weren’t laughing at Clinton. They were laughing at all the idiots who got so hysterical over a blow job.

    Now, THAT’s a case of salami envy.

  120. 120.

    ppGaz

    October 7, 2005 at 11:54 pm

    I’m laughing at those

    Laugh out of the other side of your ass, bucko.

    Your guy is the butt of every late night tv joke now. Nobody believes a fucking word he says about anything.

    If Bush announced a sunrise tomorrow, there’d be a run on flashlight batteries.

  121. 121.

    Com Con

    October 8, 2005 at 12:02 am

    Or is it that the left is just getting better at duping the gullible into following their line of, for lack of a better word, “thinking?”

    That’s what it seems like to me. They’ve convinced Americans that Iraq is going badly, that FEMA (not NagBlanco) screwed up Katrina, and that the budget deficit will destroy our economy (despite the thousands of jobs the economy produces each month). Seems like they’re doing a pretty good job. I guess you can do those things when you control the media.

    Mac: did you listen to Rush yesterday about Bush’s speech? *Classic.*

  122. 122.

    Com Con

    October 8, 2005 at 12:03 am

    Or is it that the left is just getting better at duping the gullible into following their line of, for lack of a better word, “thinking?”

    That’s what it seems like to me. They’ve convinced Americans that Iraq is going badly, that FEMA (not NagBlanco) screwed up Katrina, and that the budget deficit will destroy our economy (despite the thousands of jobs the economy produces each month). Seems like they’re doing a pretty good job. I guess you can do those things when you control the media.

    Mac: did you listen to Rush yesterday about Bush’s speech? *Classic*.

  123. 123.

    jobiuspublius

    October 8, 2005 at 12:42 am

    This is one guy that you can’t play a game of Hide The Salami with, or whatever it’s called. Here’s another. This guy was desparate for salami, but, he had to settle for gold bathroom fixtures, then a cell and some underwear. But, he did get groomed. These guys are working hard for salami. This guy finally has salami, but only a little. He may be eager to sell. This guy has the most salami in the world, yet, wants everybody’s salami, especially that of the guys working hard for it, should they ever get some.

    Here is the complete list of everybody that has salami, had salami, and is suspected of having salami, or whatever it’s called. Good night and good luck.

  124. 124.

    Jill

    October 8, 2005 at 12:53 am

    Worst pResident Ever.

  125. 125.

    Baron Elmo

    October 8, 2005 at 8:34 am

    Com Con,
    The number of jobs floating around at any given time is a rather useless barometer for accurately measuring the economy… especially since the government uses various shifty means to fudge the count.

    Example: a large factory converts 1000 full-time jobs into 1250 part-time jobs, thereby saving themselves a bundle by eliminating benefits or overtime pay for those 1000 workers who now find themselves working 12 to 15 hours less a week. Hard to consider this a windfall for this factory’s working stiffs in any sense of the word… BUT, in the government’s economic tally book, this is celebrated as an addition of 250 new jobs.

    He who controls the numbers controls all.

  126. 126.

    Slide

    October 8, 2005 at 9:00 am

    Laughing is good. Here, have a good laugh:

    “Big news this morning at the White House, President Bush defended his nominee, Harriet Miers, calling her ‘plenty bright.’ Not only that, but then the president said Miers has ‘real purdy hair.’ Then he got on a mule and headed south.”–Conan O’Brien

    “She’s never been a judge before…never served on the bench. This is part of President Bush’s strategy of surrounding himself with people who are also in over their heads.”–Jay Leno

    “Welcome to the ‘Late Show,’ ladies and gentlemen. It’s like the Supreme Court, anyone can get in here.”–David Letterman

    “As you might expect some people are criticizing the pick, especially conservative Republicans who worry that Harriet Miers is too liberal. Other critics say she’s not a good pick because she hasn’t been a judge before. Uh, had Paula Abdul been a judge before? Nobody had a problem when they picked her.”–Jimmy Kimmel

    “Well, certainly the president can claim executive privilege. But in the this case, I think with a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court, you can’t play, you know, Hide the Salami, or whatever it’s called.–Howard Dean on Hardball

    Y’know, it’s just too easy. Like shooting cronies in a barrel…

    .

  127. 127.

