• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

Consistently wrong since 2002

Take your GOP plan out of the witness protection program.

Balloon Juice has never been a refuge for the linguistically delicate.

Bark louder, little dog.

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

The next time the wall street journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

We are aware of all internet traditions.

Imperialist aggressors must be defeated, or the whole world loses.

New McCarthy, same old McCarthyism.

If you are still in the GOP, you are an extremist.

Let us savor the impending downfall of lawless scoundrels who richly deserve the trouble barreling their way.

Black Jesus loves a paper trail.

The willow is too close to the house.

I’ve spoken to my cat about this, but it doesn’t seem to do any good.

If you’re pissed about Biden’s speech, he was talking about you.

When your entire life is steeped in white supremacy, equality feels like discrimination.

So it was an October Surprise A Day, like an Advent calendar but for crime.

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

“Can i answer the question? No you can not!”

They’re not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

The worst democrat is better than the best republican.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Please Cover Your Eyes as We Change Back Into Our Jammies

Please Cover Your Eyes as We Change Back Into Our Jammies

by John Cole|  November 22, 20059:37 am| 29 Comments

This post is in: Blogospheric Navel-Gazing

FacebookTweetEmail

I guess OSM will now become Pajamas Media once again.

I actually kind of like Pajamas Media, and as a matter of fact, do blog in my jammies from time to time. So THERE!

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Why?
Next Post: Perspective on Torture »

Reader Interactions

29Comments

  1. 1.

    Mr Furious

    November 22, 2005 at 9:44 am

    You guys are starting to look like idiots…

  2. 2.

    Davebo

    November 22, 2005 at 9:44 am

    Geez.

    The term “could fuck up a wet dream” comes to mind for some reason.

  3. 3.

    John Cole

    November 22, 2005 at 9:49 am

    I am an idiot.

    But I am not running things, and again, I refer you to my business model:

    I write my blog.
    I run ads chosen by someone else rather than the hit or miss of blogads.
    Someone sends me a check.
    I spend the money on booze, gambling, loose women, electronics and video games, and I guess maybe just piss the rest of it away .

    Now that is a business model I understand.

  4. 4.

    Mr Furious

    November 22, 2005 at 9:53 am

    If OSM were a lefty site, and you were looking on, oh, the fun you would have with them/this.

    Are you running that operation out of Paris?

  5. 5.

    Krista

    November 22, 2005 at 10:02 am

    Are the jammies of the feety variety?

  6. 6.

    Pb

    November 22, 2005 at 10:02 am

    I haven’t been paying too much attention, but that entire navel-gazing blogospheric debacle has been at least mildly entertaining. A trademark dispute over “Open Source”? Say it ain’t so!

  7. 7.

    Marcus Wellby

    November 22, 2005 at 10:04 am

    Sorry, but either way — Pajamas Media or OSM, it all sounds too similiar to the “hip” internet start-ups of the late 90’s.

    Be careful with a name — need I remind you of the “B Sharps”?

  8. 8.

    John Cole

    November 22, 2005 at 10:08 am

    I have never heard of the “B Sharps.” That might be your point.

  9. 9.

    demimondian

    November 22, 2005 at 10:08 am

    A trademark dispute over “Open Source”? Say it ain’t so!

    Indeed. Particularly in the software world, where there’s one hell of an 800 pound gorilla sitting on the trademark in the first place. (Which means that Leyden’s trademark is questionable, in my mind. It certainly confused me, and, last I knew, I was an informed consumer of both kinds of open source media.)

  10. 10.

    Joel

    November 22, 2005 at 10:19 am

    OK, now all they need to do is is decide what the hell it is they are trying do, because as it stands right now the site is miserable and I have no idea what the point is. Worse: neither do they apparently. The same “blogjam” graphic has been occupying the front page for the past 5 days it seems. And personally I want nothing to do with any sort of “jam” that isn’t pulverised fruit.

    The B-Sharps is Homer Simpson’s Barbershop Quartet and the point Marcus Welby is making comes from their choice of group name. That is they decided they needed a name that souded funny the first time you heard it, but became less funny with each successive usage.

  11. 11.

