• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

I have other things to bitch about but those will have to wait.

Museums are not America’s attic for its racist shit.

Petty moves from a petty man.

If you can’t control your emotions, someone else will.

If you cannot answer whether trump lost the 2020 election, you are unfit for office.

The arc of history bends toward the same old fuckery.

Sadly, there is no cure for stupid.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

Peak wingnut was a lie.

Following reporting rules is only for the little people, apparently.

Fight for a just cause, love your fellow man, live a good life.

Teach a man to fish, and he’ll sit in a boat all day drinking beer.

The worst democrat is better than the best republican.

There are consequences to being an arrogant, sullen prick.

Republicans do not trust women.

Baby steps, because the Republican Party is full of angry babies.

Incompetence, fear, or corruption? why not all three?

Republicans choose power over democracy, every day.

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires.

There are more Russians standing up to Putin than Republicans.

The revolution will be supervised.

Donald Trump found guilty as fuck – May 30, 2024!

We are aware of all internet traditions.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Ya Gotta Be Kidding Me, Chuck

Ya Gotta Be Kidding Me, Chuck

by John Cole|  January 26, 200712:25 pm| 86 Comments

This post is in: Politics, General Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

This made me laugh out loud:

His Republican colleagues regard him warily. The White House barely speaks to him. He is reviled by his party’s conservative base.

Looks as though Sen. Chuck Hagel is on a roll.

Both parties have their Iraq war contrarians. For the Democrats, it is Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut, whose steadfast support for President Bush nearly cost him his seat last year and forced him to run as an independent. The Republican version is Hagel, a career maverick from Nebraska and the only GOP senator to call for an end to the war.

Hagel’s sharp criticism of the war has placed him squarely in the mainstream of public opinion on Iraq and revived long-dormant speculation about his presidential ambitions. Hagel has been eclipsed by Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), a leading contender for his party’s presidential nomination who has vigorously endorsed the president’s war policies.

Chuck Hagel, if he ran, would not win one primary. Hell, he couldn’t even beat McCain in South Carolina, and the base hates McCain for a number of reasons (not to mention half of South Carolina still thinks he has a black baby).

One of the most amusing (depressing) aspects of the GOP’s descent into lunacy (I can say that now that I am officially a moonbat! Do I get a certificate in the mail, Misha?) the past few years has been listening to the rhetoric of the 28%er’s, who faced with the fact that their ideas (and that is a charitable name for the babble they spew) are rejected by the majority of the country and a sizable portion of the party, are now focussed on purges within the party. I was only half-joking yesterday when I wrote the silly pledge should actually read “Follow Bush over a cliff or we will make sure that we are a Southern regional religionist party with 12 seats in the Senate!” That is what some of them want. Enter Dean Barnett:

2) What is the purpose of the pledge?

It is not a loyalty oath. Nothing like it. The pledge rests on the premise that Republicans who are supporting the anti-surge resolution are doing so as a craven political play. The pledge is merely a way of showing them that it is an extremely poor political play. And since political advantage is the coin of their realm, we think it may serve to change their hearts and minds.

3) But isn’t it somehow unseemly to demand that these people sign a petition to show their loyalty to the White House?

Again, as is so often the case, you completely miss the point. We’re not asking the Senators to sign the pledge. We’re asking people who will move any Republican who votes for the resolution to the head of their s**t list to sign the petition. The pledge is merely a way for the grassroots to communicate their feelings to the Republican Party.

All well and good, but bullshit. The point of the pledge is to stop Senators from being Senators, and continue to be lackeys for this administration. The point is to stifle any dissent. What would Barnett do if they cut off funding from the troops? Aside from having an aneurysm, they would immediately fire up the stab-in-the back machine they have been warming up for months, and then work to get all these folks unelected anyway.

But cutting off funding for the troops would be irresponsible. We all know that. So what is one to do, as a Senator, if you deeply oppose this piddling surge because your recognize the futility and underwhelming nature of it, yet do not want to fully cut off the troops. Particularly when you are dealing with an extremely obstinate President and an administration in full-fledged spin mode? An administration who has screwed up EVERYTHING they have touched over the course of the past few years, and who listens to no one?

You do the only thing you can. You signal your displeasure with the current plan through a non-binding resolution. And EVEN that is too much for the authoritarians on the right, because any dissent from the Decider is not to be had. Hell, his choice of personnel was just unanimously confirmed, and even THAT pissed off the knuckledraggers:

General David Petraeus has been confirmed by the Senate. He received 81 votes. No, he didn’t get 19 ‘no’ votes. Senator Tim Johnson is in the hospital, still. But 18 others just did not bother to show up and vote.

The United States Senate cares so much about retreating from the battlefield that we’re going round and round over a negotiated non-binding surrender resolution. They care so little about prosecuting the war that 18 of them could not be bothered to show up and cast a vote for or against the general who will lead our soldiers in Iraq — for or against the general who said he needs more troops to get the job done.

Not only are they pissed that Petraeus didn’t get all 100 votes, but they are snippy because people had the unmitigated gall to vote for the non-binding resolution saying the current surge is a bad idea, but for Petraeus:

John Warner is reportedly authoring a resolution that essentially mirrors the recommendations of the bipartisanly disregarded Iraq Study Group report while disapproving of the ongoing increase of US troops in Iraq.

