• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Battle won, war still ongoing.

Good lord, these people are nuts.

The next time the wall street journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

Historically it was a little unusual for the president to be an incoherent babbling moron.

Some judge needs to shut this circus down soon.

My years-long effort to drive family and friends away has really paid off this year.

Republicans do not pay their debts.

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

It’s time for the GOP to dust off that post-2012 autopsy, completely ignore it, and light the party on fire again.

They love authoritarianism, but only when they get to be the authoritarians.

It’s the corruption, stupid.

Nothing worth doing is easy.

Republican obstruction dressed up as bipartisanship. Again.

Shallow, uninformed, and lacking identity

Optimism opens the door to great things.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

Let’s finish the job.

I’ve spoken to my cat about this, but it doesn’t seem to do any good.

A lot of Dems talk about what the media tells them to talk about. Not helpful.

Consistently wrong since 2002

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

Republicans in disarray!

The party of Reagan has become the party of Putin.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Foreign Affairs / No Disarming Hizballuh

No Disarming Hizballuh

by John Cole|  August 15, 200610:54 am| 55 Comments

This post is in: Foreign Affairs

FacebookTweetEmail

Soemtimes I just get so exasperated with the Middle East that I wish they would just blow themselves all up:

Hizbullah will not hand over its weapons to the Lebanese government but rather refrain from exhibiting them publicly, according to a new compromise that is reportedly brewing between Lebanese Prime Minister Fuad Seniora and Hizbullah leader Hassan Nasrallah.

The UN cease-fire resolution specifically demands the demilitarization of the area south of the Litani river. The resolution was approved by the Lebanese cabinet.

In a televised address on Monday night, Nasrallah declared that now was not the time to debate the disarmament of his guerrilla fighters, saying the issue should be done in secret sessions of the government to avoid serving Israeli interests.

“This is immoral, incorrect and inappropriate,” he said. “It is wrong timing on the psychological and moral level particularly before the cease-fire,” he said in reference to calls from critics for the guerrillas to disarm.

Every time I look at the Middle East I see nothing but seething hatred, conniving, backstabbing, dishonesty, maneuvering, leadership concerned only with self-promotion and self-preservation, and, ultimately escalating levels of violence.

It is just depressing.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Some Changes Around Here
Next Post: The Immigration Issue »

Reader Interactions

55Comments

  1. 1.

    Pb

    August 15, 2006 at 11:00 am

    Soemtimes I just get so exasperated with the Middle East that I wish they would just blow themselves all up

    …and sometimes they try to oblige you.

    I see nothing but seething hatred, conniving, backstabbing, dishonesty, maneuvering, leadership concerned only with self-promotion and self-preservation

    …today’s GOP?

  2. 2.

    zzyzx

    August 15, 2006 at 11:08 am

    I don’t want them to blow up as much as I’m rooting for the discovery of an uninhabited Earth in an alternate dimension that we could export everyone to.

  3. 3.

    capelza

    August 15, 2006 at 11:13 am

    Tom Friedman had/has a show running on the History Channel about our addiction to oil. It’s really pretty good. There’s an interesting Coalition that’s formed with such disparate characters as former COA dude Woolsey, Gary Bauer (gag) and environmentalists from the “Left”.

    The whole idea is to try to figure out how to rid ourselves of the oil addiction that chains us to the ME. Of course, I’ve been hollering about this for years and years, but whatever.

    Every time I look at the Middle East I see nothing but seething hatred, conniving, backstabbing, dishonesty, maneuvering, leadership concerned only with self-promotion and self-preservation, and, ultimately escalating levels of violence.

    For a second there, I thought you were talking about the break=up of Alexander’s empire. There’s nothing new under that ancient sun. Nothing. Except the helicopter pad we built on the ruins of Babylon.

  4. 4.

    capelza

    August 15, 2006 at 11:13 am

    That should be CIA, not COA…

  5. 5.

