• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

This isn’t Democrats spending madly. This is government catching up.

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

Good lord, these people are nuts.

Their freedom requires your slavery.

Something needs to be done about our bogus SCOTUS.

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

There are a lot more evil idiots than evil geniuses.

People really shouldn’t expect the government to help after they watched the GOP drown it in a bathtub.

The most dangerous place for a black man in America is in a white man’s imagination.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

Welcome to day five of every-bit-as-bad-as-you-thought-it-would-be.

You don’t get rid of your umbrella while it’s still raining.

Republicans: The threats are dire, but my tickets are non-refundable!

We will not go quietly into the night; we will not vanish without a fight.

T R E 4 5 O N

Impressively dumb. Congratulations.

Since when do we limit our critiques to things we could do better ourselves?

Every decision we make has lots of baggage with it, known or unknown.

GOP baffled that ‘we don’t care if you die’ is not a winning slogan.

Pessimism assures that nothing of any importance will change.

A sufficient plurality of insane, greedy people can tank any democratic system ever devised, apparently.

Not rolling over. fuck you, make me.

Washington Post Catch and Kill, not noticeably better than the Enquirer’s.

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Here Is An Idea

Here Is An Idea

by John Cole|  March 7, 20063:00 pm| 27 Comments

This post is in: Politics

FacebookTweetEmail

I generally support proposals like this:

With Congress heading into a politically perilous budget season, influential House conservatives plan this week to propose an austere alternative spending plan that would pare more than $650 billion over five years, balance the budget and drastically shrink three cabinet agencies.

The legislation, part of a push by some Republicans to re-establish themselves as champions of fiscal restraint, was taking shape as President Bush struck a similar theme on Monday by asking Congress to grant him line-item veto power to eliminate federal spending that he might judge wasteful.

“We can’t be all things to all people when it comes to spending the taxpayers’ money,” Mr. Bush said at a ceremony installing a new chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers.

But House conservative leaders would go far beyond the president’s own budget proposal, illustrating the difficulty the White House and the Republican leadership have had in persuading the caucus to speak with one voice on the matter.

Wanna get my support? Include a bill killing the disastrous prescription drug pill plan, and ease up on the other medicare cuts, which will be politically devastating.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « A Turning Point
Next Post: RIP Kirby »

Reader Interactions

27Comments

  1. 1.

    Richard Bottoms

    March 7, 2006 at 3:16 pm

    Wanna get my support? Include a bill killing the disastrous prescription drug pill plan, and ease up on the other medicare cuts, which will be politically devastating.

    I shall commence holding my breath. Heh.

    Welcome back.

  2. 2.

    Steve

    March 7, 2006 at 3:21 pm

    Are these “House conservative leaders” opposed to making Bush’s tax cuts permanent? Because if they’re not, and you know they’re not, then they’re not proposing to balance the budget.

  3. 3.

    Jorge

    March 7, 2006 at 3:22 pm

    I wonder what those 3 cabinet agencies will be?

    If they are Education, Health and Human Services, and Housing and Urban Development, I might scream. Unless it is the previously mentioned prescription drug give-away. Get rid of that.

  4. 4.

    Marcus Wellby

    March 7, 2006 at 3:22 pm

    With Congress heading into a politically perilous budget season, influential House conservatives plan this week to propose an austere alternative spending plan that would pare more than $650 billion over five years, balance the budget and drastically shrink three cabinet agencies

    HAHA! I would wager anything that the actual plan would increase spending, add to the debt, and drastically increase three cabinat agencies, if not add another to perform additional “oversight”.

  5. 5.

    Davebo

    March 7, 2006 at 3:25 pm

    and ease up on the other medicare cuts, which will be politically devastating.

    More than just politically devastating to many many Americans.

    But the type of cuts to expect from this new “fiscally constrained” crowd.

    How about starting with the 40 billion or so in tax credits to oil producers? It’s not like they are barely scraping by these days.

    Nah… Cut the medicare. Granny is just a welfare queen anyway.

  6. 6.

    Pb

    March 7, 2006 at 3:30 pm

    Are there any hard details out on this five year ‘plan’? Or is it like Bush’s plan to not really cut the deficit in half once he’s no longer in office…

  7. 7.