Yet during Petraeus’ confirmation hearing he was unabashedly in favor of the troop surge ordered by the President.

The dichotomy here is simply bonejarring. On the one hand a clear majority of this panel will vote that sending additional troops to Iraq is not in the national interest. This is an extremely strong statement, one that approaches alleging treason on the part of the president and which would clearly constitute an impeachable offense. On the other hand the panel voted unanimously to confirm as military commander in Iraq a man who supports the deployment of those troops to Iraq. In essence, the Senate Armed Services Committee confirmed to four-star rank and to the command of the most critical military effort of the United States a man who is openly not acting in the best interests of the nation.

Senators possessing even a modicum of integrity would have the moral obligation to vote against David Petraeus if for no other reason than to force the president to send a nominee who does not support the troop surge. It they are truly serious about their beliefs it is hard to see how they could act otherwise.

Make sure you read the comments in that last link. The commenters patiently tried, repeatedly, to explain to Streiff that it is possible to signal your displeasure with the current surge plan while still believing a President has a right to his personnel, but he was having none of it. Nuance, as we know, is for pussies.

And back we go to Chuck Hagel, who, as you see, has no chance at ever being President. He has committed the greatest sin- he thought for himself. Hugh Hewitt, Dean Barnett, and Red State will make sure he is punished.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « The Credibility Gap
Next Post: Not My Bag, Baby »

Reader Interactions

86Comments

  1. 1.

    zzyzx

    January 26, 2007 at 12:32 pm

    You need to close your last blockquote ;)

  2. 2.

    zzyzx

    January 26, 2007 at 12:34 pm

    …oh and it is odd that so many of the saner places I went to to read the view from the other side are now agreeing with me. I suppose that’s a good thing, but it’s weird to actually see the converts.

  3. 3.

    Don

    January 26, 2007 at 12:40 pm

    The irony is that Chuck Hagel is the real conservative in this crowd. If you could bring back Barry Goldwater from the dead he would be agreeing with Hagel.

    Modern day GOP is no longer a conservative party. It is a neocon/theocratic party.

    Chuck Hagel should run for president to remind people what real conservatism stood for.

  4. 4.

    Bubblegum Tate

    January 26, 2007 at 12:40 pm

    I can say that now that I am officially a moonbat!

    Welcome aboard, comrade! Please perform either an abortion (for pleasure, naturally) or a gay marriage within the next seven days to confirm your status.

  5. 5.

    Krista

    January 26, 2007 at 12:41 pm

    (I can say that now that I am officially a moonbat! Do I get a certificate in the mail, Misha?)

    You’re a “freshly-minted” moonbat no less! All nice and shiny and smelling pretty!

  6. 6.

    Gatchaman

    January 26, 2007 at 12:42 pm

    Does it dawn on any of the knuckleheads that perhaps Hagle is simply listening to what the people of Nebraska say? Why does every Republican senator have to act as if their only obligation is to the president?

    Do schools still teach civics?

  7. 7.

    jg

    January 26, 2007 at 12:44 pm

    You got it easy John. I was ‘converted’ to moonbat when Bush still had a 85% approval rating.

  8. 8.

    Krista

    January 26, 2007 at 12:45 pm

    Please perform either an abortion (for pleasure, naturally) or a gay marriage within the next seven days to confirm your status.

    If you peform both, with your membership you will receive this beautifully framed signed photograph of Michael Moore’s ass, upon which to practice kissing up to those Godless terrorist-sympathizers who would destroy our country.

  9. 9.

    jg

    January 26, 2007 at 12:46 pm

    Does it dawn on any of the knuckleheads that perhaps Hagle is simply listening to what the people of Nebraska say?

    Haven’t you figured out yet that republican senators are supposed to serve the party not their constituents?

  10. 10.

    demimondian

    January 26, 2007 at 12:46 pm

    You’re a “freshly-minted” moonbat no less!

    Actually, I think he’s a freshly-scrod moonbat.

  11. 11.

    FAP

    January 26, 2007 at 12:49 pm

    Is redstate.com really taken seriously in conservative circles or is it regarded more of as an amusing side show?

  12. 12.

    Andrew

    January 26, 2007 at 12:50 pm

    Is redstate.com really taken seriously in conservative circles or is it regarded more of as an amusing side show?

    I call spoof question.

  13. 13.

    Unfiltered G

    January 26, 2007 at 12:54 pm

    Is redstate.com really taken seriously in conservative circles or is it regarded more of as an amusing side show?

    As long as they are on message they are taken seriously in the conservative world.

  14. 14.

    srv

    January 26, 2007 at 12:55 pm

    Is redstate.com really taken seriously in conservative circles or is it regarded more of as an amusing side show

    Conservative circles? No such animal exists anymore. It is all one giant FlufferSphere(tm) now.

  15. 15.