    Mac Buckets

    October 8, 2005 at 9:32 am

    Laugh out of the other side of your ass, bucko.Your guy is the butt of every late night tv joke now.

    Yes, just as Clinton was for eight years. It comes with the territory, and I would never get bent out of shape over it. It’s just comedy. And for the record, I have never laughed out of any part of my ass. Nor would I call Bush “my guy.”

    I think there’s a ppG impersonator out there. This post sounds a little too…”common” for him, even on his grumpy days.

    Mac: did you listen to Rush yesterday about Bush’s speech? Classic

    If I get to listen to the radio at that time, I’m listening to Jim Rome. What was the gist?

  128. 128.

    Another Jeff

    October 8, 2005 at 9:44 am

    My personal favorite joke about the Miers pick was the one where it was supposed to be a conversation between her and Dick Cheney and she asked Cheney who she should recommend to Bush and Cheney said “just recommend yourself, that’s what I did” or something like that. It’s a little more humorous when it’s told the right way.

    Good to see some people up and about on a Saturday morning. I’m just putting in a few hours at the office before I head out to Penn State so i can sit in the rain and watch them lose by two touchdowns to Ohio State.

    Hopefully, since it’s a 7:45 kickoff, I’ll be too loaded to care by that point.

  129. 129.

    Com Con

    October 8, 2005 at 10:07 am

    If I get to listen to the radio at that time, I’m listening to Jim Rome. What was the gist?

    About how good the speech was. He zeroed right in on the central point the president was making, that the liberals still believe that we can bargain with the terrorists and insurgents, and that’s really what this “anti-war movement” is about. He really sliced and diced them. Also, a very funny reference to Darryl Kagan (his “mistress in Georgia”, he called her).

    Jim Rome? I never could take him after that stunt he pulled with Jim Everett.

  130. 130.

    Mac Buckets

    October 8, 2005 at 10:21 am

    I’m just putting in a few hours at the office before I head out to Penn State so i can sit in the rain and watch them lose by two touchdowns to Ohio State.

    I think you might see a good game (I’m jealous!),although I’d pick OSU if I had to, laying 3 1/2. Rain in Happy Valley would help PSU, you’d think.

    The Mac Buckets Three-Star Nickle-Plated Faux Fur Six-Pack of the Week® is Louisville, Oklahoma, Cal, Texas Tech, Houston, and (for our host) West Virginia.

  131. 131.

    Slide

    October 8, 2005 at 10:23 am

    Com con opines:

    He zeroed right in on the central point the president was making, that the liberals still believe that we can bargain with the terrorists and insurgents, and that’s really what this “anti-war movement” is about.

    Is Rummy part of the anti-war movement?

    The U.S. military in Iraq has been holding face-to-face meetings with some Iraqi leaders of the insurgency there, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and the U.S. commander in charge of Iraq confirmed yesterday.

    Other parts of the U.S. government, including the State Department and CIA, have also been holding secret meetings with Iraqi insurgent factions in an effort to stop the violence and coax them into the political process, according to U.S. government officials and others who have participated in the efforts.

    Rumsfeld acknowledged that there is no military solution to ending the insurgency and that the talks with Iraqi insurgents were part of a search for a political solution to the war. “I mean, foreign troops are not going to beat the insurgency,” he said.

    Damn peaceniks.

  132. 132.

    Com Con

    October 8, 2005 at 10:33 am

    Sorry, Slide, but the Washington Post has a definite liberal bias. You may as well have told me that Cindy Sheehan was the reporter for the story.

  133. 133.

    Another Jeff

    October 8, 2005 at 10:52 am

    The Mac Buckets Three-Star Nickle-Plated Faux Fur Six-Pack of the Week® is Louisville, Oklahoma, Cal, Texas Tech, Houston, and (for our host) West Virginia.

    Love the picks, MacB. I may put a few shackles on Texas Tech and Cal myself.

    My biggest worry with Penn State is that they finally have some playmakers with real speed, and in their first big game, the field is gonna be a swamp.

  134. 134.

    ppGaz

    October 8, 2005 at 11:08 am

    Rumsfeld acknowledged that there is no military solution to ending the insurgency and that the talks with Iraqi insurgents were part of a search for a political solution to the war. “I mean, foreign troops are not going to beat the insurgency,” he said. “It’s going to be the Iraqi people that are going to beat the insurgency and Iraqi security forces. That’s just the nature of an insurgency.”

