• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

“woke” is the new caravan.

Thanks to your bullshit, we are now under siege.

After roe, women are no longer free.

Today’s GOP: why go just far enough when too far is right there?

Pessimism assures that nothing of any importance will change.

Tick tock motherfuckers!

I’d hate to be the candidate who lost to this guy.

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

Putting aside our relentless self-interest because the moral imperative is crystal clear.

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires

Meanwhile over at truth Social, the former president is busy confessing to crimes.

I’d try pessimism, but it probably wouldn’t work.

Come on, man.

American History and Black History Cannot Be Separated

🎶 Those boots were made for mockin’ 🎵

Some judge needs to shut this circus down soon.

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

The cruelty is the point; the law be damned.

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

Conservatism: there are some people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

The GOP is a fucking disgrace.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Foreign Affairs / Priorities

Priorities

by John Cole|  January 30, 20069:23 am| 21 Comments

This post is in: Foreign Affairs

FacebookTweetEmail

Glad Hamas has got their priorities set when taking over as the ruling party responsible for the delivery of services to their people:

Shortly after making his comments about the Hamas, Hamas leader Mahmoud Zahar said from Gaza that Israel must change its flag. “Israel must remove the two blue stripes from its national flag”, said Zahar. “The stripes on the flag are symbols of occupation. They signify Israel’s borders stretching from the River Euphrates to the River Nile.”

Israel’s national flag, a blue Star of David set between two blue stripes, was designed to resemble a Jewish prayer shawl which traditionally has stripes.

Lovely.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Richard Paey on 60 Minutes
Next Post: This Seems Odd »

Reader Interactions

21Comments

  1. 1.

    Lines

    January 30, 2006 at 10:12 am

    While maybe being new entertainment for a bored press that is unfairly picking on an embattled president, these types of things tend to get picked up by the extremists as justification for their radical stances. Both sides will use it to justify new and future attacks on the “enemy”.

    If Democracy and elections don’t work to make Palestine and Israel happy little neighbors, how can anyone expect it to work in Iraq?

  2. 2.

    Paul L.

    January 30, 2006 at 10:23 am

    Since Lines enjoys posting about Bush’s low approval rating, I thought Lines would like to comment on this.
    BUSH BREAKS FIFTY PERCENT APPROVAL on the Rasmussen poll.

    If Democracy and elections don’t work to make Palestine and Israel happy little neighbors, how can anyone expect it to work in Iraq?

    You are right Lines. The world should scrap the Democracy/Republic idea and go back to Kings/Dictators.

  3. 3.

    Lines

    January 30, 2006 at 10:47 am

    You’re a simplton, Paul, easily impressed with pretty lights and colorful charts. You must be in management.

    The rise to Democracy has never come through external force, it has always come from internal sources and a desire by the masses to move in the direction of a representative government.

    Perhaps you can show how Democracy has risen from an external force? Germany was already a Democracy and Japan had already been toying with representation and was primed for it before America occupied it.

    History doesn’t agree with our experiment, Paul. Why do you hate history?

  4. 4.

    Lines

    January 30, 2006 at 10:50 am

    Oh, and I don’t know where you get that I’m obsessed with polls, as I rarely comment on them. Toying around the middle of the spectrum doesn’t impress me, but it may mean that America may stop being so divided soon. Of course, there will be ten more polls to say he’s still in the 30’s, and there’s the whole SOTU that he will screw up, so why are you taking such stock in a single data point?

    I could taunt you all day long with how he’s losing the war for public opinion, Paul. Why do you want to play a losing position?

  5. 5.

    Paul L.

    January 30, 2006 at 11:05 am

    Oh, and I don’t know where you get that I’m obsessed with polls

    Sorry must of confused you with another lefty moonbat who posts here.
    IMHO, Polls are BS.

    Japan had already been toying with representation and was primed for it before America occupied it.

    As I recall Iraq has had elections/voting. Didn’t Saddam get 99.99999% of the vote last time he ran for President or whatever it is called of Iraq

  6. 6.

    Lines

    January 30, 2006 at 11:11 am

    Rice Urges Nations to Cut Off Hamas Aid

    What a great way to encourage Democracy in the Middle East. Because this administration is so stuck in a world of Black/White, they are unable to even work with an elected government. They supported the prior leadership even though it was plainly hiding its complicancy with Palestinian terrorism, yet when a plain speaking visible party is elected, instead of encouraging diplomacy we just tell them they are about to be Dixie Chicked.

    And it was well acknowledged that Saddam’s election was invalid as it wasn’t open to international auditing.

  7. 7.

    Steve

    January 30, 2006 at 12:01 pm

    Well, um, I wouldn’t give aid to Hamas either, not that I was in favor of giving aid to the party of Yasser Arafat.

  8. 8.

    Lines

    January 30, 2006 at 12:08 pm

    Cutting all funding and encouraging other countries to follow suit isn’t going to bring Hamas/Palestine to the bargaining table. Leaving Hamas out or ignoring them isn’t going to make them go away, its just going to make them stick to their old ways, ways that Ms. Rice needs to be reminded, got them into power through a Democratic election.