    Cyrus

    January 26, 2007 at 1:04 pm

    Hagel’s sharp criticism of the war has placed him squarely in the mainstream of public opinion on Iraq and…

    I love that part from the article, and it can’t be stated often enough these days. Once in a while, it might start to look like Democrats are too incompetent, or a Broderlike “bipartisan for its own sake” stance might be acceptable in this one instance. Until, that is, I remember what Democrats are being told they should cooperate with.

    This article could just as easily have led with “Number of Republicans responsive to electorate grows to five percent”.

  16. 16.

    Jake

    January 26, 2007 at 1:05 pm

    If you peform both, with your membership you will receive this beautifully framed signed photograph of Michael Moore’s Osama bin Hidin’s ass…

    Jeeze, can’t you get the moonbat pantheon straight? You must perform three gay marriages and two abortions as penance or surrender your MoonBadge(TM).

  17. 17.

    RSA

    January 26, 2007 at 1:05 pm

    I am struck by the cluelessness of this comment:

    Senators possessing even a modicum of integrity would have the moral obligation to vote against David Petraeus if for no other reason than to force the president to send a nominee who does not support the troop surge.

    “Force” the President to do something? Let me think about what’s happened in the past when Congress has rejected the President’s nominations for various posts. . . You know, I don’t think that’s really been effective in changing the President’s mind about anything.

  18. 18.

    Andrei

    January 26, 2007 at 1:05 pm

    If you peform both, with your membership you will receive this beautifully framed signed photograph of Michael Moore’s ass, upon which to practice kissing up to those Godless terrorist-sympathizers who would destroy our country.

    POTD. First official nominee for POTY.

  19. 19.

    ThymeZone

    January 26, 2007 at 1:06 pm

    Do I get a certificate in the mail

    Yes, you are an Enemy of the State.

    Finally.

  20. 20.

    Punchy

    January 26, 2007 at 1:09 pm

    Chuck Hagel, if he ran, would not win one primary.

    I want what YOU’RE smoking, Jonathon. This guy is getting more support everyday. He’s saying what SEVENTY PERCENT (read: a lot more than just Dems!) of America thinks and wants. Not only would he be wildly popular with mainstream (moderate) Republicans…hell, I’d vote for him for Pres long before Clinton or Obama.

    Hagel is–simply–the ONLY Senator speaking the minds of most Americans. He’s in effect saying, “Fuck this non-binding shit. My co-workers are fucking pussies. Let’s take this shit outside and settle this like men”….

  21. 21.

    Rex

    January 26, 2007 at 1:10 pm

    I actually first found this blog through Misha’s site–back when I still believed in Republicans. Words cannot describe how putrid my perception of Misha became over the years. He is one person that, based on his writings, has the wherewithal to kill Arab children with his bare hands. And if he couldn’t? He’s a pussy poseur who hides behind incendiary rhetoric.

  22. 22.

    Krista

    January 26, 2007 at 1:11 pm

    POTD. First official nominee for POTY.

    Yay for me!

  23. 23.

    Zifnab

    January 26, 2007 at 1:17 pm

    Is redstate.com really taken seriously in conservative circles or is it regarded more of as an amusing side show?

    I think Tom DeLay still posts there. For all that’s worth.

    Hagel is—simply—the ONLY Senator speaking the minds of most Americans. He’s in effect saying, “Fuck this non-binding shit. My co-workers are fucking pussies. Let’s take this shit outside and settle this like men”….

    I’m in Texas, so my vote doesn’t really count, but wtf why not. I’d vote for him in primary season. Man’s got balls. They dropped a bit late, but at least they’re hanging out there.

  24. 24.

    Douglas McElroy

    January 26, 2007 at 1:17 pm

    Speaking of 28%ers, have you seen this from Kung Fu Monkey? It explains a lot. 28% may be a base level of support nowadays. I don’t know what it says about us now that Nixon went lower.

  25. 25.

    Tsulagi

    January 26, 2007 at 1:19 pm

    If you check the list of those who didn’t show up to vote for Petraues confirmation, it comes down to 12 Republicans and 7 Democrats. Throw out Johnson who has a pretty good reason for not being present and you have twice as many Pubs as Dems who are the “they” in…

    They care so little about prosecuting the war that 18 of them could not be bothered to show up and cast a vote for or against the general who will lead our soldiers in Iraq

    So why is it constantly proven Republicans hate our troops? Why do they abandon our country in overwhelming numbers? Jesus keeps on weeping.

  26. 26.

    Face

    January 26, 2007 at 1:21 pm

    Please perform either an abortion (for pleasure, naturally) or a gay marriage

    In addition to the above, Official Moonbat Status requires that he go on a date (and get to second base) with Cindy Sheehan, and brings home the panties as proof. If it all passes the sniff test, he’ll be getting his Moonban sew-on badge in 7-10 days.

  27. 27.

    Wilfred

    January 26, 2007 at 1:22 pm

    You do the only thing you can. You signal your displeasure with the current plan through a non-binding resolution.

    yeah, that’s ripping him out a new one. I think would have signalled my own displeasure with the current plan by wiping my ass with it and pasting it on Lieberman’s forehead.

    Caligula got everything he wanted. Again.

  28. 28.

    TenguPhule

    January 26, 2007 at 1:22 pm

    If you peform both, with your membership you will receive this beautifully framed signed photograph of Michael Moore’s ass naked George Soros, upon which to practice kissing up to those Godless mutant-commie-terrorist-sympathizers who would destroy our country. Friend Computer.

