• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Good lord, these people are nuts.

I was promised a recession.

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

People are complicated. Love is not.

No one could have predicted…

You don’t get rid of your umbrella while it’s still raining.

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

That’s my take and I am available for criticism at this time.

Let’s not be the monsters we hate.

Thanks to your bullshit, we are now under siege.

Hot air and ill-informed banter

Fuck the extremist election deniers. What’s money for if not for keeping them out of office?

Motto for the House: Flip 5 and lose none.

Do not shrug your shoulders and accept the normalization of untruths.

Republicans seem to think life begins at the candlelight dinner the night before.

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

The worst democrat is better than the best republican.

“woke” is the new caravan.

… pundit janitors mopping up after the GOP

This fight is for everything.

Usually wrong but never in doubt

This really is a full service blog.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

I’m pretty sure there’s only one Jack Smith.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / The Boy President

The Boy President

by John Cole|  October 24, 20063:29 pm| 29 Comments

This post is in: Politics, Republican Stupidity, Outrage

FacebookTweetEmail

Politics and profit, it appears, is still more important than a few dead miners:

Ah, the magic of the presidency. The Senate has refused to confirm former coal company executive Richard Stickler as the head of the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA). So, while they were out, Bush gave him a recess appointment to the post.

MSHA exists to protect miners’ well-being. Once a miner himself, Stickler spent most of his career above ground, much of it as an executive for companies like coal giant Massey Energy. According to the Charleston Gazette, Stickler’s mines had accident rates of twice the national average.

At a Senate hearing in March, Stickler explained that if U.S. mines were unsafe, it wasn’t an “enforcement problem,” merely a “compliance problem.” His nomination was opposed by the United Mine Workers of America and the AFL-CIO, among others.

Apply that ‘logic’ to the war on drugs- the reason we are failing isn’t because we aren’t catching the drug dealers, it is because the drug dealers refuse to comply with drug laws.

Oh, and guess what happened over the week-end just down the road from me:

A man is dead after an accident at a coal mine Friday in Fellowsville, Preston County. Officials are not releasing the man’s name.

Caryn Gresham, spokeswoman for the West Virginia Office of Miners’ Health, Safety and Training said the accident involved a rib-roll. A rib-roll occurs when the wooden rib of a mine comes loose from the wall or roof of the mine. Gresham said once the rib is loose, it usually causes rocks to fall.

The miner was taken to Preston Memorial Hospital, where he later died.

Someone commented the other day that if the Democrats win in 2006, nothing much will change. The President will just find his veto pen and continue to appoint who he wants through recess appointments. In this case, the boy President, the great decider, had his man and he was sticking to him- even if the the Senate and everyone in the mining industry with a reason to be concerned about safety opposed him. But, as always with this administration and this GOP, it isn’t about what is right or what is good with this country. It is about political power, rewarding those who have been loyal, and, at the core, simply getting what you want at the expense of everyone else- in this case, the widows and orphans of future dead miners.

Thank goodness the adults are in charge. I am really looking forward to voting for the Democrats.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Vive La Difference
Next Post: Moonbat Watch »

Reader Interactions

29Comments

  1. 1.

    cd6

    October 24, 2006 at 3:47 pm

    I love that he signing statement-ed away the rule requiring that the new FEMA director have 5 years of relevant experience because that “might keep the most qualified people out of the job.” (paraphrased)

    This is the kind of little thing that there literally is no common sense justification for, but the dittoheads would never admit it. How does this make sense? HOW?

    After seeing so many of his reckless appointments utterly fail, why does Bush think recess apointing them in spite of the Senate is in any way logical? I mean, good God.

  2. 2.

    The Other Steve

    October 24, 2006 at 3:53 pm

    I suppose you saw the story about the guys who worked at the Sago mine committed suicide? Happened last month or so.

    The point being, that there are people in this world who do take their jobs seriously and suffer from regret when they feel they have failed.

  3. 3.

    Pb

    October 24, 2006 at 4:00 pm

    While we’re on the topic, I’m wondering if Bush will try to recess appointment Bolton back in again, I heard that they’ve got a sneaky way to do it all planned out if they can’t get him through otherwise.

