• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Beware of advice from anyone for whom Democrats are “they” and not “we.”

Anyone who bans teaching American history has no right to shape America’s future.

They were going to turn on one another at some point. It was inevitable.

People are complicated. Love is not.

“I was told there would be no fact checking.”

Disappointing to see gov. newsom with his finger to the wind.

I’d hate to be the candidate who lost to this guy.

Dear media: perhaps we ought to let Donald Trump speak for himself!

Make the republican party small enough to drown in a bathtub.

The party of Reagan has become the party of Putin.

The most dangerous place for a black man in America is in a white man’s imagination.

Not rolling over. fuck you, make me.

Compromise? There is no middle ground between a firefighter and an arsonist.

That’s my take and I am available for criticism at this time.

The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.

Someone should tell Republicans that violence is the last refuge of the incompetent, or possibly the first.

Damn right I heard that as a threat.

The words do not have to be perfect.

All hail the time of the bunny!

Good lord, these people are nuts.

We can’t confuse what’s necessary to win elections with the policies that we want to implement when we do.

Insiders who complain to politico: please report to the white house office of shut the fuck up.

My right to basic bodily autonomy is not on the table. that’s the new deal.

The rest of the comments were smacking Boebert like she was a piñata.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / House Dems Pick Up 29 30 Seats In 2006

House Dems Pick Up 29 30 Seats In 2006

by Tim F|  December 12, 200610:48 pm| 18 Comments

This post is in: Politics

FacebookTweetEmail

Congrats to Ciro Rodriguez, the new Democratic representative from Texas 23. It’s hard to overstate the upset value of this race. Incumbent Henry Bonilla ( R) barely missed winning outright when he outpolled Rodriguez 49-20 in November. Since then polls have trended in Rodriguez’s favor, but to my knowledge none showed Rodriguez ahead or even particularly close.

Let’s stipulate that it is risky to treat this race as a general indicator. Too many factors could be specific to this district and the massive cash infusion from the DCCC must not have hurt. Caveats aside, I will go out on a limb and say that Republicans should be extremely grateful that the election wasn’t held one month later.

***Update***

Think that Democrats will push for a revote in Katherine Harris’s district? It would be politically smart, though a touch cynical, to keep tonight’s upset in mind. Not that it isn’t the right thing to do anyway.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Not Fast Enough
Next Post: Letting The Nuclear Cat Out Of The Bag »

Reader Interactions

18Comments

  1. 1.

    Mike

    December 12, 2006 at 11:16 pm

    In the words of Nelson Muntz, Ha Ha!

  2. 2.

    Mike P.

    December 13, 2006 at 12:32 am

    Ahh, a nice exclamation point for those at Power Line and Red State that still just don’t get it.

    Not that they’ll notice.

  3. 3.

    Chuck Butcher

    December 13, 2006 at 2:19 am

    Since it was the Republicans that wanted those junk machines, I’d say a re-vote is a swell idea.

  4. 4.

    Bombadil

    December 13, 2006 at 8:39 am

    Not only should they have to hold a re-vote, it should be done on paper ballots and everyone should dip their finger in purple ink when they’re done.

    Democracy rules, babies!

  5. 5.

    The Other Steve

    December 13, 2006 at 8:41 am

    Did you hear how Congress had rejected any suggestion that we get rid of the stupid electronic voting machines?

    Their reasoning… it would cost a lot of money to replace them all.

    We’re willing to spend $200 billion a year in Iraq spinning in circles, but we aren’t willing to spend $10 billion in the United States ensuring our Democracy.

  6. 6.

    pie

    December 13, 2006 at 9:20 am

    We’re willing to spend $200 billion a year in Iraq spinning in circles, but we aren’t willing to spend $10 billion in the United States ensuring our Democracy.

    We spread it over there so we don’t have to spread it here.

  7. 7.

    Zifnab

    December 13, 2006 at 9:35 am

    Did you see the poll numbers going in and coming out?

    It was 51/44 for Bonilla the night before the election and Rodrigez won it 55/45. What a crazy shift. Redistrict that bitches!

  8. 8.

    Bombadil

    December 13, 2006 at 10:03 am

    And even better, there’s this from the WaPo:

    Rodriguez’s victory is doubly sweet for national Democrats, since they not only pick up another seat but also scored another direct hit on the legacy of former Rep. Tom DeLay (R-Texas). DeLay engineered the congressional re-redistricting in 2003 that led to a six-seat Republican gain in Texas in 2004. But those gains came at a price. Portions of the 2003 map, including the removal of 100,000 Hispanic voters from the 23rd District, were ruled in violation of the Voting Rights Act by the U.S. Supreme Court last June. The resulting changes in the district’s boundaries reinstituted a strong Hispanic presence in the 23rd and led to Bonilla’s loss

    (h/t Talking Points Memo)

    Josh is right — “Karma”, indeed.

  9. 9.

    demimondian

    December 13, 2006 at 10:29 am

    We’re willing to spend $200 billion a year in Iraq spinning in circles, but we aren’t willing to spend $10 billion in the United States ensuring our Democracy.

    We’re spending it over there so we don’t need to spend it over here.

  10. 10.

    p.lukasiak

    December 13, 2006 at 12:06 pm

    Bonilla’s loss is simply stunning…..

    Bonilla wasn’t personally unpopular, and Rodriguez was a weak campaigner. There are really only two key factors here….