    He also pointed out, on Fox News, that “insurgencies tend to go on five, six, eight, 10, 12 years.”

    Just expanding on your cite, slide.

    Luckily, we’ve had plenty of good discussion on this topic here at BJ, thanks to John’s interest in openly and thoroughly exploring it.

    All that churn over the summer about whether Cindy Sheehan used toilet paper at her camp? That nonsense was just to get to get page views. But the many serious Iraq discussions we’ve had here … that’s what we all come for, right?

  135. 135.

    Mac Buckets

    October 8, 2005 at 11:19 am

    Love the picks, MacB. I may put a few shackles on Texas Tech and Cal myself.

    Tech beat Nebraska by 60 last year in Lubbock, and they’re only -4 in Lincoln? I’ve heard of homefield advantages before, but 56 points worth? Are they playing on an ancient Indian burial ground?

  136. 136.

    Mac Buckets

    October 8, 2005 at 11:25 am

    This is one guy that you can’t play a game of Hide The Salami with, or whatever it’s called.

    I successfully hid the salami from him for over 10 years — in fact he never found my salami! I had to openly display my salami to George Bush before that guy would admit that I even possessed the salami. He is no champion of the Hide the Salami game, I can assure you.

    Love and Kisses,
    Muammar Abu Minyar al-Qaddafi
    معمر القذافي

  137. 137.

    Slide

    October 8, 2005 at 12:39 pm

    silly silly Com con said:

    Sorry, Slide, but the Washington Post has a definite liberal bias. You may as well have told me that Cindy Sheehan was the reporter for the story.

    ok, then how about Fox news?

    U.S. officials have held two secret meetings with insurgent commanders in Iraq. There were no breakthroughs in efforts to end the violence but more meetings are said to be planned.

    DEFENSE SECRETARY DONALD RUMSFELD: Thank you very much. Good to be with you.

    WALLACE: Thank you.

    Let’s start with these reports of these direct meetings between U.S. officials, including allegedly a representative of the Pentagon, and insurgent commanders. Did they happen, and, if so, what did they accomplish?

    RUMSFELD: Well, the first thing I would say about the meetings is they go on all the time.

    .

  138. 138.

    Tim F

    October 8, 2005 at 12:54 pm

    Sorry, Slide, but the Washington Post has a definite liberal bias.

    How convenient.

  139. 139.

    CaseyL

    October 8, 2005 at 2:29 pm

    Oh, everyone who sees clearly and speaks based on what they clearly see has a “definite liberal bias.”

    In order to not have a liberal bias, you have to… well, it’s actually kind of amazing what you have to believe.

    Anent Iraq, you have to believe that all statements the Bush Admin made before the war are not only inoperative, but were never actually made.

    Plus you have to believe that Iraqis are so grateful for being invaded and occupied, for having their assets seized and handed over to cronies, their country’s treasures looted and its infrastructure and cities destroyed, its citizens’ homes broken into and their families terrorized, their friends and relatives tortured and raped and murdered… that there would never ever have been an insurgency if it wasn’t for peaceniks and liberals saying there should be one.

    You also have to believe that the insurgency, while it only exists because of liberals and peaceniks, is also a Good Sign because it means the “flypaper strategy” worked, and all the terrorists in the world are in Iraq. Well, except for the ones in England and Spain and Indonesia and Saudi Arabia and wherever else they pop up.

    Yet you also have to believe that the insurgency is not only the liberals’ and peaceniks’ fault, and is not only a Good Sign, but is also so widespread and obdurate that we’ll have to be in Iraq for “five, six, eight, 10, 12 years,” WHILE ALSO believing that the insurgency is in its “last throes.”

    And while you’re believing this really impressive catalog of mutually incompatible mishegoss, you also have to believe that the US is ready and able to pull off another military adventure – in Iran, say. Or N Korea. Or Syria. Or all of them.

    The mental gymnastics required to not have a liberal bias put the Red Queen and the Mad Hatter to shame.

  140. 140.

    jg

    October 8, 2005 at 2:50 pm

    He zeroed right in on the central point the president was making, that the liberals still believe that we can bargain with the terrorists and insurgents, and that’s really what this “anti-war movement” is about.

