• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

And we’re all out of bubblegum.

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

Damn right I heard that as a threat.

A consequence of cucumbers

It’s easy to sit in safety and prescribe what other people should be doing.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

The next time the wall street journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

Black Jesus loves a paper trail.

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

Republicans don’t trust women.

If you’re pissed about Biden’s speech, he was talking about you.

Bark louder, little dog.

Peak wingnut was a lie.

Imperialist aggressors must be defeated, or the whole world loses.

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

Hot air and ill-informed banter

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

Take hopelessness and turn it into resilience.

The willow is too close to the house.

Consistently wrong since 2002

Sadly, there is no cure for stupid.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Election Results

Election Results

by John Cole|  November 9, 200510:26 am| 16 Comments

This post is in: Politics, Republican Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

As Tim noted, it was a good night for Democrats, and I am not even remotely surprised (even though I did not follow the elections, I do think I have an awareness of the general pulse of the country). I have been driven to the point of near despair with the spending, the anti-science attitude, the anti-gay attitudes, and what appears to be a near complete takeover of the GOP by a hostile religious right, so I am not even remotely surprised that there are a number of people out there who feel the same way. Not to be too snide, but when only 40% of the public (and that is generous) approves of the behavior of the head of your party, crushing electoral defeats are not too difficult to predict.

As far as I can tell, it is going to be even worse in 2006 for the GOP. At Red State, Mike Krempasky writes that “When Republicans don’t give their *own* supporters a reason to vote for them (other than “the Democrats are worse!!”), how in the world can they expect to reach swing voters?,” and he has a point. The White House is already spinning that this was a ‘status quo‘ election, in that Democrats won seats already held by Democrats, and they have a point.

But what they don’t take into account is that 2006 won’t be a status quo election, and that far from just failing to provide reasons to inspire voters, this administration and this Congress have given what would normally be faithful Republican votes a NUMBER of reasons to vote against them. For me, you can start with Terri Schiavo and then just pick issues at random, and there is a good chance the Republicans have violated longstanding conservative principles or their own word. That doesn’ mean I think Democrats are, as a rule, any better, but I am sure as hell willing to give them a chance (and, more importantly, I will continue to support every libertarian on the ballot, as I have in the past).

So I don’t find these results unexpected, and I would not be surprised if whole swaths of Republican seats in the house go the way of the Dover Board of Education (speaking of the Dover Board, anyone who thinks all Republicans favor this ID/Creationist nonsense is sadly mistaken). We’ll call it natural selection, and the current Republican party, it seems, has become unfit for survival.

*** Update ***

This sums things up nicely:

I was part of that wild and crazy Class of ’94 that shook the political landscape by taking over the House after more than 50 years of unfettered Democrat control. We came to Washington full of ideals and conviction.

But sadly, what they say about absolute power is coming to reality in the 2005 GOP Washington. Republicans in just 10 years have developed the arrogance it took the Democrats 30 years to develop. – JC Watts, the Las Vegas Review Journal.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « A Good Night For Democrats
Next Post: Interesting Read »

Reader Interactions

16Comments

  1. 1.

    Mr Furious

    November 9, 2005 at 10:33 am

    Even if you are a Republican who “would never pull the lever for a Democrat”, you are hardly going to be inspired to support your Republican option in 2006.

    Republicans who stay home, swing voters who think a brake needs to be applied in Washington and Democrats eager for turnover combine for what I hope is a real shift next year.

    Even if you don’t want Democrats running everything, I think many would agree having the Rpeublicans run everything (into the ground) hasn’t worked out too well…

  2. 2.

    John S.

    November 9, 2005 at 10:43 am

    John-

    If and when the Democrats consolidate as much power as the Republicans currently have in 2006, I will delight in joining you on eviscerating them for their shortcomings (whatever they may be) – whether they stoop as low as Republicans or not.

    Here’s to government accountability (regardless of what it says on your voter registration card)!

  3. 3.

    Mithrandir

    November 9, 2005 at 10:52 am

    Quite honestly, I can’t see any relation between these 2005 elections and the midterms next year. Having so little to vote on (and reportedly so few voters to do it) this year, I can hardly jump on your band wagon for any/all challengers next year and a sweep of Blue over the country. This is a quiet year for voting and nothing (outside Dover) is really that contentious to stir the populace to vote for/against.

    Two things are true: the statement you quoted from RS, and that next year will not be “status quo.” I think next year will see major turnouts from both all sides, and the “majority” of the country will be heard. And that majority is Red and not Blue.

  4. 4.

    Marcos

    November 9, 2005 at 10:55 am

    There is hope for this once-great Country yet. I just wish the Democrats learn from the past and don’t repeat the same mistakes once they’re in power. Power and complacency breeds corruption. I’ll tell you what, K street is in need of some serious fumigation. Untill those high-rolling lobbyists are cleaned out, Washington will just look like Amsterdam’s red-light district.

