• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

New McCarthy, same old McCarthyism.

Second rate reporter says what?

Prediction: the GOP will rethink its strategy of boycotting future committees.

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

I’m pretty sure there’s only one Jack Smith.

“But what about the lurkers?”

Historically it was a little unusual for the president to be an incoherent babbling moron.

Come on, man.

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

Perhaps you mistook them for somebody who gives a damn.

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

Presidents are not kings, and Plaintiff is not President.

Why is it so hard for them to condemn hate?

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

rich, arrogant assholes who equate luck with genius

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

Republicans are radicals, not conservatives.

Conservatism: there are some people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

We still have time to mess this up!

That’s my take and I am available for criticism at this time.

I know this must be bad for Joe Biden, I just don’t know how.

Damn right I heard that as a threat.

Motto for the House: Flip 5 and lose none.

After roe, women are no longer free.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Open Threads / Open Thread

Open Thread

by Tim F|  January 29, 200711:46 am| 158 Comments

This post is in: Open Threads

FacebookTweetEmail

I can’t speak for John, but I plan to be extremely busy today. Talk amongst yourselves in the meantime.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « No Kidding
Next Post: Asking For Trouble »

Reader Interactions

158Comments

  1. 1.

    Sstarr

    January 29, 2007 at 12:06 pm

    Last night I was listening to NPR’s “On the Media” while trying to install handles on my kitchen cabinets. They had a war correspondent (I don’t remember which news outlet he worked for) who claimed that the “surge” is pretty much done. The troops that would have gone home have already had their tours extended, and other soldiers have been sent to Iraq early. So, the 20,000 soldier surge is in place, even before the Senate debates the non-binding resolution to condemn the surge.

    Now, the reporter went on the make the claim that the surge won’t do anything much to the condition on the ground, and that it is simply a political fig leaf to buy more time for the Iraqi government to – hopefully – get it together. In other words, the outcome of the war is now entirely defendant on Iraqi politicians. Makes you feel that victory is right around the corner, doesn’t it?

    Anyway, is this correct? Are the soldiers (or many of them) in place now?

  2. 2.

    Pb

    January 29, 2007 at 12:39 pm

    Sstarr,

    The troops that would have gone home have already had their tours extended, and other soldiers have been sent to Iraq early.

    Throughout this waroccupation, we’ve been sending more troops, bringing more home, and in general adjusting the size of the force there. As you say, the “surge” is just a matter of keeping some troops there longer, and sending others there sooner. So once it’s in place, why does the administration act like it would it be so hard to end?

    All you’d have to do is just bring back the troops you would have kept there longer, and maybe have some others leave sooner. Bringing troops home from Iraq is not so amazingly difficult–because we’ve been doing it all along. What we really have to do is stop sending more troops to Iraq, and we’d be out of there inside a year.

  3. 3.

    Rusty Shackleford

    January 29, 2007 at 1:14 pm

    Has anybody else noticed that “body counts” are being reported much more frequently? Today’s Chicago Tribune has “250 insurgents killed in fierce battle in Iraq” right across the middle of the front page.

    The military is “anti- body counts” but Bush requests them all the time (read Fiasco, State of Denial), especially when it’s difficult for him to divine progress from battlefield.

    When I see a body count I feel an overwhelming sense of dread. To me it means that despite killing 250 (or whatever amount) of insurgents, that’s all we’ve done.

  4. 4.

    skip

    January 29, 2007 at 1:22 pm

    Almost as mysterious as body counts, we now read that that had been no terrorist attacks in Israel for many, many months. Why then no peace talks?

  5. 5.

    Bombadil

    January 29, 2007 at 1:22 pm

    When I see a body count I feel an overwhelming sense of dread. To me it means that despite killing 250 (or whatever amount) of insurgents, that’s all we’ve done.

    Oh, I suspect we’ve accomplished more than that. We’ve likely generated even more insurgents than we’ve killed.

  6. 6.

    srv

    January 29, 2007 at 1:32 pm

    Watch the wingnuts Najaf story evolving. Yesterday (and even today on some sites), it was a Sunni brigade. Now it’s a counter Al-Sistani cult of Shia. Tomorrow, it’ll be an Iranian Qod force…

  7. 7.

    ThymeZone

    January 29, 2007 at 1:33 pm

    Now, the reporter went on the make the claim that the surge won’t do anything much to the condition on the ground, and that it is simply a political fig leaf to buy more time for the Iraqi government to – hopefully – get it together. In other words, the outcome of the war is now entirely defendant on Iraqi politicians. Makes you feel that victory is right around the corner, doesn’t it?

    Yes. The insurgency is in its last throes. The last throe of the last throes, in fact. This is the final throe.

    Thank God we have a Commander in Chief with the ba**s to stand up and stay the bring it on course mission accomplished long enough to get to the last we are surely winning throe.

  8. 8.

    Jake

    January 29, 2007 at 1:37 pm

    we now read that that had been no terrorist attacks in Israel for many, many months.

    You were right, but some cretin just blew himself and three other people off the map.

    I wonder if peace talks never really start because everyone on both sides knows it is just a matter of time before the next fuckwit with a HEX vest comes along.

  9. 9.

    ThymeZone

    January 29, 2007 at 1:37 pm

    Tomorrow, it’ll be an Iranian Qod force piece …

    Heh. Improved.

  10. 10.

    Wilfred

    January 29, 2007 at 1:40 pm

    Almost as mysterious as body counts, we now read that that had been no terrorist attacks in Israel for many, many months. Why then no peace talks?

    Because like the Bush Aministration, the Israeli government neither wants nor need peace. It needs only the constant low-level threat of terrorism, or the incident today, to justify its own war machine and ‘army with a state’ existence. Three dead Israelis are a small price to pay more land-grabbing on the West Bank, scores of dead Palestinians and the usual crowing over how Israel is on the front line against a handful of illiterate tribesmen are on the verge of destroying Western civilization and establishing a new Caliphate.

    It also helps to deflect attention from their use of cluster bombs in Lebanon since FREEDOM demands tough measures, and Israel is a democracy, so it’s ok.

  11. 11.

    Paul L.

    January 29, 2007 at 1:46 pm

    Still waiting for the screams of “Urban Sprawl” and “Evil rich” from the left.
    “Cribs” with John Edwards

    Seems the media has no interest in this mixed race rape unlike the Duke Lacrosse hoax.

  12. 12.

    Pb

    January 29, 2007 at 1:57 pm

    Paul L.,

    Didn’t Solomon already cover that? Oh, I see, it’s his new house–nice! It still isn’t as big as the White House (55,000 sq. ft.) though.

  13. 13.

    r4d20

    January 29, 2007 at 1:58 pm

    He brandishes his horns on high, and whets them Bull who leads the herd, Doing with might
    heroic deeds.

    He moves, a vigorous Steed, adorned with beauteous rays of shining gold, Becoming sovran of the streams.

    He, over places rough to pass, bringing rich treasures closely packed. Descends into the reservoirs.

    Men beautify him in the vats, him worthy to be beautified, Him who brings forth abundant food.

    Him, even him, the fingers ten and the seven songs make beautiful, Well−weaponed, best of gladdeners.

  14. 14.

    Bombadil

    January 29, 2007 at 2:09 pm

    He brandishes his horns on high, and whets them Bull who leads the herd, Doing with might
    heroic deeds.

    He moves, a vigorous Steed, adorned with beauteous rays of shining gold, Becoming sovran of the streams.

    He, over places rough to pass, bringing rich treasures closely packed. Descends into the reservoirs.

    Men beautify him in the vats, him worthy to be beautified, Him who brings forth abundant food.

    Him, even him, the fingers ten and the seven songs make beautiful, Well−weaponed, best of gladdeners.

    How odd, you’re the third person to say that today.

  15. 15.

    Tony J

    January 29, 2007 at 2:16 pm

    Here’s what confuses me.

    The boost to US ground forces in Baghdad and Anbar is supposed to be aimed mostly at foreign elements and the Sunni Insurgency, right? While the job of targeting the Shia militias/deathsquads falls to the same Shia-dominated Government that has fostered and supported them since their inception. And they’re simply not going to do it, are they? Why would they?

    And El Res is doing this, even though the Saudis, with whom this White House has a close and deeply personal relationship, have stated quite openly that they will (continue to) arm and fund the Sunni Insurgency to prevent the Shia assuming permanent supremacy, because that will make Iraq an Iranian ally, and the Saudis don’t like the Iranians.

    While at the same time (and this is the confusing bit) the US and Israel are clearly gearing up for some sort of strike on Iran in the near future. Even though this would have the effect of painting a great big bullseye on the back of every US (and UK) soldier in Iraq, and would only aid the Sunni Insurgency by drawing the Shia militias into the anti-American camp.

    So my question is, what timeline could the White House be working on that would reconcile these contradictory strategies?