    Act now and get your first set of Troubleshooter Clone replacements free!

  29. 29.

    AkaDad

    January 26, 2007 at 1:22 pm

    I also know that the RINOs in the Senate who are currently working on a “non-binding” resolution against The Surge™ are nothing but a bunch of opportunist fuckweasels wanting to eat their cake and have it and that they ought to be dragged outside and shot for providing material aid and comfort to our enemies.

    shrill – adjective

    betraying some strong emotion or attitude in an exaggerated amount, as antagonism or defensiveness.

    let them be counted as al-Qaeda’s useful idiots responsible for untold thousands of dead Americans.

    That hit a 9 on my irony meter

  30. 30.

    tBone

    January 26, 2007 at 1:23 pm

    you will receive this beautifully framed signed photograph of Michael Moore’s ass*

    *reinforced hangers and mounting hardware sold separately. Please mount ONLY on load-bearing walls.

    I want what YOU’RE smoking, Jonathon. This guy is getting more support everyday.

    He would still have to navigate the feverswamp of Republican primaries. That’s the stumbling block, not popular support among the general (read: sane) populace.

  31. 31.

    Tsulagi

    January 26, 2007 at 1:26 pm

    Funny thing about the Petraeus confirmation vote, among the majority Pubs who didn’t show up was Surger McCain himself. Guess he was still catching up on his sleep after the SOTU address.

  32. 32.

    tBone

    January 26, 2007 at 1:28 pm

    Man’s got balls. They dropped a bit late, but at least they’re hanging out there.

    I think that’s a little unfair. I disagree with Hagel on a lot of other issues, but he’s never been shy about sharing his opinion of the Iraq clusterfuck Pony Parade.

  33. 33.

    RSA

    January 26, 2007 at 1:29 pm

    28% may be a base level of support nowadays.

    My favorite benchmark for popularity (it was Cheney rather than Bush, but they’re close to being in the same boat these days) was identified, I think, by Tom Tomorrow, who pointed to a poll saying that 10% of the American public would eat a rat on reality TV. So there are varying levels: Bush is still 18 points above rat-eating craziness.

  34. 34.

    Bubblegum Tate

    January 26, 2007 at 1:44 pm

    I want what YOU’RE smoking, Jonathon. This guy is getting more support everyday.

    He would still have to navigate the feverswamp of Republican primaries. That’s the stumbling block, not popular support among the general (read: sane) populace

    Yeah, exactly. The primaries are about hardcore, fire-spittin’ GOP-’til-I-die loyalists, not, you know, regular people. It’s one of the great bits of irony built into our current political system that a guy like Hagel could indeed draw some fairly widespread popular support, but his own party would never let him get the nomination.

    BTW, it’s particularly funny to see what the wingers are saying regarding Hagel and compare it to what they said about Lieberman vs. the Democratic Party in Connecticut.

  35. 35.

    The Other Steve

    January 26, 2007 at 1:45 pm

    Bizarre..

    From what I’ve seen, I think Petraeus is a highly competent military commander. I don’t agree with the surge, but I am heartened that they’re getting rid of Casey.

    I hope Patraeus drinks the same whiskey as US Grant, that’s all I can say.

  36. 36.

    Face

    January 26, 2007 at 1:51 pm

    The Iraq Pony Parade.

    Send me a bumpersticker of this…quickly. This has GOT to be the new buzzphrase. Pure genius.

  37. 37.

    mw

    January 26, 2007 at 1:55 pm

    Republicans better hope that Chuck Hagel runs for president and gets some traction in the party. As you point out, it is going to be tough road. The Republican right is now so out of step with the majority of Americans over the War in Iraq, that I cannot see how Republicans can nominate an electable candidate. Fortunately this ragged right is becoming marginalized (although over-represented in the blogosphere)and is now a small minority of the Republican party and and even smaller minority of American opinion overall.

    Chuck is prominently featured in my most recent YouTube effort “It’s the war, stupid.” and recent blog post of the same name.

    Chuck Hagel is a rock solid conservative in the Goldwater tradition. He is more conservative than McCain, Giuliani, Romney, and certainly more conservative than Bush. He has been on the right side of this war since 2002 and that makes him the only electable Republican in the field. It’ll be too bad if he can’t make it through the gauntlet of Republicans who have redefined being a Republican with a single litmus test of blind support of the President’s policies on Iraq. You don’t have to be a fiscal conservative to get their support. You don’t have to be a social conservative to get their support. You just have to put on your blinders and march lockstep on a flawed war strategy. If Republicans like these carry the day, it will be the end of the Republican Party as a relevant political force for a generation.

  38. 38.

    Pixie

    January 26, 2007 at 2:02 pm

    I have to disagree that Hagel is the ONLY one that speaks his mind, he was a lock-step bushbot during the first oh, 5 years or so. Russ Feingold remains the only senator that calls a spade a spade.

  39. 39.

    Zifnab

    January 26, 2007 at 2:07 pm

    Russ Feingold remains the only senator that calls a spade a spade.