    The Other Steve

    August 15, 2006 at 11:17 am

    The whole idea is to try to figure out how to rid ourselves of the oil addiction that chains us to the ME. Of course, I’ve been hollering about this for years and years, but whatever.

    Interesting. When Democrats proposed this in 2000 and 2004 they were attacked for giving aid and comfort to the terrorists.

    Maybe because it’d hit Halliburton’s bottom line.

  6. 6.

    The Other Steve

    August 15, 2006 at 11:18 am

    Anyway, it’s understandable why Hezbollah doesn’t want to give up weapons. Just as it’s understandable why Israel wants them to.

    The question is, what is Lebanon going to do about it?

    Capitulate, and insure another Israeli attack in the future, or try to solve the problem?

  7. 7.

    Mac Buckets

    August 15, 2006 at 11:37 am

    When Democrats proposed this in 2000 and 2004 they were attacked for giving aid and comfort to the terrorists.

    Poor baby — such a victime of those mean old Republican bullies!

    Another reason why we can’t take you seriously, TOSser. I’ve lost track: Are you delusional, ignorant, or just lying so you can pretend to be a victim? I can assure you that the only “traitor” talk you heard in response to energy policy (of all things) was entirely in your own head. First of all, no one was talking about anyone giving aid and comfort to terrorists in 2000, so that’s easily exposed as a blatant lie.

    Secondly, in our reality, here on Earth, Bush himself campaigned in 2004 on the need for the US to become more energy independent. Alternative energy development, hydrogen fuel for cars, expansion of nuclear energy, conservation legislation — all were repeatedly mentioned. Anything ring a bell? Of course not.

    Go listen to some more Journey.

  8. 8.

    Tim F.

    August 15, 2006 at 11:50 am

    Funny, I think that this particular issue could work itself out given the ideal alignment of stars. It doesn’t even require one of those Friedmanesque solutions where things would be fine if only everybody followed Friedman’s advice.

    Until now the Lebanese army has basically avoided the south because it couldn’t hope to compete with Hezbollah. Now that the ceasefire terms mandate that they enter the region they will have no choice but to stand toe-to-toe with Hezbollah. For now that is a losing proposition, which is why the UN forces will be obliged to back them up. But (Major ‘IF’ statement to follow) if the Lebanese central government receives enough aid to build its army into a respectable force, their central prerogative as a government will motivate them to either disarm Hezbollah or fold them into government control. A strong government simply cannot tolerate independent armed groups within its borders. Even if the new Lebanese state ends up strongly unfriendly to Israel, they can be dealt with on state-to-state terms which are much more favorable to Israel than the current shadow war.

  9. 9.

    RSA

    August 15, 2006 at 11:50 am

    From a 2002 NOW press release:

    Daschle’s positions on other domestic policies have sparked Republican attacks. For example, an ad is being run repeatedly in South Dakota showing a picture of Saddam Hussein with the caption “Why is America buying 725,000 barrels of oil a day from this man?” next to a picture of Daschle with the caption “Because this man won’t let America drill for oil at home.”

    HTH.

  10. 10.

    p.lukasiak

    August 15, 2006 at 12:14 pm

    The question is, what is Lebanon going to do about it?

    well, the first thing that Lebanon should do is get itself a shitload of big missiles and big bombs that it can shoot at tel aviv the next time Israel starts bombing civilian targets in Lebanon.,….

  11. 11.

    Marty

    August 15, 2006 at 12:27 pm

    The Other Steve,

    Heazbollah is a terrorist organization.

    Israel is a sovereign country.

    Do not compare the two as equals.

    Israeli proverb: “Don’t start nuthin’… won’t be nuthin’.”

  12. 12.

    dlw

    August 15, 2006 at 12:36 pm

    [from capelza]
    The whole idea is to try to figure out how to rid ourselves of the oil addiction that chains us to the ME. Of course, I’ve been hollering about this for years and years, but whatever.

    Santorum was running an ad along these lines: we need to reduce the use of oil so we don’t have to rely on crazy Mideast terrorists. I’m not sure I understand the logic. Are the terrorists going to like us when we stop buying oil? I don’t think they hate us because we buy oil.