    Right now, I’m baffled by how they appear to think this won’t be a nightmare for everyone concerned. Short of putting it all down to a strategy of kicking God up the arse and getting the Rapture started in time for teh Base to reap the benefits, I’ve only got one idea.

    Put all the onus on the Shia to ‘stand-up’ and eliminate their own paramilitary powerbase, then when the US attacks Iran, and the Shia switch sides, all the blame for the Occupation’s failure can be shifted to the Shia, who were obviously always working with the Iranians anyway. Cue a Saudi-authored rapprochment with the Sunni, and El Res’ gets to claim that executing Saddam broke a mystical spell that kept the Sunni from being ‘good Arabs’.

    Heh, it makes about as much sense as anything else.

  16. 16.

    RSA

    January 29, 2007 at 2:21 pm

    Sstarr, get to the real punchline: How did the kitchen cabinet handles turn out?!

  17. 17.

    TenguPhule

    January 29, 2007 at 2:22 pm

    It needs only the constant low-level threat of terrorism, or the incident today, to justify its own war machine and ‘army with a state’ existence.

    Shorter Wilfred: I demonstrate I know nothing with many words.

    Last I checked, Israel was trying to find someone with any real power on the Palistinian side with who to negotiate with that did not involve committing suicide.

    Of course, never let little things like a Palistinian Civil War get in the way of the ‘Israel the Hun’ rhetoric.

  18. 18.

    Pb

    January 29, 2007 at 2:26 pm

    you’re the third person to say that today

    Ancient Hindu scripture is back, baby–it’s like it never left!

    Hotar, possessor of all wealth.
    Served with oblation, kindled, bright, through love of song may Agni, bent
    On riches, smite the Vritras dead!

    Yeah, biotch, you gots tha bling, you gots mad props, now put a cap in that punk ass playah! Angi in tha hizzy!

  19. 19.

    TenguPhule

    January 29, 2007 at 2:27 pm

    Bush’s raging hardon to bomb Iran

    “If Iran escalates its military actions in Iraq to the detriment of our troops and – or innocent Iraqi people, we will respond firmly,” Bush said in an interview with National Public Radio.

    Yes, has Iran stopped beating their wives yet?

    All talk and still no proof provided by the US government to back up the claims.

    Deja Vu all over again.

  20. 20.

    Pb

    January 29, 2007 at 2:28 pm

    Right now, I’m baffled by how they appear to think this won’t be a nightmare for everyone concerned.

    Either (a) the “nightmare” is really their goal, or (b) they’re complete idiots. Neither answer is good, of course, but there you are.

  21. 21.

    srv

    January 29, 2007 at 2:36 pm

    So my question is, what timeline could the White House be working on that would reconcile these contradictory strategies?

    History would indicate that they have no idea.

  22. 22.

    Tony J

    January 29, 2007 at 2:36 pm

    Last I checked, Israel was trying to find someone with any real power on the Palistinian side with who to negotiate with that did not involve committing suicide.

    Sorry man, but that’s just bollox.

    Israeli policy has been to demonize and target anyone on the Palestinian side who might be able to bring a genuine peace to the table, because any genuine peace would see Israel end the Occupation, and ending the Occupation would cost the Israeli Right votes and a reason to exist.

    That’s not ‘Israel the Hun’ rhetoric, that’s just the policy as it stands, and that policy is to foster a civil-war between Palestinian factions. Because then, Israel can say with something approaching credibility that there really is no one to negotiate with. Since Israel couldn’t possibly interfere in a civil-war, after all, what would the Leftists say?

    If anyone uses the phrase ‘anti-Semitism’ within the next ten posts, I think I’ll crack open that drinking game I got for Christmas.

  23. 23.

    srv

    January 29, 2007 at 2:45 pm

    Remember all that negotiating in the decades before there were suicide bombers? You know, back when there was really only one political player? Bueller? Bueller?

  24. 24.

    ThymeZone

    January 29, 2007 at 2:48 pm

    Read this book about the ethnic cleansing of Palestine.

    Written by this man:

    Pappé was born in Haifa. He graduated from the Hebrew University in 1978, and obtained his D.Phil. from the University of Oxford in 1984. He was the head of the academic institute for peace in Givat Haviva from 1993 to 2000, and is currently the chair of the Emil Touma institute for Palestinian studies.

    His early books dealt with Israeli policy in 1948, a subject he has returned to in his latest book, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine. His A History of Modern Palestine covers the last two hundred years and focuses on cultural and social issues. His The Modern Middle East is a textbook that brings to the fore the social and cultural developments in the region in the last century.

    To some controversy:

    “Ilan Pappe has written an extraordinary book of profound relevance to the past, present, and future of Israel/Palestine relations. Anyone concerned with peace and justice for these two peoples needs to read and reflect upon this brave, honest, and illuminating exposure of the crimes committed against the Palestinians in the course of establishing the state of Israel in 1948, and since.”

    “Even by the skewed standards of this field of studies, Pappé’s latest book ranks in a class of its own. Not only does it add no new facts or ideas to the anti-Israel literature, but the sloppiness of its research astounds… More serious is the book’s consistent resort to factual misrepresentation, distortion, and outright falsehood. Readers are told of events that never happened”.[5]

    “Ilan Pappe is Israel’s bravest, most principled, most incisive historian.”

    As you see, his material is seen through a range of lenses.

    Read. Research. Ask. Be critical.

  25. 25.

    Andrew

    January 29, 2007 at 2:53 pm

    IT IS RESOLVED (among the various factions battling in my brain): Let the Iraqis kill themselves. It really suck that innocent kids will die in large numbers, but it sucks even more that our innocent kids are dying.

    If there’s an argument to be made that our presence will save lives from impending chaos, then let’s task a few thousand soldiers to Darfur and save a few hundred thousand lives.

  26. 26.

    TenguPhule

    January 29, 2007 at 2:55 pm

    Israeli policy has been to demonize and target anyone on the Palestinian side who might be able to bring a genuine peace to the table

    Really? And who exactly is this mythical group of people able to bring genuine peace that have been targeted?

    because any genuine peace would see Israel end the Occupation, and ending the Occupation would cost the Israeli Right votes and a reason to exist.

    And the Israeli Right is Israel? No moderates or Left at all? No Arabs there either?

    That’s not ‘Israel the Hun’ rhetoric, that’s just the policy as it stands,

    Contradicted yourself already.

    and that policy is to foster a civil-war between Palestinian factions.

    Shorter Tony J: Ponies! Look for the Ponies!! Just because two armed organizations hate each other and want to have all the power doesn’t mean they’d actually fight each other unless the James Bond Mossad used zombie mindcontrol to make them do it!

    Because then, Israel can say with something approaching credibility that there really is no one to negotiate with.

    Shorter Tony J: Because even when they tell the truth, they’re lying occupiers who just want to steal the land.

    Deep Tinfoil thoughts. Very deep.

  27. 27.

    Zifnab

    January 29, 2007 at 2:56 pm

    Almost as mysterious as body counts, we now read that that had been no terrorist attacks in Israel for many, many months. Why then no peace talks?

    [Fawzi Barhoum, a Hamas spokesman in Gaza] also said attacks on Israel were preferable to the recent bout of Palestinian infighting in Gaza between his group and the more moderate
    Fatah Party of President Mahmoud Abbas. “The right thing is for Fatah weapons to be directed toward the occupation not toward Hamas,” Barhoum said.

    Hamas and Fatwah have been kinda busy lately. I imagine this is a somewhat desperate stab at getting Isreal to start bombing Palestine so Hamas can rally more support to their side. But with Hamas – an openly hostile political movement – controlling the Palestinian government, Isreal doesn’t have a lot of people to negotiate with. I imagine Isreal is just sitting back and chillaxing until Palestine sorts itself out. In the meantime, the infighting has done wonders for Isreali security. One bombing in 9 months, and it only killed three people? What more could Isreal ask for?

  28. 28.

    AkaDad

    January 29, 2007 at 2:59 pm

    Either (a) the “nightmare” is really their goal, or (b) they’re complete idiots.

    Perhaps a worst answer? [c] That’s their goal and they’re idiots.

  29. 29.

    Andrew

    January 29, 2007 at 2:59 pm

    Remember all that negotiating in the decades before there were suicide bombers? You know, back when there was really only one political player? Bueller? Bueller?

    Hmmm, well, there was that interstitial period between intifadas where the Palestinians reached their highest standards of living because of active trade in labor and goods with the Israelis. Since then, not so much. Clearly, the suicide bombing have helped immensely!

    In other news, Palestinians are killing themselves at a rapid clip recently, but the international community doesn’t seem to care very much. Allow me to suggest that the anti-Israel factions in Europe divest themselves from Palestine in order to support the Palestinians.

  30. 30.