    I wish THAT man was running for President.

  40. 40.

    Bubblegum Tate

    January 26, 2007 at 2:07 pm

    From what I’ve seen, I think Petraeus is a highly competent military commander.

    I completely agree. If we’d had him in charge instead of that lickspittle Tommy Franks, Iraq wouldn’t be such a catastrofuck. It certainly wouldn’t be a Pony Parade (a term I will now be using on a regular basis because of its awesomeness), but it wouldn’t be the tragicomedy of errors it has been to this point.

  41. 41.

    Jake

    January 26, 2007 at 2:17 pm

    28% may be a base level of support nowadays.

    And a recent poll showed 25% of Americans think Jesus will return in the next year or so.

    Coincidence?

  42. 42.

    tBone

    January 26, 2007 at 2:18 pm

    I have to disagree that Hagel is the ONLY one that speaks his mind, he was a lock-step bushbot during the first oh, 5 years or so.

    Uh, what? Hagel has never been a “lock-step Bushbot.” He’s been a fierce critic of the Iraq policy almost from the beginning, and he’s never been scared to call out the administration on their bullshit.

    His voting record is certainly fair game for criticism, but it’s ridiculous to lump him in with the Kool-Aid guzzlers.

  43. 43.

    Grrr

    January 26, 2007 at 2:34 pm

    The commenters patiently tried, repeatedly, to explain to Streiff that it is possible to signal your displeasure with the current surge plan while still believing a President has a right to his personnel, but he was having none of it. Nuance, as we know, is for pussies.

    Hewitt and his buttboys like streiff and Riehl are increasingly reminding of me of Jack Black as Roger Davis in Bob Roberts.

    I’m not so sure these guys are kidding anymore about long knives, ropes and lampposts.

    It’s a shame really. There won’t be anyone left to keep us America-hating Socialists from redistributing every last dollar from the rich to the poor and welcoming our new Caliphate overlords.

  44. 44.

    mrmobi

    January 26, 2007 at 2:46 pm

    I have to disagree that Hagel is the ONLY one that speaks his mind, he was a lock-step bushbot during the first oh, 5 years or so. Russ Feingold remains the only senator that calls a spade a spade.

    I think Hagel is a principled guy, but remember that he was one of the senators who voted, this week, against increasing the minimum wage. He stood with his Republican colleagues so that the law would not be passed. Although all the Senators in opposition said they wanted to “amend” the bill to make it “fair,” it’s not about amendments. The Republicans in the Senate are being obstructionist because they can. What do they care about low-wage working people?

    There is a great video over at Crooks and Liars of Ted Kennedy going off on his fellow-senators about not being able to pass the minimum wage increase without another giveaway to big business.

    I agree with others that Hagel has no chance in the modern Republican party to get the nomination. It’s going to require a genuine political collapse (Big majorities in both houses of congress and the Presidency to Democrats) for the hold of the neo-cons to be destroyed. With any kind of luck, that collapse will come in 2008-09.
    I look forward to the day when decent, principled conservatives have control of the grand old party. We will all be better for it.

  45. 45.

    pharniel

    January 26, 2007 at 2:55 pm

    A riot…..is an ugly thing…..
    Seriously. Somone shoudl have edited that scene and put ‘war’ instead of ‘riot’ and sat teh decider down infront of it…maybe then he’d have understood due caution, proper planning etc…

    But i think it’s about damn time we had one!
    and this is what america should be thinking about the right wing nut job spin machine. seriously, if you think the big jc is coming to save your ass from your mistakes in the next year, please line up and certified trained professionals in texas will send you to him without the wait.

  46. 46.

    TenguPhule

    January 26, 2007 at 3:11 pm

    If we’d had him in charge instead of that lickspittle Tommy Franks, Iraq wouldn’t be such a catastrofuck.

    Out with the old lickspittle, in with the new lickspittle!

    Anyone who agrees with Lieberman that opposition ‘provides comfort to the enemy’ is a castrated asswiper who doesn’t deserve their general stars.

  47. 47.

    Zifnab

    January 26, 2007 at 3:24 pm

    His voting record is certainly fair game for criticism, but it’s ridiculous to lump him in with the Kool-Aid guzzlers.

    So he was just Spectering? Please.
    That hardly warms my heart.

  48. 48.

    salvage

    January 26, 2007 at 3:24 pm

    I can say that now that I am officially a moonbat!

    ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US!

  49. 49.

    Pixie

    January 26, 2007 at 3:38 pm

    Uh, what? Hagel has never been a “lock-step Bushbot.” He’s been a fierce critic of the Iraq policy almost from the beginning, and he’s never been scared to call out the administration on their bullshit.

    His voting record is certainly fair game for criticism, but it’s ridiculous to lump him in with the Kool-Aid guzzlers.

    Riiiight. As Zif says above, the guy was Spectering. Sure he may make a fuss every now and again, but in the end he always caves to the white house.

    And yes, Feingold would make an EXCELLENT president.

  50. 50.

    TenguPhule

    January 26, 2007 at 3:42 pm

    And yes, Feingold would make an EXCELLENT president.

    Agreed. The best people for the job are the ones who don’t want it.