    I’m all in favor of reducing oil consumption, I just don’t see where that lets us close the book on Mideast craziness or end the mythological War on Terror.

  13. 13.

    John S.

    August 15, 2006 at 12:49 pm

    Secondly, in our reality, here on Earth, Bush himself campaigned in 2004 on the need for the US to become more energy independent. Alternative energy development, hydrogen fuel for cars, expansion of nuclear energy, conservation legislation—all were repeatedly mentioned.

    LMAO – Most unintentionally funny post I’ve seen in a while.

    Bush talked about going to Mars, too.

  14. 14.

    The Other Steve

    August 15, 2006 at 12:59 pm

    Secondly, in our reality, here on Earth, Bush himself campaigned in 2004 on the need for the US to become more energy independent. Alternative energy development, hydrogen fuel for cars, expansion of nuclear energy, conservation legislation—all were repeatedly mentioned. Anything ring a bell? Of course not.

    LOL! It must be nice living in your fantasy world.

    Bush’s idea of energy independence was drilling for oil in Alaska’s ANWR.

    As RSA so aptly pointed out

  15. 15.

    The Other Steve

    August 15, 2006 at 1:03 pm

    I’m all in favor of reducing oil consumption, I just don’t see where that lets us close the book on Mideast craziness or end the mythological War on Terror.

    The problem as I see it…

    In Saudi Arabia there are reasonable people, and there are extremists.

    The extremists are pissed off at just about everybody, but the reasonable people keep them off their backs by giving them cash. In exchange the extremists attack someone else, and the reasonable people don’t worry about the extremists because they’re off their backs.

    If we stop buying oil, this will dry up the funding source to the reasonable people, who in turn will no longer be able to give money to the extremists… which will force all of them figuring out a way to challenge their creative energies into something productive instead of blowing things up.

    There’s nothing we can do that will get terrorists to like us. What we need to do is change the focus so that they are fighting each other over there, instead of us over there.

    Anyway, that’s pretty funny that Santorum is running ads like that, when Moveon.org and such ran ads like that in 2004 they were called radical fruitcakes by people such as Santorum and Mac Buckets.

  16. 16.

    Edmund Dantes

    August 15, 2006 at 1:23 pm

    Every time I look at the Middle East I see nothing but seething hatred, conniving, backstabbing, dishonesty, maneuvering, leadership concerned only with self-promotion and self-preservation, and, ultimately escalating levels of violence.

    And yet people thought it would be a great idea for the United States to stick it’s hand into the middle of it all, and thought we’d be able to remake that corner of the globe through sheer military strength alone.

  17. 17.

    Pb

    August 15, 2006 at 1:37 pm

    If we stop buying oil, this will dry up the funding source to the reasonable people, who in turn will no longer be able to give money to the extremists…

    Correct. And then what do you think they’ll do?

    which will force all of them figuring out a way to challenge their creative energies into something productive instead of blowing things up.

    Right. Because when BCCI collapsed in 1991, depriving Osama bin Laden of his main source of funding, he decided to channel his creative energies into something productive instead of blowing things up. And that’s how John Kerry prevented 9/11.

  18. 18.

    ThymeZone

    August 15, 2006 at 1:51 pm

    I wish they would just blow themselves all up:

    I went down that thematic road on the first thread here to the topic, and got called every name in the book including
    “anti-semite” for it. But of course, any reasonable person would, in fact, wish that they would just blow themselves all up. All the fanatics and “God is on our side” and “Chosen people” advocates, on both sides … fuck them all. Why should our world go up in flames because they’re crazy? Let them put their children in the homes of families who will care for them, and go off to some neutral space somewhere and kill each other with sticks and bare hands. Maybe then the rest of us can live in peace.

    But as soon as one says a sensible thing like that, here come the absolutists who have to pimp up one side of another of an endless conflict. THEY started it. WE are just defending ourselves.

    My favorite line was, “What else can we do?”