    Pb

    March 7, 2006 at 3:31 pm

    Jorge,

    Education, Commerce, and Energy. At least they say that much in the article.

  8. 8.

    jg

    March 7, 2006 at 3:31 pm

    Smoke, meet the american publics ass.

  9. 9.

    The Other Steve

    March 7, 2006 at 3:31 pm

    Sigh… The old Line Item Veto trick. Didn’t the SCOTUS strike that down once already?

    Why yes it was:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_Item_Veto_Act_of_1996

    Do Republicans have any new ideas, or are they going to keep rehashing the old ones?

    Similarly on spending.

    You got two choices at this point to make substantial impact to the budget:

    Reduce military spending(i.e. get out of Iraq and save $150 billion a year)
    Raise Taxes

    Which one do you want? Because everything else the Republicans talk about is nickled and dime shit that’ll never make a dent on a $400 billion deficit.

  10. 10.

    The Other Steve

    March 7, 2006 at 3:32 pm

    Just for the record…

    The fact that Bush brought up line item veto means he’s not serious about this.

  11. 11.

    Jorge

    March 7, 2006 at 3:33 pm

    Thanks PB –
    1 out of 3 still makes me scream. Education is my all time favorite ever. :)

  12. 12.

    LITBMueller

    March 7, 2006 at 3:35 pm

    Spending cuts and line item vetos – GOP style!: cut programs that aid the poor (like LIHEAP) and others in need. Match these with proposals that benefit big business and spend like drunken sailors on military projects (like more expensive fighter jets – I had no idea Osama had an air force!!!).

    Sounds like a winning strategy!

  13. 13.

    Jim Allen

    March 7, 2006 at 3:36 pm

    Cut the medicare. Granny is just a welfare queen anyway

    I think they’re more worried about Grandpa being a welfare queen.

  14. 14.

    Pb

    March 7, 2006 at 3:41 pm

    Jorge,

    Oddly enough, it’s one of Bush’s favorites too. Except for the part where he didn’t sufficiently fund it to keep up with his horribly ill-thought-out ‘reforms’.

  15. 15.

    S.W. Anderson

    March 7, 2006 at 4:02 pm

    “Include a bill killing the disastrous prescription drug pill plan, and ease up on the other medicare cuts, which will be politically devastating.”

    Tom DeLay is being Scootered, neutered and Roto-Rootered, Abramoff’s out of commission, Ralph Reed’s cover is blown, the heat’s on in Ohio — and you expect Bush to open himself to charges by a major part of his corporate base that he’s an Indian giver? Don’t hold your breath.

    Big Medicare cuts are a manifestation of a right-wing cause celebre: teaching Americans the federal government can’t be trusted to meet nonwealthy individuals’ needs by honoring commitments scornfully referred to as entitlement programs. (Better that people should depend on corporate benevolence, as exemplified by Wal-Mart’s health care cost-shifting strategy.) Again, it’s not going to happen.

  16. 16.

    Steve

    March 7, 2006 at 4:05 pm

    If the Abramoff scandal proved anything, it’s that the Republican Party is definitely not a bunch of Indian givers.

  17. 17.

    mark

    March 7, 2006 at 5:01 pm

    Wanna get my support? Include a bill killing the disastrous prescription drug pill plan, and ease up on the other medicare cuts, which will be politically devastating.

    Welcome to planet earth o space traveler. I see you have only been here a short time.

  18. 18.

    The Pirate

    March 7, 2006 at 5:01 pm

    This is a much better idea than the line-item veto, which just gives the President carte blanche to blackmail the opposition party.

  19. 19.

    Bernard Yomtov

    March 7, 2006 at 5:20 pm

    The annual deficit runs into the hundreds of billions, so $650 billion over five years is not going to balance the budget.

    The article says there will be $350 billion cut from Medicare, Medicaid, and other social programs. No specifics as to the cuts (surprise). Then there will be $300 billion saved “through a major reorganization of the Education, Commerce and Energy Departments.” Sure. Sounds like our old friends “waste, fraud and abuse.”