    And in that spirit I propose that anyone who runs for public office should automatically be disqualified from it.

  51. 51.

    jenniebee

    January 26, 2007 at 3:56 pm

    Oh noes! You only write like this to get links from random Kos diaries? /cry

  52. 52.

    Keith

    January 26, 2007 at 4:04 pm

    The commenters patiently tried, repeatedly, to explain to Streiff that it is possible to signal your displeasure with the current surge plan while still believing a President has a right to his personnel, but he was having none of it.

    Even more mind-numbing was Brit Hume yesterday trying to make it seem like some kind of contradiction or hypocracy that the ASC would unanimously send Petraus to the floor for a confirmation vote even though some of them would vote against the surge.

  53. 53.

    Mike

    January 26, 2007 at 4:29 pm

    Republicans better hope that Chuck Hagel runs for president and gets some traction in the party.

    I personally hope they nominate Brownback, or preferably, Tancredo.

  54. 54.

    tBone

    January 26, 2007 at 4:40 pm

    Riiiight. As Zif says above, the guy was Spectering. Sure he may make a fuss every now and again, but in the end he always caves to the white house.

    A politician who usually votes with his party. Inconceivable!

    If you want to bag on spineless Nebraska senators, Ben Nelson is the place to start.

  55. 55.

    Rick Taylor

    January 26, 2007 at 4:44 pm

    I’ve gotta say, after putting up with “centrists” carping against those of us in the Democratic party who opposed the war and criticized senators like Liebermann that supported it as moonbats applying a litmus test and stifling diversity in a way that would inevitably fracture the party or lead it to defeat, it sure is satisfying seeing what the base of the right wing is capable of. As far as I know, no one on Daily Kos has seriously considered publishing a pledge not to support any Democrat who doesn’t call for an and to the war in Iraq.

    –Rick Taylor

  56. 56.

    James F. Elliott

    January 26, 2007 at 5:02 pm

    The commenters patiently tried, repeatedly, to explain to Streiff that it is possible to signal your displeasure with the current surge plan while still believing a President has a right to his personnel, but he was having none of it. Nuance, as we know, is for pussies.

    It’s even more simple than that: It is entirely logical and principled to believe the surge is a bad idea and still want to make sure that, if it is implemented, the best leader is available for the job in order to give it any kind of a shot.

  57. 57.

    Dave

    January 26, 2007 at 5:05 pm

    Zifnab Says:

    Russ Feingold remains the only senator that calls a spade a spade.

    I wish THAT man was running for President.

    I third that.

  58. 58.

    gus

    January 26, 2007 at 6:15 pm

    There’s no pledge, Rick, but Leiberman was persona non grata among Democrats (for good reason).

  59. 59.

    Granny Miller

    January 26, 2007 at 6:23 pm

    “Chuck Hagel, if he ran, would not win one primary. ”

    Don’t bet on it :-)
    People like me took care of Rick Santorum and people like me will put Senator Hagel in the White House.

    I left the Republican party last year and Chuck Hagel could bring me back.

    Granny Miller
    http://www.nelsonrun.blogspot.com

  60. 60.

    lard lad

    January 26, 2007 at 6:24 pm

    I hope Patraeus drinks the same whiskey as US Grant, that’s all I can say.

    Props to TOS for his knowledge of American historical arcana.

  61. 61.

    Mark

    January 26, 2007 at 6:46 pm

    Past few years? I would argue that this administration has screwed up everything it’s touched for the last 5 years, at least.

  62. 62.

    MC

    January 26, 2007 at 6:53 pm

    Grrr Says:

    The commenters patiently tried, repeatedly, to explain to Streiff that it is possible to signal your displeasure with the current surge plan while still believing a President has a right to his personnel, but he was having none of it. Nuance, as we know, is for pussies.

    The sad shame of it is, when you read RedState, it’s pretty clear that Streiff is a well-read guy. Same with Thomas. They’re probably very intelligent guys but just awful thinkers. It’s a testament to the cult-like nature of the last 28% that otherwise bright people are just so absorbed in nonsensical contortions of thought all to defend every single action of Bush.

  63. 63.

    TenguPhule

    January 26, 2007 at 7:03 pm

    A politician who usually votes with his party. Inconceivable!

    A turd is a turd, no matter which party tries to put a pretty dress on it and call it a bill.

  64. 64.

    tBone

    January 26, 2007 at 8:52 pm

    A turd is a turd, no matter which party tries to put a pretty dress saddle on it and call it a bill pony.

    Better.

  65. 65.

    AlanDownunder

    January 26, 2007 at 9:37 pm

    from Avedon at The Sideshow: http://sideshow.me.uk/sjan07.htm#01260222

    You know who was a Republican with integrity? Jim Jeffords. Any Republican in the Senate who had integrity was free to join him. They didn’t. End of story.

    I like “Specterizing”, but what about “Hageling”, along with Senator Haggle?

    If a guy wants to keep on signing on, he should keep on explaining why – not why not.

  66. 66.