    What else can they do. As if perpetual mutual destruction were the pinnacle of human thought and the end product of civilization.

    I’ll tell you what else you can do: Walk into the sea and drown yourselves, you crazy fucks.

  19. 19.

    The Other Steve

    August 15, 2006 at 1:56 pm

    Heazbollah is a terrorist organization.

    Israel is a sovereign country.

    Do not compare the two as equals.

    Right When Israel invade, Hezbollah should have said “Ok, right. You guys win, here’s our weapons. We’re sorry, really we are. Dreadful mistake, really. Won’t happen again, sir.”

    Oh come on. Let’s stop worrying about Political Correctness and just make things happen.

  20. 20.

    The Other Steve

    August 15, 2006 at 1:59 pm

    Right. Because when BCCI collapsed in 1991, depriving Osama bin Laden of his main source of funding, he decided to channel his creative energies into something productive instead of blowing things up. And that’s how John Kerry prevented 9/11.

    A bit different, really. The idea here is that the reasonable people decide that they can’t survive if the extremist people are still around and they do something about it.

    Or there’s the other method. We start up the Draft and we call up 10,000,000 soldiers to occupy the region.

    Which do you think costs the US less?

  21. 21.

    The Other Steve

    August 15, 2006 at 2:01 pm

    I went down that thematic road on the first thread here to the topic, and got called every name in the book including
    “anti-semite” for it.

    As I recall that was because you were blaming all the problems on Israel, while pretending Hezbollah didn’t exist.

  22. 22.

    Darrell

    August 15, 2006 at 2:14 pm

    Until now the Lebanese army has basically avoided the south because it couldn’t hope to compete with Hezbollah. Now that the ceasefire terms mandate that they enter the region they will have no choice but to stand toe-to-toe with Hezbollah. For now that is a losing proposition, which is why the UN forces will be obliged to back them up.

    Just curious Tim, when have UN forces ever provided reliable military “back up”? Rwanda? Srebrenica? In 1967 when they stepped aside to let arabs attack Israel? Most recently, when they were stationed in Southern Lebanon doing fuck all while Hezbollah launched missiles into Israel?

    Tell us please, when have UN forces provided back up security?

  23. 23.

    ThymeZone

    August 15, 2006 at 2:22 pm

    because you were blaming all the problems on Israel,

    That’s a lie, and you are a lying fuck.

    I blamed the problems caused by Israel on Israel. I put both sides in the same category of shitheads from my first post to the subject. The fact that I didn’t wrap every Israel bash in a similar Heabollah bash to please you doesn’t give you the right to lie about it.

    Shove it up your ass, I know what I said and you are flat wrong.

    You’re a goddammed liar and we can stand here all day and go back and forth about it if you want to. All week and all month.

  24. 24.

    Mac Buckets

    August 15, 2006 at 2:22 pm

    LOL! It must be nice living in your fantasy world.

    My fantasy world has links. Yours, not so much. Tell me more about how those mean old Republican bullies called Dems traitors in 2000 because they wanted to import less oil. Or even 2004. Can’t substantiate it? Just pretend! It doesn’t matter — your hurt widdle feewings are all that matters. There, there. It’ll be OK.

    Bush’s idea of energy independence was drilling for oil in Alaska’s ANWR.

    Wrong again. The rightwing-fascist-Bush-apologists at NPR have a few clips you should listen to from the 2004 campaign.

    Or you can just take their Cheney-fellating, Rovian-implant word for it:

    Both President Bush and Sen. John Kerry are touting long-term plans to cut dependence on foreign oil and develop new sources of energy at home — while criticizing each other’s positions.

    A quick tip: If John S. has your back, you must realize that you are in Idiot Country, right?

    As RSA so aptly pointed out

    There was nothing in RSA’s post about my point. I just skipped it and assumed it had nothing to do with me, since, well…it didn’t have anything to do with me. Try reading his post again.

    Anyway, you may now continue your revision of history.

  25. 25.