    TenguPhule

    January 29, 2007 at 3:00 pm

    What more could Israel ask for?

    Bombings that only kill the bombers, preferably in as humiliating a way as possible.

  31. 31.

    ThymeZone

    January 29, 2007 at 3:01 pm

    And the Israeli Right is Israel?

    The Christian Right is America?

    I don’t know, ask Michael Schiavo.

    Ask George Bush.

    Ideas and politics have consequences.

    Consequences can overrun a country and its people.

  32. 32.

    Jake

    January 29, 2007 at 3:01 pm

    Right now, I’m baffled by how they appear to think this won’t be a nightmare for everyone concerned.

    Well it might seem like a nightmare now, but once we turn that corner after staying the course by standing up and stepping together forward, it will turn into a pleasant dream featuring many friendly ponies. Trust me. You won’t want to wake up.

    But seriously, are you familiar with the 80% Solution?

    Just remember, it isn’t ethnic cleansing if some of the other guys have weapons.

  33. 33.

    HyperIon

    January 29, 2007 at 3:02 pm

    I wonder if peace talks never really start because everyone on both sides knows it is just a matter of time before the next fuckwit with a HEX vest comes along.

    Jimmy Carter’s take on the Palestine/Israel conflict was on view in a CSPAN broadcast last night of his recent Brandeis University talk. a Dershowitz “rebuttal” followed. the contrast was striking. Carter carefully laid out his ideas, spoke respectfully but firmly about AIPAC, the history of the various peace proposals brokered by the US, his use of the term apartheid, etc. His speech was quiet and the opposite of inflammatory. (The students ask good questions. Interestingly they had formed a committee beforehand and decided on questions; obviously they wanted to make the most of Carter’s visit.)

    Dershowitz came after. He opened by saying he agreed with various parts of Carter’s recommendations and then proceeded to pick out parts that he did not like and fell into rhetoric too heated for my taste. when he started going on about how badly the UN treats Israel, i found myself thinking “Too shril”. (which is sort of ironic, i guess.)

    The most affecting part of Carter’s appearance was in response to a question about the reaction to his book. He very softly said that although he had been through many spirited election campaigns, he had never been called a liar, bigot, anti-semite, plagiarist. you could tell the guy was taken aback at the vehemence of the attacks.

    i learned many new facts from both speakers, more from Carter who did a great job of laying out the historical events. but even Dershowitz provided some. for example, he said that Israel is prohibited from being on the security council AND the UN human rights commission (?). i did not know that.

    i also did not know some of the specifics about how crappy the palestinians are treated by various israeli laws. and that in 2002 EVERY arab nation agreed to accept the right of Israel to exist peacefully within its 1967 borders (that is, if they would withdraw from the occupied territories). i believe he said that a recent Hebrew University poll indicated that 61% of israelis and 81% of palestinians thought this was an acceptable plan.

    my impression of the audience’s response to both speakers was that carter won the day.

  34. 34.

    Andrew

    January 29, 2007 at 3:07 pm

    Paul L., allow me to note that your lateness to the game is exceeded only by the blathering stupidity to which you link.

    J.Ed.’s palatial digs in Chapel Hill, neither urban nor sprawling, are about the same price as his old town house in Georgetown. In fact, people around here have realized that one very large house on 100 acres ends up preserving the vast majority of undeveloped woodland and the farmland on the property, instead of allowing a developer to clear cut and put 300-400 units in its place, which is increasing common here.

    Amazingly, no one saw fit to criticize his fancy town house as anti-working man. But his new place is so big! I guess I’m nor surprised that right-wingers are only capable of assessing value based on obvious physical characteristics such as big-osity or how many empty beer cans are in the truck bed.

  35. 35.

    TenguPhule

    January 29, 2007 at 3:08 pm

    i also did not know some of the specifics about how crappy the palestinians are treated by various israeli laws. and that in 2002 EVERY arab nation agreed to accept the right of Israel to exist peacefully within its 1967 borders (that is, if they would withdraw from the occupied territories).

    2002 was too late to offer that kind of lame deal. After the suicide bombings, Israel’s leadership was in no mood to open up another potential avenue for attack. They’d already settled into a bunker mentality. If they’d wanted to seriously make a difference the time to offer it was in 1999, when the Left was still in charge.

  36. 36.

    ThymeZone

    January 29, 2007 at 3:19 pm

    PaulL is the lamest troll on the Intertrontubes.

  37. 37.

    dreggas

    January 29, 2007 at 3:23 pm

    Is it me or is the WaPo intentionally allowing idiots like D’Souza and Liz “I’m a cheney too but not the lesbian one” Cheney to write columns to add a new Humor section to their Op/ed page?

  38. 38.

    Jonathan

    January 29, 2007 at 3:24 pm

    Waging Peace: Alabama teen’s anti-war Web site creates furor

    ALEXANDER CITY — At 5 feet 4 inches, with wavy red hair, braces and a cat named Kiko, 16-year-old Ava Lowery hardly seems like a girl who has angered some people enough to call her “a traitor” and a “terrorist” who’s responsible for “emboldening the enemy.”

    That she has been the victim of vicious threats — one e-mail to her Web site stated she needed “to die” and “get raped while your corpse rots in the sun” — seems, upon meeting her, surreal.

    “I’m just a normal teenager,” she says, turning on her computer in her room while Kiko sprawls on her bed.

    “I don’t call it anti-war, I call it pro-peace and pro-soldier,” she says of the 2-year-old Web site with its daily updates on Iraq war casualties, links to news stories about the war and over 90 Internet slide shows, called animations, that Ava has created featuring rock music playing behind what are often grim images of combat bloodshed and loss.

    “I remember when people started noticing my Web site,” when she was 15. “I ran downstairs shouting, ‘Mom, Mom, I got a thousand hits today!'”

    While reviled by many people for her criticisms of President Bush and his administration — she calls Bush “a liar” — she has gained national exposure, especially for her Internet videos and animations.

    http://www.peacetakescourage.com/

  39. 39.

    TenguPhule

    January 29, 2007 at 3:24 pm

    Coffee Shops discover pretty girls in skimpy outfits improve business

    On a lighter note, Sex still sells.

  40. 40.

    Tony J

    January 29, 2007 at 3:27 pm

    Either (a) the “nightmare” is really their goal, or (b) they’re complete idiots. Neither answer is good, of course, but there you are.

    (a) + (b) = ?

    History would indicate that they have no idea.

    Yeah, but they must at least discuss it amongst themselves.

    Imagination, people. Pretend you’re a nutcase authoritarian with a master plan.

  41. 41.

    Pb

    January 29, 2007 at 3:28 pm

    HyperIon,

    Jimmy Carter’s take on the Palestine/Israel conflict was on view in a CSPAN broadcast last night of his recent Brandeis University talk.

    Yeah, I saw some of that–pretty interesting.

    a Dershowitz “rebuttal” followed

    I turned it off once he started ranting about Iran–what a tool.

  42. 42.

    Andrew

    January 29, 2007 at 3:33 pm

    On a lighter note, Sex still sells.

    TenguPhule, you’d have a lot more credibility if you linked to the source material. (semi-work safe)

  43. 43.

    Tony J

    January 29, 2007 at 3:35 pm

    As for you, Teng. Really, you lost me when you brought ponies into the conversation.

    Yeah. Those Palestinians, they’re to blame. Everything is clear to me now.

  44. 44.

    ThymeZone

    January 29, 2007 at 3:36 pm

    Pretend you’re a nutcase authoritarian with a master plan.

    Little known fact: George Bush saw this message on a fortune cookie in 1998.

    And ……… here we are.

  45. 45.

    dreggas

    January 29, 2007 at 3:59 pm

    Joke(?) of the day:

    A kid has to do a report for school on how government works. So he asks his father to explain it to him and after a little while his father responds:

    “Well, son, you see I make the money so I am capitalism, your mom manages the money so she’s government, the maid is the working class, your baby brother is the future and you are the people…do you understand?”

    The kid thinks for a second and shakes his head no. His father tells him to think about it and talk to him in the morning.

    That night the kid wakes up, his baby brother is screaming and it appears he has shit his diaper. The kid goes to get the maid but finds his dad having sex with the maid, he then goes to get his mother but he can’t wake her up. Finally he throws his hands up and goes to bed.

    The next day his father asks if he understands what they talked about and he responds:

    “I think so dad, basically while Capitalism is screwing the working class, the government is asleep, the people are confused and the future is full of shit.”

    *bows*

  46. 46.

    Pb

    January 29, 2007 at 4:05 pm

    Speaking of authoritarian nutcases, Chapter 3 of The Authoritarians is out, and I’m lovin’ it! Apparently authoritarian followers are more likely to be gullible, irrational, dogmatic stooges–who knew? Also, it talks about Bush and the Iraq war (and the related polling data) a fair bit in the latter half of the chapter.