    Pb

    January 27, 2007 at 2:44 am

    Well, I for one am glad Hagel is not just speaking out about this, but also voting about it. But really, he’s been speaking out about it for years–in 2006, in 2005, in 2004–and now I think he’s just had enough, and sees an opportunity here for some real change now that the Democrats are in charge of Congress. Of course he’s no Democrat, but I don’t think he’s being some sort of Johnny-come-lately opportunist here, and he’s not a crazy person either–which is why there’s hardly any room left for him in today’s Republican party. I mean, check this out:

    In another area in which Hagel’s views differ sharply from the president’s, he suggested that the best way to ultimately win the war on terror is to earn the trust and respect of foreigners, especially younger people in the Arab world and other parts of the globe. The best way to do that, he said, is to make the United States more accessible to them and more open to immigration.

    “We are pushing away our friends, our allies, the next generation around the world,” Hagel said.

    What a freakin’ concept. That was Chuck Hagel back in 2004–and yes, they were speculating that he might run for President or Vice President back then as well. I don’t see it happening, but I’d go for a Chuck Hagel over a Joe Lieberman any day of the week.

  67. 67.

    Beej

    January 27, 2007 at 2:44 am

    I’m not going to vote for Hagel (or any other Repub) for Pres, but I have to say the man does have some guts. The public opinion columns and local TV station blogs here in Senator Hagel’s and my home state of Nebraska are smoking from the fiery outrage of Repub voters who see Hagel as a traitor who has stepped on the face of all those who voted for him. Forget about getting elected President, he’s going to have a lot of trouble being re-elected to his Senate seat.

  68. 68.

    Richard 23

    January 27, 2007 at 3:31 am

    Forget about getting elected President, he’s going to have a lot of trouble being re-elected to his Senate seat.

    Maybe Hagel shouldn’t have relinquished control of ES&S (Election Systems & Software):

    ES&S is one of the four largest voting companies used in the 2004 election. (Diebold Election Systems, Sequoia Voting Systems, Hart Intercivic)

    Chuck Hagel was CEO of the company until shortly before his election to the United States Senate from Nebraska. The election was conducted almost exclusively on equipment provided by his former company.

  69. 69.

    Darrell

    January 27, 2007 at 1:17 pm

    And back we go to Chuck Hagel, who, as you see, has no chance at ever being President. He has committed the greatest sin- he thought for himself

    This is a classic example of John Cole’s evolution to moonbat. You see, all opposition to the war, principled or unprincipled, is evidence of “independent” thought. Whereas anyone who agrees with anything the Bush administration does, is nothing but a Bushbot dittohead. It’s really quite simple.

  70. 70.

    Darrell

    January 27, 2007 at 1:32 pm

    What I’d like to know, is why independent maverick thinker Chuck Hagel wanted a non-binding resolution opposing the escalation rather than stand up for a binding resolution? And why didn’t the courageous independent thinker Hagel vote against the confirmation of Petreus? Wouldn’t that have been the principled thing to do if he truly believed sending more troops was such a useless march into the “meatgrinder” as he put it?

  71. 71.

    spk

    January 27, 2007 at 2:29 pm

    Chuck Hagel is presenting the best foreign policy vision of all the announced or potential presidential candidates, thusfar. And I write this as a liberal Democrat. See his Senate web site for a copy of an excellent speech given at SAIS in mid-December. I, too, dislike that he voted against raising the minuimum wage, but he doesn’t believe we should have a federal minimum wage at all. I think it a horrible idea, but he voted for another resolution that would have eliminated the federal minimum wage in favor of allowing states to deal with the issue.

  72. 72.

    Richard 23

    January 27, 2007 at 3:25 pm

    I’ll bite, Darrell. Keep in mind this is only my opinion. I don’t speak for Hagel or the “wackjob left.”

    1) One builds support for a binding resolution by starting with a non-binding resolution with which to gauge support for the idea. It also allows the President a chance to save face. He can make the right decision once he realizes that unconditional support is no longer there without the humiliation of a “binding” resolution.

    2) The President gets to choose his own people. And Petreus is a competant general. If the surge is going to happen anyway, why not allow Bush his choice to give it the best chance to work? Surge critics by no means hope for “defeat,” do they? And if it does fail to produce results in say six or nine months, it wouldn’t be the fault of surge critics.

    3) No. Are you asking rhetorical questions for some reason?

    Hope that helps.

  73. 73.

    Paddy O'Shea

    January 27, 2007 at 4:26 pm

    7 more of our military people killed in Iraq today.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16839573/

  74. 74.

    Richard 23

    January 27, 2007 at 5:25 pm

    Celebrating casualties, Paddy? How ‘reality based’ of you. Clap louder.

  75. 75.

    Darrell

    January 27, 2007 at 5:36 pm

    1) One builds support for a binding resolution by starting with a non-binding resolution with which to gauge support for the idea. It also allows the President a chance to save face. He can make the right decision once he realizes that unconditional support is no longer there without the humiliation of a “binding” resolution.

    But if he honestly believes that sending more troops is nothing but a useless march into a “meatgrinder”, then doesn’t he have a moral obligation to do everything he can to stop it? We’re not talking about consensus on a trade agreement, we’re talking about lives of American soldiers.