    ThymeZone

    August 15, 2006 at 2:26 pm

    a few clips you should listen to

    You know what, Mac? If Bush wants to go back and re-govern in accordance with “clips” from his campaigns, that would be fine with me. That would be a huge improvement over the clusterfuck government we actually got. Just let him stay within the bounds of his own campaign remarks. We’d all be a lot better off.

  26. 26.

    Mac Buckets

    August 15, 2006 at 2:39 pm

    If Bush wants to go back and re-govern in accordance with “clips” from his campaigns, that would be fine with me.

    You mean, like this, from the Condi-loving, Religiofascists at MSNBC:

    Bush pushes alternative energy proposals

    U.S. ‘held hostage’ by dependence on foreign oil, president says

    At least try to get connected to reality, even though it’s much easier to stay in the Frankensteinian “Bush bad… everything Bush say bad” mindset.

  27. 27.

    Pb

    August 15, 2006 at 2:41 pm

    Just let him stay within the bounds of his own campaign remarks. We’d all be a lot better off.

    Indeed. If Bush had stuck with his 2000 campaign promises, for example, ah, those were the days. He had a lot of sound military advice for himself back then, that he completely ignored later.

  28. 28.

    skip

    August 15, 2006 at 2:43 pm

    When measuring the lethality of the weaponery in Lebanon our channels spent a great deal of time on WWII-era stuffed with ball bearings by Hezzbollah. We all saw the footage more than once. But did we see a mention along the way of Israeli use of US-produced cluster bombs? As I recall, providing cluster bombs for such use is against the law, yet we recently read of a rush re-order from Israel about to be okayed by the Pentagon. All out in the open–business as usual. This isn’t the first time Israel has used cluster bombs in military operations either.
    Cluster bombs make K-bearing bombs look like spitballs, yet we hear nothing of them, even though unexploded mini-bombs are now being found in destroyed homes in Tyre and elsewhere.
    Had Hezzbollah used a cluster bomb against Haifa there would be no end to the story.

  29. 29.

    Pb

    August 15, 2006 at 2:45 pm

    The Other Steve,

    A bit different, really. The idea here is that the reasonable people decide that they can’t survive if the extremist people are still around and they do something about it.

    Well, it hasn’t happened yet, but who knows, right. However, I thought when you said “all of them”, you might have actually meant… “all of them”. Silly me.

    Or there’s the other method. We start up the Draft and we call up 10,000,000 soldiers to occupy the region.

    Which do you think costs the US less?

    False dichotomies aside, at the rate we’re going, even that would be more cost-effective than our current policy, because it’d at least have a chance of getting the job done. Or, there’d finally be a massive backlash against this idiocy, and Democrats would run things for the next 40 years or so.

  30. 30.

    Mac Buckets

    August 15, 2006 at 2:46 pm

    And I’m not going to get distracted from my original point, which is that TOSser is lying again, creating fantasies where he and his comrades got called “traitors” by imaginary meanie Republicans in scenarios that are too pathetic for words. Were those mean old GOPpers calling Bush a traitor in 2000 and 2004, too, since Bush was openly for reducing dependence on foreign oil?

  31. 31.

    Darrell

    August 15, 2006 at 2:55 pm

    yet we recently read of a rush re-order from Israel about to be okayed by the Pentagon. All out in the open—business as usual. This isn’t the first time Israel has used cluster bombs in military operations either.

    Do you have evidence/links outside of Al-Jazeera source info. that Israel used cluster bombs in urban areas in Lebanon?

  32. 32.

    Tim F.

    August 15, 2006 at 3:58 pm

    Mac,

    It is too convenient to simply declare the situation hopeless from the outset. In fact I did not even point out that the UN troops have to do any actual fighting, just prevent the Lebanese army from being wiped out until it builds up enough infrastructure to stand on its own. I know that knee-jerk UN bashing feels real real good but right now Israel doesn’t have much else going for it. If she didn’t know already Israel now understands that the IDF will never dislodge Hezbollah by itself. Lebanon has to do it, with somebody’s help. Who will that be, Israel? Right. Maybe we can spare a division or two…I bet the Louisiana NG isn’t doing anything useful. Either the smurfs do the job or we give up and rebuild Haifa underground.

