• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

You cannot love your country only when you win.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

It may be funny to you motherfucker, but it’s not funny to me.

In after Baud. Damn.

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

White supremacy is terrorism.

Hot air and ill-informed banter

Innocent people do not delay justice.

Yeah, with this crowd one never knows.

Damn right I heard that as a threat.

No Kings: Americans standing in the way of bad history saying “Oh, Fuck No!”

We are learning that “working class” means “white” for way too many people.

The fight for our country is always worth it. ~Kamala Harris

Balloon Juice, where there is always someone who will say you’re doing it wrong.

Radicalized white males who support Trump are pitching a tent in the abyss.

How stupid are these people?

If a good thing happens for a bad reason, it’s still a good thing.

Museums are not America’s attic for its racist shit.

Donald Trump found guilty as fuck – May 30, 2024!

This is dead girl, live boy, a goat, two wetsuits and a dildo territory.  oh, and pink furry handcuffs.

They love authoritarianism, but only when they get to be the authoritarians.

A norm that restrains only one side really is not a norm – it is a trap.

Beware of advice from anyone for whom Democrats are “they” and not “we.”

You don’t get rid of your umbrella while it’s still raining.

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Abramoffapalooza

Abramoffapalooza

by Tim F|  February 21, 20061:21 pm| 29 Comments

This post is in: Politics

FacebookTweetEmail

This story neatly encapsulates so much of what’s wrong with our current leadership:

I’ll summarize: At the behest of the Heritage Foundation, Malaysian Prime minister Matahir Mohammed, who used a sham company called the American International Center to retain the services of Jack Abramoff, paid Abramoff $1.2 million to arrange a single meeting with Bush via Karl Rove.

The Daily Muck at TPM Cafe does a good job of summarizing the essential background reading.

It would take a while to properly unpack all of the ridiculousness in this story.

For example, Bush defenders will read this and go on thinking that there was no significant link between Abramoff’s shady activities and the White House because, see, we don’t have a picture yet. Well we do but it isn’t very convincing. So there. Never mind that Rove borrowed his personal assistant Susan Ralston directly from Abramoff.

This might help to explain why Scotty Mac sincerely pledged to deliver a list of Abramoff’s contacts with the White House then thought better of it. I know it sounds crazy, but maybe Matahir Mohammed isn’t the only person who paid Abramoff to arrange a meeting with Bush. The South African Apartheid regime was already gone by then so they’re probably out, but plenty of other clandestine Abramoff clients exist and most of them probably have a working phone (that’s a hint for reporters reading this).

What is the Heritage Foundation doing advising Malaysia? I suppose that you could make some convoluted argument about free enterprise zones and import/export policies. Were they above a little investing, Pat Robertson-style? We don’t know yet, but they sure didn’t mind each other’s company.

Of course there’s the pay-to-play angle. You all remember the tremulous outrage over Bill Clinton renting out the Lincoln bedroom to campaign donors. Is it worse when the cash comes extralegally and explicitly goes towards influencing policy? The screen fades to good-government activist Rep. Dick Cheney, standing on a windswept field and shedding a single, silent tear.

We could play ‘imagine if Clinton…,’ but get real. People kept guns in the basement in case Clinton did stuff like this.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « The War on Evolution
Next Post: Open Port Security Thread »

Reader Interactions

29Comments

  1. 1.

    Pooh

    February 21, 2006 at 1:28 pm

    The screen fades to good-government activist Rep. Dick Cheney, standing on a windswept field and shedding a single, silent tear.

    That never, ever stops being funny.

  2. 2.

    Lee

    February 21, 2006 at 1:39 pm

    My favorite line.

    People kept guns in the basement in case Clinton did stuff like this.

    Just curious are the apologists ever going to get tired of trying to cover this Administration?

  3. 3.

    Andrew

    February 21, 2006 at 1:41 pm

    But Harry Reid got money from some Native Americans!

    How long until Cheney shoots someone else to distract us?

  4. 4.

