• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

John Fetterman: Too Manly for Pennsylvania.  Paid for by the Oz for Senator campaign.

They’re not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

We are aware of all internet traditions.

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

I was promised a recession.

Their freedom requires your slavery.

This blog will pay for itself.

Thanks to your bullshit, we are now under siege.

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

Good lord, these people are nuts.

I did not have telepathic declassification on my 2022 bingo card.

Conservatism: there are some people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

We still have time to mess this up!

I’d hate to be the candidate who lost to this guy.

No one could have predicted…

Republicans do not pay their debts.

I like you, you’re my kind of trouble.

I know this must be bad for Joe Biden, I just don’t know how.

Jesus, Mary, & Joseph how is that election even close?

Eh, that’s media spin. biden’s health is fine and he’s doing a good job.

Balloon Juice has never been a refuge for the linguistically delicate.

Sadly, there is no cure for stupid.

When your entire life is steeped in white supremacy, equality feels like discrimination.

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Vote Suppression

Vote Suppression

by Tim F|  November 6, 20069:39 am| 109 Comments

This post is in: Politics, Republican Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

Usually when a party descends into hackish dirty tricks they make a minimal effort to hide their responsibility. Trials and investigative reporting eventually bring out the truth, but by then who cares? The vote is done.

Surprising maybe one person who never leaves RedState, the GOP has kicked off a massive campaign of automated calls meant to deceive voters into thinking that they come from the Democratic candidate. Everybody hates robocalls and the calls come in repeatedly during dinner or early hours in the morning and they often take several minutes to get the the part where you find out that the thing was paid for by the RNC. Voters who get these decide, understandably to stay home. Josh Marshall has the full story.

The GOP doesn’t care if you know. They don’t care that local GOP candidates think the tactic is disgusting. The calls are going out everywhere (NH, PA, KS, CT, NY, IL, more from the AP)and it violates significant campaign laws, which means that the FEC will eventually level some truly impressive fines. As if the GOP cared about that.

If you live in a contested district the odds are fairly good that you have more information than I do. When you get a call, do this:
* Record the call, making sure that you get the end where the RNC announces its sponsorship.
* Record the phone number.
* Make sure that Metro desks at your local newspaper, TV stations and radio stations hear about it. If you know anybody who has also received the calls, have them call in as well.
* Contact Josh Marshall with the details and the phone number, especially if you live in a state not listed above.
* Tell EVERYBODY you know. The only thing that will kill this is word of mouth. In fact, outrage about this behavior (interrupting people repeatedly during dinner, waking them up repeatedly at ridiculous hours) should spark a major backlash. But that will only happen if people know about it, so start calling around now.

Again, if you know anybody who woke up at 3 AM to take an irritating automated phone call make sure he or she knows that the call came straight from Ken Mehlman at the RNC. Let’s help revolting behavior get the reward it deserves.

***Update***

Much more about what you can do here. Also read this diary, which may have ID’d the perpetrator.

We now know that the bogus robocalls are a single coordinated campaign targeting fifteen races: CA-04, CA-50, CT-04, CT-05, FL-13, ID-01, IL-06, IL-08, KS-02, NC-11, NH-02, NY-19, PA-06, WA-05. If you know of any more please leave the information in the comments.

***Update 2***

A more thorough list of targeted races at TPM. The perp is definitely Conquest Communications of Richmond, Virginia.

***Update 3***

Typical.

Kelleher did what any right-thinking person who was being driven half out of their minds by unsolicited phone calls would do. She called Farrell’s headquarters in Westport to ask them to stop.

The person who answered the phone said the calls weren’t coming from Farrell headquarters. A Farrell aide later told us they launched their first robo call Wednesday featuring Paul Newman saying all nice stuff about his old friend.

Farrell’s headquarters referred Kelleher to the opposition, the National Republican Campaign Committee (NRCC) in Washington, D.C., (202 479-7000, in case you want to call), where a spokesman said they were responsible for many of the calls.

“I called the number they gave me, but when I asked if they could take me off the call list they just laughed at me,” Kelleher said.

***Update 4***

The Economist‘s new blog equates Google bombing with saturation robocalling. The false equivalence fallacy strikes again.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « What Happened In Iraq?
Next Post: Open Thread »

Reader Interactions

109Comments

  1. 1.

    The Asshole Formerly Known as GOP4Me

    November 6, 2006 at 9:52 am

    Still, this kinda fizzles as the November surprise. Or was that Saddam’a show trial?

  2. 2.

    Proud Liberal

    November 6, 2006 at 9:53 am

    Had enough America?

  3. 3.

    Tulkinghorn

    November 6, 2006 at 9:53 am

    If it is happening all over the country, and all at the same time, it appears to be a conspiracy at the highest levels of the Republican party. Some governors and state AGs may want to drag these assholes out of Washington and before some grand juries, because if it is against Federal law there must be some state law violations as well.

  4. 4.

    The Asshole Formerly Known as GOP4Me

    November 6, 2006 at 10:06 am

    “Saddam’s show trial.” My fingers have failed me yet again.

    Had enough America?

    Depends on who you talk to. Some people really like pie, and wish they could have some more.

    Some governors and state AGs may want to drag these assholes out of Washington and before some grand juries, because if it is against Federal law there must be some state law violations as well.

    God, I hope so. If 20 or 30 of these bastards go to jail, there may actually be a disincentive for the rest of them to try these sorts of shenanigans in 2008.

  5. 5.

    Tim F.

    November 6, 2006 at 10:08 am

    If 20 or 30 of these bastards go to jail, there may actually be a disincentive for the rest of them to try these sorts of shenanigans in 2008.

    If they lose Dems get subpoena power, so I bet that for many Republicans the choice is jail or jail.

  6. 6.

    Tulkinghorn

    November 6, 2006 at 10:10 am

    some might get prison rather than jail.

  7. 7.

    zzyzx

    November 6, 2006 at 10:10 am

    Eh, when they win again via these tactics, they can rewrite the laws to make it ok for them to do it. It’s not like there’s a Supreme Court that’s going to overturn it.

    Yes, I am descending into cynical land. This is what the Republicans don’t understand. It’s not good for 49+% of the voting population to get absolutely nothing; hell with gerrmandering, it’s quite possible for the majority of the votes cast for the House to go to Democrats but the Republicans still hold a majority.

    Our system operates on faith. If people stop believing in it, then we’re in a lot more trouble than what any Congress can do over a 2 year period.

  8. 8.

    Randy

    November 6, 2006 at 10:11 am

    Cry me a river. Remember all the dirty stuff Clinton did in 1996? This isn’t too different from that. Not saying it’s right, but turnabout…

  9. 9.

    Tulkinghorn

    November 6, 2006 at 10:12 am

    WTF?

  10. 10.

    The Other Steve

    November 6, 2006 at 10:12 am

    YEAH! The guy who replaced Haggard lives in my town! Everybody cheer!

  11. 11.

    The Asshole Formerly Known as GOP4Me

    November 6, 2006 at 10:14 am

    If they lose Dems get subpoena power, so I bet that for many Republicans the choice is jail or jail.

    Yeah, but if they hold the House only their aides will go to jail. (Assuming the candidates themselves are smart enough to maintain some level of plausible deniability.)

    So it’s not really a tough choice: my ass, or my subordinate’s?

