• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

Bark louder, little dog.

Republicans seem to think life begins at the candlelight dinner the night before.

When your entire life is steeped in white supremacy, equality feels like discrimination.

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

Putting aside our relentless self-interest because the moral imperative is crystal clear.

Eh, that’s media spin. biden’s health is fine and he’s doing a good job.

Roe isn’t about choice, it’s about freedom.

🎶 Those boots were made for mockin’ 🎵

No one could have predicted…

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

Today’s GOP: why go just far enough when too far is right there?

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

Fuck these fucking interesting times.

When someone says they “love freedom”, rest assured they don’t mean yours.

The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

I’ve spoken to my cat about this, but it doesn’t seem to do any good.

And we’re all out of bubblegum.

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

Their freedom requires your slavery.

It’s time for the GOP to dust off that post-2012 autopsy, completely ignore it, and light the party on fire again.

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Your Semi-Daily Abramoff Roundup

Your Semi-Daily Abramoff Roundup

by Tim F|  November 25, 200511:44 am| 21 Comments

This post is in: Outrage

FacebookTweetEmail

For those of you who’ve complained that I’ve been working too hard, here’s three Abramoff bits lifted shamelessly from Josh Marshall.

* One of the gentlemen involved in that Florida cruise ship deal that devolved into a gangland hit has implicated Abramoff business partner Adam Kidan in the deal.
* Via WSJ, Conrad Burns may be in more trouble than we thought.
* Why Harry Reid’s take in the Indian Gambling scam may not be such a big deal. He represents Nevada and he opposed a casino that would have competed with Las Vegas. The real question is, how much would it have cost to get Reid to support it?

Or, get your Abramoff info straight from the MSM:
* Reuters – Abramoff probe may have a broader reach than previously thought. And we thought it was pretty broad already.
* A new corner of the scandal opens up: lawmakers took donations while helping the same tribes get school lunch money. Is school lunch money a bad thing? Discuss.
* My hometown paper provides today’s bonus outrage.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Think Progress Responds, Sort Of
Next Post: Sayanora Sayonara*, Mr. Miyagi »

Reader Interactions

21Comments

  1. 1.

    Paddy O'Shea

    November 25, 2005 at 12:04 pm

    “How much would it have cost to get Harry Reid to support it?”

    Why John, your continuing efforts to shill for the Grand Old Party of Corruption know no bounds. And doesn’t the piece you’ve cited mention the Republican Senator from Nevada John Ensign as well? No speculation on his price here, eh?

    Truth of the matter is, neither Senator from Nevada was for sale. Unlike your homeboy Bob “Show Me The Money” Ney.

    But then again, Ohio is so very much the nation’s gold (coin) standard for ethical Republican rule.

  2. 2.

    Dexter

    November 25, 2005 at 12:04 pm

    This is all inside baseball stuff. Most of it involves legal contributions being spun as “quid pro quo” by overzealous prosecutors and criminals (Scanlon) eager to rat out congressmen to save their necks. How is this a political issue at all? Do the Dumbokrats really think they can politcize this issue, given their long and storied history of corruption from Tammany Hall to the House banking scandal of the 1980s? And how can the party of Aaron Broussard and Joe Wilson think that for one minute they have credibility on this or any other issue?

  3. 3.

    John Cole

    November 25, 2005 at 12:06 pm

    Um. I didn’t write this post, Paddy. Hitting the whiskey a wee early in the morn’, aren’t we, my Irish friend.

  4. 4.

    Paddy O'Shea

    November 25, 2005 at 12:12 pm

    Really? And here I always kind of figured the “F” fellow was just you looking for the kind of credibility being a, well, non-conservative confers. You know, kind of like Bush whining about how “Democrats believed the Iraq intelligence, too?”

  5. 5.

    Tim F.

    November 25, 2005 at 12:22 pm

    Paddy, read Josh Marshall’s post. I think it’s safe to say that you and the point set off in different directions.

  6. 6.

    Steve S

    November 25, 2005 at 12:36 pm

    Thank you for the pittsburgh editorial.

    without my daily dose of hyperbole, I don’t know that I can start the morning right.

  7. 7.

    Paddy O'Shea

    November 25, 2005 at 12:49 pm

    Tim, I’ve searched the Marshall piece high and low and can find no place where he speculates, as you do above, that Reid could have been bribed had the the price been high enough.

    Unless you can show me otherwise I am going to have to assume that the smear came from you.

  8. 8.

    Rob

    November 25, 2005 at 1:12 pm

    Why do you not have a link to “Talking Points Memo” on your list of Blogs?

