• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Motto for the House: Flip 5 and lose none.

When someone says they “love freedom”, rest assured they don’t mean yours.

Good lord, these people are nuts.

Too often we hand the biggest microphones to the cynics and the critics who delight in declaring failure.

This blog will pay for itself.

Tick tock motherfuckers!

It’s time for the GOP to dust off that post-2012 autopsy, completely ignore it, and light the party on fire again.

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

Sadly, there is no cure for stupid.

The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.

Teach a man to fish, and he’ll sit in a boat all day drinking beer.

If you are still in the GOP, you are an extremist.

“But what about the lurkers?”

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

Insiders who complain to politico: please report to the white house office of shut the fuck up.

You don’t get rid of your umbrella while it’s still raining.

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

Pessimism assures that nothing of any importance will change.

This fight is for everything.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

You cannot shame the shameless.

I was promised a recession.

And we’re all out of bubblegum.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Open Threads / Camera Question

Camera Question

by Tim F|  November 5, 20056:34 pm| 26 Comments

This post is in: Open Threads

FacebookTweetEmail

For my wife’s birthday I’m planning to buy a digital camera to replace our beloved, stolen Sony DSC-V1 (no, funny guys, it’s not a dual-use gift. I have my own camera, but it’s an old Nikon film model and she likes digital). I had planned to pick up the Sony DSC-V3, but I know that a lot of people prefer Canon and honestly don’t know much about the new models of smallish digicams with decent manual control options. Any relevant advice or experience would be welcome.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Steelers News
Next Post: Torture Amendment »

Reader Interactions

26Comments

  1. 1.

    rilkefan

    November 5, 2005 at 7:22 pm

    We enjoy (see too-small-to-judge picture here) the Canon A95, which the NYT tech guy recommended – uhh, Pogue I think. He seems like a careful unbiased enthusiast. My old heavy analog Nikon slr and its heavy extra lenses sit in the closet now.

  2. 2.

    Geek, Esq.

    November 5, 2005 at 7:42 pm

    We got a Canon s50 a year ago, and it’s a great, great camera. They’re probably up to a newer model–s60–which would be the same camera, only a little better.

  3. 3.

    Krista

    November 5, 2005 at 8:29 pm

    Well, if your wife checks out this blog, you just blew her surprise. :)

    I’m thinking of getting one…in the long run, you save a lot of money. When we were in Europe for two weeks, I used up 17 rolls of film. Cost a damned fortune to have them developed. It would be nice if photo labs gave you the option of just getting CDs, for maybe a third of the cost of what prints + cds would be. It’d be such a savings of paper, too. I usually wind up throwing out 15 pictures out of every roll of 24.

  4. 4.

    srv

    November 5, 2005 at 8:48 pm

    If you’re going to be doing alot of traveling or spending time backcountry, the camera should use AA’s. Proprietary batteries suck.

    Took a Sony DSC-W5 backcountry in Yosemite with 3 pairs of AA’s over two weeks and only needed 2 pair (over 400 pics).

    The V1 appears to be more for the advanced user, but older. The latest generation of Canon/Sony’s provide pretty decent video.

  5. 5.

    eric smith

    November 5, 2005 at 9:07 pm

    As you have nikon already stay with nikon, the d-70s is a great camera. w/ the 17 to 80 lens as a package for ~$1300 it is a good deal. 6.1 megapixels will give you 11X14 prints just fine. Avoid the flame wars between canon and nikon, it is the amount of information that the camera produces that is important not if the sensor is full 35mm frame or the DX format. Also Nikon has just anounced the d200, it is a low end pro camera for $1600. 10 megapixels will be availble for x-mass.

    I shot nikon because I have always shot nikon since the early 80’s and once you get locked in a lens set it is really expensive to make the change over, still Canon can and does make great stufff as well. Hope this helps

    E

  6. 6.

    rilkefan

    November 5, 2005 at 9:19 pm

    OT: Priceless Balloon Juice exchange.

  7. 7.

    Tim F.

    November 5, 2005 at 10:18 pm

    Well, if your wife checks out this blog, you just blew her surprise. :)

    No worries; she cares little for online things. It’s a useful ego check when I want to brag that I’m blogging now.

    If you’re going to be doing alot of traveling or spending time backcountry, the camera should use AA’s. Proprietary batteries suck.

    Sage advice. It looks like the DSC-H1 will be the one.

  8. 8.

    Mr Furious

    November 5, 2005 at 10:27 pm

    Go to Radio Shack (or likely wherever you buy the camera) and buy a set of rechargable AAs and a charger. They don’t last forever, but the set I bought with my camera lasted a couple years before they started losing the ability to hold a charge. I’ve been using regular AAs in the camera over the last few months, and it absolutely EATS them. It adds up, and seems incredibly wasteful and environmentally unfriendly.

