• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Black Jesus loves a paper trail.

In my day, never was longer.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

American History and Black History Cannot Be Separated

Come on, man.

The willow is too close to the house.

Teach a man to fish, and he’ll sit in a boat all day drinking beer.

It may be funny to you motherfucker, but it’s not funny to me.

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

They are lying in pursuit of an agenda.

Do not shrug your shoulders and accept the normalization of untruths.

Reality always lies in wait for … Democrats.

“woke” is the new caravan.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

After roe, women are no longer free.

New McCarthy, same old McCarthyism.

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

That’s my take and I am available for criticism at this time.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

It’s the corruption, stupid.

My years-long effort to drive family and friends away has really paid off this year.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / War on Terror / War on Terror aka GSAVE® / One Bad Dude

One Bad Dude

by John Cole|  December 8, 200511:18 am| 21 Comments

This post is in: War on Terror aka GSAVE®

FacebookTweetEmail

I am (as previous posts will show), feeling a little cantankerous and ornery today. Apparently that is going around the blogosphere, as my friend Brian Linse, normally a mild-mannered and unreconstructed pinko commie who is known to associate with unrepentant libertarians, is about as hostile as I have seen him in a long time.

I haven’t followed the issue, and will read up about it this afternoon when I have some time.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Hopes High in Afghanistan
Next Post: Tortured Evidence Banned In UK Courts »

Reader Interactions

21Comments

  1. 1.

    Geek, Esq.

    December 8, 2005 at 11:37 am

    Those exact same asshats he takes to task would trumpet any acquittal of Tom DeLay or Scooter Libby as evidence of God’s support of Republicans.

  2. 2.

    MI

    December 8, 2005 at 11:52 am

    Hey John, maybe this will brighten your mood! I’ve discovered more amazing sites through your linking than from any other blog/site I read. You seem to really know about the gems out there. thanks.

  3. 3.

    MI

    December 8, 2005 at 11:56 am

    Oh, stoptheaclu.com being the obvious exception, heh. Although you goofed a bit on the url, which made me happy. I will say this though, the site is as entertaining as its name suggests, so there’s that.

  4. 4.

    Mona

    December 8, 2005 at 11:59 am

    It is rather unusual for me to agree with left-wing bloggers on issues related to alleged Muslim terrorists, but I strongly do here. Mr. Linse’s vehemence is quite justified. I posted this comment elsewhere yesterday:

    Every patriotic American should be proud of this verdict. Even after the horrors of 9/11, and the fact that we are engaged in a war against Islamo-fascist terrorists, twelve American citizens refused to convict 4 Muslims on a variety of charges, presumably because the government could not make its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

    The DoD should include this verdict in its information offensive in the Middle East. This is how the Great Satan’s civilized rule of law works.

    To understate, my view was not well-received by those with whom I otherwise usually agree.

  5. 5.

    John Cole

    December 8, 2005 at 12:33 pm

    MI- Brian Linse is a good guy. Doesn’t blog enough, though.

  6. 6.

    Phillip J. Birmingham

    December 8, 2005 at 12:37 pm

    I love this line:

    If not deported, Sami Al Arian should be released so he can, I hope, go fuck himself.

    Beautiful!

  7. 7.

    Gold Star for Robot Boy

    December 8, 2005 at 12:56 pm

    Has the government sucessfully prosecuted ANY high-profile case? Every arrest is trumpeted as a smashing success – and a reason to further give away our rights. But when the gavel comes down, either the crime turns out to be penny-ante crap or the accused walks due to lack of evidence.
    I seriously dislike the crew in charge of our nation.

  8. 8.

    srv

    December 8, 2005 at 1:13 pm

    Gold Star:

    Hundreds of people have been convicted under Patriot Act provisions. They just aren’t terrorists. The Act really has little to do with terrorism and alot about expanding federal powers and limiting judicial oversight for federal crimes.

  9. 9.

    Gold Star for Robot Boy

    December 8, 2005 at 1:21 pm

    The Act really has little to do with terrorism and alot about expanding federal powers and limiting judicial oversight for federal crimes.

    Absolutely. Which is why the failure to nail an acutal bad guy is all the more infuriating.

  10. 10.

    Steve

    December 8, 2005 at 1:21 pm

    I thought his best point was where he said, sure the stuff al-Arian advocated in 1991 was horrible, but if he should be jailed for it, so should every Operation Rescue nutjob, etc. Indeed.