  47. 47.

    Jake

    January 29, 2007 at 4:07 pm

    That she has been the victim of vicious threats—one e-mail to her Web site stated she needed “to die” and “get raped while your corpse rots in the sun”—seems, upon meeting her, surreal.

    The Freepers Strike Again!

    But I’m sure Abomination Gonzales is on the case seeing that he is all about protecting the children from Intertube predators.

  48. 48.

    TenguPhule

    January 29, 2007 at 4:08 pm

    Really, you lost me when you brought ponies into the conversation.

    I can not take credit for what you managed to accomplish all on your own.

    Do I think Israel is blameless? No.

    Do I think it silly to accuse them of formenting the clash between Fatah and Hamas without proof? Yes.

    And have I noticed you duck the questions, Darrell style?

    You betcha!

  49. 49.

    Pb

    January 29, 2007 at 4:16 pm

    So here’s a link that Paul L. is sure to love: Edwards critic is millionaire tax delinquent… oh yeah, and he’s got a big house too, go figure.

  50. 50.

    Dave

    January 29, 2007 at 4:44 pm

    Pb, I’ve seen you recommending this book. What do you know about the author Bob Altemeyer? (it’s a serious question). Wikipedia says he’s written extensively on Authoritarianism. Fine, just wondering if he has a particular ax to grind or is he trying to be subjective. In your opinion of course.

    When I have time, I’m thinking about reading it.

  51. 51.

    Pb

    January 29, 2007 at 4:56 pm

    Dave,

    Altemeyer is basically the leading (living) authority on Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) — he’s been working on this stuff for decades. He’s writing the book because John Dean expressed an interest in his research and thought he should make it more accessible (before he dies). He’s very open about all the research he’s done, and often lists out all the questions he’s asked in a given survey on some facet of authoritarianism, followed by the results, and if they were significant. So yeah, I think he’s trying to be subobjective, very much so. And from waht he’s said, I’m sure skeptics are welcome to pore over his research, whatever he has published, try reproducing his results, or whatever, just so long as they’re honest about it. His writing is a bit quirky (or dorky), and I’m finding it very easy to read and pretty entertaining as well.

  52. 52.

    HyperIon

    January 29, 2007 at 5:12 pm

    2002 was too late to offer that kind of lame deal. After the suicide bombings, Israel’s leadership was in no mood to open up another potential avenue for attack. They’d already settled into a bunker mentality.

    well, i think Israel’s leadership might want to consider some alternatives to their bunker mentality. unless they think living in a bunker forever is acceptable. evidently 61% of their populace does not.

  53. 53.

    Rome Again

    January 29, 2007 at 5:28 pm

    Read. Research. Ask. Be critical

    Yes, Teacher! Thank you for your guidance. I shall look to emulate you in all I do.

  54. 54.

    Jonathan

    January 29, 2007 at 5:33 pm

    I wonder how well Right Wing Authoritarianism correlates with various Myers Briggs Type Indicators?

    FWIW, I’m a strong INTP, one of the rarest of the sixteen types.

    INTPs are essentially anti-authoritarian.

  55. 55.

    ThymeZone

    January 29, 2007 at 5:33 pm

    I shall look to emulate you in all I do.

    Dangerous. I drive too fast.

    A leadfoot, I am.

  56. 56.

    TenguPhule

    January 29, 2007 at 5:36 pm

    well, i think Israel’s leadership might want to consider some alternatives to their bunker mentality. unless they think living in a bunker forever is acceptable. evidently 61% of their populace does not.

    They did. Then Sharon had a stroke and it all went to hell as the new Prime Minister is a hack who lacks the charisma and influence of Sharon among the Israeli public and even worse lacks Sharon’s mmilitary credentials that allowed for restraint in response to provocations. Hence Lebanon II.

    And with all the free ammo the Palistinians have handed the Likud with the thousands of Israeli casualties, it’s a big mess. The majority of Israel wants an end to the settlements if it would bring an end to to the fighting and killing, but the settlers are a *very* sizable minority with enormous pull and unfortunately a stubbornness to match Hamas.

  57. 57.

    Rome Again

    January 29, 2007 at 5:39 pm

    Dangerous. I drive too fast.

    A leadfoot, I am.

    ::gives TZ nasty scornful look::

    Really, and so WHY must I remain in 500?

    Do you often ask those to do what YOU yourself cannot?

    ::turns back:: “Hmmmph!”

  58. 58.

    ThymeZone

    January 29, 2007 at 5:42 pm

    FWIW, I’m a strong INTP, one of the rarest of the sixteen types.

    Same here, pure INTP. It’s a nice fit with my job, which requires a lot of planning and future-modeling.

  59. 59.

    ThymeZone

    January 29, 2007 at 5:45 pm

    Do you often ask those to do what YOU yourself cannot?

    Yes. If I had no legs, would I not be allowed to suggest that you walk?

  60. 60.

    Rome Again

    January 29, 2007 at 5:46 pm

    hypocrit!

  61. 61.

    ThymeZone

    January 29, 2007 at 5:48 pm

    hypocrit(e)!

    Alright, I’ll slow down.

  62. 62.

    Rome Again

    January 29, 2007 at 5:49 pm

    Does this mean I can’t speed up? You got to, why can’t I?

  63. 63.

    ThymeZone

    January 29, 2007 at 5:51 pm

    You got to, why can’t I?

    I’m a licensed commercial pilot?

    I actually have a foot made of lead?

    My radar detector is awesome?

    (One of these is true, BTW)

    { very loud clunking sound }

  64. 64.

    Paul L.

    January 29, 2007 at 5:54 pm

    Andrew Says:
    J.Ed.’s palatial digs in Chapel Hill, neither urban nor sprawling, are about the same price as his old town house in Georgetown. In fact, people around here have realized that one very large house on 100 acres ends up preserving the vast majority of undeveloped woodland and the farmland on the property, instead of allowing a developer to clear cut and put 300-400 units in its place, which is increasing common here.

    A) Georgetown real estate values are inflated. Thanks to DC.
    B) I just find it funny that the loudest complainers about sprawl, American’s wasting resources and consumerism are willing to give him a pass and make excuses.
    Just like Bill Clinton and Feminists.

    John Edwards is a important person and deserves a huge house.
    It is just like Hollywood Liberals who than drive around in Limos and fly in private jets. They can do it but not the unwashed rabble. Hypocrites.
    i.e.
    Some animals are more equal than other.

  65. 65.

    Rome Again

    January 29, 2007 at 5:54 pm

    I’m a licensed commercial pilot?

    What’s that got to do with anything, this isn’t the Spacely generation.

    I actually have a foot made of lead?

    Hmmm, I guess I’ll have to do something about that.

    My radar detector is awesome?

    So is mine, so what does this tell me?

  66. 66.

    srv

    January 29, 2007 at 5:56 pm

    FWIW, I’m a strong INTP, one of the rarest of the sixteen types.

    INTP is rare on the web and amongst SW/HW geeks like Darrell is to logic.

  67. 67.

    TenguPhule

    January 29, 2007 at 5:56 pm

    Shorter Paul L: There are no bad Republicans. There are no good Democrats.

    Some animals are more equal than other.

    And some animals don’t have to be led to the slaughterhouse. They walk in of their own accord.

  68. 68.

    Zifnab

    January 29, 2007 at 5:57 pm

    So here’s a link that Paul L. is sure to love: Edwards critic is millionaire tax delinquent… oh yeah, and he’s got a big house too, go figure.

    That’s a Daily Kos link. Such links are invalid because they are full of liberal and automatically lying. Why do you turn our website into a house of lies? Why do you hate Capitalism America?

  69. 69.

    dreggas

    January 29, 2007 at 5:59 pm

    srv Says:

    FWIW, I’m a strong INTP, one of the rarest of the sixteen types.

    INTP is rare on the web and amongst SW/HW geeks like Darrell is to logic.

    I am INFJ (and a software geek by trade)

    of course I don’t know what INFJ was, hopefully someone can enlighten me.

  70. 70.

    ThymeZone

    January 29, 2007 at 6:00 pm

    this isn’t the Spacely generation.

    Not according to my wife, Starla.

  71. 71.

    Rome Again

    January 29, 2007 at 6:04 pm

    Well, if you think so, then you’ll agree it is optimal to fly from one place to another?

  72. 72.

    Jake

    January 29, 2007 at 6:05 pm

    VoteVets.org sez: There is no pony.

  73. 73.

    ThymeZone

    January 29, 2007 at 6:05 pm

    Well, if you think so, then you’ll agree it is optimal to fly from one place to another?

    Yes, in an airplane. With a door.

  74. 74.

    Jonathan

    January 29, 2007 at 6:06 pm

    I drop in on DU from time to time and they have had something of a minor flamewar going on about Edward’s house.