    Marcus Wellby

    November 22, 2005 at 10:27 am

    I have never heard of the “B Sharps.” That might be your point.

    The B-Sharps are from a Simpsons episode. Homer and the gang form a highly succesful Barbershop Quartet and need a name. Someone says what we need is a name that first sounds witty and clever, but starts sounding stupid after you’ve heard it a while — the result is: The B Sharps.

    My point is (and I seldom have points) that Pajamas Media may sound “witty” or even “clever” now, but in a year from now people are going to cringe when they have to tell others they are associated with it.

    There used to be this doofus here in Boston on the Howie Carr(AM talk, righty but funny) show who went by the name of “VB” it was short for Virgin Boy. It was stupid but they got laughs out of it because the guy was such an idiot you suspected he was a genuine 40 year old virgin. Years later this same doofus got a job on the local Fox morning news. He still goes by the name “VB” as that is the name he is known by and pretty locked in at this point. Though when people who don’t know him ask, while he is interviewing them, what VB is short for he gets all quiet and sort of mumbles his way out of it.

  12. 12.

    circlethewagons

    November 22, 2005 at 10:38 am

    And then the running gag becomes “make sure you ask him what VB stands for…”, although he’s not technically in on the gag.

  13. 13.

    Dave Ruddell

    November 22, 2005 at 10:54 am

    Cluster, meet fuck.

  14. 14.

    slightlybad

    November 22, 2005 at 11:10 am

    The whole OSM/pajamas thing has pretty gone over my head. I read a lot of the bloggers involved pretty regularly and wish you guys the best of luck, although from the product so far I would say that there is still a lot of work to do.

    What I really don’t understand is some of the opposition of other bloggers. If you think the output sucks, don’t read it (pretty much my take for the time being). I don’t understand the snarky pieces attacking the idea from Althouse, et al, who seem to think that this is ruining blogging, that these people have sold out, whatever. I used to read Althouse for some of her legal commentary, but her reaction (and others) to this thing is mystifying.

    I personally don’t blog (just leave stupid comments) but I thought the whole idea was having a public forum to write what you want to write about. The idea that trying out a new forum/idea somehow violates the sanctity of the blogosphere is just dumb…it reminds me of that whole blogger code of ethics thing. Even online, there are people who can’t seem to stomach the idea of other people doing something that they don’t like, even if it has no impact on them. There are a bunch of highly educated professionals acting like this is still the 6th grade and trying to shout down people doing something new because it might end up being cooler than them. The whole thing is just queer (no offense to the queers).

  15. 15.

    John Cole

    November 22, 2005 at 11:13 am

    Slightlybad- Pretty much my take. I don’t understand what some people have against it. As you said- if you don’t like it, don’t read it.

  16. 16.

    docG

    November 22, 2005 at 11:17 am

    Possible conclusions based on the evidence presented:
    1. A group of people started an LLC without consulting an attorney.

    2. A group of people started an LLC, consulted with an attorney who did not bother to discuss trademark issues in naming the business.
    3. A group of people started an LLC, consulted with an attorney who did discuss trademark issues in naming the business, but gave bad, perhaps even falsified, advice.

    4. A group of people started an LLC, consulted with an attorney who did discuss trademark issues in naming the business, gave good advice, but it was not followed.

    If you are pro-John Cole, you will pick #2 and #3 as the correct scenerio. If you are anti-John Cole, #1 and #4 are the possible correct scenerios.
    Of course, we are already into the business, so any possible mistakes in how it came to be aren’t important. It is our patriotic duty to support our bloggers who have so bravely placed themselves in harm’s way. And parody IS NOT A CHEMICAL WEAPON, GODDAMMIT!!!!

  17. 17.

    tzs

    November 22, 2005 at 11:19 am

    It’s tulip bulbs All Over Again…

    Nah, just a standard CF put together by a bunch of people with no business experience and less sense. From what I can tell, John has more of a business plan as outlined above than these idiots.

    And don’t tell me that having got “VC money” means anything. I’m watching right now the trajectory of at least two nanotech companies that are great at conning VC money out of people who should know better. Supposed payback is in an ultra-niche market with a product that has crappy technology, is over-priced, and has already been superceded by the competion.