    Come on, John. What are you supporting? They haven’t said and you don’t know. This is strictly a PR stunt to cover massive Republican fiscal irresponsibility. Don’t fall for it.

    When specific realistically measured cuts are proposed it will be time to evaluate them. Until then this is nonsense.

  20. 20.

    Zifnab

    March 7, 2006 at 5:48 pm

    The article says there will be $350 billion cut from Medicare, Medicaid, and other social programs. No specifics as to the cuts (surprise). Then there will be $300 billion saved “through a major reorganization of the Education, Commerce and Energy Departments.” Sure. Sounds like our old friends “waste, fraud and abuse.”

    Funny how the Bush Administration has found so many places to save a few bucks, but never bothers to mention them until an hour before they push the paperwork through.

    Perhaps we could pass legislation against that.

  21. 21.

    KC

    March 7, 2006 at 6:29 pm

    I was against the line-item veto in ’96, and I’m against it now. If the President is unwilling to veto a spending bill and Congress is unwilling to trim a bill so be it. If Bush was a real conservative, he’d veto the next big spending item that comes down the line. If Republicans were really conservatives, they’d be trimming better than barbers.

  22. 22.

    tzs

    March 7, 2006 at 6:46 pm

    Dept. of Energy?

    Excuse me, but isn’t this sorta like Bush’s “great support for alternative energy” and then we discovered that NREL was getting its budget axed?

    Some of the work getting done under the DOE is probably our best chance to get off the fossil fuel kick.

    If we got rid of those tax breaks for the oil companies how much DOE support could we provide?

    Y’know, I wonder if Bush et al. are in cahoots with (the Illuminati, the Masons, the pick-your-random-rule-the-world-conspiracy) to deliberately leave the U.S. a dry husk of a wrecked economy with no technology base and no future. Because he’s certainly ACTING like it.

  23. 23.

    chopper

    March 8, 2006 at 6:38 am

    If Bush was a real conservative, he’d veto the next big spending item that comes down the line. If Republicans were really conservatives, they’d be trimming better than barbers

    if republicans were really conservatives, he wouldn’t have to.

  24. 24.

    ET

    March 8, 2006 at 8:21 am

    I will believe it only when I see it.

  25. 25.

    moonbiter

    March 8, 2006 at 9:00 am

    Funny how the Bush Administration has found so many places to save a few bucks, but never bothers to mention them until an hour before they push the paperwork through.As Daniel Gross points out:

    They want to save $300 billion over five years through a “major reorganization” of the Energy, Commerce, and Education departments? That must be some reorganization. Look at the tables from the most recent budget. In 2006, the Commerce Department had a budget of $6.4 billion, the Energy Department had a budget of $23.5 billion, and the Education Department had a budget of $56.5 billion. Together, spending on the three adds up to $86.4 billion. If you held that figure steady for five years, that would come to $432 billion. So to get $300 billion out of savings in five years from those units, budgeteers would have to cut 70% of the anticipated spending on the three departments.

  26. 26.

    Vlad

    March 8, 2006 at 10:05 am

    “I think they’re more worried about Grandpa being a welfare queen.”

    What he does in the privacy of his own home is his business, not yours, and certainly not the government’s.

  27. 27.

    Barry

    March 8, 2006 at 11:31 am

    moonbiter, maybe their previous budget allocated a gazillion dollars to each department. Cutting from those projects would yield a few hundred billion quite easily.
    It’d be the same sort of money that you save when you buy extra stuff on sale, but hey, these guys prefer fiction in all things.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - PaulB - Olympic National Park: Lake Quinault 1
Image by PaulB (5/17/25)

Recent Comments

  • Jay on Repubs in Disarray Open Thread (May 18, 2025 @ 3:33am)
  • Elizabelle on Repubs in Disarray Open Thread (May 18, 2025 @ 3:24am)
  • Jay on Repubs in Disarray Open Thread (May 18, 2025 @ 3:17am)
  • Elizabelle on Repubs in Disarray Open Thread (May 18, 2025 @ 2:58am)
  • Jay on Repubs in Disarray Open Thread (May 18, 2025 @ 2:44am)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!