    Well if the president said it then that must be what the anti-war crowd wants. He’s brilliant.
    Its amazing that the right wingers will believe anything this man says no matter how stupid it is. And if they don’t want to beieve something they just say the source has a liberal bias. Which, even if true, doesn’t mean the source isn’t providing accurate information but it is a convenient excuse to enaable the ignoring of information that doesn’t agree with your already established (or established in you by Rush) views.

    Credibility is important but its not everything. Its hard to listen to a source you know is biased (I can’t stand the voices of anyone on Fox) but the information they are giving might be true and when its also repeated on a ‘credible’ source it can’t and shouldn’t be ignored just because it came from a source your right wing handlers have declared to be liberally biased’.

    Am I the only one who thinks the whole ‘liberal bias’ thing is just an excuse for FOX to only pimp the conservative side? Rupert was upset that the news media was constantly reporting things which conflicted with the conservative world view they were trying to instill in the peeps so they invented a ‘fair and balanced’ channel to funnel their BS and push the story that the other guys shouldn’t be listened to. Maybe I’m crazy but saying that the mass media is involved in a conspiracy to keep the american public from hearing the truth rather than that they are just hacks working for ratings seems to me like adding complexity where its not needed.

  141. 141.

    ppGaz

    October 8, 2005 at 3:44 pm

    When ends justify means, mental gymnastics are just the daily warmup exercises.

    When ends justify means, anything goes. No evil is too much shit to bear in order to get the desired outcome.

    GWB is an EJM president. He is surrounded b EJM people with EJM ideas. The Neocon movement is all about EJM, that’s the whole point.

  142. 142.

    Com Con

    October 8, 2005 at 4:01 pm

    JG, look most of the soliders in Iraq say things there are going well, yet all we hear on CBS, NBC, and ABC is bad news about Iraq. We hear that we’re in a recession even though there’s lots of new jobs being created. We hear that Bush is detached and ignorant although those close to him say that he is hands on and detail-oriented. Even Newsweek admitted this a few months ago. We hear that global warming is a fact, when many scientists consider it to be only a theory. We hear that Saddam had no ties to Al Qaeda although his lieutenants had a secret meeting with Mohammed Otta in Prague. We hear that there no terrorists in Iraq period even though there are clearly thousands now and where do you think they came from. We hear that Harriet Miers isn’t qualified even though she was the first woman head of the Texas bar.

    Tell me there’s no liberal bias againi.

  143. 143.

    Tim F

    October 8, 2005 at 4:18 pm

    Am I the only one who thinks the whole ‘liberal bias’ thing is just an excuse for FOX to only pimp the conservative side?

    It’s known as ‘working the refs.’ Football fans would be glad to explain it to you.

    They declared after Nixon that they’d do it, they did it and it worked. Hooray for them.

  144. 144.

    jobiuspublius

    October 8, 2005 at 4:21 pm

    I successfully hid the salami from him for over 10 years—in fact he never found my salami! I had to openly display my salami to George Bush before that guy would admit that I even possessed the salami. He is no champion of the Hide the Salami game, I can assure you.

    Love and Kisses,
    Muammar Abu Minyar al-Qaddafi
    معمر القذافي
    October 8th, 2005 at 11:25 am

    I’m sorry my friend, but, we all new your salami, or whatever it’s called, was … for personal use.

  145. 145.

    jobiuspublius

    October 8, 2005 at 4:25 pm

    ppGaz Says:

    All that churn over the summer about whether Cindy Sheehan used toilet paper at her camp? That nonsense was just to get to get page views. But the many serious Iraq discussions we’ve had here … that’s what we all come for, right?

    What? It’s not about salami, or whatever it’s called? BoooooooooRing. Hey, churn is a great place to hide salami, or whatever it’s called.

  146. 146.

    jobiuspublius

    October 8, 2005 at 4:27 pm

    Tim F Says:

    Am I the only one who thinks the whole ‘liberal bias’ thing is just an excuse for FOX to only pimp the conservative side?

    It’s known as ‘working the refs.’ Football fans would be glad to explain it to you.

    They declared after Nixon that they’d do it, they did it and it worked. Hooray for them.

    And that’s how you play the game of Hide the Salami, or whatever it’s called. If you can’t stand the stink, stay out of the kitchen.