  12. 12.

    The Asshole Formerly Known as GOP4Me

    November 6, 2006 at 10:16 am

    Cry me a river. Remember all the dirty stuff Clinton did in 1996? This isn’t too different from that. Not saying it’s right, but turnabout…

    No, I don’t remember Clinton doing stuff like this. Could you please remind me what he did? Other than having a couple guys whacked, of course.

  13. 13.

    Walker

    November 6, 2006 at 10:17 am

    Does Randy ever make arguments? Or is it all just false analogies (like the above), unsubstantiated claims and ad hominem attacks?

    Or is he a spoof? I swear I can no longer tell on this site who is real and who is a spoof.

  14. 14.

    The Practitioner

    November 6, 2006 at 10:21 am

    If you can’t stomach what has to be done to debride the putrid, festering wound that is the Bush administration, its okay to sit this one out.

    I swear no allegiance to any political party; I am an American first, last and always.

  15. 15.

    ThymeZone

    November 6, 2006 at 10:22 am

    Back in the 1950’s, this practical joke was making the rounds:

    Call your victim every 20 minutes starting at 2:00 am.

    Ask for Frank.

    After six or seven of these calls, call again and …

    “Hi. This is Frank. Have there been any calls for me?”

    Har har, good for a laugh.

    Who dreamed that someday, very smart people would figure out how to hijack the government of the country using techniques like this?

    I hand it to the GOP. Doing “whatever it takes” is the signature behavior of the true patriot. When keeping America Republican is the end, the means are justified. Any means at all. Voter suppression, vote counting irregularities, lies, smear campaigns, phony wedge issues, gerrymandering … nothing is off the table.

    You have to respect that kind of passion and committment.

  16. 16.

    cleek

    November 6, 2006 at 10:29 am

    this is the kind of thing local news stations should be reporting on – telling voters what’s up with these calls.

    anyone think it’ll happen?

  17. 17.

    ThymeZone

    November 6, 2006 at 10:31 am

    Or is he a spoof? I swear I can no longer tell on this site who is real and who is a spoof.

    Pardon me for boasting, but I pride myself on having the most sensitive spoof-detector on the board, the Binford 3000 Turbo Spoofapalooza Detector.

    The Binford tells me that Randy is definitely a spoof.

    But take heart, the blog has moved from carrying about 30% spoof on a typical day, with peaks at 50% of all posting activity (earlier this year) to about 15-20% now, with peaks at around 30%.

    One thing the Binford cannot do is identify the authors of spoof. Pretty much every non-spoof must be considered a suspect for spoof authorship. DougJ is an obvious default choice, but he’s only one of several dedicated spoofers here. And without proof to the contrary, you have to consider the proprietors to be spoof suspects too.

    Spoof is just part of the blogosphere now, you just have to get used to it.

  18. 18.

    jcricket

    November 6, 2006 at 10:33 am

    So far the RNC has spent $6 million defending the people involved in the New Hampshire phone jamming scandal, resulting in a conviction of at least one person involved – James Tobin.

    However, one might ask why the RNC would spend so much defending one guy, if they weren’t involved in, oh I dunno, a larger conspiracy to suppress Democratic votes that reaches all the way to the White House. This is why that case is ongoing.

    Jail, jail or Prison. One suspects the Grand Old Docket is going to get mighty long in the next 2-4 years.

    Again, I believe these are the “death throes” of a failed party we’re seeing here. Dead-enders and all that.

  19. 19.

    Steve

    November 6, 2006 at 10:36 am

    One thing the Binford cannot do is identify the authors of spoof. Pretty much every non-spoof must be considered a suspect for spoof authorship. DougJ is an obvious default choice, but he’s only one of several dedicated spoofers here. And without proof to the contrary, you have to consider the proprietors to be spoof suspects too.

    I heard from scs that all spoofers are DougJ. That includes you and me, of course, and probably scs too.

    What’s unusual about the sleazy tactic in this post is that it comes straight from party headquarters, and they don’t even seem to be embarassed by it. So of course, we’ll hear lots of comparisions between this officially-sanctioned stunt and isolated episodes of tire-slashing and the like, because our trolls love nothing more than a false equivalence. Of course, that might be because they’re all DougJ.

  20. 20.

    jcricket

    November 6, 2006 at 10:37 am

    Or is he a spoof? I swear I can no longer tell on this site who is real and who is a spoof.

    It’s not just Balloon Juice where that’s a problem. When Dick Cheney’s talking points and sites like Powerline and RedState are less believable than the Onion, you know the Republican party has “jumped the shark”. I think it’s hilarious that the spoofs can’t keep up any more. The real party does and says stuff so outrageous each day (i.e. Bush never said “stay the course”) that the spoofs pale in comparison.

  21. 21.

    ThymeZone

    November 6, 2006 at 10:41 am

    That includes you and me, of course, and probably scs too.

    Not really. It’s relatively easy to prove non-spoofitude.

    I’ve done it more than once. I have a real email address, a real name, even a real phone number that real posters here have called and used to carry on a real conversation with yours truly.

    Ask scs to do that. Or Randy. Or ParR. You’ll discover a difference.

    As for you …. heh. Let’s check the Binford. Hmm. So far you are in the green (nonspoof). So far, I say. Your Steve persona could be a cover for a spoof author with a different real name.

  22. 22.

    stickler

    November 6, 2006 at 10:59 am

    PpGaz has spoken to posters from this site on his home phone?

    Yikes. I’d be talking to 911 immediately thereafter if it happened to me.

    Or were the calls … coming from inside the house?!? (Cue scary music and shrieking violins)

  23. 23.

    The Other Steve

    November 6, 2006 at 11:08 am

    Cry me a river. Remember all the dirty stuff Clinton did in 1996? This isn’t too different from that. Not saying it’s right, but turnabout…

    But you are saying it’s right. Why do you claim your not when you are?

    How can you be honest with us when you aren’t even honest with yourself.

  24. 24.

    Randy

    November 6, 2006 at 11:15 am

    All right, everybody, it’s me, DougJ.

    Just trying to get everyone amped for election day.

  25. 25.

    ThymeZone

    November 6, 2006 at 11:16 am

    Yikes. I’d be talking to 911 immediately thereafter if it happened to me.

    Hilariously funny. Really, that’s Borat-level material. But, as it happens, they called me. So I guess they’d be calling 911 to report that I answered the phone.

  26. 26.

    Steve

    November 6, 2006 at 11:19 am

    All right, everybody, it’s me, DougJ.

    Just trying to get everyone amped for election day.

    This is no time to be getting randy. We have work to do.

  27. 27.

    Baby Jane

    November 6, 2006 at 11:21 am

    Just trying to get everyone amped for election day.

    That’s very Abu Ghraib of you.

  28. 28.

    scarshapedstar

    November 6, 2006 at 11:23 am

    Why hasn’t the “liberal media” touched this story?

  29. 29.

    scarshapedstar

    November 6, 2006 at 11:25 am

    And why aren’t these guys simply banned from politics? They whine and cry about criminals being let loose on the streets, don’t they? Well, why is there a revolving door for election fraud?

  30. 30.

    ThymeZone

    November 6, 2006 at 11:26 am

    All right, everybody, it’s me, DougJ.

    Now if John Cole would just come clean on that scs character ….