  33. 33.

    Darrell

    August 15, 2006 at 6:14 pm

    I know that knee-jerk UN bashing feels real real good but right now Israel doesn’t have much else going for it.

    Tim, it’s not UN “bashing” if it’s true.. and it is true. More to the point, those UN troops can potentially do a lot of harm ala Srebrenica or 1967 Israel type abdication of duty in which Israel is lulled into a false sense of security with international troops ‘protecting’ them, then when the rockets start firing, UN troops drop their weapons and run like hell. Historically, that’s pretty much what has typically happened when UN troops are involved in military security operations.

    If the forces are in UN control, there is no realistic hope that they can help disarm and/or fight Hezbollah terrorists. It won’t happen. It will have to be a NATO controlled force to have any hope. I know you UN worshipers don’t like to hear it, but it is a more reality based idea than relying on the UN.

  34. 34.

    ThymeZone

    August 15, 2006 at 6:17 pm

    You mean, like this

    No, I meant just what I said. Not your version of it.

  35. 35.

    VidaLoca

    August 15, 2006 at 6:40 pm

    Darrell,

    Do you have evidence/links outside of Al-Jazeera source info. that Israel used cluster bombs in urban areas in Lebanon?

    This article from HRW discusses artillery-fired cluster munitions:

    (Beirut, July 24, 2006) – Israel has used artillery-fired cluster munitions in populated areas of Lebanon, Human Rights Watch said today. Researchers on the ground in Lebanon confirmed that a cluster munitions attack on the village of Blida on July 19 killed one and wounded at least 12 civilians, including seven children. Human Rights Watch researchers also photographed cluster munitions in the arsenal of Israeli artillery teams on the Israel-Lebanon border.

  36. 36.

    Mac Buckets

    August 15, 2006 at 6:40 pm

    No, I meant just what I said.

    Fire bad.

  37. 37.

    ThymeZone

    August 15, 2006 at 7:13 pm

    Fire bad.

    Your progress from Doofus to Hipster Doofus is on track.

  38. 38.

    ThymeZone

    August 15, 2006 at 7:15 pm

    but it is a more reality based idea than relying on the UN.

    As only Darrell can explain, the greatest danger in the world is not people who will shrug at burning the faces off kids in front of their mothers.

    It’s people wearing uniforms who are nothing but “peacekeepers.”

    If it weren’t for the peacekeepers, we’d HAVE peace in the world, in Darrellspeak.

  39. 39.

    ThymeZone

    August 15, 2006 at 7:25 pm

    Did I make that clear?

    Okay, what I meant was, if we’d turn the world over to the people who burn the faces off kids, we’d have peace.

    The way to peace lies in burning off the faces of kids.

    Not with funny-looking “peacemakers.”

    In Darrellspeak.

  40. 40.

    chopper

    August 15, 2006 at 7:36 pm

    My fantasy world has links. Yours, not so much.

    yes, links. to campaign speeches. honest to god speeches. what more can you ask for?

    bush also talked about going to mars, ending steroid use in baseball and fighting sex slavery. i’d ask you to let us all know when we get to mars, but it looks like you’re already there.

    oh, but he has a proposal now! nice news link, i like how it’s from a year and a half after the 2004 campaign you speak of. i can’t imagine why it took a year and a half for bush to come up with an actual plan, i’m sure it was because he spent all that time thinking so, so hard on it.

    what a joke. the dems have been pushing energy independence for god knows how long. bush comes up with a plan in 2006 after consumers get pissed enough about gas prices and suddenly the goopers start acting like it was their idea. typical.

  41. 41.

    John S.

    August 15, 2006 at 8:12 pm

    A quick tip: If John S. has your back, you must realize that you are in Idiot Country, right?

    A quick tip: If this is the best “response” Mac has to offer, you know you’re right.