  11. 11.

    demimondian

    December 8, 2005 at 1:43 pm

    I’m with him on this, and the repeated failures to convict people after these hugely publicized witch-hunts really troubles me. Wen-ho Lee, Padilla, the chaplain at Guantanamo, now al Arian…lots of “secret evidence”, and no public evidence, and, eventually, acquittal.

    Is this a problem that needs to be solved? If so, what’s the right way to solve it?

  12. 12.

    Gold Star for Robot Boy

    December 8, 2005 at 1:59 pm

    the chaplain at Guantanamo

    This ties in with one of the larger – and largely overlooked – scandals of the Bush administration: bouncing the officers (including a general! with four stars and everything!) who dared cross Rummy. All of a sudden, there’s a rash of top officers who can’t keep it in their pants? When Bush says the military agrees with him 100 percent, he ain’t lying – because the brass knows what happens when you say otherwise.
    (linkies)

  13. 13.

    Steve S

    December 8, 2005 at 2:25 pm

    Fascinating. So the wingnut brigade doesn’t believe in Ex Post Facto(another one of them inconvenient pro-criminal things from our Constitution) for terror suspects… but they rally to the high heaven as long as it protects Tom Delay.

    Gotta love their view of reality.

  14. 14.

    Al Maviva

    December 8, 2005 at 4:43 pm

    He wasn’t on trial for advocating terror or the genocide of the Israelis. He was on trial for acting as the Chief Financial Officer and chief fundraiser of a terror network that, as part of its hearts and minds campaign, also provides social benefits.

  15. 15.

    W.B. Reeves

    December 8, 2005 at 7:27 pm

    He wasn’t on trial for advocating terror or the genocide of the Israelis. He was on trial for acting as the Chief Financial Officer and chief fundraiser of a terror network that, as part of its hearts and minds campaign, also provides social benefits.

    Which is precisely the charge that the Government has failed to prove. However, since this was a multiple count indictment, it is self-evidently false to claim al Arian was on trial for a single charge. As for the question of al Arian’s record of advocacy, it was the Government that raised these issues by digging around in al Arian’s pre-1995 activities.

  16. 16.

    demimondian

    December 8, 2005 at 7:51 pm

    the Government has failed to prove

    No — the government proved that he was the CFO for a terror network. It didn’t prove that he continued to be the CFO for a terror network after that became an illegal thing to do in the United States (for that particular terror network, yadda yadda yadda.)

  17. 17.

    W.B. Reeves

    December 8, 2005 at 8:05 pm

    No—the government proved that he was the CFO for a terror network. It didn’t prove that he continued to be the CFO for a terror network after that became an illegal thing to do in the United States (for that particular terror network, yadda yadda yadda.)

    Excuse me but no. al Arian has not been convicted of anything. Ergo, the Government has proved nothing. Except, perhaps, its own venality and incompetence.

  18. 18.

    demimondian

    December 8, 2005 at 8:58 pm

    Excuse me but no. al Arian has not been convicted of anything. Ergo, the Government has proved nothing.

    Excuse me, but yes. The evidence the government exhibited was quite conclusive. It just ended in 1995, when Hamas was banned here.

  19. 19.

    W.B. Reeves

    December 8, 2005 at 9:09 pm

    Excuse me, but yes. The evidence the government exhibited was quite conclusive. It just ended in 1995, when Hamas was banned her

    Evidently not conclusive enough for the Jury to convict him of anything.

  20. 20.

    demimondian

    December 8, 2005 at 11:18 pm

    Evidently not conclusive enough for the Jury to convict him of anything

    Of course not — it wasn’t a crime then. It didn’t become a crime until 1995.

  21. 21.

    W.B. Reeves

    December 9, 2005 at 12:22 am

    Of course not—it wasn’t a crime then. It didn’t become a crime until 1995.

    So what could have been the Government’s purpose in introducing evidence of a non-crime? Could it possibly have been to prejudiced the jury in favor of conviction? One thing is certain, the jury was not so impressed.

    All rather beside the point though. You are entitled to your opinion of the evidence. You’re not entitled to present your opinion as evidence.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Geminid on War for Ukraine Day 400: Russia Takes a Hostage (Mar 31, 2023 @ 2:43am)
  • Subsole on The Funniest Thing About All of This (Mar 31, 2023 @ 2:29am)
  • Subsole on The Funniest Thing About All of This (Mar 31, 2023 @ 2:29am)
  • Subsole on The Funniest Thing About All of This (Mar 31, 2023 @ 2:28am)
  • Geminid on War for Ukraine Day 400: Russia Takes a Hostage (Mar 31, 2023 @ 2:27am)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup coming up on April 4!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!