    I’m torn between believing that it’s just him writing scs, or that it’s an ongoing class project that he runs at the school.

    Either solution is plausible.

    It’s much harder to believe that scs’ material is real and written by a sincere lunatic.

  31. 31.

    Zifnab

    November 6, 2006 at 11:28 am

    The real party does and says stuff so outrageous each day (i.e. Bush never said “stay the course”) that the spoofs pale in comparison.

    I’m still waiting for someone to point out that since Al Gore was the one who was really elected back in ’00, this is all technically his fault. That’s right, kids. The George W. Bush II Administration is all one big fabrication by the Democratic party to swing elections. Don’t believe it for a minute.

  32. 32.

    ThymeZone

    November 6, 2006 at 11:34 am

    I would not be surprised to find out that the GOP machine is so sophisticated that it can employ one trick to provide cover for other, even worse tricks. Trick A can be just a throwaway whose purpose is to distract from Tricks B, C and D.

    I started to think this when I saw the guy who did the New Hampshire thing being so matter of fact about it when interviewed on tv. He acted as if it were no big deal.

    Well, it’s not a big deal, if the whole purpose of it is to generate smoke to cover up an even bigger deal. I don’t trust these assholes any farther than I can see them.

  33. 33.

    Bob In Pacifica

    November 6, 2006 at 11:46 am

    Why am I waking up from nightmares where a “sudden late surge” of support for Republicans, not reflected in election-day polling, will give the Republicans a narrow win in the House?

  34. 34.

    Perry Como

    November 6, 2006 at 11:47 am

    Why am I waking up from nightmares where a “sudden late surge” of support for Republicans, not reflected in election-day polling, will give the Republicans a narrow win in the House?

    Polls have a well known liberal bias.

  35. 35.

    Rick Taylor

    November 6, 2006 at 11:50 am

    As much as I’m willing to pile on the Republicans, I listened to one of the robocalls over at Talking Points Memo. It’s clear if you listen to more than the first brief sentence that it’s a call from a Republican Organizatin; it attacks the Democratic candidate and at the end says it’s paid for by the NRC. I would think most people who received the call wouldn’t be confused about where it came from, so I’m skeptical whether it’s the dirty trick people are saying.

    –Rick Taylor

  36. 36.

    ThymeZone

    November 6, 2006 at 11:54 am

    a “sudden late surge” of support for Republicans

    It’s actually just a method of the Diebold VoterResponse object. Easily invoked by running a little program after the polls are closed. You just pass it an argument containing the desired “late surge” amount and it does the rest.

  37. 37.

    Zifnab

    November 6, 2006 at 11:58 am

    It’s clear if you listen to more than the first brief sentence that it’s a call from a Republican Organizatin; it attacks the Democratic candidate and at the end says it’s paid for by the NRC.

    At the very least, it generates confusion and bad feelings. Smear calls like this are all about tainting the process and defaming the system. It’s just like when Bill O’Reily stands up and says, “I don’t like Republicans because they are politicians and you can’t trust politicians. So no matter who you vote for, you’re going to get a crook.”

    I’m thinking that if the Republicans do try to rig the election, it won’t be record numbers of Republicans coming out of the woodwork, but a simple disappearance of Democratic support. As in, “Gee. We set up the polls, but we only have 500 ballots out of 10,000 registered voters. I guess people just weren’t interested in politics this election cycle. Ho-hum.”

  38. 38.

    scarshapedstar

    November 6, 2006 at 12:01 pm

    I would not be surprised to find out that the GOP machine is so sophisticated that it can employ one trick to provide cover for other, even worse tricks.

    Gee, you mean like apparently meaningless hanky-panky with the voting machines (first time they don’t register a Dem vote, second time they do, clearly it was an innocent mistake!) to cover up the fact that the real hoodwinking goes on by simply changing the results after the polls close?

    Nah, that’d never happen.

  39. 39.

    Bruce

    November 6, 2006 at 12:03 pm

    Rick,

    The problem is if you only listen to the first few seconds of it and hang up before the message is complete it will call you back… several times. Many people will only listen to the first few seconds of it, realize its an automated election related call, and then hang up.

    Those first few seconds are “I’m calling with information about “. That is about when most people hang up. Have that robocall call back six times and you hear that over and over again and many people get pissed off at the thinking its them. Given the fact the message and timing seems exactly the same among the dozens of districts being covered I’d say someone got creative.

    I’m kinda surprised the law that requires them to tag their message with who paid for it isn’t at the front of the message.

  40. 40.

    Baby Jane

    November 6, 2006 at 12:30 pm

    It’s clear if you listen to more than the first brief sentence that it’s a call from a Republican Organizatin

    Hence, the dirty trick:

    People hate robocalls.
    People hang up…over and over and over and over.
    People get pissed.
    People are dirty-tricked.

    Dirty-trickin’ people know this.

  41. 41.

    Steve

    November 6, 2006 at 12:33 pm

    I would think most people who received the call wouldn’t be confused about where it came from, so I’m skeptical whether it’s the dirty trick people are saying.

    That doesn’t explain why Democratic candidates are getting hundreds upon hundreds of complaints about these calls.

    Frankly, it’s patently obvious that the GOP is placing these deceptive calls at 6am and such to try and inspire a backlash against the Democratic candidate; so it’s pretty much a red herring to spend time wondering how effective the deception has been. It’s a sleazy, sleazy tactic and I hope they get fined into bankruptcy for it.

  42. 42.

    Demdude

    November 6, 2006 at 12:34 pm

    Perhaps Conquest Communications should be reminded that when/if the Democrats take over the house, they will have subpoena power.

    Maybe that will slow it down a bit.

  43. 43.

    ThymeZone

    November 6, 2006 at 12:35 pm

    I hope they get fined into bankruptcy for it.

    Me too. I want to see Dick Cheney have to sell off at least five percent of his Halliburton portfolio. That will serve the fat bastard right.

  44. 44.

    Larry

    November 6, 2006 at 12:35 pm

    Give Conquest a call at 804-358-0560

    Tell them what you think.
    Very satisfying…..

  45. 45.

    DougL

    November 6, 2006 at 12:43 pm

    I called my local (Republican) state representative to let him know that if this was supposed to get out the vote in favor of the Republican congressional candidate in my district, it was backfiring. I would have considered one call fair game, but the annoying nature of the calls (I received four calls over a period of seven days, all substantially identical) was increasing my resolve to vote against the Republican.

    His response? (Wait for it…) “The Democrats are doing the same thing.”

    To his credit, though, other than that, his tone was not noticeably dismissive. He did offer a sort of helpful suggstion that the calls were tied into a daily feed from the local election board of which voters had and had not already voted (we have an early voting option) and he suggested that I could get the calls stopped by simply voting early.

    This brings up a second issue for me. I don’t believe it’s anyone’s business (other than the local election board’s to ensure that people only vote once) whether I’ve voted early or not and to get a daily update feed.

    In discussion with some friends, it was suggested that this availability of data is intended so that local Dem organizations can call people up who haven’t voted in order to “offer them a ride to the polling site”. I don’t care what the original “good intentions” were for this kind of daily updated data. This practice should end and rolls of who has and hasn’t voted should no longer be available outside of the election board, at least not until polling has completed.

  46. 46.