    I’m banned there but I do find them a good resource for breaking news.

  75. 75.

    srv

    January 29, 2007 at 6:08 pm

    of course I don’t know what INFJ was, hopefully someone can enlighten me.

    It means you’re insecure like GW.

  76. 76.

    ThymeZone

    January 29, 2007 at 6:08 pm

    VoteVets.org sez: There is no pony.

    Jesus (NMYM). That is a powerful ad.

  77. 77.

    Rome Again

    January 29, 2007 at 6:09 pm

    Yes, in an airplane. With a door.

    Okay, if you insist, I still think you’re being a hypocrit(e) about this.

  78. 78.

    ThymeZone

    January 29, 2007 at 6:12 pm

    Okay, if you insist, I still think you’re being a hypocrit(e) about this.

    I put the safety of others above that of my own.

  79. 79.

    Bob Altemeyer

    January 29, 2007 at 6:13 pm

    To Pb:

    Thanks for your endorsement. Some people have been quick to hop over to the website where the book is being presented, and I appreciate that. Also thanks for saying, in answer to Dave’s very reasonable question, that you think I’m to be trusted. I did have plans for world domination once, but I sold those to Dogbert.

    The one thing I’d add, which I hope you’ll agree with, is that the book is not just presenting scientific evidence that supports observations many people have made about authoritarian followers (e.g. they are dogmatic), but also explaining why they are the things they are. All are invited to judge for themselves.

  80. 80.

    Wilfred

    January 29, 2007 at 6:14 pm

    T. Phule says:

    Do I think it silly to accuse them of formenting the clash between Fatah and Hamas without proof? Yes.

    Fair enough. But short of a a private briefing at Langley how about this: http://joshualandis.com/blog/?p=143

  81. 81.

    TenguPhule

    January 29, 2007 at 6:22 pm

    Yes, in an airplane. With a door.

    Proof you are a mutie-commie-liberal-hippie.

    Real redmeat-eating-conservative-culture-warriors jump out of holes in the side of the plane. That they tear out with their bare hands. While in the snow. Flying North both ways.

  82. 82.

    demimondian

    January 29, 2007 at 6:24 pm

    But short of a a private briefing at Langley how about this: http://joshualandis.com/blog/?p=143

    Better still, how about this?

  83. 83.

    Rome Again

    January 29, 2007 at 6:24 pm

    I put the safety of others above that of my own.

    Let’s face it, what you really mean is you put the ability of a man to do this task above that of a woman. ::looking for feminist hat, which I put away in the attack in the 1970’s::

    What you really mean is you don’t trust “crazy woman drivers”, lets be honest here, shall we?

    ::kidding you know::

  84. 84.

    Rome Again

    January 29, 2007 at 6:25 pm

    hmmm, attic. sorry

  85. 85.

    Rome Again

    January 29, 2007 at 6:26 pm

    TP, I was not a conservative when I was a skydiver.

  86. 86.

    demimondian

    January 29, 2007 at 6:30 pm

    Troubleshooter TenguPhule:

    Your friend, The Computer, wants only the best for you, and asks that you not embolden the citizenry to attempt to add new portals to any Complex Alpha Owned equipment by direct manual intervention. Although, of course, there is no way that the barrier compound would be subject to such vandalism, it is nevertheless the case that citizens might find themselves less than satisfied, and be harmed by engaging in unauthorized experimentation.

    It has been determined that you are a commie-mutant-librul-traitor, in light of which, you are awarded a special opportunity as a high-priority atom-source. The Computer warmly requests your presence in food availability preparation chamber F-207, in direct recognition of this fact.

  87. 87.

    TenguPhule

    January 29, 2007 at 6:32 pm

    While Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has hesitantly supported the program, many of his key advisors have made it clear that they want to have nothing to do with starting a Palestinian civil war.blockquote>

    Wilfred, A US backed program employed by various Middle East Factions and with the tepid backing of Olmert is not proof of Israeli involvement. If anything, this demonstrates that the Israelis do not want to be drawn into this mess because they are not crazy. While Palistinian infighting has the welcome benefit of short term peace on Israeli streets, the asshats are quick to try and draw Israel into it with suicide bombings.

    Frankly, the Fatah/Hamas battle is long overdue. We’ve just been arming the side we want to win.

  88. 88.

    Rome Again

    January 29, 2007 at 6:35 pm

    t has been determined that you are a commie-mutant-librul-traitor, in light of which, you are awarded a special opportunity as a high-priority atom-source. The Computer warmly requests your presence in food availability preparation chamber F-207, in direct recognition of this fact.

    Look Dorothy, and it ticks too!

  89. 89.

    Wilfred

    January 29, 2007 at 6:39 pm

    demimondian says: well, whatever.

    You need to get out more, read different things other than the AIPAC playbook. Eliot Abrams is an old Iran-Contra hand. Now some people around here might remember how stupid it was back then to think that Americans could have ever engaged in something as sordid as the Iran-Contra deal. Yeah, back then we wore tin-foil hats, too. You’re right, man. Yeah.

  90. 90.

    ThymeZone

    January 29, 2007 at 6:40 pm

    What you really mean is you don’t trust “crazy woman drivers”, lets be honest here, shall we?

    Okay, that’s what I mean.

    { waits }

    { waits }

    { sound of approaching frying pan }

    { ducks }

    { crash }

    See what I mean? Could a woman have ducked that frying pan? AHA!

  91. 91.

    TenguPhule

    January 29, 2007 at 6:42 pm

    Citizen demimondian,

    Friend Computer has determined that your knowledge of the banned substance barrier compound exceeds your clearance level. Failing to report your mutie-commie-liberal subversion is a crime against your Friend the Computer. It is in your best interests that the Computer, which is your friend, has determined that your heresy be expunged from the system via direct processing through the central waste disposal and reprocessing facilities. Friend Computer has already prepared a lavatory for your disposal and eagerly awaits your joyful cleansing of the mutie-commie-liberal-traitor neurons that have plagued you.

  92. 92.

    Bubblegum Tate

    January 29, 2007 at 6:43 pm

    FWIW, I’m a strong INTP, one of the rarest of the sixteen types.

    INTPs are essentially anti-authoritarian.

    I’ve taken the MBTI (abnd the Kiersey Temperment Sorter) more times than I can count. Every time, I come back a very strong INFP.

  93. 93.

    Rome Again

    January 29, 2007 at 6:44 pm

    See what I mean? Could a woman have ducked that frying pan? AHA!

    Why yes sir, I do believe a woman could have not only ducked that frying pan, but could have taken a bit of time off of your record (we’re smaller, less weight to move around, thus the time is less).

    Shall we try the experiment with the frying pan in YOUR hand and see?

  94. 94.

    ThymeZone

    January 29, 2007 at 6:47 pm

    Shall we try the experiment with the frying pan in YOUR hand and see?

    Trickster! Trying to get me to say that I would go after a woman with a frying pan! Again I duck and save myself.

    AHA!

  95. 95.

    Rome Again

    January 29, 2007 at 6:50 pm

    Trickster! Trying to get me to say that I would go after a woman with a frying pan! Again I duck and save myself.

    AHA!

    Not what I had in mind at all. I am glad you did confess above though that you just don’t trust “crazy woman drivers”. Apparently it IS a sexist thing, you think I can’t handle the task?

  96. 96.

    dreggas

    January 29, 2007 at 6:52 pm

    of course I don’t know what INFJ was, hopefully someone can enlighten me.

    It means you’re insecure like GW.

    Seriously?

  97. 97.

    Pb

    January 29, 2007 at 6:55 pm

    Jonathan,

    I wonder how well Right Wing Authoritarianism correlates with various Myers Briggs Type Indicators?

    I was wondering that myself, actually.

    FWIW, I’m a strong INTP, one of the rarest of the sixteen types.

    I’m more of an ENTP–and definitely an NP in any case.

  98. 98.

    TenguPhule

    January 29, 2007 at 7:04 pm

    Democrats demonstrate Common Sense

    Something tells me National Security is not going to be a big highlight for the Republicans in ’08.

  99. 99.

    Rome Again

    January 29, 2007 at 7:06 pm

    Yes. If I had no legs, would I not be allowed to suggest that you walk?

    ::hears “See you in September” in my head::

  100. 100.

    Jonathan

    January 29, 2007 at 7:17 pm

    dreggas:

    INFJ characteristics.

  101. 101.

    dreggas

    January 29, 2007 at 7:24 pm

    Jonathan Says:

    dreggas:

    INFJ characteristics.

    Geez no wonder I am so damn hard on myself to be more and be better LOL. Couple that with being a capricorn and having a pretty high IQ and I am probably a psychiatrists wet dream with regards to a patient.

  102. 102.

    ThymeZone

    January 29, 2007 at 7:26 pm

    you think I can’t handle the task?