    1) Bush’s extreme unpopularity — basically, anyone with an “R” next to their name is starting out with a major disadvantage

    2) the disarray in the GOP as a result of their losses on November 6. Its obvious that the GOP did not respond sufficiently (if at all) to the well publicized DCCC efforts on behalf of Rodriguez — and the Democrats simply outhustled the GOP here…

    as to calling for a new election in Sarasota — that has to be a given. The GOP blew any chance they had of avoiding a new election by selecting a partisan hack to be in charge of “auditing” the machines used in Sarasota County. But first the Democrats need to hold hearings in which Sarasota voters testify under oath about the problems they had with the machines — and the ballot design — and the failure of GOP hack Kathy Dent to address those concerns despite their being brought to her attention during “early voting” well before election day.

  11. 11.

    jcricket

    December 13, 2006 at 12:52 pm

    It’s really 31 seats – Bernie Sanders (I-VT) will be caucusing with the Democrats.

    So, Democrats didn’t lose a single seat, governorship or house of Congress that they were defending. They picked up the US House, Senate, 6 governorships, took control of like 9 state legislatures and increased their control in nearly every state legislature they already controlled. All this after 6 years of total Republican control and a totally gerry-mandered era that was supposed to deliver a permanent Republican majority.

    The American public has seen what the Republican party can do when given control. Republicans have been measured, and they have been found wanting. YHT. YHL. HAND. FOAD

  12. 12.

    jcricket

    December 13, 2006 at 12:58 pm

    And I second the call for getting rid of the touch-screen electronic voting machines as designed by any of the current companies involved. Even with a “paper trail” these machines are clearly incapable of doing what they need.

    For the time being, I prefer we go to all-vote-by-mail with optical scan paper-ballots, coupled with consolidation of election facilities in every county (meaning one facility per county with one set of standards and good oversight) and better statewide voter/voting databases. Eliminates virtually every problem we have with voting these days (machine maintenance, long lines, multiple technologies, touch-screen issues, etc.) without introducing any new ones. We could do this for the next 5 years.

    Second step would be to allow people to print their optically-scannable ballots with a computer (still using a special envelope, to prevent duplicate ballot submissions) – but not store those computer-generated ballots on any database. The printing eliminates the ballot-spoilage problem with humans filling out/missing ovals, etc. We could do that for another 5-10 years.

    Third step is actually voting online. Put this 10-20 years out.

  13. 13.

    MNPundit

    December 13, 2006 at 1:13 pm

    Voting by mail SEEMS like a good solution, but it does have problems of its own.

    What to do about voters who are confused by the ballots? At least with voting places you can tell that there is a problem like in Florida. How much more difficult would it be if they were all vote by mail that way, it’s more expensive than poll voting, and in both Oregon which has been doing vote by mail for a long time, and the UK there is either no rise in turnout (OR) or a decline (UK). That might be attributable to vote-by-mail but then again it might not be. The point is it has had no demonstrable effect on turn out.

    Some argue that it’s insecure and not the best way to trust a majority of the votes (100,000,000 pieces of mail in a two week period every 4 years+normal operations? Ye Gods!) but I am of two minds about that, the mail was designed to be a system where the government could reliably send sensitive documents and it works rather well. If I have a choice of DHL, UPS or FedEx, I will always go with USPS.

  14. 14.

    Steve

    December 13, 2006 at 1:52 pm

    The main concern I’ve seen regarding vote-by-mail can be pictured if you imagine the pastor of some nice, pleasant, evangelical megachurch announcing “Okay, everybody, bring in your ballots next Sunday and we’ll all fill them out together.”

    Voting by mail has some big advantages, but it’s true that when you’re alone in that voting booth, you answer to no one’s conscience but your own.

  15. 15.

    Chuck Butcher

    December 13, 2006 at 3:44 pm

    Somehow, we (OR)seem to avoid having problems, there are the odd re-counts for close elections and sometimes the optical scanners jam, but nobody says re-vote or stolen election…

  16. 16.

    Chuck Butcher

    December 13, 2006 at 3:50 pm

    I hit the “Submit” a little quickly…

    Megachurch; the ballots are mailed to your home, why would you take it to a church unless you were already buying their line? Or the union hall, or…
    The only real concern is the control freak spouse one.

  17. 17.

    Steve

    December 13, 2006 at 5:08 pm

    The point is that you can be pressured with a mail-in ballot in ways you can’t be pressured in the voting booth. And yes, the scenario of a husband making sure his wife votes the “right” way (or vice versa) is a related issue I didn’t bring up.

    The fact that it works in Oregon is a positive, but I still think these issues are worth considering. Not everyplace is Oregon, for one thing.

  18. 18.

    Zifnab

    December 13, 2006 at 5:09 pm

    Megachurch; the ballots are mailed to your home, why would you take it to a church unless you were already buying their line? Or the union hall, or…

    What sort of godless heathen are you who doesn’t vote with your congregation?

    Although, to be fair, anyone stupid enough to show up at a church with his ballot probably planned on voting straight ticket “Jesus” anyway.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - Albatrossity - The Birds of May 3
Image by Albatrossity (7/31/25)

World Central Kitchen

Donate

Recent Comments

  • Kathleen on The Ongoing Texas Tragedies (Jul 12, 2025 @ 12:58pm)
  • Princess on The Ongoing Texas Tragedies (Jul 12, 2025 @ 12:57pm)
  • Gretchen on The Ongoing Texas Tragedies (Jul 12, 2025 @ 12:57pm)
  • trollhattan on The Ongoing Texas Tragedies (Jul 12, 2025 @ 12:54pm)
  • Omnes Omnibus on The Ongoing Texas Tragedies (Jul 12, 2025 @ 12:52pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Feeling Defeated?  If We Give Up, It's Game Over

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!