    Zifnab

    November 6, 2006 at 12:45 pm

    Me too. I want to see Dick Cheney have to sell off at least five percent of his Halliburton portfolio. That will serve the fat bastard right.

    Yeah. That’ll put him… 5% closer… to poverty… out of his… millions of millions… *sigh*

    Worst case senario, I’m betting Cheney goes out like Lay. Late night “heart attack” that renders him “dead” followed by a quicky cremation and some legal mumbo-jumbo resulting in him being aquitted of all charges.

  47. 47.

    norbizness

    November 6, 2006 at 12:45 pm

    It was only rat-fucking when Donald Segretti and pals were doing in for Nixon in ’72; I think they’ve graduated to fucking much larger mammals… perhaps even the stately caribou.

  48. 48.

    Andrew

    November 6, 2006 at 12:47 pm

    Quick, someone buy a robocall to keep dialing Conquest.

  49. 49.

    jcricket

    November 6, 2006 at 12:49 pm

    Nah, that’d never happen.

    While not commenting on the specific cases of vote-machine hanky-panky, I wonder why people are so incredulous that it would happen.

    Non-electronic ballot-box stuffing, ballot destruction, etc. happened for years (and still happens all the time in developing countries). Why would “going electronic” get rid of the potential for people to try and alter results?

    It wouldn’t.

    I think the short-term fix that would solve most voting problems (that is if you’re interested in making a secure, reliable, trustworthy, usable voting system, not just disenfranchising your opponent’s voters) is to for everyone to vote by mail using optical scan ballots the way Oregon and Washington do. This has a large number of advantages:

    1) No machine shortages or physical intimidation.

    2) No volunteer poll workers to train

    3) No multiple systems to support or outdated equipment to maintain

    4) Shown to increase turnout/voter participation.

    5) Built-in paper trail that can be audited multiple ways (hand re-checking, feeding through different machines, etc.) and by multiple groups (trained poll workers, neutral observers, the media down the road).

    Let’s combine this with some common sense election reforms:

    1) Making sure the primary and general election are far enough apart.

    2) Connect state-wide databases to ensure the voting rolls are clean, but not unfairly scrubbed.

    3) Make challenges to voter registration difficult to do, especially en masse, and require they come at least a month before elections. Anyone honestly interested in voter roll integrity will have no problem with this. Any knowingly false challenges shall be subject to huge penalties, like junk faxing or do-not-call violations ($11,000 per violation, triple damages possible).

    4) Make any remaining voter suppression of “confusion” tactics (anonymous robocolls, fake robocolls, fake mailers, etc) into federal and state crimes with large penalties (see above).

    Ideally I’d throw in the following:

    Computer-assisted voting. This means that you could choose to either use your pre-printed ballot and fill it in by hand or use a secure web site to print a “perfect” ballot for mailing. This ballot would not be stored anywhere on a server. And you could set up kiosks in libraries or wherever if people wanted to use the computer system, but didn’t have a computer. You’d still only have one “secure” envelope (preventing multiple ballot submissions)

    This solves the primary problem with optical scan ballots – spoilage.

    Some 10% of ballots are “spoiled” because people put stray marks, have to cross off a mistake, double vote or accidentally under-vote. Most states allow for a hand-rechecking of these ballots and sometimes duplicating them, but computer assisted ballot printing would probably drop the spoilage rate to 2% or less (some percent will always be unreadable due to machine calibration problems or issues with the ballot being folded or torn).

    And if you want the “true” wishlist item we’d make it illegal to disenfranchise former felons. Once someone has served their sentence, keeping them from voting does not deter future felonies, it merely serves as another way felons are prevented from re-integrating with society, which is one way their chances of re-offending if increased.

    Yes, down the road you might eventually eliminate the mailing in part, but for now this system would probably solve 90% of the real problems with our voting system (both the systemic problems and the dirty tricks parts).

  50. 50.

    Perry Como

    November 6, 2006 at 12:51 pm

    Quick, someone buy a robocall to keep dialing Conquest.

    Would an asterisk box sitting on an OC-3 and connected to a POTS system do it? If only I knew someone that had that…

  51. 51.

    ThymeZone

    November 6, 2006 at 1:12 pm

    we’d make it illegal to disenfranchise former felons.

    In my state, once sentence is served, felons can petition the court for restoration of their civil rights including voting, and will generally get it in the case of nonviolent crimes (which means, the great majority of cases can get it). The petitions are screened and vetted for any signs of trouble with the offender, and if there aren’t any, the rights are generally restored.

  52. 52.

    Pb

    November 6, 2006 at 1:16 pm

    First, note that what they’re doing is illegal and deceptive–they’re required by law (under the TCPA) to identify themselves at the *beginning* of the call–instead, they mention their opponent. Their calls generally go something like this:

    Hello, I’m calling with information about [Democratic candidate].
    (pause)
    [Candidate name] [lie]
    (pause)
    [Candidate name] [smear]
    (pause)
    [Candidate name] [baseless attack]
    (pause)
    [NRCC disclaimer]

    And the typical caller experience might go something like this:

    So it was more than a little difficult last week when the phone in Kelleher’s Bridgeport home started ringing at odd hours of the day and night. Making it even harder was the fact that the calls were not from her daughter or a friend, but from a political campaign.

    Since the calls began by talking about Diane Farrell, it seemed likely to Kelleher that they were coming from the headquarters of the former Westport first selectwoman, who is running for the 4th District congressional seat held by Rep. Christopher Shays. The two have waged a spirited, sometimes slashing race.

    Now I imagine that a lot of people might not follow up past that, but if they did:

    So Kelleher did what any right-thinking person who was being driven half out of their minds by unsolicited phone calls would do. She called Farrell’s headquarters in Westport to ask them to stop.

    The person who answered the phone said the calls weren’t coming from Farrell headquarters. A Farrell aide later told us they launched their first robo call Wednesday featuring Paul Newman saying all nice stuff about his old friend.

    Farrell’s headquarters referred Kelleher to the opposition, the National Republican Campaign Committee (NRCC) in Washington, D.C., (202 479-7000, in case you want to call), where a spokesman said they were responsible for many of the calls.

    “I called the number they gave me, but when I asked if they could take me off the call list they just laughed at me,” Kelleher said.

    In my opinion, only should she sue for the monetary damages she’s entitled to by statute, she should sue for harrassment, and probably a few other things.

  53. 53.

    jcricket

    November 6, 2006 at 1:20 pm

    In my state, once sentence is served, felons can petition the court for restoration of their civil rights including voting

    I just don’t see why it shouldn’t be a condition of their release? Why do they have to petition the courts? In my state (WA) they used to have to do this, but the courts ruled it was unconstitutional (esp. the part about them having to pay all their fines).

    If they re-offend, their rights get taken away again, simple.

    I get the idea that if someone’s a criminal they lose their rights while incarcerated, but keeping them from voting afterwards, or requiring they jump through some hoops, serves no rational purpose (except to keep ex-felons from voting)

  54. 54.

    Andrew

    November 6, 2006 at 1:25 pm

    Would an asterisk box sitting on an OC-3 and connected to a POTS system do it? If only I knew someone that had that…

    We could all give you an alibi if something slipped and hit the button the triggered the script to auto-dial everyone associated with Conquest.

    “But he was busy posting at BJ!”

  55. 55.