    I am sure you can handle any task. I just don’t like to encourage people to drive the way I do. I don’t even like to encourage me to drive the way I do.

    That’s why I got rid of the fast car.

  103. 103.

    Rome Again

    January 29, 2007 at 7:27 pm

    Geez no wonder I am so damn hard on myself to be more and be better LOL. Couple that with being a capricorn and having a pretty high IQ and I am probably a psychiatrists wet dream with regards to a patient.

    Me too, huh!

  104. 104.

    Rome Again

    January 29, 2007 at 7:28 pm

    I am sure you can handle any task. I just don’t like to encourage people to drive the way I do. I don’t even like to encourage me to drive the way I do.

    That’s why I got rid of the fast car.

    Okay, 500 it is, just remember, it shouldn’t be a sexist thing, okay?

  105. 105.

    ThymeZone

    January 29, 2007 at 7:30 pm

    Okay, 500 it is, just remember, it shouldn’t be a sexist thing, okay?

    I’m not a sexist, I think men deserve equal treatment.

  106. 106.

    ThymeZone

    January 29, 2007 at 7:32 pm

    I am probably a psychiatrists wet dream

    Lasciviousness violation.

    Please reenter.

  107. 107.

    Rome Again

    January 29, 2007 at 7:32 pm

    I’m not a sexist, I think men deserve equal treatment.

    Okay, do you trust me at 500?

  108. 108.

    ThymeZone

    January 29, 2007 at 7:34 pm

    Okay, do you trust me at 500?

    500 mph is way too fast, even for me.

    { waits }

    { runs away …. }

  109. 109.

    Andrew

    January 29, 2007 at 7:34 pm

    This INTJ wants to tell Paul L. that:

    A) Georgetown real estate values are inflated. Thanks to DC.

    Is some of the stupidest shit I have ever read. On so many levels. It’s not even semantically correct. A part of DC is expensive due to the fact that DC? WTF?

    Let me give this a shot: Qana property values are down because of Lebanon. Dead children, on the other hand, are a growth market!

  110. 110.

    Rome Again

    January 29, 2007 at 7:38 pm

    500 mph is way too fast, even for me.

    Silly wabbit, you know what I’m sayin’, don’t change the subject.

  111. 111.

    dreggas

    January 29, 2007 at 7:43 pm

    Lasciviousness violation.

    Please reenter.

    Sorry a Psychiatrists Nocturnal Emission.

    Is that better?

    (and there’s that memory thing in action remembering that from sex-ed and, well, the updated version you get in Boot Camp, or as they call it now, BCT).

  112. 112.

    ThymeZone

    January 29, 2007 at 7:43 pm

    Silly wabbit, you know what I’m sayin’, don’t change the subject.

    I am, I do, and okay, I won’t.

    500 is good enough for the Indianapolis Speedway. It’s good enough for me.

  113. 113.

    Rome Again

    January 29, 2007 at 7:46 pm

    500 is good enough for the Indianapolis Speedway. It’s good enough for me.

    What’s the normal amount it takes for those events? I don’t know much about Nascar sorry.

    Think I’m going to have to take a book to keep me occupied.

  114. 114.

    dreggas

    January 29, 2007 at 7:49 pm

    Senator Norm Coleman injured while dumpster diving for a lamp his wife threw away.

  115. 115.

    Rome Again

    January 29, 2007 at 7:55 pm

    Senator Norm Coleman injured while dumpster diving for a lamp his wife threw away.

    It’s just a lamp, geez!

  116. 116.

    Jonathan

    January 29, 2007 at 7:55 pm

    Geez no wonder I am so damn hard on myself to be more and be better LOL.

    I was pretty suprised when I looked up my MBTI type for the first time. Like most of us I guess I thought I was unique. It was a bit of a blow to read the description and see myself reflected in it.

  117. 117.

    Rome Again

    January 29, 2007 at 7:56 pm

    Think I’m going to have to take a book to keep me occupied.

    Something tawdry, and put out by Harlequin.

  118. 118.

    dreggas

    January 29, 2007 at 7:59 pm

    Rome Again Says:

    It’s just a lamp, geez!

    It’s not just a lamp it’s a GRAND PRIZE!!! even has FRA-GIL-EE written on it, it must be italian!

    In Fact I bet he kept it in the front window!

  119. 119.

    Rome Again

    January 29, 2007 at 8:01 pm

    In Fact I bet he kept it in the front window!

    Art-Deco, what’s the problem?

    Some women are so jealous, geez!

  120. 120.

    ThymeZone

    January 29, 2007 at 8:07 pm

    In Fact I bet he kept it in the front window!

    Ratzenfratzsonofabrrnbuckmunglegirvens!

    { crash }

  121. 121.

    Rome Again

    January 29, 2007 at 8:10 pm

    Well, TZ, if you don’t like it, I won’t stop you from trashing it, but it’s your choice. I wouldn’t make you get rid of it.

    ::smiles::

  122. 122.

    ThymeZone

    January 29, 2007 at 8:22 pm

    I was channeling Darren McGavin.

  123. 123.

    TenguPhule

    January 29, 2007 at 8:29 pm

    I was channeling Darren McGavin.

    You’ll shoot your eye out!

  124. 124.

    jake

    January 29, 2007 at 8:31 pm

    Coleman told Akers he was “looking for something that my wife accidentally threw in the dumpster.”

    Now we know where he keeps his stash.

  125. 125.

    ThymeZone

    January 29, 2007 at 8:36 pm

    You’ll shoot your eye out!

    Oh no, … the classic mother BB gun block!

  126. 126.

    Rome Again

    January 29, 2007 at 9:35 pm

    Oh no, … the classic mother BB gun block!

    Nah, thonth worry abouth thath TZth, justh keepth your thongueth away from frozen pollth.

  127. 127.

    ThymeZone

    January 29, 2007 at 9:47 pm

    justh keepth your thongueth away from frozen pollth.

    If I did that, I’d expect a licking when I got home.

  128. 128.

    Rome Again

    January 29, 2007 at 9:48 pm

    If I did that, I’d expect a licking when I got home.

    Oh, so many possibilities, you left yourself wide open on that. You should be glad I’m such a good sport.

  129. 129.

    Pb

    January 29, 2007 at 9:51 pm

    Bob Altemeyer,

    Fancy meeting you here! I hope I summarized the backstory more or less correctly there, but if I didn’t, I guess Dave can read your Introduction for himself.

    I did have plans for world domination once, but I sold those to Dogbert.

    Well, he *looks* trustworthy… hmm, maybe I’ll have to dig through some of your papers after all. :)

    The one thing I’d add, which I hope you’ll agree with, is that the book is not just presenting scientific evidence that supports observations many people have made about authoritarian followers (e.g. they are dogmatic), but also explaining why they are the things they are. All are invited to judge for themselves.

    But in my opinion, you do present enough research to back it up as you go along that the speculations that have been made thus far don’t seem unreasonable, but rather at the least fairly plausible. However, I’m holding out for a big plot twist near the end…

  130. 130.

    ThymeZone

    January 29, 2007 at 9:52 pm

    you left yourself wide open on that.

    Thank you.

  131. 131.

    Rome Again

    January 29, 2007 at 9:56 pm

    Thank you.

    Anytime, babycakes.

  132. 132.

    Pb

    January 29, 2007 at 10:28 pm

    Jonathan,

    Ok, I found something sort of relating the two (Myers-Briggs types and authoritarianism, that is):

    A sample of 422 female undergraduate students, attending a university-sector college in Wales specialising in teacher education and liberal arts subjects, completed the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator together with the Troldahl-Powell Dogmatism Scale. The data demonstrated that higher dogmatism scores are most clearly associated with sensing rather than intuition. Higher dogmatism scores are also associated with extraversion rather than introversion, and with judging rather than perceiving. No significant difference in dogmatism scores were found between thinking and feeling.

    Note that dogmatism corellates with authoritarianism, so from this you might expect more authoritarians than normal to be S’s, E’s, or J’s — I’d bet a lot of SJ’s, the “Guardian” (also more on that link re:Lakoff):

    Among the Guardians, Administrators (ESTJs & ISTJs) tend to be strict parents because their main concern is that their children do what is right and not do what is wrong. They regard it as their obligation to the family and the community to keep their children under their watchful eye lest they stray from the fold. Their children must behave in a seemly manner and must not do things that reflect badly on the family. These are the parents who believe that punishment is the best way to keep their kids in line, and they will at times resort to corporal punishment to get their point across—to spare the rod, they believe, is to spoil the child.

    That sounds like the right mindset, anyhow. I’d expect that Bob (can I call you Bob?) knows more about it, though.

  133. 133.

    Pb

    January 29, 2007 at 10:28 pm

    Oh, and while we’re on the subject of Myers-Briggs types, of course this Adequacy post deserves special mention, as does everything else by bc.