  9. 9.

    Stormy70

    January 30, 2006 at 12:43 pm

    Cutting all funding and encouraging other countries to follow suit isn’t going to bring Hamas/Palestine to the bargaining table. Leaving Hamas out or ignoring them isn’t going to make them go away, its just going to make them stick to their old ways, ways that Ms. Rice needs to be reminded, got them into power through a Democratic election.

    Why should our money go to reward the Palestinians” collective stupidity? Hamas is a terrorist organization, and it’s not like they weren’t warned about electing Hamas. They did it anyway, so Hamas is now in the big leagues and will have to deal with an already pissed off constituency.

  10. 10.

    Steve

    January 30, 2006 at 1:11 pm

    I’m not sure if we’re agreeing or disagreeing. I favor the Bill Clinton approach, that is, I’d keep an open mind about talking to Hamas and sending them aid if they change their ways and commit to being a legitimate, non-terrorism-sponsoring government. But the ball is in their court to change.

  11. 11.

    Steve

    January 30, 2006 at 1:30 pm

    Very nice dkos diary on this issue here.

  12. 12.

    Perry Como

    January 30, 2006 at 2:15 pm

    Democracy Spread: Now with 20% more extremism!

  13. 13.

    Theseus

    January 30, 2006 at 3:01 pm

    What a great way to encourage Democracy in the Middle East. Because this administration is so stuck in a world of Black/White, they are unable to even work with an elected government. They supported the prior leadership even though it was plainly hiding its complicancy with Palestinian terrorism, yet when a plain speaking visible party is elected, instead of encouraging diplomacy we just tell them they are about to be Dixie Chicked.

    Dirty little secret about democracy and elections: there are CONSEQUENCES for one’s choices (a lesson that Democrats sometimes have difficulty grasping). The Palestinians made their faustian choice, now they have to live with the consequences of their actions with respect to Israel, the US and hopefully Europe. They chose war over peace and they deserve everything Israel throws at them. There is only so much a person can do to stop another person from commiting suicide, which is what the Palestinians apparently want to do.

  14. 14.

    Off Colfax

    January 30, 2006 at 3:09 pm

    Well damn. That makes two news stories that’ve made me spit coffee all over the monitor. And in under 12 hours, too… Okay, the first one also made me seriously consider a career in projectile vomiting (Sheehan for Senate? Projectile vomiting should be a traditional response for that one, and I’m sure that my post on it closely resembled the aftermath of such activity.) in addition to the spit take.

    I’m thinking I might need a news break for a litle bit. And not just because I’m leaving for work in an hour. If I get any more coffee on the cats with my continued out-of-control spit takes, they’re going on strike. I’m sure of it.

  15. 15.

    Lines

    January 30, 2006 at 3:15 pm

    They chose war over peace and they deserve everything Israel throws at them. There is only so much a person can do to stop another person from commiting suicide, which is what the Palestinians apparently want to do.

    Who says Hamas has to continue the way they did? Who says Palestine only wants war and that this election is a direct indication? Right now, they have gone from a bastard that hid everything to a group that doesn’t hide much. They know what they want and they say so. Thats definately a lot better than a snake in the grass.

    Now if Israel does the same thing, what will we see?

  16. 16.

    Steve

    January 30, 2006 at 3:31 pm

    Dirty little secret about democracy and elections: there are CONSEQUENCES for one’s choices (a lesson that Democrats sometimes have difficulty grasping). The Palestinians made their faustian choice, now they have to live with the consequences of their actions with respect to Israel, the US and hopefully Europe.

    The fact that the Republicans have difficulty grasping is that, like it or not, you can’t bully the world into doing things your way. This was a lesson most recently learned in Iran and now in the Palestinian elections.

    If your foreign policy is limited to “don’t elect someone we don’t like, or we’ll cut you off!” then lots of people are going to continue in this same vein, just to give us a giant Fuck You. That’s bad for them, it’s bad for us, and it’s bad for the world, so can we maybe ratchet down the confrontational rhetoric a little bit? Sadly, the Republican idea of “diplomacy” seems more designed to throw Bolton-style red meat to the partisans back home than to actually accomplish anything productive in the world community.

    I said twice above that I’m not in favor of doing anything for Hamas until they show that they’re willing to behave as a civilized government, and I mean that. If they want to engage in state-sponsored terrorism, I have no problem if they end up like the Taliban. But they need to at least be given the chance to get it right, and it’s simply not in our best interests to back them into a corner where they look like wimps to their own people if they give in.

  17. 17.

    skip

    January 30, 2006 at 3:32 pm

    We never gave the Palestinians jack anyway, and what little we did give had many strings attached. Israel–our largest recipient-has no such restraints.

    The Palestinians were not permitted, for example, to spy on us with our own money, nor were they allowed to secretly sell our secrets to the Chinese.

    What did Rouseau say? Every Frenchman, rich or poor, has an equal right to sleep under the Point Noeuf.