    ThymeZone

    November 6, 2006 at 1:28 pm

    I just don’t see why it shouldn’t be a condition of their release?

    Well, because most of them are poor, black, Hispanic, or otherwise distant from the lily white fellowship groups that we want casting our votes.

    As we know, keeping felons … well, felons … is the foundation of the family.

  56. 56.

    Steve

    November 6, 2006 at 1:35 pm

    First, note that what they’re doing is illegal and deceptive—they’re required by law (under the TCPA) to identify themselves at the beginning of the call—instead, they mention their opponent.

    Does the TCPA even apply to political calls? I didn’t think regular telemarketers were allowed to use robocalls at all, any more.

  57. 57.

    jcricket

    November 6, 2006 at 2:08 pm

    Well, because most of them are poor, black, Hispanic, or otherwise distant from the lily white fellowship groups that we want casting our votes.

    Right, that was sort of my point :-) With the exception of keeping many millions of potential Democrats from voting, and the whole “felons should be punished forever because it will keep future felons from offending” line of thinking, there’s no rational reason from keeping felons from automatically receiving their restored voting rights, once they’ve served their sentence.

    Some states go so far as to allow felons to vote, even while in jail, but I can understand the argument against that better (part of your punishment, while in jail, includes not being able to participate in most things regular society allows for). But I don’t get bent out of shape for those states that allow it. I can see the argument in favor of it as well (keeps felons connected, at least a little, to the society they will eventually rejoin).

  58. 58.

    jcricket

    November 6, 2006 at 2:12 pm

    Does the TCPA even apply to political calls? I didn’t think regular telemarketers were allowed to use robocalls at all, any more.

    As part of the regulations that set up the Do Not Call list, non-political telemarketers are not allowed were forbidden from using auto-dialers anymore (the kind where they often pre-dial + leave you hanging with multiple seconds of silence or more before they pick up), which would effectively preclude using pre-recorded messages too.

    The whole political + charity exemption from the DoNotCall list thing strikes me as bad anyway. What part of “Do Not Call” do they not understand?

  59. 59.

    ThymeZone

    November 6, 2006 at 2:16 pm

    k

    eeping many millions of potential Democrats from voting,

    I’m getting more and more convinced that this is the true basis for the GOP’s sudden interest in “immigration reform.”

    Illegal or legal immigrants who gain citizenship and voting rights are likely to vote D. Why else would people like the disgusting JD Hayworth (R-AZ) talk incessantly in this campaign about his Dem opponent wanting to give “amnesty and a path to citizenship for illegal aliens?” The latter phrase is said by a voice dripping with contempt.

    Only one reason I can think of: Votes from his base today, and suppression of votes from our base down the road.

    Everything this assholes do is about power.

  60. 60.

    capelza

    November 6, 2006 at 2:21 pm

    Vote by Mail, I’m telling you…no phony directions to polling booths, no “observers” to challenge your vote, no electronic voting machines to hack, none of that bullshit. My little family of three sat down on Friday evening and voted…we looked over the voter phamlets again and talked it through and each voted our minds (not all the votes were the same. They went into the mail on Saturday.

    God, this stuff just pisses me off to no end.

  61. 61.

    Brian

    November 6, 2006 at 2:26 pm

    You know… I always try to keep politics out of personal relationships, but I’m not sure I can stay friends with Republicans if they’re willing to tolerate these sorts of tactics. At what point do Republicans around the country say “enough is enough”?

  62. 62.

    jcricket

    November 6, 2006 at 2:27 pm

    Fixed:

    Everything this assholes do is about maintaining power by illegal or unethical means in the face of a decline in support from voters.

  63. 63.

    Pb

    November 6, 2006 at 2:30 pm

    Steve,

    Does the TCPA even apply to political calls?

    Check the link; my understanding of it is that parts of it (such as the identitification requirement I mentioned) do apply, whereas other parts might be exempt.

  64. 64.

    Punchy

    November 6, 2006 at 2:36 pm

    Why am I waking up from nightmares where a “sudden late surge” of support for Republicans, not reflected in election-day polling, will give the Republicans a narrow win in the House?

    Oh, count on it. Santorum will win PA, Harris will lose FL….by only 3%, and Abramoff will somehow win the write-in in Delay’s old district. All counted “overnite”.

    I predict a run Wednesday morning on razor blades, rope, and “How to Tie Knots” books…

  65. 65.

    Bender

    November 6, 2006 at 2:39 pm

    Surprising maybe one person who never leaves RedState, the GOP has kicked off a massive campaign of automated calls meant to deceive voters into thinking that they come from the Democratic candidate.

    What a whiny diaper-load of fake-victim nonsense. Please listen to the TPM-linked call from NY19. If you are dumb enough to think that it might come from the Democrat (when within three seconds it calls him “Liberal John Hall” and starts attacking his record on taxes), then you are already a Democrat.

    That ad was not meant to deceive anyone — it’s just a negative ad on the phone. Should they be robo-calling? Not in my opinion, but it’s in no way suppression. I have personally received the same kind of automated, caller-ID suppressed calls from the Democrats for six months now about our local house race (starts out talking about the incumbent Republican, never mentions the Democrats until the very end — if you hung up after the first few seconds, you could possibly think it might be from the GOP… if you weren’t terribly bright). I never thought to cry about it. I just hung up.

    It’s the standard “accuse the other side of doing what you are doing” bit. With the weekend’s chatter about the Dems’ Operation Infiltration in Ohio, it appears that the Dems are going to do their best AGAIN to suppress GOP votes. Add this to the list: indictments for fraud due to Claire McCaskill’s ACORN hijack (duping well-meaning citizens into breaking the law for her campaign, and then not paying them for their work!) last election’s slashing of GOP get-out-the-vote van tires, vandalizing GOP HQs, and paying ex-cons in crack cocaine to forge Democrat voter registrations… You can save your whining about a phone call.

    Incidentally, John Marshall is a lying simpleton, as if you all didn’t already know that. One of his “few samples” (only to a math genius like Josh is two “a few”) of “GOP voter suppression” is actually nothing to do with the GOP at all.

    The company behind the mailer is Larry Levine & Associates, based in Sherman Oaks. Larry Levine heads the firm and dismisses critics who call the guide misleading.

    In a phone interview, Levine said, “I think those people ignore the fact that one thing that is wonderful about being a Democrat is we can disagree. We don’t have to all think alike, like Republicans.”

    Levine is a self-described lifelong Democrat and says the mailer reflects his personal opinion based on years of experience. Not, he says, a result of the amount of money he received from individual campaigns.

    Just like terrorists are trained to cry “torture” whether it’s true or not, the Democrats are trained to cry “intimidation” or “suppression” or “Diebold” or “disenfranchizement,” whether it happens or not. It takes the sting off of losing, I guess.

  66. 66.

    Punchy

    November 6, 2006 at 2:58 pm

    You know… I always try to keep politics out of personal relationships, but I’m not sure I can stay friends with Republicans if they’re willing to tolerate these sorts of tactics.

    One of my best friends is a die-hard Republican. Full-bore, “I’d raise Limbaugh’s kids if I was asked to” republican. We’ve agreed to disagree, and instead talk incessantly about sports and music. Works great.

  67. 67.