  134. 134.

    jake

    January 29, 2007 at 11:01 pm

    I came up I Need Toilet Paper on a longer on-line version of the MB but if faded memories of Introductory Psych serve, the real test is a brazillian pages long.

    Anyway, the definition seemed to hint that personality type carries slight overtones of arrogant arseholishness. Rubbish! I’m a TOTALLY arrogant arsehole. Stupid on-line personality test, sheesh.

  135. 135.

    Jonathan

    January 29, 2007 at 11:05 pm

    Pb:

    The data demonstrated that higher dogmatism scores are most clearly associated with sensing rather than intuition. Higher dogmatism scores are also associated with extraversion rather than introversion, and with judging rather than perceiving.

    That’s close to what I was guessing. INTP is almost an anti-authoritarian so it seems likely that the opposite or ESFJ would be an authoritarian.

    The Adequacy post was hilarious. Glad to see that I’m on the bottom ;-)

  136. 136.

    Pb

    January 29, 2007 at 11:12 pm

    jake,

    I had a long computerized version of the test–heck, I probably still have it lying around somewhere. The thing is, I got it from a BBS back in the 80’s, and it was written for DOS in some form of compiled BASIC. But yeah, it was really long. However, on the plus side, it gave numeric scores for each trait.

    P.S. arsehole.

  137. 137.

    Jonathan

    January 29, 2007 at 11:18 pm

    jake:

    Here is the best INTP profile I’ve seen. I fit the pattern damn near perfectly.

    Arrogant, self centered asshole, I guess.

  138. 138.

    demimondian

    January 29, 2007 at 11:21 pm

    I’m insulted. I’m an INFJ, and I’m neither dogmatic nor authoritarian. You’re just going to have to take my word for it.

  139. 139.

    Pb

    January 30, 2007 at 12:02 am

    demi,

    I’m insulted. I’m an INFJ, and I’m neither dogmatic nor authoritarian. You’re just going to have to take my word for it.

    Hah–I always knew you were a dick, but now I know why! :)

    But really, INFJ doesn’t sound so bad to me. Unless you don’t like Jimmy Carter, that is…

  140. 140.

    Fledermaus

    January 30, 2007 at 1:21 am

    Bush sez: ‘Heck of a job GOP Congress!’

    NPR Interview:

    MR. WILLIAMS: So, some people would say, well, if you believe in spending restraint, why haven’t you vetoed one bill, you know, one appropriations bill?

    PRESIDENT BUSH: Because the United States Congress that was controlled by Republicans exercised spending restraint.

  141. 141.

    Tony J

    January 30, 2007 at 4:06 am

    That was a good night’s sleep. Where were we?

    Really? And who exactly is this mythical group of people able to bring genuine peace that have been targeted?

    Well, if you’d rein in ‘teh shrill’, you’d recognise that you already answered this question in your previous post, but that was before you got all hot and sweaty and decided to spin off alone into snarkland.

    I’ll give you a clue, eh? When Arafat was the leader of the Palestinians, he was the bogeyman. Once he died, the onus shifted to demonizing his successors in the Fatah movement. Then when Fatah lost power, lo and behold, they’re suddenly the reasonable moderates that Israel would love to co-operate with, if is wasn’t for those pesky Palestinian voters.

    Anyone who achieves enough authority amongst the Palestinians to credibly sit at a negotiating table and talk about making peace becomes Israel’s number one enemy, and that’s just the way it is. If you want to stamp your feet and tell me the sky is a nice lime-green colour, that’s up to you and your conscience.

    And the Israeli Right is Israel? No moderates or Left at all? No Arabs there either?

    And how long have the moderates, the Left and/or Israel’s Arab minority been in charge of Occupation policy? What, they haven’t? So… other than as a method to spin past an inconvenient fact of Israeli political life, what was your point supposed to be?

    Contradicted yourself already.

    No I didn’t. I made a claim that you choose to disagree with.

    Shorter Tony J: Ponies! Look for the Ponies!! Just because two armed organizations hate each other and want to have all the power doesn’t mean they’d actually fight each other unless the James Bond Mossad used zombie mindcontrol to make them do it!

    Wow. Is that one of those ‘False Opposite’ cheats people use to pretend that they’ve made a rational argument when all they’ve done is tried to be as offensive as possible? I was under the impression that the only people ill-mannered enough to use that kind of misdirection on this site were The Senator and his ilk. Way to earn that respect, Teng.

    Shorter Tony J: Because even when they tell the truth, they’re lying occupiers who just want to steal the land. Deep Tinfoil thoughts. Very deep.

    And again. Nice to see you really put a lot of thought into that steal from the Pony Whisperer’s handbook.

    Do I think Israel is blameless? No.

    Funny, because you’d be hard-pressed indeed to infer that from your posts.

    Do I think it silly to accuse them of formenting the clash between Fatah and Hamas without proof? Yes.

    Oh, I thought you were playing ‘Slap the Victim’ and giggling about it. Come to think of it, I’m still pretty certain that’s what you were doing.

    And have I noticed you duck the questions, Darrell style? You betcha!

    No, what you ‘noticed’ was me peeling myself away from the PC so that I could eat dinner with my girlfriend and chill out for a couple of hours before bed. Pissing her off so that I could stay online correcting your AIPAC-sponsored talking points wouldn’t have been a sensible use of my time.

    BTW, after sleeping on the bizarre experience of being compared in any way, shape or form to Project: Darrell, I’ve come to the conclusion that, since that’s the online equivalent of spitting in my face and telling me it’s a snowflake, you can go away and fuck yourself with all the style and elegance you’ve brought to this conversation.

  142. 142.

    GOP4Me et al

    January 30, 2007 at 6:02 am

    MR. WILLIAMS: So, some people would say, well, if you believe in spending restraint, why haven’t you vetoed one bill, you know, one appropriations bill?

    PRESIDENT BUSH: Because the United States Congress that was controlled by Republicans exercised spending restraint.

    He’s right. Tax cuts don’t count as spending. You don’t spend money, you just take less in.

    Also, the Medicare bill was a temporary investment in American pharmaceutical companies. We’ll see big dividends back on that one, in the form of both jobs for taxpaying citizens, AND campaign finances which the Republicans will put right back into the economy in the course of future campaigns. (Same goes for Iraq, too, except that in addition to the taxable income of Iraqi-American refugees, we’ll also get free oil after the occupation is done paying for itself.)

  143. 143.

    jake

    January 30, 2007 at 8:02 am

    Thanks Jonathan.

    [reads]

    … Hmmm … Uh-huh … Heh, I guess that would annoy people … Yep … “and many an INTP is a Monty Pythonite.”

    Score.

    Oh well, if I’m an arsehole at least I’m not a [scoffs] common arsehole.

  144. 144.

    Jonathan

    January 30, 2007 at 8:17 am

    jake:

    Oh well, if I’m an arsehole at least I’m not a [scoffs] common arsehole.

    Well, yeah.

    But then there’s this.

  145. 145.

    Pb

    January 30, 2007 at 10:20 am

    AIPAC-sponsored talking points

    Well I looked through the AIPAC website, and they do have a Donate page, but I couldn’t find where I could sponsor a pony.

  146. 146.

    demimondian

    January 30, 2007 at 10:26 am

    Do I think Israel is blameless? No.

    Funny, because you’d [sic] be hard-pressed indeed to infer that from your posts.

    Of course one would — he’s busy refuting the lies you’re spouting. If you were actually interested in debate, instead of wanting to talk about ponies, the conversation would have proceeded differently.

  147. 147.

    Tony J

    January 30, 2007 at 12:05 pm

    Well I looked through the AIPAC website, and they do have a Donate page, but I couldn’t find where I could sponsor a pony.

    Regarding ponies, and their uses, I really don’t think that word means what you think it means.

  148. 148.

    Tony J

    January 30, 2007 at 1:22 pm

    Of course one would—he’s busy refuting the lies you’re spouting. If you were actually interested in debate, instead of wanting to talk about ponies, the conversation would have proceeded differently.

    What? Here’s Teng’s statement that I labelled bollox:

    Last I checked, Israel was trying to find someone with any real power on the Palistinian side with who to negotiate with that did not involve committing suicide.

    Of course, never let little things like a Palistinian Civil War get in the way of the ‘Israel the Hun’ rhetoric.

    I called it bollox because it is bollox. Since the collapse of the Barak/Arafat talks and the start of the 2nd Intifada, Israel has shown zero interest in finding someone with ‘real power’ to negotiate with.

    On the contrary, whichever faction gains ‘real power’ in the PA – meaning whichever faction currently enjoys the support of enough Palestinians to enter negotiations with any kind of legitimate right to make demands and concessions in their name – instantly gets frozen out by Israel until they show their good faith by arresting everyone on the Israeli shitlist and disarming all of the militias. That this would inevitably lead to a Palestinian Civil-War of everyone vs the faction that tried to do it isn’t, as they say, a ‘bug’ in the policy, it is the policy.

