• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Nancy smash is sick of your bullshit.

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

Reality always lies in wait for … Democrats.

The cruelty is the point; the law be damned.

Their freedom requires your slavery.

I know this must be bad for Joe Biden, I just don’t know how.

Putin dreamed of ending NATO, and now it’s Finnish-ed.

I like you, you’re my kind of trouble.

Everybody saw this coming.

… pundit janitors mopping up after the GOP

The willow is too close to the house.

Hot air and ill-informed banter

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

Insiders who complain to politico: please report to the white house office of shut the fuck up.

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

Hi god, it’s us. Thanks a heap, you’re having a great week and it’s only Thursday!

You cannot shame the shameless.

I’ve spoken to my cat about this, but it doesn’t seem to do any good.

Republicans do not pay their debts.

An almost top 10,000 blog!

“Can i answer the question? No you can not!”

Since when do we limit our critiques to things we could do better ourselves?

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / The Problem With Hugh Hewitt

The Problem With Hugh Hewitt

by John Cole|  November 11, 200512:03 pm| 22 Comments

This post is in: Politics, Blogospheric Navel-Gazing

FacebookTweetEmail

It became increasingly clear during the Miers debacle that Hugh Hewitt, who I am certain is an amiable guy and who has been more than friendly to me considering the barbs I have chucked his way, is little more than a mouthpiece for the Republican party whose chief (only?) concerns are the consolidation of Republican political power and the maintenance of that political dominance, regardless what we do with it. No clearer example can be offered than this post today from Hugh:

Yesterday John McCain attacked the Bush Administration’s conduct of the war in Iraq.

Yesterday Mitt Romney attacked the Massachusetts Supreme Court’s judicial activism.

Which speech will be better received among likely GOP primary voters in 2008?

A popular saying that has achieved more prominence with the elections of George Bush has been “all hat, no cattle,”a regional colloquialism signifying the individual is all talk. Perhaps a fitting adaptation of that phrase for Hugh would be “All party, no principle.”

Unfortunately, I should note that Hugh is probably right, and that he does understand how to maintain political coalitions.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Defending the Oil Companies
Next Post: One Hammer Short Of A Toolbox »

Reader Interactions

22Comments

  1. 1.

    Mike S

    November 11, 2005 at 12:14 pm

    who I am certain is an amiable guy

    Hugh is one of the most disingenuous talk radio hosts there is yet does seem like a genuinely nice guy.

  2. 2.

    jg

    November 11, 2005 at 12:15 pm

    is little more than a mouthpiece for the Republican party whose chief (only?) concerns are the consolidation of Republican political power and the maintenance of that political dominance, regardless what we do with it.

    Not exactly limited to Hugh there JC. I can’t believe its just occurred to you.

  3. 3.

    simon

    November 11, 2005 at 12:19 pm

    It didn’t take you this long to realize that, did it? What other rightwing pundits fit this description in your mind? There are legitimately dozens.

  4. 4.

    physics geek

    November 11, 2005 at 12:21 pm

    I think that QandO’s description of Hewitt was apt: “the distilled essence of the party man.”

  5. 5.

    Steve

    November 11, 2005 at 12:36 pm

    No discussion of right-wing shills would be complete without Time Magazine’s Blog of the Year.

  6. 6.

    Steve S

    November 11, 2005 at 12:37 pm

    Hugh is right. Romney’s speech will be greated with cheers by primary voters. McCain is regarded as a traitor.

    The same thing also happens on the Democratic side. It’s the nature of partisanship.

    I think the thing that bugs me most about people like this, particularly Hewitt, is you cannot debate them intelligently. In 2002 their argument is one thing, but by 2004 they are arguing the complete opposite of the point. There’s no overwhelming ideology, rather they argue for what is convenient in their goal to just maintain power.

    Look at the deficit as an example of this. In 1980 it was a big deal, by 1984 the Republicans had completely abandoned it as a principle… and now look where they are today, actually cheering on massive deficit spending claiming it helps the economy. Not because it does, but because they have no other point to argue.

  7. 7.

    jg

    November 11, 2005 at 12:51 pm

    I think the thing that bugs me most about people like this, particularly Hewitt, is you cannot debate them intelligently.

    All they’re looking for is a way to avoid hearing you. Its systemic, Hugh’s not alone by any means.

  8. 8.

    don surber

    November 11, 2005 at 1:30 pm

    Nice observation on Hugh Hewitt. Guess it takes all kinds to fill a party: Including those of us who supported Miers, the war and the spending

    Cattle are overrated :)

  9. 9.

    rilkefan

    November 11, 2005 at 2:02 pm

    I still prefer the Hewitts to the Reynoldses.