    DougJ

    February 21, 2006 at 1:45 pm

    How come we never hear about all the foreign leaders who met with Bush without having bribed Jack Abramoff? The media doesn’t want you to know about them, because it would undermine the whole “Bush is evil” meme that they’re always pushing.

  5. 5.

    Pooh

    February 21, 2006 at 1:47 pm

    We’re taking bribes over there so we don’t have to…

  6. 6.

    Paul L.

    February 21, 2006 at 2:15 pm

    You all remember the tremulous outrage over Bill Clinton renting out the Lincoln bedroom to campaign donors. Is it worse when the cash comes extralegally and explicitly goes towards influencing policy?

    You mean like Bill Clinton, Lorel and the Chinese Waiver?
    Clinton Defends China Satellite Waiver

  7. 7.

    Lee

    February 21, 2006 at 2:18 pm

    Thanks for the link to Clinton doing something similar. Now we can truthfully say that Bush=Clinton.

  8. 8.

    ppGaz

    February 21, 2006 at 2:24 pm

    Corruption in Washington?

    Well, Bush already has his lines for such a happenstance:

    “Bring it on!”

    “I am not really that concerned with it!”

    “Corruption is in its last throes.”

    “It was just an unfortunate accident.”

    And the blogs are ready:

    “The press has overplayed this story.”

    “How long before the Dems overplay their hand on this?”

    “Bush did have quid pro quo with that man, Jack Abramoff!”

  9. 9.

    ppGaz

    February 21, 2006 at 2:25 pm

    CRAP!

    “Bush did not have quid pro quo with that woman, Jackie Abramoff.”

  10. 10.

    The Other Steve

    February 21, 2006 at 2:38 pm

    Oh come on. Jack Abramhoff took money… This isn’t like Bush took a bribe himself.

  11. 11.

    The Other Steve

    February 21, 2006 at 2:41 pm

    You mean like Bill Clinton, Lorel and the Chinese Waiver?
    Clinton Defends China Satellite Waiver

    So that’s the source of the Republican moonbat accusations against Clinton that he sold military secrets to China. All these years I’ve been trying to figure out what the hell you guys were talking about.

    Sheesh. Talk about blowing something out of proportion.

  12. 12.

    chopper

    February 21, 2006 at 2:58 pm

    the funniest thing about this whole story is that the prime minister of malaysia had to pay money to meet with the president of the US.

  13. 13.

    DougJ

    February 21, 2006 at 3:04 pm

    The real outrage here is how the Democrats are trying to politicize this issue.

    In the end, though all of this is inside the beltway stuff: million dollar bribes, money laundering, possible links to gangland style executions. Until the Democrats step up and deal with the real issues facing the country — runaway brides, the war on Christmas, outrageous remarks by Bryant Gumble — they won’t start winning elections.

  14. 14.

    neil

    February 21, 2006 at 3:23 pm

    The Republicans really overplayed their hand here. Yup.

  15. 15.

    Paul L.

    February 21, 2006 at 4:08 pm

    The Other Steve Says:
    So that’s the source of the Republican moonbat accusations against Clinton that he sold military secrets to China. All these years I’ve been trying to figure out what the hell you guys were talking about.

    That and Johnny Chung/Charlie Trie
    Ex-Democratic fund-raiser Johnny Chung to testify before House committee
    Charlie Trie Indicted
    CHARLIE TRIE PLEADS GUILTY TO FEDERAL CAMPAIGN FINANCE VIOLATIONS

    Sheesh. Talk about blowing something out of proportion

    You mean like the Quail-gate/Cheney Hunting Accident?

  16. 16.

    kelsey

    February 21, 2006 at 4:48 pm

    $1.2 million to meet with the president? How many sweatshop t-shirts do you think that works out to?

  17. 17.

    The Other Steve

    February 21, 2006 at 4:52 pm

    You mean like the Quail-gate/Cheney Hunting Accident?

    Well, obviously. Also Chappamoonbat, and the other faux outrage Republican generated scandals.

    I’m glad we got that covered, now hopefully you’ll start acting like an intelligent adult and now bring these things up again.

