• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Conservatism: there are some people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

Historically it was a little unusual for the president to be an incoherent babbling moron.

And we’re all out of bubblegum.

I like you, you’re my kind of trouble.

Schmidt just says fuck it, opens a tea shop.

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

You don’t get rid of your umbrella while it’s still raining.

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

Infrastructure week. at last.

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

Tick tock motherfuckers!

Usually wrong but never in doubt

Thanks to your bullshit, we are now under siege.

This fight is for everything.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

An almost top 10,000 blog!

Just because you believe it, that doesn’t make it true.

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

The next time the wall wtreet journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

Consistently wrong since 2002

It may be funny to you motherfucker, but it’s not funny to me.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Red State Endorses John Shadegg

Red State Endorses John Shadegg

by John Cole|  January 12, 200610:35 am| 20 Comments

This post is in: Politics

FacebookTweetEmail

Red State rejects Blunt and Boehner (for good reason) and endorses John Shadegg (R-AZ).

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Livid
Next Post: The Biden Plan »

Reader Interactions

20Comments

  1. 1.

    Geek, Esq.

    January 12, 2006 at 10:58 am

    They’re right on (as much as conservative Republicans can be, anyways).

    However, as one of those pesky liberal Democrats, I have to wonder why they didn’t reject DeLayism before it became expedient to do so.

  2. 2.

    Lines

    January 12, 2006 at 11:01 am

    Since I’m so caustic and nasty, I guess I’ll have to oppose Shadegg just because Red State likes him.

  3. 3.

    Tim F.

    January 12, 2006 at 11:08 am

    ‘just because’ isn’t very strong. You could argue instead that Blunt and Boehner (great pair of names, by the way) keep the stigma alive through the ’06 midterms so we should root for them for that reason.

    For me, an easily-defeated party of unrepentant crooks or a clean Republican party that doesn’t make me want to move to Canada are both desirable outcomes. So from my perspective it’s win-win.

  4. 4.

    neil

    January 12, 2006 at 11:18 am

    Sounds like a good choice, frankly. And he only got a few thousand from Abramoff. Maybe they’ll get some power-of-the-blogosphere thing going to back him. A Kos endorsement would surely help. *smirk*

  5. 5.

    Davebo

    January 12, 2006 at 11:24 am

    The time has come for a new face in the House Republican leadership.

    Because they’re like totally on to us now…

    I used to enjoy RedState. But it’s obvious now why Tacitus had to bail on those nitwits.

    Wanted to post a comment on their “sudden revelation” that perhaps all is not well in the House leadership.

    But dissent is apparantly no longer allowed at RedState and they had cancelled my account.

    Oh well, enjoy the circle jerk guys.

  6. 6.

    Geek, Esq.

    January 12, 2006 at 11:31 am

    If DeLay were still majority leader, would they have made such a call?

    Hell no. They’re too dependent upon the Republican Beltway Establishment.

    We’ve heard of access journalism. Red State is access blogging. If they’re willing to turn on a Republican, it’s not a sign of principle on their part–it’s a sign of weakness for that Republican.

  7. 7.

    Blue Neponset

    January 12, 2006 at 11:31 am

    After reading that RedState story I am not impressed. The RS Directors seem to be more concerned with the politics of the nomination than with the ethics of it. This is a snippet from the story:

    Whether we accept Boehner or Blunt (if we were forced to choose, it would be Boehner) we would be choosing a compromised leader at a time when every indication is that the Democrats intend to wage war on ethics.

    I guess Boehner or Blunt would be OK if the Dems weren’t banging the ethics war drum.

    It seems to me the only sin a Repub can commit in the eyes of the RedStaters is getting caught.

  8. 8.

    neil

    January 12, 2006 at 11:41 am

    _The RS Directors seem to be more concerned with the politics of the nomination than with the ethics of it._

    Ever the blogosphere was such.

  9. 9.

    Geek, Esq.

    January 12, 2006 at 11:44 am

    Haven’t seen their editorial calling for Bob Ney to resign as Chair of the House Administration Committee.

  10. 10.

    The Other Steve

    January 12, 2006 at 11:49 am

    These are my picks:

    Christopher Shays (R-CT)
    Jim Ramstad (R-MN)
    Jim Leach (R-IA)

    Ramstad is my rep… I picked them because I think it’s the only 3 Republicans in the House who aren’t moonbats.