    So tell us, Mac, what is more important: What Bush says or what Bush does?

    There’s an old saying, a man of words…no, a man of deeds, well, he’s a garden of flowers – no, no – well the point is, he’s like a bunch of weeds.

  42. 42.

    ThymeZone

    August 15, 2006 at 8:19 pm

    Bush: I don’t know the loophole question. Can you give me some loopholes?

    This is the man who gave you the Terror Threat Level Alert System Color Codes.

    Just remember that the next time you see that we have been on “yellow” every day for four years.

  43. 43.

    Krista

    August 15, 2006 at 8:40 pm

    Just remember that the next time you see that we have been on “yellow” every day for four years.

    As in yellow-bellied?

  44. 44.

    DougJ

    August 15, 2006 at 8:53 pm

    Every time I look at the Middle East I see nothing but seething hatred, conniving, backstabbing, dishonesty, maneuvering, leadership concerned only with self-promotion and self-preservation

    I can’t imagine what that must be like.

  45. 45.

    The Other Steve

    August 15, 2006 at 9:39 pm

    And I’m not going to get distracted from my original point, which is that TOSser is lying again, creating fantasies where he and his comrades got called “traitors” by imaginary meanie Republicans in scenarios that are too pathetic for words. Were those mean old GOPpers calling Bush a traitor in 2000 and 2004, too, since Bush was openly for reducing dependence on foreign oil?

    Someone please explain to Mac Buckets that Drilling for Oil in ANWR is not a “policy” for eliminating our addiction to oil.

    I don’t have time to teach people acting like whiney little two year olds today.

  46. 46.

    The Other Steve

    August 15, 2006 at 9:49 pm

    It’s interesting, how everybody was bamboozled and didn’t realize that Bush was really for breaking our dependence upon oil until his born again moment during his 2006 SOTU address.

    According to Mac, this has been Bush’s position all along.

    Wishful thinking? Selective Imagination?

  47. 47.

    Slide

    August 15, 2006 at 10:02 pm

    Cole:

    Every time I look at the Middle East I see nothing but seething hatred, conniving, backstabbing, dishonesty, maneuvering, leadership concerned only with self-promotion and self-preservation, and, ultimately escalating levels of violence.

    and yet John supported the United States invading Iraq to spread democracy. Go figure.

  48. 48.

    Beej

    August 16, 2006 at 1:08 am

    A couple of points:

    1. The UN does have an abysmal record as peacekeepers, especially in the Middle East. Is it fair to judge them on their record? I think so.

    2. A fairly large proportion of the Lebanese army is made up of Shia Muslims. How effective and motivated is this army going to be in disarming and containing Hezbollah? I don’t know, but I do have to wonder.

    3. (Okay, I know I said a couple of points, but what the hell) Has anyone noticed that we haven’t been talking about Iran’s nuclear program since the Israel/Hezbollah brouhaha started? Chalk one up for Iran.

    4. (Just this one more, I promise) A scenario for your consideration-The peacekeepers move in but are unable to disarm Hezbollah. Hezbollah uses the cessation of hostilities, which was costing them dearly, to resupply, re-arm, and gain new converts by helping to rebuild southern Lebanon. At some time down the road, the whole miserable cycle starts again-Hezbollah or Israel does something which causes the other side to attack, the world wrings its collective hands, peacekeepers are sent in with much hoopla and sighs of relief, the warring parties use the cessation of hostilities to resupply, re-arm, etc. Lather, rinse, repeat.

  49. 49.

    Beej

    August 16, 2006 at 1:14 am

    John, I’m with you. Sometimes I wish they would all just blow themselves up and be done with it!

  50. 50.

    JSmith

    August 16, 2006 at 11:39 am

    Something we in the Enlightened West need to spend more time on is ensuring that the Sunnis never forget that the Shiites are heretics, and that the Shiites always remember that the Sunnis murdered Ali and Hussein. (That was back in the 7th century, of course – a long time ago for us, but only yesterday in the fun-filled Middle East!)