  18. 18.

    ppGaz

    February 21, 2006 at 5:28 pm

    $1.2 million to meet with the president? How many sweatshop t-shirts do you think that works out to?

    PoTD?

    Spit my coffee, worth 5 points right there.

  19. 19.

    Harley

    February 21, 2006 at 5:31 pm

    That’s a lotta dough just to meet the Prez. Seems like the guy could’ve saved himself some money by simply making a donation to the RNC, or becoming a Bush Pioneer.

  20. 20.

    DougJ

    February 21, 2006 at 5:34 pm

    $1.2 million to meet with the president? How many sweatshop t-shirts do you think that works out to?

    PoTD.

  21. 21.

    DougJ

    February 21, 2006 at 6:05 pm

    Can anyone believe this deal to let the UAE run our ports? I simply cannot believe it.

  22. 22.

    Perry Como

    February 21, 2006 at 6:22 pm

    Can anyone believe this deal to let the UAE run our ports?

    No Sheik Left Behind

  23. 23.

    Steve

    February 21, 2006 at 6:23 pm

    No one ever talks about the ports the UAE doesn’t run.

    I think a far more interesting issue would be to predict which of our BJ posters – both left- and right-wing – will support Bush’s position. There is always one “reasonable Democrat,” and there is always at least one Bushbot.

  24. 24.

    stickler

    February 21, 2006 at 6:56 pm

    Just curious are the apologists ever going to get tired of trying to cover this Administration?

    No. They are never going to get tired of it. Without Bush the whole dike collapses and the sea rushes in.

  25. 25.

    ppGaz

    February 21, 2006 at 7:25 pm

    If UAE doesn’t get the port deal, the terrorists win.

  26. 26.

    Mac Buckets

    February 21, 2006 at 10:44 pm

    Is it worse when the cash comes extralegally and explicitly goes towards influencing policy?…We could play ‘imagine if Clinton…,’ but get real.

    “Imagine if Clinton?” Imagine if Clinton got extralegal money for a policy quid pro quo? I’ll raise you with the fact that the quid pro quo hurt national security and strengthened the offensive missile capability of the Communist Chinese government!

    “Get real,” right back atcha, Tim. Compared to the policy impact of Clinton’s boys and the Chinese satellite deal, the Jack Abramoff affair is extremely, extremely tiny potatoes.

  27. 27.

    DougJ

    February 22, 2006 at 12:34 am

    Imagine if Saddam Hussein were still in power. And imagine that Iraq had control of our ports. Wouldn’t that be a lot worse than having the UAE in charge of them?

  28. 28.

    ppGaz

    February 22, 2006 at 12:59 am

    DougJ is right. The world is better off without Saddam Hussein in charge of our ports.

  29. 29.

    DecidedFenceSitter

    February 22, 2006 at 8:12 am

    Steve Says:

    No one ever talks about the ports the UAE doesn’t run.

    I think a far more interesting issue would be to predict which of our BJ posters – both left- and right-wing – will support Bush’s position. There is always one “reasonable Democrat,” and there is always at least one Bushbot.

    I hate being predictable.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - lashonharangue - Costa Rica - Part 3 5
Image by lashonharangue (12/7/25)

2026 Pets of Balloon Juice Calendar

PLEASE REVIEW YOUR INFO ASAP

Recent Comments

  • Msb on Late Night Open Thread: Jasmine Crockett Is Making Her Decision (Dec 8, 2025 @ 2:19am)
  • Msb on Sunday Morning Garden Chat: Desert Yardscaping (Dec 8, 2025 @ 2:17am)
  • WTFGhost on Sunday Night Open Thread (Dec 8, 2025 @ 2:11am)
  • Msb on Tom Stoppard, High-Culture Influencer (Dec 8, 2025 @ 2:10am)
  • Aris Merquoni on Sunday Morning Garden Chat: Desert Yardscaping (Dec 8, 2025 @ 2:10am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
On Artificial Intelligence (7-part series)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!