  11. 11.

    db

    January 12, 2006 at 12:25 pm

    Shadegg is my rep. He was one of those people born into his congressional seat with the work his dad did for Goldwater back in the day (if you can track down his dad’s obscure, old book on how Republicans could get into the majority, it was amazingly prophetic).

    I don’t think he has demonstrated much cajones to be suitable for the position. From what I’ve seen and remember, he has had way too much ties to DeLay Inc. If that stuff blows up any bigger, he’s likely to be a name involved with that mess and it would be yet another smear on the GOPs name in Congress.

    I concur with Other Steve – there are better, cleaner people in Congress than Shadegg.

  12. 12.

    rilkefan

    January 12, 2006 at 12:33 pm

    the Democrats intend to wage war on ethics

    Yep, just heard Obama say, “Death to ethics!”

    It’s RedState, of course they can’t say “the Democrats intend to run against Republican corruption” or “no doubt the Democrats will take advantage of the Republican ethics scandals”.

    And what are they going to do if Blunt is chosen? Consider voting Independent next time?

  13. 13.

    docG

    January 12, 2006 at 12:48 pm

    Oh, great. Would you rather step in mule sh*t or horse sh*it? Thanks for the “choices”, but the same steaming pile will be in place regardless. The system corrupts the players when they become leaders, no matter who (or what party) they are.

  14. 14.

    Ancient Purple

    January 12, 2006 at 1:16 pm

    Shaddeg is my congressman and I oppose him as majority leader for one very good reason.

    Last year, he refused to tell his consitutents which way he voted on the “DeLay rule” which would have allowed DeLay to remain as ML even if indicted. I personally called his offices in Phoenix and Washington and was told that his vote was “private” (Phoenix) and “none of my business” (Washington).

    I am not apt to support any of my elected representatives that tell me that a vote such as this is none of my business.

  15. 15.

    db

    January 12, 2006 at 1:30 pm

    Same experience here, Ancient Purple. It was a complete slap in the face of all his constituents when his offices were telling people that. I only contacted the PHX office and gave up on the guy after that.

  16. 16.

    Pooh

    January 12, 2006 at 1:43 pm

    None of your business? That is fucking scandalous. (Though perhaps not truly scandalous…)

  17. 17.

    my cat

    January 12, 2006 at 2:25 pm

    Yeah, the Democrats “war on ethics” got me too. Irony! Jeez, how do those people live with themselves?

  18. 18.

    Pb

    January 12, 2006 at 3:28 pm

    Red State’s endorsement here is entirely unsurprising–they’ve always been big fans of the Republican Study Committee and its agenda.

    Incidentally, here’s the six degrees of Osama bin Laden for John Shadegg:

    John Shadegg -> Republican Study Committee -> Paul Weyrich -> Heritage Foundation -> Reagan Doctrine -> Mujahideen -> Osama bin Laden

  19. 19.

    Kimmitt

    January 12, 2006 at 6:40 pm

    Red State is, as usual, completely disconnected from reality. No way anyone who isn’t part of the machine gets the job.

  20. 20.

    Paul Wartenberg

    January 12, 2006 at 8:50 pm

    I’m surprised Blunt is getting so much support. He’s connected to DeLay in a handful of ways that would certainly allow the Dems to paint the Republicans as DeLay’s puppets.

    If I were with the GOP congress right now, I’d be pushing for someone with as little to do with DeLay or Abramoff or with the Abramoff money as possible, even if it were for appearances sake. Aren’t there any Republicans from, oh, Vermont or something? Whatever is farthest from Texas (or Alaska).

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • SuzieC on On Wisconsin! (Jan 28, 2023 @ 6:15pm)
  • Baud on Fibbie McGonigal : New Information Never *Mitigates* the Original Crime (Jan 28, 2023 @ 6:15pm)
  • oatler on Fibbie McGonigal : New Information Never *Mitigates* the Original Crime (Jan 28, 2023 @ 6:13pm)
  • trollhattan on Fibbie McGonigal : New Information Never *Mitigates* the Original Crime (Jan 28, 2023 @ 6:11pm)
  • trollhattan on Fibbie McGonigal : New Information Never *Mitigates* the Original Crime (Jan 28, 2023 @ 6:10pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!