  18. 18.

    slightlybad

    November 22, 2005 at 11:28 am

    John, I think you stole your philosophy from Georgie Best, the Manchester United soccer star from the ’70s:

    I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered.

  19. 19.

    danelectro

    November 22, 2005 at 11:31 am

    the only objection i have it that lgf’s charles johnson is a loathsome individual, and i would never have any sort of business relationship with him. john has addressed this issue slightly, and he obviously sees it a different way. but that is his choice, an definitely not one i would make.

  20. 20.

    John Cole

    November 22, 2005 at 11:32 am

    Great- my philosophy mirrors that of a drunken has-been British footballer. Probably an ale-soaked Jordie, that Georgie Best.

  21. 21.

    Steve

    November 22, 2005 at 11:33 am

    I like the John Kerry-esque position that they erred by listening to their consultants and handlers, but watch out, they’re going to be a new man now!

  22. 22.

    slightlybad

    November 22, 2005 at 11:35 am

    Actually, he was from Belfast. Probably the greatest player of his generation, but partied it all away.

  23. 23.

    srv

    November 22, 2005 at 11:44 am

    My sources tell me they’re going to come out with a line of jammies and dolls for blogreaders. Now you’ll be able to go to bed with jammies designed by John, Jeff, Michelle and Glenn. Dolls will whisper your favorite quotes, like “America, better than Saddam(tm)”.

  24. 24.

    Steve S

    November 22, 2005 at 12:42 pm

    BTW, you idiots hit the big time on this one…

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/22/1513219&tid=188

    Two slashdot’s in as many days… I’ll bet that brought OSM^h^h^hPajamas some nice hits.

  25. 25.

    neil

    November 22, 2005 at 1:23 pm

    I liked the name Pajamas Media more anyway. It was a good move, although it seems like they should’ve resisted blaming the fiasco on the money guys.

  26. 26.

    OCSteve

    November 22, 2005 at 3:50 pm

    I hope they are on the right track now and wish them well. They did make plenty of screw ups to date. Especially that launch party (what the heck was that), (apparently) screwing over Dennis and the other early partner, and signing up 300 bloggers then cutting 230 of them. They got a lot of ridicule and a lot of advice in a short time, sometimes from the same person (Jeff Jarvis for instance). I hope they can make a business out of it. Obviously they should have gone with the soft launch, started slow with a few early adopters. Lessons learned I hope.

  27. 27.

    John S.

    November 22, 2005 at 8:30 pm

    Cole-

    Have you seen this parody letter from Charles and Roger?

    Looks like a lot of blogospheric navel-gazing, but pretty amusing nonetheless.

  28. 28.

    Mason

    November 23, 2005 at 12:48 am

    Oh, goodie. That OSMPajamas Media link requires an account to read. How annoying. Never thought I’d have to go to bugmenot just to read a damn blog post.

  29. 29.

    don surber

    November 23, 2005 at 7:21 am

    John, Gay Orbit also talked about OSM/MSM/PJM in the third person. Whoa. You guys ARE the OSM/MSM/PJM/PB&J
    And I am so jealous
    But hey, be honest in your posts about “it” because in your case it is “me”
    You hold the NYT accountable, be accountable

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • Jeffro on Proud to Be A Democrat: Alvin Bragg Is Not Here for the GOP’s Performative Outrage (Mar 27, 2023 @ 4:02pm)
  • Renie on Cake Watch: Day 1 (Mar 27, 2023 @ 4:00pm)
  • Deputinize Eurasia from the Kuriles to St Petersburg on Proud to Be A Democrat: Alvin Bragg Is Not Here for the GOP’s Performative Outrage (Mar 27, 2023 @ 4:00pm)
  • JPL on Proud to Be A Democrat: Alvin Bragg Is Not Here for the GOP’s Performative Outrage (Mar 27, 2023 @ 3:59pm)
  • Quinerly on Proud to Be A Democrat: Alvin Bragg Is Not Here for the GOP’s Performative Outrage (Mar 27, 2023 @ 3:59pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!