  10. 10.

    Steve S

    November 11, 2005 at 2:04 pm

    rilkefan – Well, it’s a good point. At least Hewitt is honest with his leanings.

    Reynolds basically trumpets the same line as Hewitt, but pretends to not be a partisan.

  11. 11.

    ppGaz

    November 11, 2005 at 2:38 pm

    chief (only?) concerns are the consolidation of Republican political power and the maintenance of that political dominance,

    Why bring Fox News into this?

  12. 12.

    Davebo

    November 11, 2005 at 3:10 pm

    Speaking of Fox news, why did they interview a Hollywood actor (Ron Silver) to discuss his all knowing views on UN corruption today?

    I thought we weren’t supposed to care about what actors thought of politics?

  13. 13.

    jg

    November 11, 2005 at 3:21 pm

    I think they use Ron Silver because he’s been on the West Wing and he used to be a liberal.

  14. 14.

    jg

    November 11, 2005 at 3:21 pm

    I meant on ‘West Wing’ not on THE West Wing.

  15. 15.

    TM Lutas

    November 11, 2005 at 3:26 pm

    I’ve come to the conclusion that the major parties are both about getting and having power. The ideological coalitions that inhabit those parties are another story but the parties themselves are fairly empty vessels and have been for decades.

  16. 16.

    Lines

    November 11, 2005 at 3:35 pm

    Lutas, what are you going to do about it? I’m not trying to be an ass, but seriously, what do you think can be done about a horrible 2 party system?

  17. 17.

    Jcricket

    November 11, 2005 at 4:09 pm

    Hugh and (most of the time) Glenn are emblamatic of the “ditto-wing” of the Republican party. Where the party can do no wrong and any attempt to look into things is navel-gazing, or fringe-talk. This kind of thinking is, IMHO, just about the worst kind of thing for our country. The idea that everything can be boiled down to a sound-bite, or a party platform, and then is no longer to be discussed is pathetically lazy.

    I’m with John Stewart on this, “Stop. Hurting. America!”

  18. 18.

    Stormy70

    November 11, 2005 at 4:19 pm

    Ron Silver just narrated a documentary on the UN, my brilliant “Chemical Weapons Everywhere” posters.

  19. 19.

    Steve S

    November 11, 2005 at 5:51 pm

    Ron Silver never was a liberal.

    The only thing he’s consistently been is a coward.

  20. 20.

    capriccio

    November 11, 2005 at 9:42 pm

    I read that even Hewitt’s pals call him Monica behind his back because of his girlish enthusiasm for Bush. He would be the epitome of the party above country hack, if there wasn’t this pathetically nerdy, juvenile tone to all his stuff (not to mention the website decorated with team logos and Bush pin-ups). There really is something quite Teen Beatish about it all, and I think when he’s awakened from his wet dream of a One Party State about aa year from now, he’s going to need some very serious counseling.

  21. 21.

    Michael Stickings

    November 12, 2005 at 1:38 am

    I’ve been thinking recently about who could emerge as the establishment candidate against McCain — assuming that McCain is unable to shake his “maverick” label. It won’t be Frist, obviously, and Jeb is unlikely to run. Giuliani is far too liberal for the primaries, as is Rice on certain key social issues.

    So why not Romney? The fact that his speech will be better received than McCain’s suggests that he may be one of the few establishment candidates who could hold off McCain.

  22. 22.

    Veeshir

    November 12, 2005 at 10:44 am

    I’ve come to the conclusion that the major parties are both about getting and having power. The ideological coalitions that inhabit those parties are another story but the parties themselves are fairly empty vessels and have been for decades.

    A-fricking-men.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • jefft452 on Late Night Silly Season Classics Open Thread: We *Want* to Believe ! (Jun 9, 2023 @ 6:48am)
  • Baud on Late Night Silly Season Classics Open Thread: We *Want* to Believe ! (Jun 9, 2023 @ 6:48am)
  • Geminid on Late Night Silly Season Classics Open Thread: We *Want* to Believe ! (Jun 9, 2023 @ 6:47am)
  • Matt McIrvin on Late Night Silly Season Classics Open Thread: We *Want* to Believe ! (Jun 9, 2023 @ 6:46am)
  • Baud on Late Night Silly Season Classics Open Thread: We *Want* to Believe ! (Jun 9, 2023 @ 6:45am)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup on Sat 5/13 at 5pm!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!