    I don’t think the cease-fire will last very long. If Hezbullah wants to launch some rockets the Lebanese Army will provide targeting information and the UN peacekeeping “force” will be sure to stay under cover.

  51. 51.

    Mac Buckets

    August 16, 2006 at 12:27 pm

    So tell us, Mac, what is more important: What Bush says or what Bush does?

    That’s entirely irrelevant to the point, of course, although I’ve been able to show (you know, with actual links to actual news stories — albeit from Rethuglican-Rove-mind-controlled-wingnuts like NPR-burton and MSNB-Diebold) that in this particular regards, the two are at least roughly the same. You guys, on the other hand, have shown zilch. Nada. Not one link. Nothing but pointless and baseless whining. But I’m used to holding myself to a higher standard, of course, so no biggie.

    The point is that your functionally retarded little friend is lying (the pathological motivation for which makes me a little sad inside) about imaginary meanie Republicans bullying poor widdle imaginary Democwats and calling them imaginary nasty names about some imaginary policy in a fantasy that not only has zero chance of being true, but doesn’t stand the first test of logic (in short, why would the GOP call the Dems “traitors” for doing what Bush was openly advocating? The answer is in found only TOS’s world of illusion and mist).

    So I called him on it, and instead of manning up and admitting he was lying or providing any shred of evidence, he essentially posted (get this) that since he didn’t know about Bush’s alt-energy stance until SOTU 2006, then it didn’t exist, and therefore (I guess) the GOP did call Dems “traitors” because of the oil dependence issue, even though he can’t find a single instance.

    Still got his back?

  52. 52.

    yet another jeff

    August 16, 2006 at 12:40 pm

    Didn’t the Powers That Be qualify that bit in Bush’s speech the next day?

  53. 53.

    Mac Buckets

    August 16, 2006 at 12:56 pm

    According to Mac, this has been Bush’s position all along.

    Wishful thinking? Selective Imagination?

    Being smart? Paying attention? Citing real news sources?

    Tip: Your own ignorance isn’t really a great defense for lying about something that even you must admit can’t possible have been true.

  54. 54.

    scs

    August 16, 2006 at 1:49 pm

    Every time I look at the Middle East I see nothing but seething hatred, conniving, backstabbing, dishonesty, maneuvering, leadership concerned only with self-promotion and self-preservation, and, ultimately escalating levels of violence.

    You know, that reminds me of a little anecdote. I briefly worked, maybe about a month, as a receptionist for a large, professional-looking, “personnel” agency over the summer while in college. The owner was a guy in his 30’s from Egypt. Well it didn’t take me long to figure out that the whole place was a scam. And that was before the reporters busted him.

    One converstaion I had with the owner before I quit struck me. I remember him saying how the only thing he cared about was his family, and the rest of the world could go to hell. I suppose that explained his mind-set that allowed him to rip-off people for a living with elaborate schemes when he could probably with a little more effort have made money the same way legitimately.

    If this is a common attitude in the Middle East, then no wonder we have so many problems there. Perhaps it stems from the harsh desert climate, when it was either your family- or the other guy’s family.

  55. 55.

    yet another jeff

    August 17, 2006 at 11:24 am

    Follow us home? They want us to leave so they can fight us here instead of fighting us there? Is Bush saying that Iraq plans to have a civil war here in the US?

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • Omnes Omnibus on B-J After Dark Open Thread: FaFo in Utah (Mar 24, 2023 @ 1:32am)
  • Alison Rose on B-J After Dark Open Thread: FaFo in Utah (Mar 24, 2023 @ 1:30am)
  • West of the Rockies on B-J After Dark Open Thread: FaFo in Utah (Mar 24, 2023 @ 1:24am)
  • a thousand flouncing lurkers (was fidelio) on B-J After Dark Open Thread: FaFo in Utah (Mar 24, 2023 @ 1:23am)
  • oatler on B-J After Dark Open Thread: FaFo in Utah (Mar 24, 2023 @ 1:16am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!