Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

The willow is too close to the house.

An unpunished coup is a training exercise.

This fight is for everything.

Imperialist aggressors must be defeated, or the whole world loses.

Glad to see john eastman going through some things.

… gradually, and then suddenly.

The frogs are rarely mistaken.

There’s always a light at the end of the frog.

The cruelty is the point; the law be damned.

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

He wakes up lying, and he lies all day.

Boeing: repeatedly making the case for high speed rail.

When your entire life is steeped in white supremacy, equality feels like discrimination.

Fuck these fucking interesting times.

I really should read my own blog.

The choice is between normal and crazy.

“But what about the lurkers?”

Come on, man.

Republicans: slavery is when you own me. freedom is when I own you.

Peak wingnut was a lie.

Everyone is in a bubble, but some bubbles model reality far better than others!

T R E 4 5 O N

Let us savor the impending downfall of lawless scoundrels who richly deserve the trouble barreling their way.

Republican obstruction dressed up as bipartisanship. Again.

You are here: Home / Politics / The Pittsburgh Mayoral Race

The Pittsburgh Mayoral Race

by | 12 Comments

This post is in: 

Surprising exactly one person, Bob O’Connor (D) beat Joe Weinroth (R ) for mayor of Pittsburgh today. I don’t know who this Weinroth guy is, but you have to know that he was only running in case O’Connor got hit by a truck or got caught with a kilo of uncut Panamanian blow. This is Pittsburgh; Zippy the Pinhead (D) would take Dwight Eisenhower (R ) without breaking a sweat.

Some thoughts.

O’Connor keynoted his victory speech with a promise to “increase efficiency” in city government. With apologies to Godwin, when I hear about efficiency in government I reach for my browning. Representative government isn’t efficient. Two-party politics is far from efficient. True democracy is a mess, a theater of the absurd which Churchill was right to describe as, ‘the worst possible form of government, except for everything else.’

One-party rule is efficient. Corruption and cronyism is ‘efficient.’ ‘Efficient’ leaders make decisions without deliberation, never to be unmade. Of all the things to which the Bush administration aspired one of the most important in their view was ‘efficiency.’ If mess means representative government, and clean government, I’ll take the mess.

Weinroth’s concession speech focused on how everybody won because his presence contributed to ‘the debate.’ If he ever had a chance of winning he’d have made noises about the spirited race and the solid effort that his supporters put in, but the best he could do was that he got people to talk about him. Judging by tonight’s dinner with the extended family, he could have accomplished the same thing by having his girlfriend glue his balls together. [link]

Your snapshot of one-party rule in Allegheny County. This is why I busted my ass for Jim Roddey (R ) when county council decided to reinstate the post of County Executive. Naturally the Democrats ran Cyril Wecht, the last guy who’d held the job when county council decided to fire him and eliminate the position over accusations of embezzlement. Wecht, who’s a big fan of running government as a family business, knows all about efficiency. As strange as it felt reassuring nervous borough leaders that Roddey wouldn’t vote to increase abortion rights (like he could if he wanted to), it felt great when he won.

Reader Interactions

12Comments

  1. 1.

    MI

    Judging by tonight’s dinner with the extended family, he could have accomplished the same thing by having his girlfriend glue his balls together

    HAHAHA

  2. 2.

    Candidus

    O’Connor keynoted his victory speech with a promise to “increase efficiency” in city government. With apologies to Godwin, when I hear about efficiency in government I reach for my browning.

    Then you can’t be all bad.

    Good aesthetic sense, too.

  3. 3.

    John

    So let me get this straight. When George W. Bush promises “smaller, leaner government” that’s a good thing. Because hey, efficiency is good. Unless, of course, the guy promising efficiency has a (D) after his name.

    Look, I know you’re not one of those partisan “party before country” types that plague both sides of the aisle, so I don’t want to make a huge case out of nothing, but for you to argue that efficiency in government isn’t a good thing in and of itself strikes me as… what’s that? We’ve ALWAYS been at war with Oceania?

  4. 4.

    Tim F.

    John, I think it’s safe to say that the point sailed right past you. I’m not John Cole and if you think I would cite Bush approvingly (not that he would either) you haven’t been reading very carefully.

  5. 5.

    Steve

    That’s pretty hilarious. John can’t help but be accused of being a fascist water-carrier for the Bush Administration, even when he didn’t make the post.

  6. 6.

    yet another jeff

    Smaller govt is good, promises of efficiency are bad. I think we’re all safer with inefficient govt. When the govt. has to take their time to pass bad laws, Democracy is safe.

    I am wondering, however, what could have been accomplished by having Weinroth’s balls glued together.

  7. 7.

    DJAnyReason

    Whatever Weinroth wants to say to make himself feel better, the debate ended in mid-May. If people didn’t like Bob (and, believe me, I’m not a fan), they had the choice to make between Bob, Bill, and Mike five months ago.

    Pittsburgh politics aren’t without choice, its just that our choice is between a democrat and another democrat. As a big stinking liberal, I’m quite happy with that :)

  8. 8.

    John

    I certainly apologize for mistaking the poster for someone else, but my point stands: efficiency in government isn’t a bad thing. In fact, it’s something to aspire to.

    If there’s a problem, and solution A requires 10 employees and 100 million dollars to fix the problem, while solution B requires 8 employees and 84 million dollars to fix the same problem, which solution will you choose? I’ll choose B, the more efficient solution.

    And yes, promises of efficiency THAT ARE NOT KEPT are bad, just like any other promise that isn’t kept.

  9. 9.

    Tim F.

    I am wondering, however, what could have been accomplished by having Weinroth’s balls glued together.

    Local joke. I can’t explain why, but everybody has been talking about that stupid story for what feels like weeks now.

  10. 10.

    yet another jeff

    Heh…ok. I think that gluing someone’s balls together would be a better decision than most of the one’s made by “efficient” govt. An efficient govt is one that Does Things…and we’re all going to suffer when the govt Does Things.

  11. 11.

    Dave Ruddell

    This is Pittsburgh; Zippy the Pinhead (D) would take Dwight Eisenhower (R ) without breaking a sweat.

    Okay, but what if he was taking on Ben Roethlisberger(R )?

    (I see why you had to put a space after the ‘R’, otherwise you get one of these: (R))

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. […] Okay, so I lifted Michael Stickings’s entire post. Michael is one of those bloggers who take the principle of evenhandedness practically to its logical extreme. If I wrote that sort of thing the BDS crowd (Bush Defense Syndrome) would write it off as some sort of mental illness. That may even be a little true; I will freely admit that as far as I am concerned the president lost thebenefit-of-the-doubt some time around when he mocked Karla Faye Tucker. The guy just repulses me. That hardly means Republicans in general, but a loaded gun wouldn’t convince me to support this administration. […]