  147. 147.

    jobiuspublius

    October 8, 2005 at 4:45 pm

    jg Says:

    Am I the only one who thinks the whole ‘liberal bias’ thing is just an excuse for FOX to only pimp the conservative side? Rupert was upset that the news media was constantly reporting things which conflicted with the conservative world view they were trying to instill in the peeps so they invented a ‘fair and balanced’ channel to funnel their BS and push the story that the other guys shouldn’t be listened to. Maybe I’m crazy but saying that the mass media is involved in a conspiracy to keep the american public from hearing the truth rather than that they are just hacks working for ratings seems to me like adding complexity where its not needed.

    And that’s a great way to Hide the Salami, or whatever it’s called. I new this way before Dean spilled the beans. Now they know we’re on to them. Thx alot Big Dean!

  148. 148.

    ppGaz

    October 8, 2005 at 4:46 pm

    And that’s how you play the game of Hide the Salami, or whatever it’s called.

    Heh. That’s the salami, any way you slice it.

    It’s a whole new deli counter.

  149. 149.

    rilkefan

    October 8, 2005 at 4:58 pm

    Is John off on a bender or something?

  150. 150.

    Theseus

    October 8, 2005 at 5:06 pm

    Plus you have to believe that Iraqis are so grateful for being invaded and occupied, for having their assets seized and handed over to cronies, their country’s treasures looted and its infrastructure and cities destroyed, its citizens’ homes broken into and their families terrorized, their friends and relatives tortured and raped and murdered…

    huh, for a second there, it seemed like you were describing Saddam’s Iraq. But of course, the Iraqis are much worse off under the new Iraqi government and the US. Just like the Iranians are better off with the Mullahs, the North Koreans with lil’ Kim, the Arabians under the Saudis, etc, etc…anything beats the evil Americans, especially if their president at the time happens to be from the ungodly, Sith-like Rethuglicans. What the fuck is a “liberal” these days anyways? No matter how bad the GOP or Bush fucks up, the alternative i.e. the Dems and their minions, are a far scarier and worrysome reality and THAT is bad for America, IMHO.

    And of course, there is NO liberal bias, not when about 80-90% of journalists, editors and the likes identify themselves or vote Democrat. No bias at all…these are all professionals you see who don’t allow their worldview, their perceptions of reality to affect how they report “reality” or the TRUTH. No bias at all…

  151. 151.

    Slide

    October 8, 2005 at 5:11 pm

    Is John off on a bender or something?

    Hiding the salami?

  152. 152.

    Slide

    October 8, 2005 at 5:24 pm

    Theseus said:

    No matter how bad the GOP or Bush fucks up, the alternative i.e. the Dems and their minions, are a far scarier and worrysome reality and THAT is bad for America, IMHO.

    Bingo man. Look how the dems fucked things up the last time they had the predidency:

    Longest Economic Expansion in U.S. History.
    Moving From Record Deficits to Record Surplus
    Paying Off the National Debt.
    More Than 22 Million New Jobs.
    Fastest and Longest Real Wage Growth in Over Three Decades.
    Household Income Breaks $40,000 for First Time in History
    Unemployment is the Lowest in Over Three Decades.
    Lowest Poverty Rate Since 1979
    Tax Cuts for Working Families.
    Increased the Minimum Wage.
    Expanding Work Study and Pell Grants.
    Making College More Affordable.
    Lowest Crime Rates in a Generation.
    Putting 100,000 More Police on the Streets.
    More Than Half a Million Felons, Fugitives and Domestic Abusers Denied Guns.
    Lowest Percentage of Americans on Welfare in 35 Years as More Recipients Go to Work
    More Americans Have Health Insurance.
    Unprecedented Investment in Biomedical Research\
    Smallest Federal Civilian Workforce in 40 Years.
    Slowest Per Capita Growth of Government Spending Since the 1950’s.
    Lowest Federal Spending as a Share of the Economy Since 1966

    man those dems can really screw things up.

  153. 153.

    ppGaz

    October 8, 2005 at 5:35 pm

    Just like the Iranians are better off with the Mullahs

    Ooooh noooh, they were better off before, with the Shah, the murdering thieving dictator (Saddam Hussein in better suits) who dined regularly in the White House East Room, because the US would cornhole anyone in that part of the world who smiled at us and sold us cheap oil.