  4. 4.

    David

    October 24, 2006 at 4:02 pm

    After seeing so many of his reckless appointments utterly fail, why does Bush think recess apointing them in spite of the Senate is in any way logical? I mean, good God.

    Maybe Bush doesn’t think of “failure” in the same way that we do. I mean, sure, Iraq killed (literally) uncounted thousands of innocents, created a black hole of money and destabilized the country for years to come. But it won elections, sent money to contractors and made the Republicans feel manly, so it succeeded! Same principle.

  5. 5.

    stickler

    October 24, 2006 at 4:39 pm

    First let me say that my screen name is in no way an endorsement of the hopeless tool Bush just appointed.

    Maybe Bush doesn’t think of “failure” in the same way that we do. I mean, sure, Iraq killed (literally) uncounted thousands of innocents, created a black hole of money and destabilized the country for years to come. But it won elections, sent money to contractors and made the Republicans feel manly, so it succeeded! Same principle.

    Precisely. Bush’s definition of “succeed” seems to be different than ours. This idiot must have been pushed by some moneyed supporter of Bushco. Thus, they are rewarded by his appointment.

    The question is: who is getting served by this? Follow the money.

  6. 6.

    DougJ

    October 24, 2006 at 5:40 pm

    I remember John that at the time you were angry that some Democrats were trying to politicize the mine tragedies. You’ve changed, man.

  7. 7.

    DougJ

    October 24, 2006 at 5:49 pm

    But, as always with this administration and this GOP, it isn’t about what is right or what is good with this country. It is about political power, rewarding those who have been loyal, and, at the core, simply getting what you want at the expense of everyone else- in this case, the widows and orphans of future dead miners.

    Well put. It’s interesting that we only hear the unvarnished — though obvious — truth from potty-mouthed bloggers and not the wise old gray heads of the Gang of 500.

  8. 8.

    Davebo

    October 24, 2006 at 6:18 pm

    You’re doing a heckuva job Dickie.

  9. 9.

    Rex

    October 24, 2006 at 7:06 pm

    This blog wasn’t worth a damn for about a month straight toward the end of summer. Cole and company are more than making up for it with this pre-election buzzsaw of posts.

    Good job, John and Tim!

  10. 10.

    Filthy McNasty

    October 24, 2006 at 7:21 pm

    Sure, go ahead and vote Democrat, you turncoat. And smoke this bongload of what America will get as a result of your betrayal.

    The Democrats have no business running any aspect of our national government. And this is a perfect example why they should be denied elected office in these trying times. They’re unfit to serve, and you’re unfit to call yourself a citizen.

  11. 11.

    Perry Como

    October 24, 2006 at 7:44 pm

    Did you know that if you vote Democrat an uppity black man may date a white woman? Do the right thing and vote for Corker. Otherwise the strawmen may get you!

  12. 12.

    JoeTx

    October 24, 2006 at 8:23 pm

    Filthy McNasty Says:

    Sure, go ahead and vote Democrat, you turncoat. And smoke this bongload of what America will get as a result of your betrayal.

    The Democrats have no business running any aspect of our national government. And this is a perfect example why they should be denied elected office in these trying times. They’re unfit to serve, and you’re unfit to call yourself a citizen.

    Dude, what planet do you live on?

  13. 13.

    Bob In Pacifica

    October 24, 2006 at 8:28 pm

    David, the fragmentation of Iraq and destabilization of the region will also increase the cost of oil. That helps friends.

  14. 14.

    Barry

    October 24, 2006 at 9:27 pm

    One difference that Democratic control of the House would make is that these recess appointees could be properly ‘vetted’. By that, I mean left feeling like the Spanish Inquisition had been on their case.

  15. 15.

    Mike S

    October 24, 2006 at 9:42 pm

    If you keep this up pj media is going to stop sending you those $.32 checks. Not to mention RedState’s children “blamming” you into oblivion.

    I’m glad your voting Dem and I hope you and people like you will retake control of your party.

  16. 16.