    Took my Nikon 35mm on vacation last week, and added another 4 rolls to the ten or so I have piled up waiting to develop. One of these days I’m going to buy a digital Nikon body to use with the lenses I own and retire the film body and the old (now subpar) Olympus digital…

  9. 9.

    Jon H

    November 6, 2005 at 12:12 am

    Wife? Huh, that’s news to me.

    Are you sure you haven’t started seeing Tunch in a new light?

    Just kidding.

    (Not casting doubt on your marriageability, just noting that as far as I recall you’ve mentioned pets far more than the spouse…)

  10. 10.

    Enigma

    November 6, 2005 at 1:24 am

    I buy $20 digital cams so I wouldn’t know what quality is…LOL!

  11. 11.

    Craig

    November 6, 2005 at 1:47 am

    i bought the canon sd450 and i am very happy with it. the skin tones are great, the battery life i decent at least it lasted the life of my 256 card. The reinforced screen is a great improvement over the sd400 and sd300.

  12. 12.

    O.F. Jay

    November 6, 2005 at 2:02 am

    Tim, I have a Sony W1 which I bought early this year. It’s not even sold in stores anymore. I concur with SRV’s advice: the W5 or the W7 even would be great, because they use AAs. Judging gtom my own experience with the W1’s manual control and a 30sec exposure capacity, I recommend W series Sonys with great confidence.

  13. 13.

    scs

    November 6, 2005 at 2:18 am

    Did you just get married? You just posted that she was your fiancee.

  14. 14.

    Matthew J. Stinson

    November 6, 2005 at 4:18 am

    Canon does make a really good compact in their ELPH series. Over the weekend I picked up a Canon SD550 Digital ELPH and have found it to be an intuitive piece of equipment — good because the manual is all in Chinese — that takes snazzy photos and just looks plain cool.

    If you are interested in an ultra-compact camera, the Sony T5 and Nikon S3 might appeal to your needs. Both are extremely thin and palm-of-your-hand tiny. The S3 is especially sweet and it doesn’t force you to use Sony media. I personally like to have a sense I’m actually holding onto something, however, and the ultra-compacts don’t have enough heft.

    Jay’s recommendation is good too in case you’re worried about the high cost of rechargeable batteries and want a larger small-frame camera than the ELPHs or ultracompacts.

  15. 15.

    Tim F.

    November 6, 2005 at 9:36 am

    Wife? Huh, that’s news to me.

    John owns Tunch (or as some would have it, vice-versa). I’m the other guy who writes posts for Balloon Juice.

    Did you just get married? You just posted that she was your fiancee.

    We were engaged at the time that we did our church touring. We got married this past December, but when describing things that happened beforehand I thought it would be more gramatically correct to describe our status at the time.

  16. 16.

    Vlad

    November 6, 2005 at 9:57 am

    I’ve bought several cameras in my day, and once you weed out the obvious losers, it really pays to consider how the camera feels in your hand. If she had a camera, try and get one for her that has a similar interface and a similar size, with buttons in similar positions. There’s nothing more annoying than constantly hitting the power button instead of the shutter, purely out of force of habit.

    Also, don’t get a Fuji. Back when I sold the things, they were by far the most fragile of the major manufacturers (in contrast to Olympus, whose cameras you could drop down multiple flights of stairs without picking up anything worse than a few scratches).

  17. 17.

    Mark-NC

    November 6, 2005 at 10:21 am

    I bought a Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ5 Black Digital Camera from

    http://www.butterflyphoto.com/ – GREAT PRICES!!

    Great camera.

    It’s light, small, 5 Meg, image stabilized, etc. and takes great pictures.

    I paid $330 for the camera, and added the Panasonic Lumix Essentials Kit to get a carrying case, 512 meg storage, and extra battery – highly recommended.

    Only complaints – doesn’t use AA batteries (but the ones it does use last a long time!!), and I would prefer a larger display on the back panel.

  18. 18.

    nycmoderate

    November 6, 2005 at 1:00 pm

    I’ve used Canon cameras for years and years. I have EOS 630 SLR, which was purchased in something like 1989-90 and still functions perfectly and is still compatible with all the accessories (lenses, flashes, etc) that more recent Canon digital and non-digital slr’s are using.

    When I have the money, I’ll move up to a digital SLR, but for a point and shoot digital, I went with the 7.1 megapixel Canon SD500. It’s lightweight, with a long lasting battery (at least so far) and a large, bright screen. For less money, you can get the 5MP SD400, which several of my friends have and love. Depending on what you’re looking for, the Powershot series is also a good choice.

    The only other company I’d go with is Nikon. My mother has a Minolta that’s given her nothing but hassles. Whatever you choose, keep in mind that good electronics are far easier to make than good optics, so go with a camera company (e.g. Canon, Nikon) rather than an electronics company (e.g. Sony, Casio).