    Far more likely, Hagel is a gutless coward who wants to have it both ways. If the surge works, he can claim he didn’t do anything to stop it (‘non-binding’ resolution, didn’t vote against Petreus). If it goes bad, he can say “I tried to stop it” with the resolution. Sure it’s unprincipled, but he’s a politician with Presidential aspirations. I don’t buy for one minute that Hagel was just trying to ‘build consensus’.

  76. 76.

    mrmobi

    January 27, 2007 at 8:33 pm

    Far more likely, Hagel is a gutless coward who wants to have it both ways.

    Just when I think you can’t sink lower, Gruppenfuhrer, you pull me back in.

    I don’t agree with Chuck Hagel about most things, but he seems to grasp the reality of the situation in Iraq pretty well.

    All you can do, knowing that the vast majority of America thinks that the ruling shitheads are the biggest bunch of fuckups they’ve ever seen, is call a decorated Viet Nam vet a “gutless coward.”

    You Nazi turd.

  77. 77.

    Richard 23

    January 27, 2007 at 11:37 pm

    Well I agree with Darrell. Hagel needs to be booted. We need purity in the Republican Party. If we don’t have unity, we’re as bad as the Democrat party.

  78. 78.

    Rick Taylor

    January 28, 2007 at 1:50 am

    Gus Said:

    There’s no pledge, Rick, but Leiberman was persona non grata among Democrats (for good reason).

    That’s exactly my point, Gus. Activists were vilified as left wing loonies that would destroy the Democratic party because they supported an opposition candidate to a Senator who’d been outspoken in smearing and undercutting people who thought maybe we needed a change of strategy for this war, and then argued he should be supported as the Democratic candidate when he won the primary. I don’t remember anyone saying they wouldn’t vote for him if he’d won the primary. I certainly don’t recall anyone threatening to boycott the DLC if they didn’t cut off funding to Senators for not opposing the war.

  79. 79.

    Pb

    January 28, 2007 at 2:40 am

    spk,

    It’s a shame that Hagel’s site doesn’t have more of his floor speeches–I had to dig through the Congressional record (Page: S10175, or just search for Hagel) to find his floor speech on the Iraq AUMF of 2002.

    In short–even though he did vote for it, foolishly trusting his party’s President to listen to the Senate and do the right thing, he did have his reservations, and he saw what could happen if things went south, if they didn’t listen, if they didn’t work with the UN, if they didn’t take seriously the other growing threats around the world. And Hagel was right about all of that, the only thing he was wrong about was in giving Bush the benefit of the doubt. Here’s to him not making the same mistake again now.

  80. 80.

    TenguPhule

    January 28, 2007 at 4:21 am

    But if he honestly believes that sending more troops is nothing but a useless march into a “meatgrinder”, then doesn’t he have a moral obligation to do everything he can to stop it?

    Shorter Darrell: What do you mean you came inside me?! I told you to pull out!

    Let’s all have a good laugh at the idea that Darrell think Bush actually cares about moral obligations.

  81. 81.

    demimondian

    January 28, 2007 at 11:31 am

    But if he honestly believes that sending more troops is nothing but a useless march into a “meatgrinder”, then doesn’t he have a moral obligation to do everything he can to stop it?

    Why, yes, he does.

    This has been another edition of SATOB.

  82. 82.

    Misha I

    January 28, 2007 at 4:59 pm

    In the mail? What, John, am I MADE of money?

    Nah, I’d be happy to present it to you in person, however, over a beer or two. I still owe you one (or more).

  83. 83.

    dreggas

    January 29, 2007 at 2:19 pm

    Official Moonbat Status requires that he go on a date (and get to second base) with Cindy Sheehan, and brings home the panties as proof. If it all passes the sniff test..

    I just threw up in my mouth a little…

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. The Heretik : Return of the Hero says:
    January 26, 2007 at 1:14 pm

    […] We need a hero! But it probably isn’t Chuck Hagel. Some day Hagel will fall back to earth. In truth Hagel has been here with us on the ground all along. […]

  2. Gus diZerega » Musings After a Period of Silence says:
    January 27, 2007 at 11:53 am

    […] I heartily recommend their two posts, here and here.  And Tim F. has a funny Austin Powers add-on.  Most fitting for our macho right… […]

  3. Americas Victory 08 says:
    February 19, 2007 at 1:54 pm

    Ya Gotta Be Kidding Me Chuck

    Generally speaking, we here at America’s Victory like to publish links to our articles on the front page. Today however, I am publishing a link to a pledge, a pledge to support our troops and to hold Republicans accountable for their actions. …

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - Winter Wren - North of Quebec City (part 2 of 3) - Cap Tourmente and on the way to Tadoussac 4
Image by Winter Wren (5/16/25)

Recent Comments

  • Baud on Open Thread: Oh, Really? (May 17, 2025 @ 8:14am)
  • Ohio Mom on Open Thread: Oh, Really? (May 17, 2025 @ 8:10am)
  • Betty Cracker on Open Thread: Oh, Really? (May 17, 2025 @ 8:08am)
  • They Call Me Noni on Open Thread: Oh, Really? (May 17, 2025 @ 8:08am)
  • Enhanced Voting Techniques on Open Thread: Oh, Really? (May 17, 2025 @ 8:08am)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!