    I mean, that is what it’s all about, right? Isn’t that what turned Saddam from our bought-and-paid-for security guard into “the recincarnation of Hitler”, overnight?

  154. 154.

    jobiuspublius

    October 8, 2005 at 6:40 pm

    Slide Says:

    Bingo man. Look how the dems fucked things up the last time they had the predidency:

    …

    man those dems can really screw things up.

    You forgot, Hiding the Salami, or whatever it’s called.

  155. 155.

    Darrell

    October 8, 2005 at 6:52 pm

    Ooooh noooh, they were better off before, with the Shah, the murdering thieving dictator (Saddam Hussein in better suits)

    Iranians worse off under the Shah than under the mullahs? Damn that Shah giving women all those rights. I see ppgaz has been smoking the salami

  156. 156.

    jg

    October 8, 2005 at 7:29 pm

    look most of the soliders in Iraq say things there are going well, yet all we hear on CBS, NBC, and ABC is bad news about Iraq.

    I don’t watch news for GOOD news, they don’t report that. Its not bias, its ratings. Soldiers don’t leave the Green Zone without a full military convoy (froma soldier over there) but things are going well?

    We hear that we’re in a recession even though there’s lots of new jobs being created.

    Compared to how many lost? Look into the numbers. I’m sure you have no difficulty believeing that dems will cook the books. Repubs don’t? Ever?

    We hear that Bush is detached and ignorant although those close to him say that he is hands on and detail-oriented.

    On the record they say that. I would expect them to. Off the record they say they draw short straws to give him bad news. Which is the truth?

    We hear that global warming is a fact, when many scientists consider it to be only a theory.

    Its not a theory. What scientists say that? The world is warmer than it was. The only debate is if we are the cause and that breaks down on party lines because republicans receive campaign donations from the industry that would have to revamp their product lines if its true that WE are the cause. Bias anyone? They say its bunk because they don’t want to have to react to it, not because its a theory.

    We hear that Saddam had no ties to Al Qaeda although his lieutenants had a secret meeting with Mohammed Otta in Prague. We hear that there no terrorists in Iraq period even though there are clearly thousands now and where do you think they came from.

    OMG. Did I just spend time doing this whole reply thing and not realize until now that I’ve been punk’d by a DougJ clone? Meetings in Prague? Is this back? Maybe it hapened in Niger over a serving of yellowcake and tea?

    We hear that Harriet Miers isn’t qualified even though she was the first woman head of the Texas bar.

    No one said she wasn’t a lawyer or even a good one. Doesn’t mean she is the most deserving of a lifetime appointment debating the meaning of the most revered legal document in our history.

  157. 157.

    jg

    October 8, 2005 at 7:38 pm

    But of course, the Iraqis are much worse off under the new Iraqi government and the US. Just like the Iranians are better off with the Mullahs, the North Koreans with lil’ Kim, the Arabians under the Saudis, etc, etc…anything beats the evil Americans, especially if their president at the time happens to be from the ungodly, Sith-like Rethuglicans.

    When did it become our place to decide how other people in other countries should live their lives? Actually more to the point, when did it become a concern of REPUBLICANS or CONSERVATIVES?

    How many people think the Iraqis are smart enough to realize all our bloviating about the oppression they suffered under Saddam is just bullshit and that we wouldn’t give a shit if they weren’t sitting on an ocean of oil? Perception trumps reality in any and all cases.

  158. 158.

    ppGaz

    October 8, 2005 at 8:46 pm

    Iranians worse off under the Shah than under the mullahs? Damn that Shah

    Jesus, you are dense, Darrell.

    Iran is what it is today precisely because of rejection of the Shah, you stupid moron.

    The Shah, a murdering thieving dictator whose dick we sucked on a regular basis. Remember that the next time you hear those Iranians talking about the US as “Satan.” Where do you suppose they got that fucking idea?

  159. 159.

    Slide

    October 8, 2005 at 9:37 pm

    Time for a reality check:

    CIA overthrows the democratically elected Mohammed Mossadegh in a military coup, after he threatened to nationalize British oil. The CIA replaces him with a dictator, the Shah of Iran, whose secret police, SAVAK, is as brutal as the Gestapo.