    Tsulagi

    October 24, 2006 at 10:30 pm

    And this is a perfect example why they should be denied

    Well Filthy, took that link you provided over to Powerline. Guess, Scott, was too busy going ass up for Bush with the gang to provide a link to the Philadelphia Inquirer editorial he was printing. Sort of wanted to read it directly from the Inquirer. Not that I think they make shit up all the time on Powerline.

    Damn, on the Inquirer site couldn’t find the editorial Powerline was quoting from. Not saying it doesn’t exist. I have faith in the assuppers. However, while on the Inquirer site I did find their editorial from Sunday, Oct. 22 regarding Santorum and Casey. The Inquirer endorses Casey by the way. Wonder why? Probably because only someone brain dead would vote Republican at this point.

  17. 17.

    p.lukasiak

    October 24, 2006 at 10:46 pm

    well, the good news is that this appointment is only effectve until the new Congress is seated (i.e. until January).

    The bad news is that the if they win in November, the Democrats probably won’t have the sense to refuse to officially “recess”, and thus prevent Bush from doing this kind of crap for the next two years….

    (I mean, you need both houses of congress to agree to a “recess” for it to happen. If the Dems gain control of one house, all they have to do is refuse to go into an official “recess” — and pass legislation that defines “recess” as a period of more than 60 days when Congress is not in session. The whole idea of “recess appointments” is one of those outdated “quaint” aspects of the Constitution from back in the day when Congress was intended to meet for only a few weeks each year—and should be done away with.)

  18. 18.

    sglover

    October 25, 2006 at 12:24 am

    It might be a tangential point, but aside from the usual cronyism, this appointment represents something that had me highly annoyed at the Cheney administration long before they started their criminal military schemes: They’re totally in the pocket of last century’s technology. If the Dems 1) manage to take the Congress, and 2) don’t betray us by pussyfooting around, maybe we’ll see some real investigations of Cheney’s “energy task force”, and lingering question about the logic behind our glorious Mesopotamian adventure might finally get an answer.

  19. 19.

    jcricket

    October 25, 2006 at 1:23 am

    at the core, simply getting what you want at the expense of everyone else- in this case, the widows and orphans of future dead miners.

    Not to be cavalier, but isn’t that the core model of Libertarianism? I know, somehow privatizing everything will result in even better environmental stewardship and we’ll all have ponies.

    Seriously, I know you’ve had at least a temporary “conversion” (even if it’s just “I hate the GOP”), but do you really think the GOP is coming back from the direction it’s headed? If anything I think

    At this point the theocracy, no-bid contracts, graft, pork, spending with no tax increases (at least tax and spend makes some kind of logical sense), ill-conceived militarism, anti-diplomatic foreign policy, hatred of immigrants/gays/non-christians, disdain for science are part and parcel of the GOP agenda – not just the current crop of politicians. It’s part of the Rovian wedge-politics strategy and I don’t think you’re headed back, even if you lose.

    See the Texas GOP part platform, for one example of where I believe the GOP is headed. You dance with the devil, the devil don’t change, the devil changes you.

  20. 20.

    The Other Steve

    October 25, 2006 at 7:45 am

    The Democrats have no business running any aspect of our national government. And this is a perfect example why they should be denied elected office in these trying times. They’re unfit to serve, and you’re unfit to call yourself a citizen.

    What are we going to do after the Democrats win and hand the keys ot the country over to Osama bin Laden and Adolf Hitler?

    Whooaaaa is me!

    I’ll bet Osama bin Laden wants to raise taxes too!

    Whoaaaa is me!!!!!

  21. 21.

    Bombadil

    October 25, 2006 at 7:51 am

    Hey, John — are you willing now to go back to this thread and admit that maybe you were full of shit then when you jumped on Democrats and others on the left as politicizing a mine disaster? Or is it OK now that you’re a lefty sympathizer?

  22. 22.

    rachel

    October 25, 2006 at 10:28 am

    Shorter Filthy McNasty:

    The Democrats are going to take my T-bird away!

  23. 23.