  18. 18.

    skip

    January 30, 2006 at 3:32 pm

    We never gave the Palestinians jack anyway, and what little we did give had many strings attached. Israel–our largest recipient-has no such restraints.

    The Palestinians were not permitted, for example, to spy on us with our own money, nor were they allowed to secretly sell our secrets to the Chinese.

    What did Rouseau say? Every Frenchman, rich or poor, has an equal right to sleep under the Point Noeuf.

  19. 19.

    Stormy70

    January 30, 2006 at 3:37 pm

    Right now, they have gone from a bastard that hid everything to a group that doesn’t hide much. They know what they want and they say so

    They want the destruction of Israel. How is this not choosing war? The Pals know what Hamas is, and they chose this terrorist group to govern them. Time to face the piper, Hamas. I can here the panic from here. Sweet. Hamas either transforms itself, or it will get the war it always wanted. They already want to raise a Hamas army. I say raise it, then the Israelis can slaughter them like pigs. No more hiding behind women and children, Hamas scum. I am not a fan of a terrorist group that shoots Jewish three year olds in the head as a policy platform.

  20. 20.

    Theseus

    January 30, 2006 at 7:10 pm

    Who says Hamas has to continue the way they did? Who says Palestine only wants war and that this election is a direct indication?

    Hamas says. They voted for a party that advocates the destruction of Israel. I dunno about you but that seems about as clearcut as you can get. Where do you see the nuance?

    Right now, they have gone from a bastard that hid everything to a group that doesn’t hide much. They know what they want and they say so. Thats definately a lot better than a snake in the grass.

    Agreed. What we have now is greater clarity. It’s gonna be a lot harder for people to make excuses for the Palestinians and pretend that all they really want is peace. That clearly is not true and, sadly, many who have been saying that for years, that there really is no partner for peace, have been vindicated.

    Now if Israel does the same thing, what will we see?

    Sorry, I’m afraid I don’t understand the question. Most Israelis would choose peace in a heartbeat, if they thought that there was someone they could genuinely negotiate with. There isn’t.

    If your foreign policy is limited to “don’t elect someone we don’t like, or we’ll cut you off!” then lots of people are going to continue in this same vein, just to give us a giant Fuck You. That’s bad for them, it’s bad for us, and it’s bad for the world, so can we maybe ratchet down the confrontational rhetoric a little bit?

    What confrontational rthetoric? They voted for a party that advocates the destruction of another people. We are supposed to what, reward them for that. Are you kidding? If a country is following a course of action that the US deems is hostile to their own national interests, then what, the US is supposed to shut up about it and put a big smile on their face. People can vote for whomever they want, but they have to realize that their votes have consequences, sometimes not only on the course their own country will take but how the rest of the world will be forced to react and/or respond to their decisions. Choices have consequences. If the Palestinians want to commit suicide, you know what, it’s their prerogative. That doesn’t mean they have to take everyone down with them.

    Sadly, the Republican idea of “diplomacy” seems more designed to throw Bolton-style red meat to the partisans back home than to actually accomplish anything productive in the world community.

    And the Democratic idea of “diplomacy” is what, pray tell? Let the UN or the “international community” whatever the hell that means, handle it.

  21. 21.

    Andrew J. Lazarus

    January 31, 2006 at 1:19 am

    The Israel National News is not a national news organization. It’s a dodgy, deliberate mistranslation of Israel Nationalist News, as in, a voice of the Settler Movement.

    The worse news is that, although I believe the linking of the Israeli flag’s stripes to the Nile and Euphrates is an anti-Semitic canard, the idea that Israel’s natural extent is precisely that region is indeed a touchstone of the Israeli extreme right. (Since the INN is itself on the extreme right, ignorance does does explain their failure to mention this.)

    “Candidly speaking, we’re not at all interested in peace, as this concept is understood by the general public,” [Noam Livnat, brother of cabinet member and importnat Likud leader Limor Livnat] wrote. “As the ultimate of radical right-wing messianists, we look forward to the Redemption, to [ruling over the] true Whole Land of Israel, from the river of Egypt to the Euphrates … [and] this integrity will undoubtedly be attained through conquest and wars.”

    I read a pre-Internet interview with Livnat’s father, one of the rightwing political leaders of the founding generation, and he said pretty much the same thing, minus the messianic overtones. Indeed, the anthem of the Herut Party, a precursor to the Likud, referred to “both sides of the Jordan”.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • StringOnAStick on Cheeto Benito Indicted (Mar 30, 2023 @ 5:41pm)
  • WaterGirl on Cheeto Benito Indicted (Mar 30, 2023 @ 5:41pm)
  • UncleEbeneezer on Cake Watch: Day 4 (Screw the Cake, I Am Baking a Pie) (Mar 30, 2023 @ 5:41pm)
  • Alison Rose on Cheeto Benito Indicted (Mar 30, 2023 @ 5:41pm)
  • bbleh on Cake! Manhattan Grand Jury Voted to Indict Trump (Mar 30, 2023 @ 5:41pm)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup coming up on April 4!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!