    Face

    November 6, 2006 at 3:01 pm

    All you crying moonbats need to do is go pure cellular. They don’t call cells, only landlines, unless you specifically sign up for them to call. And if they do call late/early….ah…the beauty of the “vibrate” option…

  68. 68.

    Pb

    November 6, 2006 at 3:11 pm

    Um, yeah. I link to an actual news account documenting the fraud and illegal activity, Bender links to a hoax. Get serious, man!

  69. 69.

    Perry Como

    November 6, 2006 at 3:15 pm

    and “How to Tie Knots” books…

    I’m surprised you don’t remember the lessons your gay scout leader taught you.

  70. 70.

    jcricket

    November 6, 2006 at 3:34 pm

    I’m surprised you don’t remember the lessons your gay scout leader taught you.

    They had a different book, it was “How to knot ties”, dontcha know? Fashion being all gay and what-not. Because gays like the clothing. And know how to tie a windsor knot.

    Because they’re gay.

    /joke-2.0

  71. 71.

    RSA

    November 6, 2006 at 3:34 pm

    Incidentally, John Marshall is a lying simpleton, as if you all didn’t already know that.

    Typical necon hatred for the Supreme Court, though you’d think there would be some respect for the Chief Justice who established the concept of judicial review in our legal system.

  72. 72.

    Tim F.

    November 6, 2006 at 3:36 pm

    Bender, it looks to me like you have a series of unsupported allegations. But knock yourself out, prove me wrong by pointing to which of those has been connected with the Democratic hierarchy by anybody other than the accusers.

    I just hung up.

    …and they immediately called you back a half dozen times. At three in the morning. If not then you breezed past the point of the story.

  73. 73.

    ThymeZone

    November 6, 2006 at 3:39 pm

    whiny diaper-load of fake-victim

    That’s a 6.2 on the Binford Spoof Scale.

  74. 74.

    jcricket

    November 6, 2006 at 3:41 pm

    Fixed:

    …and they immediately called you back a half dozen times. At three in the morning. If not then you breezed past intentionally ignored the point of the story. in order to create the appearance of false equivalence.

    I will truly give the Republicans credit, in a sense, for their dirty trickery. Our party largely stopped the over-the-top dirty tricks (mass numbers of dead people voting, mainly) back in the 50s and 60s. Republicans have, since then, been perfecting the art form.

  75. 75.

    Punchy

    November 6, 2006 at 3:43 pm

    I’m surprised you don’t remember the lessons your gay scout leader taught you.

    No, they taught “How to untie knots”…and for some reason, my Gay Scoutmaster always had a rope for belt…

  76. 76.

    Pooh

    November 6, 2006 at 4:10 pm

    Incidentally, John Marshall is a lying simpleton, as if you all didn’t already know that.

    Typical necon hatred for the Supreme Court, though you’d think there would be some respect for the Chief Justice who established the concept of judicial review in our legal system.

    John Marshall. The name Josh has a well known liberal bias.

  77. 77.

    Bender

    November 6, 2006 at 4:13 pm

    Bender, it looks to me like you have a series of unsupported allegations…
    and they immediately called you back a half dozen times. At three in the morning.

    Speaking of unsupported, I couldn’t find anything in your links to “half dozen” or “three in the morning.”

    If not then you breezed past the point of the story.

    No, I think you’ve lost your own plot. Your point and TPMs wasn’t about annoying people with phone calls at night; it was ridiculous whining about “suppression” of their vote. The only way it could be vote suppression is if the GOP intentionally made people believe that the Democrat made the call to them, which would be such a retarded strategy on so many levels that I won’t even take the time to explain to you.

    Like I said: Listen to that call from NY19, and if you think that “Liberal John Hall” is making that call to admit to you on the phone that he’s wrong on taxes, then you are a mental defective. If that call is “suppressing” votes, then the calls I received were trying to suppress mine. That allegation is silly on its face.

  78. 78.

    DougL

    November 6, 2006 at 4:25 pm

    All you crying moonbats need to do is go pure cellular. They don’t call cells, only landlines, unless you specifically sign up for them to call.

    Nope. I’ve gotten quite a few of those robocalls on my cellphone.

    At one point, cell phone numbers were given out in cellphone-specific prefixes. That went away in lots of US areacodes (all?) with the brouhaha that was number portability (de)regulation. It is no longer possible to determine ahead of time whether a given phone number rings to a cellphone or landline. That’s definitely the case in the Chicago area, and likely the case in areas that are served by what used to be Ameritech (IL, WI, MI, OH), and possibly the case elsewhere.

  79. 79.

    The Other Steve

    November 6, 2006 at 4:26 pm

    What a whiny diaper-load of fake-victim nonsense.

    Which was then followed by a whiny diaper-load of fake-victim nonsense.

  80. 80.

    Tom in Texas

    November 6, 2006 at 4:27 pm

    Bender:

    Your point and TPMs wasn’t about annoying people with phone calls at night

    From the post:

    the GOP has kicked off a massive campaign of automated calls meant to deceive voters into thinking that they come from the Democratic candidate. Everybody hates robocalls and the calls come in repeatedly during dinner or early hours in the morning…

  81. 81.

    The Other Steve

    November 6, 2006 at 4:32 pm

    Leave it to Bender to excuse bad behavior.

    It’s so typical of these assclowns. They don’t know the difference between right and wrong, they just know about how to stuff an election to win.

    I don’t know why Democratic candidates hold themselves back so. We ought to do the same to them. Some robocalls reporting on their prediliction for pedophilia might be fun.

  82. 82.

    RSA

    November 6, 2006 at 4:39 pm

    The only way it could be vote suppression is if the GOP intentionally made people believe that the Democrat made the call to them, which would be such a retarded strategy on so many levels that I won’t even take the time to explain to you.

    From Tim F.’s update:

    She called Farrell’s headquarters in Westport to ask them to stop.
    The person who answered the phone said the calls weren’t coming from Farrell headquarters.

    Never let reality get in the way of ideology. I can’t see how anyone could be deceived, and thus no one is actually being deceived.

  83. 83.

    jcricket

    November 6, 2006 at 4:43 pm

    I can’t see how anyone could be deceived, and thus no one is actually being deceived.

    Otherwise known as a textbook case of “argument from incredulity”

    Good stuff, these lessons in logic.

  84. 84.

    chopper

    November 6, 2006 at 4:48 pm

    when it comes to robocalls, i, like many americans, hang up after the first sentence.

    of course, in this case, i would be led to believe that the call was from a dem candidate election committee. as i would continue to after they called me back 7 times.

    at 3 in the morning.

    this is why the FCC regulation that such calls must identify the party calling at the beginning of the call is so damned important when it comes to autodialed calls; it’s easy to use peoples’ impatience with recorded messages.

  85. 85.

    Tim in SF

    November 6, 2006 at 4:48 pm

    Is Bender a nom de plume for Darrell? They have the same writing style and both personally insult those with whom they disagree at the same frequency (several times a post). If they are the same person, I can safely add “Bender” to my pie-hole list.

  86. 86.

    Tim in SF

    November 6, 2006 at 4:51 pm

    I think voter suppression is treasonous. I don’t believe in the death penalty for anything other than treason, and I strongly think voter suppression should be counted right in there with stealing and selling state secrets.

  87. 87.

    Zifnab

    November 6, 2006 at 4:55 pm

    I don’t know why Democratic candidates hold themselves back so. We ought to do the same to them. Some robocalls reporting on their prediliction for pedophilia might be fun.