    It’s the same tactic Israel used against Lebanon last summer, the same as the US is using against Iran, i.e. no negotiations until you surrender, and it has the same inevitable and intended result of closing off the possibility of reaching a diplomatic solution. So what’s left but the use of force? Again, that’s not a bug, that’s the policy.

    Where am I lying, Demi? Where have I utilised a pony in all this? I don’t really see one, any more than I see where Teng has refuted anything I posted, or where anything he posted would lead someone to infer that the answer to “Do I think Israel is blameless?” would be anything other than the one I gave.

    If you want to debate this without it turning into a flamewar, you could start by toning down the Darrellisms. There’s a reason I don’t engage with the Pony Whisperer, and I’d hate to think his brand of content free vituperation had infected the tone of anyone else on this site.

    And if you spellcheck “You’d”, you’d find that it needs no *sic. ‘Palistinian’, on the other hand, does.

  149. 149.

    TenguPhule

    January 30, 2007 at 1:42 pm

    When Arafat was the leader of the Palestinians, he was the bogeyman.

    So what was he when they were negotiating in 1999? This may come as a surprise to you, but it takes at least two sides to come to an agreement. Guess who refused to make a deal? Hint, it wasn’t Israel.

    Once he died, the onus shifted to demonizing his successors in the Fatah movement.

    Bullshit. Israel kept repeating what they’ve been saying for quite awhile ‘reign your damn gunmen in’.

    Anyone who achieves enough authority amongst the Palestinians to credibly sit at a negotiating table and talk about making peace becomes Israel’s number one enemy, and that’s just the way it is.

    Shorter Tony J: Stop trying to confuse me with the facts! It’s true because I believe it to be true in the face of all evidence to the contrary!

    And how long have the moderates, the Left and/or Israel’s Arab minority been in charge of Occupation policy? What, they haven’t?

    Shorter Tony J: Pre-Sharon government never existed! I disbelieve!

    Is that one of those ‘False Opposite’ cheats people use to pretend that they’ve made a rational argument when all they’ve done is tried to be as offensive as possible?

    Irony, Tony J. Tony J…oh, you’ve met.

    Because then, Israel can say with something approaching credibility that there really is no one to negotiate with.

    And again.

    Yes, here we go again with Tony’s own words saying exactly what he meant to say.

    Funny, because you’d be hard-pressed indeed to infer that from your posts.

    See an optometrist.

    Oh, I thought you were playing ‘Slap the Victim’ and giggling about it. Come to think of it, I’m still pretty certain that’s what you were doing.

    Tony J and Israeli conspiracies. Darrell and Iranian Nukes.

    Seperated at birth?

    Pissing her off so that I could stay online correcting your AIPAC-sponsored talking points wouldn’t have been a sensible use of my time.

    Shorter Tony J: So you caught me redhanded, that doesn’t prove a thing!

    BTW, after sleeping on the bizarre experience of being compared in any way, shape or form to Project: Darrell, I’ve come to the conclusion that, since that’s the online equivalent of spitting in my face and telling me it’s a snowflake,

    Shorter Tony J: I will contest your Darrell label by acting like Darrell!

  150. 150.

    TenguPhule

    January 30, 2007 at 1:59 pm

    I called it bollox because it is bollox. Since the collapse of the Barak/Arafat talks and the start of the 2nd Intifada, Israel has shown zero interest in finding someone with ‘real power’ to negotiate with.

    Shorter Tony J: Because the Israelis haven’t found someone yet means they’re not looking!

    On the contrary, whichever faction gains ‘real power’ in the PA – meaning whichever faction currently enjoys the support of enough Palestinians to enter negotiations with any kind of legitimate right to make demands and concessions in their name – instantly gets frozen out by Israel until they show their good faith by arresting everyone on the Israeli shitlist and disarming all of the militias.

    Shorter Tony J: Just because Israel got burned last time they armed and funded the Palistinian government is no reason for them to ask that the Palistinians take away the guns from the people killing Israeli citizens and prove that they can actually exert power over their own people instead of just standing on the sidelines like last time!

    That this would inevitably lead to a Palestinian Civil-War of everyone vs the faction that tried to do it isn’t, as they say, a ‘bug’ in the policy, it is the policy.

    Shorter Tony J: Israelis do not deserve peace and should not expect it when exchanging land for it.

    no negotiations until you surrender demonstrate you actually have control over your people so that we can negotiate in good faith

    Fixed.

    Where have I utilised a pony in all this?

    and it has the same inevitable and intended result of closing off the possibility of reaching a diplomatic solution.

    There’s your Pony. Must you keep picking up his dropping and flinging them all over?

    There isn’t going to be Dipomatic solution until the militas are reigned in. Claiming otherwise is a big Shiny Bush-pie-in-the-sky Pony. If the Palistinian government can’t stop the militias now, why should Israel expect them to stop them later? They haven’t forgotten the revolving door jail policy of Fatah.

    And as long as Hamas “Destroy Israel to the last child’ is in de facto control, what exactly is Israel supposed to negotiate with now? A middle ground of ‘Destroy Israel but let the last child escape’?

  151. 151.

    TenguPhule

    January 30, 2007 at 2:01 pm

    If you want to debate this without it turning into a flamewar, you could start by toning down the Darrellisms.

    Tony J’s Irony of the Day(tm).

  152. 152.

    Tony J

    January 30, 2007 at 2:02 pm

    Teng, you are so full of shit that I’m tempted to put on wellies and call for the Fire Brigade to hose out the thread.

    Have you listened to yourself? It’s like a thesis on fucking Projection Theory. No, I’m not arguing like Darrell. I’m not just saying this to be contrary. Yes, I did bail last night because here in the UK it was 8.30 in the evening, I’d been on the PC since I came home from work at 4.30 pm, and pissing off my girlfriend just to respond to your sneering, Darrellesqe post right there and then was not something I had an obligation to do. If you don’t believe me, or if you want to pretend that you don’t believe me just so you can play ‘Gotcha’, fuck you, I don’t really care.

    Case in point. Liverpool are playing West Ham in the Premiership at 7.45 pm, I’m going the pub to watch it. It’s now 6.56 pm, and I’ve got to get dressed. Do the fucking math and stop jumping down my throat.

  153. 153.

    Pb

    January 30, 2007 at 2:53 pm

    My solution to the Israeli/Palestinian conflict:

    1. Presume bad faith on both sides.
    2. Fight to the death.
    3. Mission Accomplished!

    Wait, what’s that, you say? They’re already executing my master plan? Excellent.

    P.S. Note how even blog flamewars about the conflict follow the same pattern!

  154. 154.

    TenguPhule

    January 30, 2007 at 3:04 pm

    Have you listened to yourself? It’s like a thesis on fucking Projection Theory. No, I’m not arguing like Darrell.

    Irony, Tony. Tony…oh it’s you again.

    Yes, you are Darrelling. First you duck the question in your response, then you leap into a tangent projected off of a false interpretation, then it’s on to the full bore queering followed by contradicting yourself followed by the bellows of outrage and so on and so forth.

    So spare us the mockery of outrage and stop acting like Darrell.

  155. 155.

    Bob Altemeyer

    January 30, 2007 at 5:39 pm

    Probably nobody cares about this any more, but someone once did. I’ve never correlated my measure of right-wing authoritarianism with the Myers-Briggs, and that’s the simplest way of finding out if different types of people vary in this trait. Somebody out there will soon, I am sure. Bob.

  156. 156.

    demimondian

    January 30, 2007 at 6:10 pm

    Probably nobody cares about this any more…

    Don’t bet on it. Comments die only very slowly here.

  157. 157.

    Krista

    January 30, 2007 at 9:17 pm

    Yes. Yes, they do.

  158. 158.

    Pb

    January 31, 2007 at 2:09 am

    Bob, Demi,

    Don’t bet on it. Comments die only very slowly here.

    Agreed. Thanks for the heads-up, Bob! I appreciate even the negative confirmation, because at least it helps explain why I wasn’t finding much. :)

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • oatler on Sunday Afternoon Open Thread: Anybody Watching the Grammies? (Feb 5, 2023 @ 5:56pm)
  • Betty Cracker on Le Clueless (Open Thread) (Feb 5, 2023 @ 5:52pm)
  • SFAW on Le Clueless (Open Thread) (Feb 5, 2023 @ 5:52pm)
  • raven on Sunday Afternoon Open Thread: Anybody Watching the Grammies? (Feb 5, 2023 @ 5:52pm)
  • sab on Sunday Afternoon Open Thread: Anybody Watching the Grammies? (Feb 5, 2023 @ 5:50pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!