    But that’s just my 2¢.

  19. 19.

    Mark-NC

    November 6, 2005 at 1:52 pm

    As an adder to my above post:

    My camera for 20 years was a Canon A1. Great camera. Still works perfectly, takes great pictures – and is now collecting dust!

    My Panasonic is 2/3 the size, 1/3 the weight, and best of all has a 12x zoom built in.

    Another partial negative – no hot shoe – but has a decent built-in flash!

    BTW – I’m not trying to say that this is the only camera on the planet I’d buy. I spent a long time deciding, and this one won on features/price. I would have bought the Kodak easy share but it didn’t have image stabilization. The “name brand” types tend to be more money by 20-30% for the same stuff.

    FYI – with 512 meg of memory, I can take about 200 full 5 meg. resolution pictures. I leave the camera in the highest res setting permanently. It records to the chip in about 2 seconds at the full 5 meg density (this is a reason I bought this camera – most cameras are slower). They look great on my 20″ monitor and make excellent 11″ x 14″ prints.

  20. 20.

    Jon H

    November 7, 2005 at 12:09 am

    “John owns Tunch (or as some would have it, vice-versa). I’m the other guy who writes posts for Balloon Juice.”

    Doh! Missed the byline, went for the gag.

  21. 21.

    Don

    November 7, 2005 at 11:42 am

    I love my Canon S500 as I loved my S100 before it. While it does use the propriatary batteries that srv doesn’t care for I know an important trick: ebay.

    There’s knockoffs for most any propritary battery that’s been around a while and the S500 uses the same battery as all the SX00s before it. I have five of these puppies but I rarely use 2 before I recharge again – I get about 100+ pictures on a charge and when I was in Puerto Rico for a week and using it daily I didn’t change it once.

    As opposed to my girlfriend’s Nikon which she bought for exactly srv’s reasons and she changes those AAs roughly daily when we’re on vacation. For her camera we travel with 5 pairs of rechargable AAs which cost about 2x what my aftermarket propriatary batteries did, weight about 4x as much and take up 2x as much space.

    So don’t be too quick to dismiss propriataries as bad.

  22. 22.

    carpeicthus

    November 7, 2005 at 1:26 pm

    What does she use it for? Do you think she wants an upgrade path, flexibility, portability, stylishness, etc.? There are hundreds of models out, most of them pretty good, so it depends on her taste and needs. I’m actually a professional photographer and obsessed with new camera models, so feel free to give me an e-mail if you want specfic recommendations about specific needs; otherwise everyone’s just going to recommend what they bought. ;-)

  23. 23.

    carpeicthus

    November 7, 2005 at 1:27 pm

    Hm, thought that would leave my e-mail. Ah well, link to my photoblog, where I can be contacted.

  24. 24.

    Eric

    November 7, 2005 at 1:39 pm

    Before my camera was stolen at the Marriot Marquis in Times Square last week, I had a good system worked out for my batteries. I had a simple wall charger with an extra set of high capacity AA batteries which, when I was on the road, I would switch out every night I was using the camera. It pretty much eliminated any problem with batteries going dead at inoportune moments.

  25. 25.

    Ahah

    November 7, 2005 at 8:06 pm

    I’m the happy owner of a Canon SLR setup : EOS 350D + EF 28-135mm IS USM (+ a 14 mm lense I rarely use). The setup is not cheap (about $1,700 I think) but lot of fun. The lense is gyro-stabilized and that feature IS REAAAALLY EEEFFFING AAAAAWWWWEEEESOME.

    Sorry for the all-caps but, even if you don’t want to plop the money for an SLR, you should really invest in a stabilized boxen (or a very heavy tripod) before looking for high pixel count or sensitivity or background noise. Sharpness and picture quality are just plain insane with a gyro. You will make your significant other very happy.

  26. 26.

    Rick Lee

    November 7, 2005 at 11:44 pm

    I just blogged about getting a new pocket digital camera. For what it’s worth, I’ve been a professional photographer since the 70s and I’ve been fully digital since 2000.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • Ruckus on Late Night Open Thread: Debating The Dubious Privilege of Being Obnoxious in Public (Feb 6, 2023 @ 3:19am)
  • prostratedragon on Sunday Night Open Thread (Feb 6, 2023 @ 3:11am)
  • YY_Sima Qian on War for Ukraine Day 346: A Brief Sunday Night Post (Feb 6, 2023 @ 3:06am)
  • Bruce K in ATH-GR on Medium Cool – Who Almost Got the Part Instead? (Feb 6, 2023 @ 3:02am)
  • Brachiator on Late Night Open Thread: Debating The Dubious Privilege of Being Obnoxious in Public (Feb 6, 2023 @ 2:47am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!