    Teak111

    October 25, 2006 at 10:36 am

    There is nothing more revealing then critism from one of your own, great stuff John Cole. Don’t get me started on the Dem Party. I think the lesson learned here is to vote for the most compentant, intelligent, sharp candidate available, regardless of party. The other lesson over the past 6 years is, given total power over the government, either party would deteriorate into corruption. ITs up to the people to understand the importance of checks and balances in government, that the sunshine and bleach is often the other party.

  24. 24.

    Hyperion

    October 25, 2006 at 10:43 am

    Bombadil Said: go back to this thread

    wow, i did and was reminded of Brian…precursor of scs and Darrell, no? that guy was annoying.

  25. 25.

    CaseyL

    October 25, 2006 at 11:44 am

    I’m not going to get on John’s case about things he said way back when. There’s nothing he can do about things he said, or votes he cast, way back when.

    Everyone will prefer to stick up for what they see as “their side,” and everyone is more likely to see (and criticize) the mote in the “other side’s” eye than the beam in their own. That’s human nature.

    I think that John – who tends to be a bit, ah, hyperbolic when he’s upset anyway – was more hair-trigger than usual during what now, in retrospect, seems to have been the last throes of the last vestiges of his Republicanism.

  26. 26.

    Zifnab

    October 25, 2006 at 12:04 pm

    I’m not going to get on John’s case about things he said way back when. There’s nothing he can do about things he said, or votes he cast, way back when.

    John’s been apologizing through his nose for the past two months. I think every other post begins or ends with “I can’t believe I voted for these guys”. He’ll be voting straight D in November and I’m sure he’s doing a few Hail Marys before he goes to bed. He’s paying his penance.

  27. 27.

    John Cole

    October 25, 2006 at 12:17 pm

    Bombadil-

    There is a clear difference between the two situations. First, this is behavior on the part of the president that has occurred AFTER the Sago 13, which is completely inexcusable. Second, I am not blaming the President for the death of this miner, as RedDan was blaming Bush for the deaths of those 13.

    I think there are some pretty big distinctions there.

  28. 28.

    John Cole

    October 25, 2006 at 12:22 pm

    Not to mention, I have been known to be wrong about things before…

  29. 29.

    Bombadil

    October 25, 2006 at 1:32 pm

    First, this is behavior on the part of the president that has occurred AFTER the Sago 13, which is completely inexcusable.

    Irrelevant, unless the Sago 13 incident was the first mine disaster ever. The Sago 13 incident was AFTER whatever disaster had come before, and the mine safety regulations and funding for their enforcement were still being cut.

    Second, I am not blaming the President for the death of this miner, as RedDan was blaming Bush for the deaths of those 13.

    Codswallop. From the quote you yourself posted:

    Undoubtedly, some will criticize me for placing blame on President Bush here. The defense will be that Bush didn’t cause the explosion that collapsed the mine. My response will be that he didn’t do anything to prevent it. In fact, if anything, the actions of his administration made the situation worse.

    I don’t see how his laying this at the feet of the Bush Administration’s actions and policies is much different from your own take on it here:

    But, as always with this administration and this GOP, it isn’t about what is right or what is good with this country. It is about political power, rewarding those who have been loyal, and, at the core, simply getting what you want at the expense of everyone else- in this case, the widows and orphans of future dead miners.

    And re:

    Not to mention, I have been known to be wrong about things before…

    You’re hardly alone there. We’re thinking of having jackets made up.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • NotMax on Late Night Open Thread: Schadenfreude Shots All Round! (Mar 21, 2023 @ 3:27am)
  • 🐾BillinGlendaleCA on Late Night Open Thread: Schadenfreude Shots All Round! (Mar 21, 2023 @ 3:18am)
  • Frankensteinbeck on Late Night Open Thread: Schadenfreude Shots All Round! (Mar 21, 2023 @ 3:18am)
  • NotMax on Late Night Open Thread: Schadenfreude Shots All Round! (Mar 21, 2023 @ 3:17am)
  • Baud on Late Night Open Thread: Schadenfreude Shots All Round! (Mar 21, 2023 @ 3:12am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!