    Where would you put him? Left or Center?

  9. 9.

    Tim F.

    November 25, 2005 at 1:12 pm

    Like I said Paddy, you and the point passed each other quietly in the night.

    Think about it this way. If I wanted to accuse Reid of taking a bribe, it only makes sense if it was given to swing a vote that he wouldn’t have made anyway. So if Reid took money from a tribe that wanted him to oppose something you could count on him to oppose anyway, then it looks more like wasted money than a bribe. Now pay attention, because the point comes in here. If Reid had taken money and then acted against Nevada’s interests, that would be a bribe. That didn’t happen, so no bribe occurred. Let me know if that helps.

  10. 10.

    Tim F.

    November 25, 2005 at 1:26 pm

    Why do you not have a link to “Talking Points Memo” on your list of Blogs?

    Good question. John’s the proprietor here but I’ll take the initiative to rectify that.

  11. 11.

    Kazinski

    November 25, 2005 at 2:35 pm

    Brilliant reasoning. Since all the Rethuglians are fundementalist killjoys, and their natural leaning would be to kill the casino, then their motives shouldn’t be questioned either.

  12. 12.

    KC

    November 25, 2005 at 4:16 pm

    John’s a fundamentalist killjoy?

  13. 13.

    Paddy O'Shea

    November 25, 2005 at 6:48 pm

    Tim: Here on Planet Earth where words still occasionally have meaning it would generally be assumed that when a feller says something along the lines of: “The question is, how much would it have cost to get Reid to support it,” it would be taken for a comment upon the honesty of the individual in question.

    Actually, it reads pretty much like your garden variety rightwing cheap shot.

    Now perhaps that was not your intention, and you really were merely making a comment about the credulity of Abramoff as you claim here. But your words do not really indicate that.

    You don’t have a Colmes complex or something, do you?

  14. 14.

    Paddy O'Shea

    November 25, 2005 at 8:03 pm

    For those of you who practically have cerebral infarctions over some of the stuff they read on Daily Kos, do not go here:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/cartoons/martinrowson/0,7371,1367426,00.html

  15. 15.

    Paddy O'Shea

    November 25, 2005 at 8:13 pm

    Here’s one for John:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/cartoons/martinrowson/archive/0,14954,1284262,00.html

  16. 16.

    Dexter

    November 25, 2005 at 8:33 pm

    Jack Abramoff is an American hero. He has stood up for conservative values time and time again. He plays hardball, I won’t deny that, but within the rules. His only mistake was not knowing that sooner or later he would become the victim of the anti-Republican legalistic jihad.

  17. 17.

    Paddy O'Shea

    November 25, 2005 at 8:40 pm

    This one is for Dexter …

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/cartoons/stevebell/0,7371,1649561,00.html

  18. 18.

    Dexter

    November 25, 2005 at 8:44 pm

    Paddy, you’re one of those old-school Irish-Catholic liberals, aren’t you? You support Ted Kennedy, don’t you? You honk and wave when you drive past picketing strikers, don’t you?

  19. 19.

    Paddy O'Shea

    November 25, 2005 at 8:58 pm

    Why yes, I do honk and wave when I drive past picketing strikers. And actually I have been known to stop by and give the lads some sandwiches and the odd beer from time to time. Picketing is hard and thankless work, and one should alwys stop by to shake hands and share a story or two.

    But that is because I am by nature a kind man. Like when you’re off to work and that buxon beauty of a wife you keep imprisoned in that depressing flat of yours. Sometimes she gets lonely and feels the need for a little companionship. I stop by there as well.

  20. 20.

    rachel

    November 26, 2005 at 5:20 am

    And here I hoped Conrad Burns was Homer Simpson’s boss ’cause that? Would have been kind of fun. But he’s just some old Republican Senator.

    *pouts*

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. Balloon Juice says:
    December 2, 2005 at 2:03 pm

    […] Read our previous coverage: You can read our ongoing Abramoff coverage here: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 […]

Primary Sidebar

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • Geminid on Monday Morning Open Thread: Go, Team Biden! (Feb 6, 2023 @ 10:25am)
  • Suzanne on Monday Morning Open Thread: Go, Team Biden! (Feb 6, 2023 @ 10:25am)
  • lowtechcyclist on Monday Morning Open Thread: Go, Team Biden! (Feb 6, 2023 @ 10:23am)
  • NotMax on Monday Morning Open Thread: Go, Team Biden! (Feb 6, 2023 @ 10:19am)
  • cope on On The Road – cope – Grand Junction and Beyond, Part II (Feb 6, 2023 @ 10:18am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!