    The Shah’s brutal secret police force, Savak, was formed under the guidance of the CIA in 1957, and trained by Mossad (Israel’s secret service) to directly control all facets of political life in Iran. Its main task was to suppress opposition to the Shah’s government, and keep the people’s political and social knowledge as minimal as possible. Savak was notorious throughout Iran for its brutal methods. Universities, labor unions, and peasant organizations, among others, were all subjected to intense surveillance by the CIA/Savak agents and paid informants. The agency was also active abroad, especially in monitoring Iranian students who publicly opposed the Shah’s government. Over the years, Savak became a law unto itself, having legal authority to arrest, detain, brutally interrogate, and torture suspects indefinitely. Savak operated its own prisons in Tehran, such as the Qezel-Qalaeh and Evin facilities.

    hmmm…. American spreading freedom and democracy circa 1953.

  160. 160.

    ppGaz

    October 8, 2005 at 9:42 pm

    Good work, Slide.

    Whenever I hear that “democracy is on the march” in the middle east, I have to decide whether to laugh or cry. The idea is so ludicrous, so completely anathema to everything we did and stood for in the region for half a century … continuing to this day with things like our support for corrupt oligarchies like the royals of Saudi and Kuwait.

    The idea that this sick little fuckhead of a president, this Saudi-bung-holing little man, would utter such phrases in public, is enough to kill irony forever.

  161. 161.

    Slide

    October 8, 2005 at 9:49 pm

    Unfortunatly for us, the arab world is much more knowledgeble about our history in the middle east than Americans are. So while the Darrells and Thesues of the world might be impressed with the blather of the administration few with a real knowledge of our past actions are equally deluded. .

  162. 162.

    DougJ

    October 8, 2005 at 9:49 pm

    What part of “freedom is on the march” don’t you America-haters understand?

  163. 163.

    ppGaz

    October 8, 2005 at 9:54 pm

    What part of “freedom is on the march” don’t you America-haters understand?

    Well, the “freedom is on the march” part, I think.

    “On the march into the crapper thanks to our policies for half a century.” That, I understand.

  164. 164.

    Slide

    October 8, 2005 at 9:56 pm

    What part of “freedom is on the march” don’t you America-haters understand?

    The credible part.

  165. 165.

    jobiuspublius

    October 8, 2005 at 11:08 pm

    Does salami, or whatever it’s called, march? And, where to?

  166. 166.

    ppGaz

    October 8, 2005 at 11:36 pm

    Salami is God’s gift to mankind.

  167. 167.

    DougJ

    October 8, 2005 at 11:58 pm

    No one could have anticipated that the salami would be hidden.

  168. 168.

    jobiuspublius

    October 9, 2005 at 12:16 am

    ppGaz Says:

    Salami is God’s gift to mankind.

    Specifically, Log Cabin kind.

    DougJ Says:

    No one could have anticipated that the salami would be hidden.

    ROFLAMO

  169. 169.

    ppGaz

    October 9, 2005 at 12:16 am

    Salami is almost an anagram of malaise.

  170. 170.

    DougJ

    October 9, 2005 at 1:05 am

    Clinton had *eight years* to find that salami.

    I believe the title of the memo was “Salami determined to strike within the United States.”

  171. 171.

    Veeshir

    October 9, 2005 at 10:54 am

    Allow me to rephrase that

    What part of “freedom is on the march” don’t you America-haters understand?

  172. 172.

    goonie bird

    October 9, 2005 at 3:34 pm

    Prove what dirty secrets that KERRY is trying to hide from the public like him trying to pretend he was a gun rights supporter what a fruad

  173. 173.

    Krista

    October 10, 2005 at 9:02 pm

    Clinton had eight years to find that salami.

    He found it. And he used it. Often.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Geminid on Sunday Morning Open Thread: The (Debt Limit) Beat Goes On (May 28, 2023 @ 11:59am)
  • Kristine on People Are Highly Overrated (May 28, 2023 @ 11:59am)
  • Frankensteinbeck on Sunday Morning Open Thread: The (Debt Limit) Beat Goes On (May 28, 2023 @ 11:58am)
  • frosty on People Are Highly Overrated (May 28, 2023 @ 11:57am)
  • YY_Sima Qian on Sunday Morning Open Thread: The (Debt Limit) Beat Goes On (May 28, 2023 @ 11:54am)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup on Sat 5/13 at 5pm!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!