    I can almost already hear it.

    Dick Cheney’s daughter wants you all to get gay married. Mark Foley wants to verbally molest your kids. Ted Haggard wants to do a line of cocaine off your young son’s naked rear end. Vote Republican and doom our nation to legalizing the forbidden love of man and box turtle. “Paid for by the Foundation for the Council of the People Who Brought You The Corporation That Sponsored The Something Something Something Blah Blah Blah Have You Hung Up Yet? Democratic Council.”

  88. 88.

    Bender

    November 6, 2006 at 5:08 pm

    Tom:

    Everybody hates robocalls and the calls come in repeatedly during dinner or early hours in the morning…

    Tom, I didn’t say Tim never mentioned that the calls were annoying, just that it wasn’t his or Josh’s primary point, although it would be a fairer point, just not as sensational for the partisans as “Help, help, I’m being suppressed!” You’d have found Tim’s point if you wouldn’t have chopped his sentence where you did (although the rest is mostly unsubstantiated assertions, I’m still counting it as a point because I’m magnanimous like that).

    and they often take several minutes [unsubstantiated and in fact disproved by all the calls Josh links, which are only 30 seconds at most, and which ID to the NRCC after only 17 to 22 seconds and make clear from 3 seconds that they are attacks on the Democrats’ records] to get the the part where you find out that the thing was paid for by the RNC [unsubstantiated — the NRCC isn’t the RNC, but I get his point]. Voters who get these decide, understandably to stay home [unsubstantiated — Tim links to one woman who wrote a Letter to the Editor in Florida saying she wouldn’t vote for anyone who ever robocalls, which isn’t really germane to this discussion.

    If Josh and Tim want to change their point to “Those calls are annoying,” I’ll support them 100%. When they overreach to “suppression,” that’s the boy crying wolf.

  89. 89.

    Bender

    November 6, 2006 at 5:21 pm

    Leave it to Bender to excuse bad behavior.

    What’s the bad behavior I’m excusing? I don’t think they should robocall, I certainly think they should follow Do Not Call lists, I don’t think they should call too late, or call back six times if you don’t answer (both unsubstantiated charges, AFAICT). It’s an annoying method, but it ain’t voter suppression, no matter how much you want to play the victim.

    I don’t know why Democratic candidates hold themselves back so. We ought to do the same to them.

    The Democrats make robocalls, too. But if you feel you guys are holding back, illegally hijack a voter registration drive like Claire McCaskill did! Forge some more voter registrations! Pay with crack cocaine! Slash some more tires! Out some more gays! Call the troops stupid! Don’t “hold back!” Then pull out the really big gun: More robocalls!

  90. 90.

    Perry Como

    November 6, 2006 at 5:30 pm

    We ought to do the same to them. Some robocalls reporting on their prediliction for pedophilia might be fun.

    If I were a Democrat, let alone a Democratic operative, I would out Rove, Rove.

    Take Ford in TN for example. They want to run some coded racist ads about him? Guess what? The “Concerned Conservatives of America” are going to mail out fliers with pictures of Ford where his skin tone has been noticeably darkened and he’s stalking white women. Let’s kick it into overt racism since the GOP is too afraid to say what they really mean.

    Fuck the GOP.

  91. 91.

    Area Man

    November 6, 2006 at 5:45 pm

    Of course its not suppression. Its common knowledge everyone loves automated unsolicited phone rants and depend on them to decide all of life’s important matters. What a brilliant idea.

    Of course, I expected this – and much worse. This GOP has the sense of entitlement of an 8 year old spoiled brat.

    Not that it will change anything. Republican insiders are scared shitless and rightfully so. This is shaping up to be a humiliating blow-out.

    If RedState was smart, they’d start collecting the belts and shoelaces now.

  92. 92.

    Bender

    November 6, 2006 at 5:50 pm

    when it comes to robocalls, i, like many americans, hang up after the first sentence.

    Then you should realize that you have no idea what the call was about or who placed it, right?

    of course, in this case, i would be led to believe that the call was from a dem candidate election committee.

    Why? I repeat: Then you should realize that you have no idea what the call was about. I wouldn’t watch the first ten seconds of CSI and figure that I knew who’s the murderer!

    Come on, no one is this naive: “Well, I heard the Democratic candidate’s name before I hung up — therefore, the call must be from him! After all, why would the other candidate ever mention his opponent’s name? Duuuuuuh!” Well, maybe that one short-busser cited is that naive. I have a feeling misattributing political ads is the least of her concerns.

    Accepting for a second that you hang up after you sense the first period — man, a run-on sentence could keep you on phone for ages — after the second call, you’d want to know who to complain to. You would stay on for 3 whole seconds, at which time, the intent of the call would be obvious — it’s an opposition ad, and you’d have a general idea who to complain to. Or you could stay on for 20 seconds more and find out it was a RNCC ad, and you could complain to the exact proper channels. Hell, you could boycott all their candidates! Which is why the GOP would never intentionally call at (allegedly) 3 in the morning (allegedly) half a dozen times.

    Short answer: It makes no sense to annoy the voters and then attach your name to the ad. It’s like heaving an autographed brick through someone’s window. The GOP doesn’t control both houses and the oval office because it tries to annoy voters. Remember, Rove is an evil genius! Not an evil moron! I suggest that the reason no one can come up with citations of late night repeating calls is that they don’t exist, because they would be massively counterproductive.

  93. 93.

    Pb

    November 6, 2006 at 5:58 pm

    Bender, your ignorance alone doesn’t make anything ‘unsubstantiated‘–but as it is apparently wilful ignorance, I will simply conclude that you like pie.

  94. 94.

    chopper

    November 6, 2006 at 6:04 pm

    Then you should realize that you have no idea what the call was about or who placed it, right?

    i personally don’t give a crap. but i’m not most people. most people, based on the single sentence ‘hi, i’m calling about supporting bender for congress’ are likely going to assume that your campaign made the call.

    and i assume they’d at least be able to figure out that the call was about a congressional campaign.

    Why? I repeat: Then you should realize that you have no idea what the call was about. I wouldn’t watch the first ten seconds of CSI and figure that I knew who’s the murderer!

    that has to be the dumbest comparison i’ve read this week. it’s a phone call.

    Come on, no one is this naive: “Well, I heard the Democratic candidate’s name before I hung up—therefore, the call must be from him! After all, why would the other candidate ever mention his opponent’s name? Duuuuuuh!”

    uh, robocalls are required by law to state the source of the call at the beginning. when the call starts out ‘hi, i’m calling about supporting bender for congress’, what the hell do you think people will assume, that it’s the other guy calling?

    Accepting for a second that you hang up after you sense the first period—man, a run-on sentence could keep you on phone for ages—after the second call, you’d want to know who to complain to.

    you’re one of those people that replies to spam, aren’t you?

  95. 95.

    Bender

    November 6, 2006 at 6:55 pm

    Bender, your ignorance alone doesn’t make anything ‘unsubstantiated‘—but as it is apparently wilful ignorance, I will simply conclude that you like pie.

    The next time you post anything useful will be the first time, but I’ll humor you this once. From now on you’re going to have to earn it.

    What exactly do you think this puff-piece is substantiating? Well, let’s look at what I said was “unsubstantiated.”