  5. 5.

    Lines

    November 9, 2005 at 11:18 am

    Mith still believes that empty land has a voting right.

    Of course, we’ll just have to wait a year for him to suck it up and admit he’s wrong, because he’s a man with morals, after all, he’s a Republican.

  6. 6.

    Lines

    November 9, 2005 at 11:22 am

    Look, Democrats don’t ever need to have majority ever again, and neither do Republicans. I for one will always encourage balance and restraint in politics, especially while we’re stuck in this horrible 2 party system. Give me a general assembly anyday.

    lets just hope that in 2006 things come to more of a balanced standstill where true debate and compromise become the general rule, where laws need to be well written and fair to pass.

    Is that too much to ask?

  7. 7.

    Krista

    November 9, 2005 at 11:35 am

    Republicans in just 10 years have developed the arrogance it took the Democrats 30 years to develop. –

    God love ’em, they’re nothing if not efficient.

  8. 8.

    Jaybird

    November 9, 2005 at 12:40 pm

    I have seen two readings of yesterday’s elections:

    “If the elections in 2001 were any indicator of 2002 and the elections in 2003 were any indicator of 2004, it looks like the democrats will have a fairly good year in 2006.”

    and the other is:

    “So the incumbent party won in all of the governor’s elections, democratic initiatives failed in a republican state and republican initiatives failed in a democratic state. Clank. No net change.”

    I’m leaning towards the former, myself.

  9. 9.

    Steve S

    November 9, 2005 at 1:09 pm

    Jaybird – Except in the past republican initiatives usually won in California.

    Remember, this is the state which gave us the two of the Republican Presidents in the past 40 years. Nixon and Reagan.

  10. 10.

    Jon H

    November 9, 2005 at 1:19 pm

    “At Red State, Mike Krempasky writes that “When Republicans don’t give their own supporters a reason to vote for them (other than “the Democrats are worse!!”), how in the world can they expect to reach swing voters?,” and he has a point.”

    Well, he might if he weren’t cosily in bed with those selfsame people.

    I mean, hell, what is RedState, if not a venue designed for spreading the ‘the Democrats are worse!’ message?

  11. 11.

    Jon H

    November 9, 2005 at 1:21 pm

    John writes: ” anyone who thinks all Republicans favor this ID/Creationist nonsense is sadly mistaken).”

    What’s more sad is that many Republicans may not favor it, yet favor its use as a get-out-the-vote issue akin to using gays as a boogeyman.

  12. 12.

    Jon H

    November 9, 2005 at 1:23 pm

    “Untill those high-rolling lobbyists are cleaned out, Washington will just look like Amsterdam’s red-light district.”

    It’d be a fun project to put red filters on all the streetlights on K Street.

    Except, in the post-9/11 environment, you’d probably get sent to Gitmo or shot.

  13. 13.

    Aziz Poonawalla

    November 9, 2005 at 3:38 pm

    John,

    one point about the Dover school board. The newly elected Democrats on the board are NOT anti-ID. Via Panda’s Thumb:

    It should be noted that the incoming board members from the Dover CARES campaign have a platform plank saying that “intelligent design” will be discussed in Dover public schools. However, the venue of such instruction will not be the science classrooms, where it was out-of-place, but rather an elective course on comparative religion, where it fits perfectly.

  14. 14.

    Steve S

    November 9, 2005 at 4:50 pm

    one point about the Dover school board. The newly elected Democrats on the board are NOT anti-ID.

    They are anti-ID in Science Classes… which is what most people care about on this issue.

    If you want to believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster, fine. But it’s not science.

  15. 15.

    p.lukasiak

    November 9, 2005 at 4:54 pm

    This wasn’t a status quo election….one look at the mayoral race in St. Paul. The mayor there had high approval ratings, but he lost decisively because he had endorsed Bush for President.

    And the Democratic win in Virginia also strongly suggests that Bush is pulling down the entire party (not that the GOP is putting up much of a fight.)

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. The Politburo Diktat » Blog Archive » Kansas and Dover Evo/ID Elections says:
    November 9, 2005 at 6:14 pm

    […] John Cole / Balloon Juice:   Election Results  —  As Tim noted, it was a good night for Democrats … […]

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Odie Hugh Manatee on A Couple Weeks Into the Diet (Jun 5, 2023 @ 3:04am)
  • Tehanu on Medium Cool – Best Mystery Genres! (Jun 5, 2023 @ 2:47am)
  • KrackenJack on A Couple Weeks Into the Diet (Jun 5, 2023 @ 2:23am)
  • eclare on A Couple Weeks Into the Diet (Jun 5, 2023 @ 2:17am)
  • NotMax on A Couple Weeks Into the Diet (Jun 5, 2023 @ 2:11am)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup on Sat 5/13 at 5pm!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!