    Where exactly does it say she was called at 3 in the morning? Oh, it doesn’t.

    When does it say she was redialed a half dozen times? Never?

    When does it say it took several minutes for the GOP to ID itself? Never?

    When did it say it was an RNC ad? Never?

    Where did it say that this writer wouldn’t ever vote for a robocalling candidate? Weeeeeeell, she asserts that it’s an really effective strategy, to infuriate the voter so much that they don’t vote, but she never says she’s not voting, so she kind of defeats her own weak point. (On the contrary, I suspect she’d vote for any robocalling Democrat, even if they called at 3AM.)

    So, that wasn’t really helpful in the least! Or to translate into words you BJ drones seem to understand, your post consisted of “pie, pie, pie, pie, pie, and pie.”

  96. 96.

    Mumon

    November 6, 2006 at 7:01 pm

    It’s a bad analogy: google bombing & robocalling.

    Spam is a much better analogy…Republican robocalls are the telephone equivalent of “ViAgRA” e-mails that pollute too many in-boxes.

  97. 97.

    Pb

    November 6, 2006 at 8:25 pm

    I’ll humor you this once. From now on you’re going to have to earn it.

    Now that’s irony–and quit stealing my lines!

    let’s look at what I said

    Don’t mind if I do…

    What a whiny diaper-load of fake-victim nonsense.

    Bullshit.

    That ad was not meant to deceive anyone

    Uh-oh, we’ve found the culprit–Bender wrote the ad!

    I have personally received the same kind of automated, caller-ID suppressed calls from the Democrats for six months now

    Unsubstantiated–got a recording?

    With the weekend’s chatter about the Dems’ Operation Infiltration in Ohio

    Hoax.

    Incidentally, John Marshall is a lying simpleton

    and… projection, for the win!

  98. 98.

    Tulkinghorn

    November 6, 2006 at 9:17 pm

    In my opinion, only should she sue for the monetary damages she’s entitled to by statute, she should sue for harrassment, and probably a few other things.

    I like the sound of that. Imaging 100,000 small claims cases (can not be consolidated) filed steadily over the course of a couple years, all demanding the maximum $ 5,000… Filing fee for each case is something like $50, nobody needs an attorney… Name the individual directors for the company making the calls, serving a separate copy to each director… These guys will get murdered with legal fees, will have to default on them after a while… then sell the judgments to a hardass collection attorney…

    You could bankrupt that business and scare the creeps from trying this again.

  99. 99.

    ThymeZone

    November 6, 2006 at 9:34 pm

    Bender, your ignorance alone

    Spoof alert?

  100. 100.

    The Asshole Formerly Known as GOP4Me

    November 6, 2006 at 10:05 pm

    Spoof alert?

    ‘Fess up, DougJ, you’ve been writing several people around here.

    BTW, I’m the one that called ThymeZone, so in regards to one another we’re pretty sure we really exist. I wish I could say the same for the rest of you, some of you I’m about 99.9% sure are real but there are one or two (Bender, scs) that I’m 99.9% sure of the opposite.

  101. 101.

    Bender

    November 6, 2006 at 10:46 pm

    Pb,

    You could’ve just posted: “OK, you got me. The article I linked was worthless and proved nothing. I’m an idiot for having posted it, and I apologize that I attempted to use it to insult you. I can’t answer any of your questions intelligently, so I’ll just drop it now, and pretend I never posted it. You needn’t respond to my drivel anymore.”

    You didn’t have to do that embarrassing tap-dance back there. Yeeeesh! I hope you at least got some pie out of the deal. Hee-hee, I said “pie” again!

  102. 102.

    Pb

    November 6, 2006 at 10:59 pm

    Bender,

    You could’ve just posted: “OK, you got me. The article I linked was worthless and proved nothing.

    Or, you could have tried reading it…

  103. 103.

    Baby Jane

    November 7, 2006 at 12:28 am

    Hello, I’m calling with information about Bender.

    *click*

    Hello, I’m calling with information about Bender.

    *click*

    Hello, I’m calling with information about Bender.

    *click*

    Hello, I’m calling with information about Bender.

    *click*

    Hello, I’m calling with information about Bender.

    *click*

    Hello, I’m calling with information about Bender.

    *click*

    Now, it doesn’t matter what the information might’ve been; negative info, positive info, makes no difference.

    But you can be sure that as all the people pass you by on the street, less of them will be dropping quarters into your styrofoam cup.

  104. 104.

    Baby Jane

    November 7, 2006 at 12:30 am

    Hello, I’m calling with information about Bender.

    *click*

    Hello, I’m calling with information about Bender.

    *click*

    Hello, I’m calling with information about Bender.

    *click*

    Hello, I’m calling with information about Bender.

    *click*

    Hello, I’m calling with information about Bender.

    *click*

    Hello, I’m calling with information about Bender.

    *click*

    Now, it doesn’t matter what the information might’ve been; negative info, positive info, makes no difference.

    But you can be sure that as all the people pass you by on the street, less of them will be dropping quarters into your styrofoam cup.

  105. 105.

    Zifnab

    November 7, 2006 at 9:39 am

    Please stop trying to convince Bender that robocalls are annoying. If the very term ‘robocall’ doesn’t scream harassment of an auditory nature at you from the get-go you’re lost. And I’ll bet a year’s salary that for all Bender’s shit talk about automated voice calling at all hours of the day and night being not so bad, he was still not above putting himself on the Do Not Call list.

    Apparently, robocalling is just one of those Republican Values.

  106. 106.

    tBone

    November 7, 2006 at 9:46 am

    The next time you post anything useful will be the first time, but I’ll humor you this once. From now on you’re going to have to earn it.

    I’m starting to think that Bender is just Mac Buckets under a new handle. Constant arguments from incredulity? Check. Unwarranted arrogance? Check. Patronizing bullshit? Check.

  107. 107.

    Bender

    November 7, 2006 at 12:39 pm

    Please stop trying to convince Bender that robocalls are annoying.

    Yeah, because Bender loves robocalls!

    Bender: If Josh and Tim want to change their point to “Those calls are annoying,” I’ll support them 100%.

    Bender: I don’t think they should robocall

    Please stop trying to convince me that Zifnab can read English.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. Balloon Juice says:
    November 6, 2006 at 1:25 pm

    […] Typical. […]

  2. Thought Theater says:
    November 6, 2006 at 7:15 pm

    GOP Robocalling Scheme: The Party Of Values?

    The GOP has added robocalling to their final get out the vote / suppress the vote effort in a number of Congressional districts. The gist of robocalling is to make repeated calls to voters at annoying times and with…

Primary Sidebar

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • M31 on Saturday Morning Open Thread: The DNC Winter Meeting (Feb 4, 2023 @ 1:17pm)
  • Geminid on Saturday Morning Open Thread: The DNC Winter Meeting (Feb 4, 2023 @ 1:10pm)
  • PaulB on Saturday Morning Open Thread: The DNC Winter Meeting (Feb 4, 2023 @ 1:08pm)
  • Anyway on Saturday Morning Open Thread: The DNC Winter Meeting (Feb 4, 2023 @ 1:04pm)
  • zhena gogolia on Saturday Morning Open Thread: The DNC Winter Meeting (Feb 4, 2023 @ 12:58pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!